Scribd
Upload
267 views15 pages

Soil Classification

This document provides an outline of soil classification systems, focusing on the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). It discusses the purpose of classifying soils and two commonly used systems: USCS and AASHTO. For USCS, the document details its origins, major divisions, definitions of grain sizes, classification procedures, symbols, and handling of borderline cases. Organic soils are also addressed. The goal is to classify soils into groups with similar engineering properties to facilitate communication between engineers.

Uploaded by

Dr. Chayan Gupta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
267 views15 pages

Soil Classification

This document provides an outline of soil classification systems, focusing on the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). It discusses the purpose of classifying soils and two commonly used systems: USCS and AASHTO. For USCS, the document details its origins, major divisions, definitions of grain sizes, classification procedures, symbols, and handling of borderline cases. Organic soils are also addressed. The goal is to classify soils into groups with similar engineering properties to facilitate communication between engineers.

Uploaded by

Dr. Chayan Gupta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Outline

1. Purpose
2. Classification Systems
3. The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)
4. American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials System (AASHTO)
5. Suggested Homework

2
1. Purpose
Classifying soils into groups with similar behavior, in terms
of simple indices, can provide geotechnical engineers a
general guidance about engineering properties of the soils
through the accumulated experience.

Communicate
between
engineers

Simple indices Classification Estimate Achieve


system engineering engineering
GSD, LL, PI (Language) properties purposes
Use the
accumulated
experience
3
2. Classification Systems

Two commonly used systems:

• Unified Soil Classification System (USCS).

• American Association of State Highway and


Transportation Officials (AASHTO) System

4
3. Unified Soil Classification System
(USCS)
Origin of USCS:
This system was first developed by Professor A. Casagrande
(1948) for the purpose of airfield construction during World
War II. Afterwards, it was modified by Professor Casagrande,
the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers to enable the system to be applicable to dams,
foundations, and other construction (Holtz and Kovacs, 1981).
Four major divisions:
(1) Coarse-grained
(2) Fine-grained
(3) Organic soils
(4) Peat
5
3.1 Definition of Grain Size
No specific
grain size-use
Atterberg limits

Gravel Sand Silt and


Boulders Cobbles
Clay
Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine

300 mm 75 mm No.4 No.200


4.75 mm 0.075
19 mm No.10 No.40 mm
2.0 mm 0.425 mm

6
3.2 General Guidance
50 %
Coarse-grained soils: Fine-grained soils:
Gravel Sand Silt Clay
NO. 4 NO.200
50%
4.75 mm 0.075
mm

•Grain size distribution •PL, LL LL>50


LL <50
•Cu •Plasticity chart

•Cc
Required tests: Sieve analysis

Atterberg limit
7
3.3 Symbols

Soil symbols: Liquid limit symbols:


G: Gravel H: High LL (LL>50)
S: Sand L: Low LL (LL<50)
M: Silt Gradation symbols:
C: Clay W: Well-graded
O: Organic P: Poorly-graded
Pt: Peat Well − graded soil
Example: SW, Well-graded sand 1 < C c < 3 and C u ≥ 4
(for gravels)
SC, Clayey sand
1 < C c < 3 and C u ≥ 6
SM, Silty sand, (for sands)
MH, Elastic silt
8
3.4 Plasticity Chart
L H
• The A-line generally
separates the more
claylike materials
from silty materials,
PI
and the organics
from the inorganics.
• The U-line indicates
the upper bound for
general soils.

Note: If the measured


limits of soils are on
the left of U-line,
LL they should be
rechecked.
(Holtz and Kovacs, 1981)

9
3.4 Plasticity Chart - BIS

10
3.5 Procedures for Classification

Coarse-grained
material
Grain size
distribution

Fine-grained
material
LL, PI

Highly

(Santamarina et al., 2001)


11
Passing No.200 sieve 30 % LL= 33
3.6 Example Passing No.4 sieve 70 % PI= 12

Passing No.200 sieve 30 %

Passing No.4 sieve 70 %

LL= 33
PI= 12
PI= 0.73(LL-20), A-line
PI=0.73(33-20)=9.49
SC
(≥15% gravel)
Clayey sand with Highly
gravel
(Santamarina et al., 2001)
12
3.7 Organic Soils

• Highly organic soils- Peat (Group symbol PT)


− A sample composed primarily of vegetable tissue in various stages of
decomposition and has a fibrous to amorphous texture, a dark-brown
to black color, and an organic odor should be designated as a highly
organic soil and shall be classified as peat, PT.

• Organic clay or silt( group symbol OL or OH):


− “The soil’s liquid limit (LL) after oven drying is less than 75 % of its
liquid limit before oven drying.” If the above statement is true, then
the first symbol is O.
− The second symbol is obtained by locating the values of PI and LL
(not oven dried) in the plasticity chart.

13
3.8 Borderline Cases (Dual Symbols)
For the following three conditions, a dual symbol should be
used.
• Coarse-grained soils with 5% - 12% fines.
− About 7 % fines can change the hydraulic conductivity of the coarse-
grained media by orders of magnitude.
− The first symbol indicates whether the coarse fraction is well or poorly
graded. The second symbol describe the contained fines. For example: SP-
SM, poorly graded sand with silt.
• Fine-grainedsoils with limits within the shaded zone. (PI
between 4 and 7 and LL between about 12 and 25).
− It is hard to distinguish between the silty and more claylike materials.
− CL-ML: Silty clay, SC-SM: Silty, clayed sand.
• Soil contain similar fines and coarse-grained fractions.
− possible dual symbols GM-ML

14
3.8 Borderline Cases (Summary)

(Holtz and Kovacs, 1981)

15
6. References
Main References:
Das, B.M. (1998). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 4th edition, PWS Publishing
Company. (Chapter 3)
Holtz, R.D. and Kovacs, W.D. (1981). An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering,
Prentice Hall. (Chapter 3)
Others:
Santamarina, J.C., Klein, K.A., and Fam, M.A. (2001). Soils and Waves, John Wiley & Sons,
LTD.

16

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy