Interpretation of Statute - Basic Principles of Statutory Interpretation of Law

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

INTERPRETATION OF STATUTE -

BASIC PRINCIPLES OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION OF LAW.

BY- PARICHAYA REDDY


BBA,LL.B
THE FUNDAMENTAL RULES OF INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES ARE :-
• WHAT IS
LEGISLATURE?
“WHAT IS INTENTION OF
LEGISLATURE”
-“SENTENTIA LEGIS” I.E., TRUE INTENTION OF
LEGISLATURE.

According to Salmond the duty of the judicature is to discover and to act upon
the true intention of the legislature under the Maxim, ‘sententia legis’ or mens.

AS ESSENCE OF THE LAW LIES IN THE SPIRIT, NOT IN ITS LETTER, BUT LETTER
ARE THE ONLY WAY IN WHICH INTENTIONS ARE EXPRESSED. THE
WORDS ARE EXTERNAL MANIFESTATION OF INTENTION THAT IT INVOLVES.
WHEN THERE IS POSSIBILITY OF ONE OR MORE INTERPRETATION OF
STATUTE, COURTS HAS TO ADOPT THAT INTERPRETATION WHICH REFLECTS
THE ‘TRUE INTENTION OF LEGISLATURE’ WHICH CAN ALSO BE CONSIDERED
LEGAL MEANING STATUTORY PROVISIONS.
PARI MATERIAE. WHE • ACCORDING TO J, A MECHANICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE
N TWO PROVISIONS WORDS AND APPLICATION OF LEGISLATURE INTENT DEVOID OF
CONCEPT WILL MAKE MOST OF THE REMEDIAL AND BENEFICENT
OF TWO DIFFERENT
LEGISLATION FUTILE (INEFFECTIVE). JUDICIARY WOULD MOLD OR
STATUTES DEAL WITH CREATIVELY INTERPRET LEGISLATION AS THEY ARE FINISHERS,
THE SAME SUBJECT REFINERS AND POLISHERS OF LEGISLATION.
MATTER AND FORM
PART OF THE SAME
SUBJECT MATTER. IT IS
AN EXTERNAL AID
TO INTERPRETATION).
THEN WHAT IS THE SUPPOSED INTENTION OF
THE LEGISLATURE?

AND WHAT ARE THE SUPREME COURT


SETTLED PRINCIPLES OF INTERPRETATION?
WHAT JURISTS SAY ABOUT THIS RULE ?

• A STATUTE IS TO BECOME CONSTRUED • THE FIRST AND PRIMARY RULE OF


ACCORDING TO THE INTENT OF THOSE CONSTRUCTION IS THAT THE INTENTION OF
WHO MAKE IT AND THE DUTY OF THE THE LEGISLATURE MUST BE FOUND IN
JUDICIARY IS TO ACT UPON THE TRUE THE WORDS USED BY THE LEGISLATURE ITSELF.
INTENTION OF THE LEGISLATURE- HON’BLE JUSTICE GAJENDRAKAR IN KANNAIL
I.E., THE MENS OR SENTENTIA LEGIS IN AL SUR VS PARMNIDHI SADHUKHAN, 1957
RMD CHAMBARBAUGWALA VS UOI
EX VESCRIBUS ACTUS
TWO IMPORTANT
THINGS. PROVISIONS/WORDS
/CLAUSES SHOULD NOT BE
READ IN ISOLATION. AND
THEY MUST BE READ
IN ITS CONTEXT.
FEW THINGS ABOUT THIS RULE:
REMARKS
IN ONE OF
THE CASE
CASE LAWS
• TAN BUG TAIM VS COLLECTOR OF
BOMBAY ON 9 AUGUST, 1945


K.P. MOHAMMED SALIM VS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

SARABJIT SINGH VS UNION OF INDIA


AND ORS.
• PADMA SUNDER RAO VS STATE OF
TAMILNADU

BADSHAH VS. URMILA BADSHAH GODSE


AND ANOTHER, [(2014) 1 SCC 188]
THANK YOU!
HAVE A GREAT DAY.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy