Improved Plant Regeneration in Cowpea Through

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Journal

Journal of Applied Horticulture, 10(1): 40-43, 2008


Appl

Improved plant regeneration in cowpea through


shoot meristem

Muthusamy Manoharan*, Sharmin Khan and James O. Garner


Department of Agriculture, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Pine Bluff, AR 71601, USA.
*E-mail: manoharanm@uapb.edu

Abstract
Cowpea is a highly recalcitrant nutrient-rich leguminous vegetable crop. Efforts to genetically transform cowpea with insect-resistant
genes remains a challenging task due to lack of an efficient regeneration system. We have established an efficient regeneration system
in cowpea through shoot meristem. Shoot meristems were isolated from embryos that were precultured for 3-5 days on Murashige
and Skoog (MS) medium containing 8.9 μM benzylaminopurine (BA). The isolated shoot meristems were cultured on MS medium
containing 0.89 μM BA. After 3-4 weeks, multiple shoots were separated from the explant and cultured on half-strength MS medium
for elongation and rooting. More than 90% of the regenerants formed roots. The rooted plantlets were transferred first to peat pellets
and subsequently to the greenhouse. The plants were allowed to flower and set seed. The efficiency of regeneration in all four cultivars
ranged from 76-87%, demonstrating a significant improvement over the published protocols (1-32%). At least six to seven plantlets
were obtained from each meristem. The protocol using shoot meristems is simple, efficient, rapid and genotype-independent and may
be amenable for transformation through particle bombardment.
Key words: Vigna unguiculata, shoot meristem, regeneration, transformation, legumes

Introduction in these reports is too low (1-32%) to reliably obtain transgenic


plants. Consequently, efforts to transform cowpea were mostly
Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.), an annual vegetable, is unsuccessful or resulted in very few transgenic plants (Garcia et
one of the world’s important legume food crops. Cowpea grain al., 1986, 1987; Penza et al., 1991; Muthukumar et al., 1996;
contains about 25% protein, especially rich in folate, potassium, Ikea et al., 2003). In recent years, regeneration of shoots from
iron, magnesium, and the essential amino acids lysine and cotyledon nodes or from other meristematic explants has emerged
tryptophan. Cowpea is also rich in phytochemicals that may help as a rapid and relatively efficient method of transformation in a
prevent chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer number of legumes that are highly recalcitrant in tissue culture
and diabetes. In addition, cowpea is a good source of fiber. A (Oger et al., 1996; Trieu and Harrison, 1996; Larkin et al.,
diet high in fiber can help lower blood cholesterol levels, which 1996; Olhoft et al., 2001). In cowpea, transgenic plants were
can reduce risk of heart disease (www.mayoclinic.com/health/ regenerated using cotyledon nodes containing axillary meristems
legumes/NU00260) (Popelka et al., 2006), although at low frequency (0.05-0.15%),
Cowpea is severely infected by insects such as thrips demonstrating the feasibility of using meristems as an alternate
(Megalurothrips sjostedti), aphids (Aphis craccivora), curculio source for genetic transformation.
(Chalcodermus aeneus), pod borer (Maruca vitrata), weevils In this report, we present a simple, efficient, rapid and genotype-
(Callosobruchus maculatus) etc. that cause significant damage to independent regeneration system for cowpea plants from four
crop production and yield (Singh et al., 1990). However, current cultivars by using shoot meristems. The regeneration method
cultivars do not offer protection against insect damage. Efforts has potential use in transforming cowpea with insect resistant
to develop durable insect resistance did not succeed because the genes.
genome of cowpea may be devoid of major resistance genes to
many insect pests that attack cowpea. Also, attempts to bring Materials and methods
insect resistance into cowpea from wild Vigna species have failed
Four cowpea cultivars (Early Scarlet, Coronet, Quick Pick and
because of high genetic barriers between wild Vigna and cultivated
AR87-435-68) were selected for regeneration. Mature seeds
cowpea (Singh et al., 1997).
(kindly provided by Dr. S. Okiror, University of Arkansas at Pine
Cowpea is an ideal vegetable crop for the application of genetic Bluff, USA) were surface sterilized in 70% alcohol for 5 minutes,
engineering technologies for developing insect resistance. rinsed in sterile water and placed in 0.2% sodium hypochlorite
However, cowpea is highly recalcitrant to tissue culture and solution. After 1 h, the seeds were rinsed thrice with sterile water.
therefore genetic transformation is difficult to achieve. There have Finally, the seeds were allowed to soak in sterile water overnight.
been a few reports of plant regeneration through organogenesis Murashige and Skoog (1962) medium (MS) supplemented with
and somatic embryogenesis (Muthukumar et al., 1995; 3% (w/v) sucrose (Sigma, USA) and various concentrations of
Pellegrineschi, 1997; Brar et al., 1999a, b; Anand et al., 2000, growth regulators were used for tissue culture and regeneration.
2001; Ramakrishnan et al., 2005). The efficiency of regeneration The media were adjusted to pH 5.8 with 1 N NaOH or 1 N HCl,
Improved plant regeneration in cowpea through shoot meristema 41

