2 KK Geodezja
2 KK Geodezja
2 KK Geodezja
Warsaw 2016-2017 1 2
1
2016-12-13
2
2016-12-13
3
2016-12-13
azimuth.
hence: ( (α ) ) Az Az n 200 g (or 180 0 )
i 1
l i t c s
i 1
( (α l/r )i )p practical sum of angles (observed angles)
n i 1
i 1 15
( (α l/r )i )t theoretical sum of angles 16
i 1
4
2016-12-13
α v
adj obs i X and Y of each traverse leg;
α i i α ΔX (i 1 ) i d (i 1 ) i cos Az(i 1 ) i
ΔY(i 1 ) i d (i 1 ) i sin Az(i 1 ) i
So,
adjusted angle = observed angle + angle adjustment where:
Az(i-1)-i – azimuth of leg (i-1)-i;
19
d(i-1)-i – length of leg (i-1)-i; 20
5
2016-12-13
fl max . 3 md n 300
400
0,15
0,16
1100
1200
0,26
0,27
6
2016-12-13
B 140.2389 BC 376.23
C 77.4315 CD 687.61
7
2016-12-13
8
2016-12-13
Az 2 3 Az1 2 αL 200 g
67.0571
84.7255
-0.0011
A 115.2756
115.2745
0.0000
or B
Σαp 400.0041
Az 2 3 Az1 2 αR 200 g
33
Σαt 400.0000
fα 0.0041 34
fαmax. 0.0180
Closed Loop Traverse Computation – Linear Closed Loop Traverse Computation – Linear
Misclosure Misclosure…con’t
Checking the distance component of the closed traverse is Azimuth Length of side
Coordinates Differences
called a linear misclosure check. A d
Basically, the coordinates differences for each leg of the g c cc [m] Adj. Adj.
traverse must be computed and then summed up. ⁰ ` " Δx = Latitude Δy = Departure
4 5 6 7
( ΔX i )p ΔX A B ΔX B C ΔX C D ΔX D A
84.7255 506.50
120.36 491.99
0.0000
i 1
n
( ΔYi )p ΔYA B ΔYB C ΔYC D ΔYD A fx=, fy=
fl
-0.09
0.10
0.05
i 1 35 flmax. 0.40 36
Total 1888.91 -0.09 0.05
9
2016-12-13
37 38
1 2 3
⁰
4 5
Δx = Latitude
6
Departure
7
A+50g
8
C
9
Δy= S – C
10 11 12
Thank you !
A 1000.00 1000.00
0.02 -0.01 225.263 159.29 318.57
0.0000 318.57
-0.0010 318.57 0.00 50.0000 159.29 0.00
B 140.2389 1318.59 999.99
140.2379 0.02 -0.01 266.031 -40.63 222.28
340.2379 376.23
-0.0010 222.28 -303.54 390.2379 262.91 -303.54
C 77.4315 1540.88 696.44
77.4305 0.03 -0.02 486.214 -424.85 -661.30
217.6684 687.61
-0.0010 -661.30 -188.40 267.6684 -236.45 -188.40
D 67.0581 879.61 508.02
67.0571 0.02 -0.01 358.150 306.18 120.36
84.7255 506.50
-0.0011 120.36 491.99 134.7254 -185.81 491.99
A 115.2756 1000.00 1000.00
115.2745
400.0000
B
10
12/20/2016
Why do surveyors need to understand the Why do surveyors need to understand the
Theory of Errors? Theory of Errors?...con’t
1
12/20/2016
2
12/20/2016
• Booking errors:
– transposing figures while booking;
– booking a reading in wrong place in fieldbook;
– incorrectly labeling target or observation;
11 12
3
12/20/2016
4
12/20/2016
• Precision: • Accuracy:
• is a measure of repeatability or consistency; – is a measure of reliability;
• precise observations are not necessarily – accurate measurements are closer to the true
accurate; value;
• the range of a set of observations indicates the – the true value is never known;
precision; – the mean value is used as the best estimate of
• Standard Error (Root Mean Square Error) of a the true value;
set of observations is a measure of precision; – there is absolute and relative accuracy;
19 20
5
12/20/2016
6
12/20/2016
(v
inflection on each side
of the curve, i.e. points i vi )
where the slope of σ i 1
curve changes from n1
concave to convex.
The residuals at these n
-p +p
v as Standard Deviations i 1
-σ +σ
or Root Mean Square n - is the number of observations
Error (RMSE). (n-1) is the number of redundant (extra) observations
n
Probable error (v i vi )
made to determine a value.
– black shaded σ i 1
n1 25 26
Standard Deviation, Probable Error, Limit Error Direct Equally Accurate Observations
7
12/20/2016
Standard Deviation of the Arithmetic Mean Direct Not Equally Accurate Observations
Observations are vary in accuracy when factors influencing
their errors change (i.e. measuring equipment, observer,
n external environment etc.)
