Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 537 views

    Nature of Error While Analyzing The Case Sequel

    Uploaded by

    ankit
    The document analyzes the case of Mehta, a student at IMT Nagpur. It identifies the root causes of error in Mehta's analysis of a case study project as being his ego in countering a competitor's opinion and basing his decision on incomplete figures to support his ego. It examines Mehta's motives for impression management as wanting to get noticed, be the center of attention, and be seen as the best. According to Myers-Briggs personality typing, Mehta demonstrated preferences for extraversion, intuition, feeling, and judging, while Kumar demonstrated preferences for introversion, sensing, thinking, and perceiving. Mehta's behavior in teams was characterized as I-oriented, commanding, lacking trust in teammates

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Nature of Error While Analyzing The Case Sequel

    Uploaded by

    ankit
    537 views3 pages
    The document analyzes the case of Mehta, a student at IMT Nagpur. It identifies the root causes of error in Mehta's analysis of a case study project as being his ego in countering a competitor's opinion and basing his decision on incomplete figures to support his ego. It examines Mehta's motives for impression management as wanting to get noticed, be the center of attention, and be seen as the best. According to Myers-Briggs personality typing, Mehta demonstrated preferences for extraversion, intuition, feeling, and judging, while Kumar demonstrated preferences for introversion, sensing, thinking, and perceiving. Mehta's behavior in teams was characterized as I-oriented, commanding, lacking trust in teammates

    Original Description:

    aequeal

    Original Title

    Nature of Error While Analyzing the Case Sequel

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document analyzes the case of Mehta, a student at IMT Nagpur. It identifies the root causes of error in Mehta's analysis of a case study project as being his ego in countering a competitor's opinion and basing his decision on incomplete figures to support his ego. It examines Mehta's motives for impression management as wanting to get noticed, be the center of attention, and be seen as the best. According to Myers-Briggs personality typing, Mehta demonstrated preferences for extraversion, intuition, feeling, and judging, while Kumar demonstrated preferences for introversion, sensing, thinking, and perceiving. Mehta's behavior in teams was characterized as I-oriented, commanding, lacking trust in teammates

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    537 views3 pages

    Nature of Error While Analyzing The Case Sequel

    Uploaded by

    ankit
    The document analyzes the case of Mehta, a student at IMT Nagpur. It identifies the root causes of error in Mehta's analysis of a case study project as being his ego in countering a competitor's opinion and basing his decision on incomplete figures to support his ego. It examines Mehta's motives for impression management as wanting to get noticed, be the center of attention, and be seen as the best. According to Myers-Briggs personality typing, Mehta demonstrated preferences for extraversion, intuition, feeling, and judging, while Kumar demonstrated preferences for introversion, sensing, thinking, and perceiving. Mehta's behavior in teams was characterized as I-oriented, commanding, lacking trust in teammates

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    NATURE OF ERROR WHILE ANALYZING THE CASE SEQUEL

    • The root cause of error: Mehta’s Ego (countering his competitor’s opinion)

    • Incomplete Exhibit figures: Year-to-date

    • Based entire decision on the wrong figures; to support his ego

    NATURE OF IMPRESSION THAT MEHTA WAS KEEN ON ESTABLISHING AT IMT AND THE MOTIVES
    BEHIND HIS EFFORTS:

    IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT: attempt to control the perceptions of others

    Mehta wanted to:

    • Get noticed

    • To be the center of attention

    • THE BEST

    MOTIVES BEHIND MEHTA’S EFFORT AT IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT:

    • Being consistent

    • Self-promotion

    • To be like Prasoon Joshi

    ACCORDING TO MBTI FRAMEWORK: PERSONALITY TYPE PREFERENCE OF

    MEHTA AND KUMAR

    • Mehta was extrovert and judging

    • Kumar was introvert, perceiving and intuitive

    MEHTA’S BEHAVIOR IN THE TEAM BECAUSE OF HIS PERSONALITY

    • I – ORIENTED

    • Commanding

    • Poor communicator

    • Lack of trust on team members- rackets!

    • Heedless
    COMMON BIASES AND ERRORS

    • Overconfidence bias

    • Anchoring bias

    • Confirmation bias

    • Availability bias

    • Escalation of commitment

    • Randomness error

    • Risk aversion

    • Hindsight bias

    Question # 2: What was the nature of the impression that Mehta was keen on establishing at IMT
    Nagpur?

    What were the motives behind Mehta’s effort at impression management?

    • He wanted to be the Torch bearer for IMT Nagpur and be the next ‘’ PRASOON
    JOSHI’’

    • Recognition

    • Self validation

    • Career success

    • Narcissism

    • proactive personality

    Question # 3: Mapping the demonstrate behavior and attitudes of Mehta and Kumar to the MBTI
    framework of understanding personality, what personality type preferences do you think Mehta and
    Kumar demonstrate?

    The Myers-Briggs Type (MBTI) :

    • Extraverted (E) vs. Introverted (I)

    • Sensing (S) vs. Intuitive (N)

    • Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (Fabil)

    • Judging (J) vs. Perceiving (P)

    MEHTA:

    • Extraverted

    • Intuitive
    • Feeling

    • Judging

    KUMAR:

    • Introverted

    • Sensing

    • Thinking

    Perceiving

    Ranjan wanted to become more popular among his peers and teachers, and he wanted to excel in all
    subjects, particularly Organisational behaviour. He always thinks about high achievement goal. He is
    self-motivated, brilliant, energetic type of person but sometimes he could be overconfident and also
    could not communicate with group member. Ranjan thought that any of the case analyses presented
    by other groups in the class were inferior than his own. He depends always on group member
    kumar.

    Ranjan made a huge error in his study and analysis of a case, and as a result, his and his team's
    performance on an assigned project fell down. He just predicated his entire analysis on several
    figures that were incomplete, resulting in the failure of the group. Later, he began to think about the
    events that brought him to the present situation and wondered how things could have gone wrong.

    He is self-motivated, brilliant, energetic type of person. One of the good things is that he passed the
    CAT and enrolled in well know institute at the age of 21 and other were elder than him.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy