Social Work Ecological Perspective
Social Work Ecological Perspective
Social Work Ecological Perspective
Carmen Ambriz
La Sierra University
interactions among many levels. The ecological perspective is one of the two conceptual
frameworks that are intended to “guide the process of assessment, intervention, and evaluation.”
With that being said, the social work profession considers it necessary that you assimilate the
knowledge and develop competencies related to certain areas (Kirst-Ashman & Hull, 2015). In
simpler terms, the ecological perspective has a “person-in-environment” approach, this involves
conditions, circumstances, and human interactions which encompass human beings. This
perspective is important to the social work field because it is what defines human beings, it is
what makes each and every being unique. Humans are social creatures, in order to survive and
successfully being able to interact in your environment is established in the beginning stages in
life, which is why parents are encouraged to talk or sing to their children in their first five years
of life.
Social environment involves the conditions, circumstances, and human interactions that
encompass human beings. The social environment includes the types of homes people live in, the
type of work they do, the amount of money available, and the laws and social rules they live by.
The social environment also includes all the individuals, groups, organizations, and systems
which a person comes into contact (Kirst-Ashman & Hull, 2015). Like anything in the social
work profession, practitioners must have a sound knowledge base about human behavior in the
social environment to be effective. In Carl’s case, he has a range of environments, such as his
interactions at home with his parents, his interactions at school with teachers and peers, and the
ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE 3
interaction with himself. To begin with, the interaction between specifically his parents is
unclear, but based on the reason why Carl has been brought to my agency can give insight on the
relationship between him and his father. The mother claims her ex-husband has used marijuana,
and Carl has been caught using marijuana, therefore that might of been an interaction point
between father and son. The mother on the other hand has been disabled by multiple sclerosis,
which after some time, she might not be able to care for herself nor Carl, in that case her son
might have taken a parent role. Taking a parent role at a young age and assisting his mother with
daily activities might have enhanced their interaction. Now that the situation has progressed on a
greater scale, Carl’s father wishes to place a restraining order on his ex-wife, which might result
When it comes to school interactions, not much was provided. Based on the vignette,
Carl was caught smoking marijuana with a friend, this might be a school friend or a friend in the
neighborhood, yet many factors can take place here, meaning what if this was an act of peer
pressure? What if this was his friend’s idea? Who’s marijuana was it?
environment. Each of these interactions or transactions is both active and dynamic. There may be
a positive or negative transaction (Kirst-Ashman & Hull, 2015). In other terms, transaction is the
positive or negative response to the environment. In Carl’s case, it seems to be on the negative
side. Dealing with a complicated divorce at a young age can be difficult, afterall he might
potentially blame himself. There is also the possibility of Carl taking a parent-like role in
assisting his mother, which might affect him. With that being said, children who are affected by
ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE 4
their parents divorce can lead to many issues, such as withdrawal, poor performance at school,
poor social skills and possibly adapt to violent behaviour. Carl being a young adolescent, and
with the divorce of his parents might have disrupted his ability to possibly start and maintain a
relationship.
Energy is the natural power of active involvement among people and their environments.
Energy can take the form of input or output. Input is a form of energy coming into a person’s life
and adding to that life. Output is a form of energy going out of a person’s life or taking
something away from it (Kirst-Ashman & Hull, 2015). The way I view energy is in two
subcategories, input and output. Input is the action of receiving or adding something to your life,
either positive or negative, or in other terms the cause. Output, on the other hand, is the outcome
or the effect, this is mostly based on the vitality put in the first time. Based on the vignette, there
are various inputs, to begin with, the divorce has added something detrimental to Carl’s life.
Another input was the act of Carl smoking marijuana. The output of Carl smoking would be
either becoming addicted to the drug or possibly enhancing the father-son relationship. Another
output in this case would be if the father decides to pull through with the restraining order on his
ex-wife, as a result of that action, Carl’s relationship with his mother may be jeopardized, on the
other side, the relationship his father has with his son may or may not be affected.
Interface is the exact point at which the interaction between an individual and the
environment takes place. Interface must be clearly in focus in order to target the appropriate
interactions for change (Kirst-Ashman & Hull, 2015). There is a bit of caution, if interface is
inaccurately targeted, much time and energy will be wasted before getting to the real problem.
ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE 5
Based on the vignette, I would say the turning point was when Carl was caught smoking
marijuana. With the environment he has to adapt to, young adolescents tend to seek outside
sources to help cope with stress. As a 12 year old, he might have experimented with an outside
source to destress himself. Unfortunately, he might have found a method not suitable for his age.
Carl might have a different opinion, but lucky for him, he was caught before the situation got out
of hand.
must change or adapt to new conditions and circumstances in order to continue functioning
effectively. As people are constantly exposed to changes and stressful life events, they need to be
flexible and capable of adaptation. Therefore adaptation often implies a two-way process
involving both the individual and the environment. Coping is a form of human adaptation and
implies a struggle to overcome problems. Although adaptation may involve responses to new
positive or negative conditions, coping refers to the way we deal with the problems we
experience (Kirst-Ashman & Hull, 2015). In simpler terms, coping is the action taken upon the
individual to help relieve or reduce the stress brought along the change of environment. For each
family member, their escape from reality, or method of coping will differentiate from each other.
The family had to adapt to various circumstances such as: a divorce, a health condition that will
forever change you, arguing parents, Carl living and adapting to two different households, and
living without his mother with possible limitations. With everything occurring at the same time,
it is quite overwhelming for a 12 year old, which might explain why Carl was using marijuana.
Children tend to imitate what they see and witness and integrate it somehow in their own lives
(cde.ca.gov). The father’s usage of marijuana is unclear, meaning no information has been
ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE 6
provided if the father uses marijuana in front of his son, how often the substance is used, or the
emotional/mental state in which Carl’s father uses the substance. As mentioned earlier, children
tend to mirror what their parents do, if the father does smoke in front of his son while stressed
out, there is a high chance Carl will imitate his father’s behaviour.
Interdependence is the mutual reliance of each person on each other person. Individuals
are interdependent as they rely on other individuals and groups of individuals in the social
environment. As mentioned, humans are social creatures, therefore interaction is crucial, people
cannot exist without each other. Just like human interaction is important to survive, in a highly
industrialized society, people are interdependent and need each other to survive (Kirst-Ashman
& Hull, 2015). As like all families, all members somehow intricately rely on each other. To begin
with, before the divorce occurred, if the mother has already suffered from multiple sclerosis she
might of already depended on her husband or son to assist her with daily activities. Moving on to
the son, clearly he is not in the working age, therefore he relies on both his parents for financial
and moral support support. Moving along to the divorce, since Carl will be living under the
supervision of one parent, he will have to rely on that parent financially. Another aspect to this
case would be who determines full or part custody of the child? Child support comes into play
after deciding who receives custody. Depending on who is granted custody of the child, the
parent receiving pension might rely on the non-custodial parent paying as another source of
income, that is if the parent with custody does not have a steady income.
worker’s implicit theory in an orderly manner. This also considers many outside factors into the
ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE 7
problem, which reduces any initial biases that may influence your interpretation. By first
determining your biases, you determine with what is suitable to you, this is appropriate in order
to work in your favor which leads you to better assist those in need of help.
ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE 8
References
“Ages and Stages of Development” Ages and Stages of Development - Child Development
Kirst-Ashman, Karen Kay, and Grafton H. Hull. “Practice for Working with Individuals.”
Understanding Generalist Practice. 7th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, 2015. Print.