8
12/20/2016
Direct Not Equally Accurate Observations…con’t Direct Not Equally Accurate Observations…con’t
I def:
RMSE of typical observation, i.e. p0 = 1:
1 of ith observation:
Weight
pi
σ i2 n
1 1 1
(p i vi vi )
p1:p2:...:pn 2 : 2 :...: 2 σ0 i 1
σ1 σ2 σn (n 1)
Direct Not Equally Accurate Observations…con’t Direct Not Equally Accurate Observations…con’t
(p v v )
i
_ xi – ith observation;
Xp i 1
n pi – weight of ith observation;
p
i i i
σ0
σ_ i 1
i
i 1
n n
( pi ) (n 1)
_
p
vi X p xi Xp
n Properties of i
1. (pi v i ) 0 the weighted i 1 i 1
i 1
n residuals:
2. (pi v i v i ) min . ;i.e. first derivative 0
i 1 35 36
9
12/20/2016
10
12/20/2016
41 42
Thank you !
43
11
1/4/2017
Definitions Definitions…con’t
The elevation/height of a
point on the surface of the • Vertical Datum - is an arbitrary level surface to
Earth is its vertical distance which the heights of all points are referred to (e.g.
above or below the
arbitrarily assumed level Geoid or Ellipsoid).
surface (e.g. Geoid), that
every element of which is • Poland’s vertical datum is the mean sea level (MSL)
normal (perpendicular) to in Bay of Finland, determined by zero of
the plumb line (i.e. the mareograph in Kronstad near St. Petersburg
direction of gravity ).
• The separation (undulation) between Ellipsoid and
A horizontal surface - will form a tangent to the level surface Geoid must be known to make Ellipsoidal heights
at a point. For most practical purposes using sights of less (e.g. from GPS survey) useful to the engineering and
than 150 m the horizontal line approximates very closely to
the level line, both being on their respective surfaces. scientific communities.
3 4
1
1/4/2017
Accuracy
+/- 0.03mm
over 40m
7 8
2
1/4/2017
ΔH i Δh r
• where: -D-
3
1/4/2017
13 14
• Foresight (FS)
– Always the last reading of levelling rod from last
instrument station while run levelling.
4
1/4/2017
5
1/4/2017
21 22
6
1/4/2017
Tubular bubble
Tubular bubble axis
Crosshair
Collimation axis
Circular bubble
Objective lens
Levelling screw
There are three basic types of level:
Vertical axis • Dumpy Levels - A tubular bubble is rigidly attached to the
Tripod leg
telescope and the assembly is levelled by foot screws
which are levelled first in one direction (parallel to two
levelling srews), then at 90° direction with respect to the
25 previous direction. 26
1 – telescope
2 – vertical axis
3 – spirit bubble/main
bubble/tubular bubble
4 – crosshair/reticle
5 – tilting screw
6 – circular/pond bubble
Tilting Levels - This type of level is fitted with a circular 7 – pivot
bubble for preliminary, approximate levelling and a main
8 – tribrach with
bubble which is attached to the telescope. For each
observation the main bubble is brought to its center point by levelling/foot screws
27 28
a slow motion screw.
7
1/4/2017
Automatic/Self-Levelling Levels
31 32
8
1/4/2017
9
1/4/2017
Leads to an incorrect staff reading and it should be carried out on uniformly flat ground.
39 40
10
1/4/2017
•Read staff at each peg, and calculate true height difference. Instrument Instrument
Station 1 Station 2
•Move level about 3 m/4 m beyond one of the pegs.
•Read staff at each peg again, and calculate height difference.
•Collimation Error = a difference between two height
differences obtained during the above procedure and is
expressed as a number of mm per L m. 10 m 10 m 20 m
•Acceptable errors: ≤ |± 2 - 3| mm per 70 m
If the Collimation Error > acceptable value, level has to be Direction of travel
11
1/4/2017
Instrument Instrument
Station 1 Station 1
S1 S2
10 m
10 m
45 46
Instrument Instrument
Station 2 Station 2
S3 S4
40 m 20 m
48
47
12
1/4/2017
ΔhT1 ΔhT2
S1' S '2 S 3' S '4
S1 x S 2 x S 3 4 x S 4 2 x 15 m 15 m 15 m
(S1 S 2 ) (S 3 S 4 ) 2 x
(S S4 ) (S1 S2 ) Direction of travel
x 3 2 49
Instrument Instrument
S1 Station 1 Station 1 S2
15 m 30 m
51 52
13
1/4/2017
Instrument Instrument
S3 Station 2 Station 2 S4
30 m 15 m
53 54
14
1/4/2017
15
1/4/2017
BS FS
ΔH1,2
BM
L/2 L/2
L
61 L < 150m 62
El= 104.519 m
FS BS=2.280 FS=0.825
16
1/4/2017
67 68
17
1/4/2017
36.50
35.00
Thank you !
33.50
32.00
0 30 60 90 120 150
18
12/1/2016
Calculations
-Δh-
or
C B
they are meaningless
-R-
Lecture No.8
with respect to the
Jerzy Durlej MSc. required accuracy.
j.durlej@il.pw.edu.pl
α
Warsaw 2016-2017 O
1 O 2
1
12/1/2016
Radial vs. Grid Coordinates Azimuth (Az) ≡ Whole Circle Bearing (WCB)
Location of P by (X P , YP )
X = Northing
X P f ( s, α ) ; YP f ( s, α ) P1
X P s cos α
YP s sin α
(XP,YP)
W Y = Easting
Location of P by (s, α ) O
XP s f ( X P , YP ) ; f ( X P , YP ) P2 Azimuth O-P1
YP Azimuth O-P2
tan α S
YP XP
YP •An angle measured clockwise from a reference direction,
Pythagorean Theorem α arctan ( ) usually north direction, to the direction of interest.
X P
s2 = Xp2 + Yp2 •Measured: 0° – 360° or 0g – 400g
s (X P2 YP2 ) 7 8
2
12/1/2016
Y = Easting
P
AZIMUTH = 180° + BEARING III II AZIMUTH = 180° - BEARING
AZIMUTH = 235° AZIMUTH = 150°
P
S 55° W S 30° E
11 12
3
12/1/2016
Forward Azimuth vs. Backward Azimuth Forward Azimuth vs. Backward Azimuth
N=X
ΔΧ AB
Az AB 180 0 b • III Quadrant where ΔXAB < 0 and ΔYAB < 0
XB
when: AzAB = 180⁰ + b
YA b – bearing of line AB
YB ΔΧ AB X B - X A • IV Quadrant where ΔXAB > 0 and ΔYAB < 0
ΔYAB YB -YA 15 AzAB = 360⁰ + b 16
4
12/1/2016
AzAB = b -ΔX
-ΔX Az
-ΔY
+ΔY
• II Quadrant where ΔXAB < 0 and ΔYAB > 0
AzAB = 180⁰ - b I Quadrant II Quadrant III Quadrant IV Quadrant
Azimuths 0 0 90 0 Azimuths 90 0 180 0 Azimuths 180 0 270 0 Azimuths 270 0 360 0
ΔY ΔY ΔY ΔY
• III Quadrant where ΔXAB < 0 and ΔYAB < 0 Az arctan
ΔX
Az 180 0 arctan
ΔX
Az 180 0 arctan
ΔX
Az 360 0 arctan
ΔX
AzAB = 180⁰ + b
XA
d AB Δx AB
2
Δy AB
2
XB or x B x A Δx AB x A d AB cos Az AB
Δy AB Δx AB
YA
d AB y B y A Δy AB y A d AB sin Az AB
YB sin Az AB cos Az AB
19 20
5
12/1/2016
6
12/1/2016
7
12/1/2016
1 1
x1 2
x1 2
x2 x2
x3 3 x3 3
x4 x4
4 4
Y Y
O y1 y4 y2 y3 O y1 y4 y2 y3
Area by Coordinates..con’t
X
1
x1 2
x2
Thank you !
x3 3
x4
4
Y
O y1 y4 y2 y3
8
1/11/2017
in Poland 0.20
0.10
0.00
Lecture No. 9
Due to the way their positions are depicted, networks are
Jerzy Durlej MSc. broken down into:
j.durlej@il.pw.edu.pl
• Horizontal Control Networks (X,Y) – positions of the
points are defined within an adopted system of
Warsaw 2016-2017 1 2
coordinates, ( e.g. ”1965” and ”2000” coordinate systems);
Definitions…con’t Definitions…con’t
• Vertical Control Networks (H) – heights of the points are Poland’s vertical datums are:
defined with relation to an adopted reference level surface • the mean level of Baltic Sea in Bay
(datum), e.g. MSL. of Finland, determined by zero of
mareograph in Kronstadt near St.
≈ 8 cm - 10 cm
Petersburg,
3 4
1
1/11/2017
5 6
2
1/11/2017
Usage of National Spatial Reference System Use of National Spatial Reference System
§ 15. 1. National spatial reference system used in the 3. PL-UTM coordinate system is used for the issuing:
surveying and mapping works, and the creation of spatial • standard maps from 1:10,000 to 1:250,000;
data by public authorities, wherein: • marine maps;
• and other maps for security and defense purposes.
1. PL-LAEA coordinate system is used for spatial analysis and
reporting at European level. 4. PL-2000 coordinate system is used for mapping at scales
larger than 1:10,000 - for cadastral maps and principal
2. PL-LCC coordinate system is used for the issuing of maps maps in particular.
at scale 1:500,000 and smaller.
5. PL-1992 is used in non-standard studies.
11 12
3
1/11/2017
4
1/11/2017
5
1/11/2017
Class I & II Horizontal Control Networks Class I, II & III Horizontal Control Networks
primary control point
Auxilary point
6
1/11/2017
32 km
Thank you !
27