solidified with 3 g L-1 phytagel (Sigma, USA) and autoclaved shoots could be seen from the cut end of the meristem. After 3-4
at 1 kg cm-2 for 20 min. Media (50 mL) were dispensed into weeks, individual shoots were separated from each meristem and
20- by 100-mm sterile Petri dishes (Falcon, Becton Dickinson transferred to half-strength MS medium for elongation and rooting.
Labware, USA). The cultures were maintained at 25 ± 2 0C with Among the different concentrations tried, MS medium containing
a 16-h photoperiod (25-40 μmol cm-2 s-1). All growth regulators
0.89 μM BA produced more shoots (3.2 shoots per meristem) than
were filter sterilized before adding to the media. Embryos were
isolated and precultured either on MS basal medium or MS other concentrations. To improve the number of multiple shoots,
medium containing BA (8.9 μM) (Table 1). After 3-5 days, the embryos were precultured on higher concentration of BA (8.9
shoot meristems (0.5-1 mm) were carefully isolated and cultured μM) for 3-5 days and the isolated shoot meristems were cultured
on MS media with different concentrations of BA (0.4-22.2 μM) on different concentrations of BA (Table 1). Significantly, more
for three week. After three weeks, the regenerated multiple shoots plants were regenerated after transfer to MS medium containing
were transferred to elongation and rooting medium (half-strength 0.89 μM BA from all four cultivars tested, indicating the positive
MS with no growth regulators). Plantlets with well-developed effect of preculture in inducing multiple shoots (Fig. 1A). More
roots were removed from the culture medium, the roots washed
than six shoots per meristem were regenerated from all four
thoroughly with tap water, and transferred to peat pellets [Jiffy-
7, Jiffy Products (N.B.) Ltd., Shippagan, Canada] for initial cultivars with the preculture on BA (8.9 μM) medium. Increasing
acclimatization. The plantlets were covered with plastic wrap the concentration of BA beyond 0.89 μM in the culture media
to maintain high humidity for first few days. Gradually the resulted in callus growth that significantly reduced the number
humidity was reduced by slowly removing the plastic wrap and of multiple shoots. The addition of other cytokinins such as
the hardened plants were transferred to the greenhouse [24-28ºC, zeatin and kinetin in the regeneration media also led to callus
16/8 h (day/night) photoperiod supplemented by sodium halide growth from shoot meristems, thereby significantly reducing the
lights]. Plants were allowed to flower and set seed. The root tips number of shoots (data not shown). Shoots were separated and
of the regenerated plants were collected in cold distilled water,
transferred to half-strength MS medium for elongation (Fig. 1B)
kept at 40C for 24 h and then fixed in Farmer’s fixative (3:1 95%
ethanol: glacial acetic acid). The root tips were squashed with and rooting. More than 90% of the regenerants formed roots in the
carbol fuchsin and observed under a microscope. half-strength MS medium (Fig. 1C). The regenerated plants with
roots were initially transferred to peat pellets for hardening. Only
Results 50% of the plants survived during hardening. After 10-12 days of
Shoot meristems (0.5-1 mm) were carefully isolated from hardening, the surviving plants were transferred to the greenhouse
precultured embryos and cultured on different concentrations (Fig. 1D). No phenotypic and chromosomal abnormalities (2n =
of BA (Table 1). After 3-5 d of culture, newly formed multiple 22) were noticed.

Table 1. Effects of benzylaminopurine (BA, μM) on shoot regeneration from cultured meristems in cowpea
Genotype Preculture medium Culture medium Explants forming shoots (%) Number of shoots per explant†
Early Scarlet MS MS 56.25 1.16 j
MS MS + 0.4 BA 59.37 2.62 f,g,h,i,j
MS MS + 0.9 BA 60.94 3.24 c,d,e,f,g
MS MS + 2.2 BA 59.37 2.83 e,f,g,h,i
MS MS + 4.4 BA 51.28 2.37 f,g,h,i,j
MS MS + 8.9 BA 69.58 2.16 g,h,i,j
MS MS + 13.3 BA 60.35 1.89 h,i,j
MS MS + 22.2 BA 68.71 1.22 j
MS + 8.9 BA MS + 0.4 BA 70.89 4.87 b,c
MS + 8.9 BA MS + 0.9 BA 72.33 6.73 a
MS + 8.9 BA MS + 2.2 BA 76.82 5.45 b
MS + 8.9 BA MS + 4.4 BA 74.02 4.21 c,d,e
Coronet MS MS 72.66 1.99 g,h,i,j
MS MS + 0.9 BA 73.08 3.34 d,e,f,g,h
MS + 8.9 BA MS + 0.9 BA 87.65 6.89 a
MS + 8.9 BA MS + 2.2 BA 86.23 5.32 b
Quick Pick MS MS 81.23 1.89 h,i,j
MS MS + 0.9 BA 83.78 3.87 c,d,e,f
MS + 8.9 BA MS + 0.9 BA 86.66 6.46 a
MS + 8.9 BA MS + 2.2 BA 85.62 5.12 b
AR87-43568 MS MS 75.83 1.71 i,j
MS MS + 0.9 BA 79.21 3.43 c,d
MS + 8.9 BA MS + 0.9 BA 84.02 6.29 a
MS + 8.9 BA MS + 2.2 BA 82.17 5.18 b

means followed by the same letters are not significantly different based on Duncan’s multiple range test (P<0.05).
42 Improved plant regeneration in cowpea through shoot meristema

