Shareholders Disputes, IPO, Investment
Shareholders Disputes, IPO, Investment
Shareholders Disputes, IPO, Investment
Shareholder disputes occur when a serious disagreement happens between two or more
shareholders in a company. Shareholder disputes almost always affect the performance of
the company which is why they must be solved as quickly as possible. Several common
issues that lead to disputes include:
B. NEGOTIATION
The best solution is for the disputing parties to negotiate with each other and find an
amicable settlement. A mediator or trusted third-party can be involved in the negotiations
to assist the process of reaching a fair outcome for all parties.
The relevant authorities will look at several areas to determine the suitability of your
company for listing.
ACE Market is a sponsor-driven market designed for companies with growth prospects. It
was formerly known as the MESDAQ Market prior to 3 August 2009. Sponsors must assess
suitability of the potential issuers, taking into consideration attributes such as business
prospects, corporate conduct and adequacy of internal control.
ACE Market provide companies with greater visibility via the capital market and a clearly
defined platform to raise funds from both institutional and retail investors.
B. Public Spread
a. At least 25% of the company’s total number of shares; and
b. Minimum of 200 public shareholders holding not less than 100 shares each.
a. Companies with MSC status, BioNexus status and companies with predominantly
foreign-based operations are exempted from the Bumiputera equity requirement.
A. What is a shareholder?
This is the name given to anyone who owns ‘shares’ in a company limited by shares. As a
shareholder, you own part of a company in relation to the proportion of shares you
hold. A company can have just one shareholder or many shareholders. Each one is
entitled to receive a portion of profits in relation to the number and value of their
shares. Shareholders invest their money into the company by buying shares, and have
the potential to profit from the company if business goes well.
Yes, any person or corporate body (company, firm, organization etc.) can be a
shareholder of a private company limited by shares.
Shares are units of equity ownership interest in a corporation that exist as a financial
asset providing for an equal distribution in any residual profits, if any are declared, in
the form of dividends. Each piece represents a certain percentage of the company.
Anyone who owns shares in a limited company is called a 'shareholder' or 'member'.
The number of shares held by each member determines how much of the company they
own and control. They normally receive a percentage of trading profits that correlates
with their percentage of ownership.
Two very basic but important principles of company law (whether in Malaysia or many
other jurisdictions) which translates to a company having the following features:
B. THE SHAREHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY ARE GENERALLY NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
COMPANY’S DEBTS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS
Specifically, in the case of shareholders, their liability or risk is only up to the amount
they have invested or agreed to invest in the company. If the company were to wind up,
the shareholders have no legal responsibility to rescue the company or inject further
capital. This is known as the ‘limited liability principle’ and can also apply to directors,
other representatives / agents and employees.
C. CORPORATE VEIL
It is the separation between the company and the people behind it where they’re seen
as separate entities. However, this represents the general rule. As with all rules, if this
rule is applied strictly without exceptions, it can be abused.
There are instances where the people behind the company can be held personally
responsible for acts purportedly carried out by or in the name of the company. This is
sometimes called “piercing the corporate veil”, which is to go behind the so-called
“corporate veil” or “legal entity” and hold the ultimate “controlling mind” of the
company personally liable.
The core of company law (in this context, the separate legal entity / limited liability
principles) is driven by commercial considerations in the sense that genuine
businessmen need an avenue or entity to carry out legitimate business ventures without
the fear of being personally responsible should the venture fail – which can happen for
various inadvertent reasons (e.g. bad luck, recession, competition, wrong business
model, etc). At the same time, the law recognizes that there will be unscrupulous
parties who will abuse this avenue and cause hardship to other third parties– hence the
exceptions to the general rule.
The broad consensus is that a director's role in controlling the firm should not subject
him to tort liability (i.e., he shouldn't be sued). If the director has abused his position
and gone beyond his authorized responsibilities, the situation may be different.
All in all, the shareholders and directors would not be held liable for any legal action from a
third party due to the company being a separate legal entity with the shareholders and
directors. The director, however, may be taken action if his position being abused (such as
siphoning money to other accounts, fraud, scam, etc.).