explants on media containing cytokinins like BA on shoot


regeneration has been reported in other legumes such as grain
legume (Vigna mungo), Phaseolus sp. and Cajanus cajan (Shiv
Prakash et al., 1994; Santalla et al., 1998; Saini and Jaiwal,
2005). Once the regeneration system for the cultivar Early Scarlet
was optimized, the system was applied to the cultivars Coronet,
Quick Pick and AR87-43568. The shoot meristems from these
cultivars were isolated from the embryos precultured on 8.9 μM
BA and cultured on 0.89 μM BA. All three cultivars produced
six to seven shoots per meristem, demonstrating the applicability
of the shoot meristem-based protocol to different genotypes. The
regeneration efficiency of shoot meristems that produced multiple
shoots ranged from 72-88% in the four cultivars compared to 1-
32% obtained through organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis.
In conclusion, we have successfully established a simple,
rapid and efficient regeneration system in cowpea using shoot
meristems. The regenerated plants exhibited no phenotypic and
Fig.1. In vitro regeneration of cowpea plants cv Early Scarlet from shoot genotypic abnormalities. Moreover, the regeneration response of
meristem. A. Development of multiple shoots from precultured shoot
meristems on BA medium (0.89 μM); B. Multiple shoots, separated and four cultivars to the shoot meristem based system was similar,
transferred to rooting medium; C. Rooted plants in half-strength MS demonstrating the genotype-independent nature and applicability
medium; and D. Fully established plants in the greenhouse. of this protocol. The regeneration procedure developed from this
study may be used to transform cowpea with insecticidal genes
Discussion
through biolistics transformation.
Cowpea is one of the most recalcitrant leguminous vegetable
for regeneration and transformation (Popelka et al., 2004). References
Consequently, well known insecticidal genes such as those Anand, R.P., A. Ganapathi, V.R. Anbazhagan, G. Vengadesan and N.
for Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin, alpha-amylase inhibitor, Selvaraj, 2000. High frequency plant regeneration via somatic
plant lectins etc. could not be introduced into cowpea due to the embryogenesis in cell suspension cultures of cowpea, Vigna
lack of a simple, routine and reproducible regeneration system. unguiculata (L.) Walp. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.-Plant, 36: 475-480.
Previously, regeneration of cowpea plants was achieved through Anand, R.P., A. Ganapathi, G. Vengadesan, N. Selvaraj, V.R. Anbazhagan
organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis using explants such and Kulothungan, 2001. Plant regeneration from immature
cotyledon-derived callus of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp (cowpea).
as cotyledons, hypocotyls, primary leaves or embryonal axes Current Sci., 80: 671-674.
(Muthukumar et al., 1995; Pellegrineschi, 1997; Brar et al.,
Brar, M.S., J.M. Al-Khayri, T.E. Morelock and E.J. Anderson, 1999a.
1999a, b; Anand et al., 2000, 2001; Ramakrishnan et al., 2005). Genotypic response of cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) to in vitro
However, the frequency of plant regeneration was too low (1- regeneration from cotyledon explants. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.
32%) to establish a routine and reproducible transformation – Plant, 35: 8-12.
system in cowpea. Brar, M.S., M.J. Moore, J.M Al-Khayri, T.E. Morelock and E.J.
Anderson, 1999b. Ethylene inhibitors promote in vitro regeneration
In recent years, use of meristems as a source of totipotent cells for of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.-Plant,
regeneration and transformation has emerged in a number of plants 35: 222-225.
including legumes (Somers et al., 2003). To date, the meristem- Bidney, D., C. Scelonge, J. Martich, M. Burrus, L. Sims and G. Huffman,
based transformation method has been successfully established 1992. Microprojectile bombardment of plant tissues increases
in several species such as pea, sunflower, corn, tobacco, rice, transformation frequency by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol.
Biol., 18: 301-313.
and maize (Hussey et al., 1989; Bidney et al., 1992; Gould et
Garcia, J.A., J. Hille and R. Goldbach, 1986. Transformation of cowpea
al., 1991a, b; Zimmerman and Scorza, 1996; Park et al., 1996; Vigna unguiculata cells with an antibiotic resistance gene using a
Zhang et al., 2002). Because inducing organogenesis or somatic Ti-plasmid derived vector. Plant Sci., 44: 37-46.
embryogenesis is difficult, meristem-based direct regeneration Garcia, J.A., J. Hille, P. Vos and R. Goldbach, 1987. Transformation
may overcome bottlenecks in cowpea transformation. of cowpea Vigna unguiculata cells with a full-length DNA copy of
cowpea mosaic virus m-RNA. Plant Sci., 48: 89-98.
In our study, shoot meristem culture was first established in
Gould, J., S. Banister, O. Hasegawa, M. Fahima and R.H. Smith, 1991a.
the cultivar Early Scarlet. Embryos were cultured on MS basal Regeneration of Gossypium hirsutum and G. barbadense from shoot-
medium for 3-5 days. Subsequently, shoot meristem was isolated apex tissues for transformation. Plant Cell Rep., 10: 35-38.
and cultured on different concentrations BA. At least three shoots Gould, J., M. Devey, E.C. Ulian, O. Hasegawa, G. Peterson and R.H.
were regenerated from each meristem on medium containing 0.89 Smith, 1991b. Transformation of Zea mays L. using Agrobacterium
μM BA. Calli began to proliferate at the base of the meristems tumefaciens and the shootapex. Plant Physiol., 95: 426-434.
with increasing concentrations of BA (2.2-22.2 μM) thereby Hussey, G., R.D. Johnson and S. Warren, 1989. Transformation of
significantly reducing the number of shoots regenerated. Further, meristematic cells in the shoot-apex of cultured pea shoots by
Agrobacterium tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes. Protoplasma, 148:
the number of multiple shoots significantly increased when shoot 101-105
meristems were preconditioned on medium containing high BA Ikea, J., I. Ingelbrecht, A. Uwaifo and G. Thottappilly, 2003. Stable
(8.9 μM) before culturing on 0.89 μM BA, regenerating at least gene transformation in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) using
6-7 shoots per meristem. The positive effect of preculturing particle gun method. Afr. J. Biotech., 2: 211-218.
Improved plant regeneration in cowpea through shoot meristema 43

Larkin, P.J., J.M. Gibson, U. Mathesius, J.J. Weinman, E. Gartner, E. Popelka, J.C., S. Gollasch, A. Moore, L. Molvig and T.H.V. Higgins,
Hall, G.J. Tanner, B.G. Rolfe and M.A. Djordjevic, 1996. Transgenic 2006. Genetic transformation of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) and
white clover. Studies with the auxin-responsive promoter, GH3, in stable transmission of the transgenes to progeny. Plant Cell Rep.,
root gravitropism and lateral root development. Transgenic Res., 25: 304-312.
5: 325-335. Ramakrishnan, K., R. Gnanam, P. Sivakumar and A. Manickam, 2005. In
Muthukumar, B., M. Mariamma and A. Gnanam, 1995. Regeneration vitro somatic embryogenesis from cell suspension cultures of cowpea
of plants from primary leaves of cowpea. Plant Cell Tissue Org. [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Plant Cell Rep., 24: 449-461.
Cult., 42: 153-155. Saini, R. and P.K. Jaiwal, 2005. Transformation of a recalcitrant grain
Muthukumar, B., M. Mariamma, K. Veluthambi and A. Gnanam, 1996. legume, Vigna mungo L. Hepper, using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-
Genetic transformation of cotyledon explants of cowpea (Vigna mediated gene transfer to shoot apical meristem cultures. Plant Cell
unguiculata L. Walp) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Rep., 24: 164-171.
Rep., 15: 980-985.
Santalla, M., J.B. Power and M.R. Davey, 1998. Efficient in vitro shoot
Murashige, T. and F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth regeneration responses of Phaseolus vulgaris and P. coccineus.
and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant., 15: Euphytica, 102: 195-202.
473-497.
Shiv Prakash, N., D. Pental and N. Bhalla-Sarin, 1994. Regeneration
Olhoft, P.M. and D.A. Somers, 2001. L-Cysteine increases Agrobacterium- of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) from cotyledonary node via multiple
mediated T-DNA delivery into soybean cotyledonary-node cells. shoot formation. Plant Cell Rep., 13: 623-627.
Plant Cell Rep., 20: 706-711.
Singh, S.R., L.E.N. Jackai, J.H.R. Dos Santos and G.B. Adalia, 1990.
Oger, P., A. Petit and Y. Dessaux, 1996. A simple technique for direct Insect pests of cowpea. In: Insect Pests of Tropical Food Legumes.
transformation and regeneration of the diploid legume species Lotus
S.R. Singh (ed), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, p. 43-89.
japonicus. Plant Sci., 116: 159-168.
Singh, B.B., D.R. Mohan, K.E. Dashiell and L.E.N. Jackai, 1997.
Park, S.H., S.M. Pinson and R.H. Smith, 1996. T-DNA integration
Advances in cowpea research. IITA and JIRCAS, Ibadan, Nigeria
into genomic DNA of rice following Agrobacterium inoculation of
isolated shoot apices. Plant Mol. Biol., 32: 1135-1148. and Ibaraki, Japan.
Pellegrineschi, A. 1997. In vitro plant regeneration via organogenesis of Somers, D.A., D.A. Samac and P.M. Olhoft, 2003. Recent advances in
cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). Plant Cell Rep., 17: 89-95. legume transformation. Plant Physiol., 131: 892-899.
Penza, R., P.F. Lurquin and E. Filioppone,1991. Gene transfer by Trieu, A.T. and M.J. Harrison,1996. Rapid transformation of Medicago
cocultivation of mature embryos with Agrobacterium tumefaciens truncatula: regeneration via shoot organogenesis. Plant Cell Rep.,
application to cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Walp.). J. Plant Physiol., 16: 6-11.
138: 39-42. Zhang, S., R.R. Williams-Carrier and P. Lemaux, 2002. Transformation
Popelka, J.C., N. Terryn and T.H.V. Higgins, 2004. Gene technology for of recalcitrant maize elite inbreds using in vitro shoot meristematic
grain legumes: can it contribute to the food challenge in developing cultures induced from germinated seedlings. Plant Cell Rep., 21:
countries? Plant Sci., 167: 195-206 263-270

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy