Written Assessment in The Law School: Legal Writing and Citation
Written Assessment in The Law School: Legal Writing and Citation
Written Assessment in The Law School: Legal Writing and Citation
2
Page
Written Assessment in the Law School – Legal Writing and Citation 2017
Part 1: Law School requirements for written assessment
Presentation and submission requirements may differ between units. Unless otherwise
instructed (on the unit’s Blackboard site), the following requirements must be complied
with:
Word limits
Written assessment must comply with the prescribed word limit. There is no 10% policy in
the Law School and the word limits are imposed strictly.
If the word limit is exceeded, the examiner will not read or grade beyond the word limit.
Where there is a word limit and a page limit (e.g. 1000 words in 3 pages), both must be
complied with. Anything beyond the word or page limit will not contribute to the grade.
Formatting
Times New Roman or Arial font in 12 point
note that Times New Roman is a more compact font if there is a page limit as well as a
word limit
1.5 line spacing
Mandatory Forms
if applicable, the Group Acknowledgment Form must be completed and attached to the
assignment
Submission
The Law School requires that written assessment must be submitted in the following way,
unless otherwise instructed (refer to the unit’s Blackboard site):
Electronic copy uploaded to the unit’s Blackboard site (Assessment page) by the due
date. The electronic version must be in Word or PDF (but not scanned).
Documents submitted in an Apple ‘Pages’ format cannot be read.
3
Page
Written Assessment in the Law School – Legal Writing and Citation 2017
Academic writing: overview
Academic writing is formal, objective and evidenced by recognised sources of knowledge. It
also requires you to use the technical vocabulary of your discipline.
In Law, the effective use of language is a vital professional skill. Legal writing is precise, clear
and informed. Legal writing considers the reader at all times and uses plain English.
Plain English involves the use of direct, clear language. This kind of writing includes
specialised legal terms, but does not become complicated ‘legalese’. This means using
concise sentences and precise words that are appropriate to the context and audience.
For more advice on the Plain English movement, see Chapter 3 of Corbett-Jarvis and Grigg’s
text Effective legal writing: a practical guide.
For more advice on the conventions and genres of academic writing, refer to QUT cite|
write, an introductory guide to citing, referencing and academic writing at QUT.
4
Page
Written Assessment in the Law School – Legal Writing and Citation 2017
Planning and editing
Academic Writing is a process: planning and editing are key stages that facilitate the writing
phase and ensure that you produce the highest quality work.
Written Assessment in the Law School – Legal Writing and Citation 2017
Expression
GRAMMAR- I have…
ensured all my sentences are complete. Each sentence should contain the following elements:
subject-verb-object (someone is doing something to someone/something). Tip: Read your
assignment aloud one sentence at a time. You will usually hear when a sentence is not complete.
e.g.: Good lawyers look out for the interests of their clients.
ensured each sentence only has one point. If it has more, it should be divided into more than one
sentence (see note about commas vs semi-colons below).
PUNCTUATION- I have…
used commas in the right places. The most common ways commas should be used are:
when inserting a clause, phrase or quote within a sentence.
e.g.: Your research materials, including your record of research, must be submitted with
your essay.
when separating elements in a series, such as adjectives or nouns.
e.g.: The student considered a number of sources including case law, legislation, legal
encyclopaedias and commentaries.
after an introductory element.
e.g. Despite a number of appeals, the original decision was not reversed.
not misused commas. Commas should not be used to add an extra idea, even if connected.
Instead, use semi-colons, connecting words or new sentences e.g.
× Fast reading is an essential skill for lawyers, it should be taught in the first year of university.
√ Fast reading is an essential skill for lawyers. It should be taught in the first year of university.
√ Fast reading is an essential skill for lawyers that should be taught in the first year of university.
× The lease states tenants must pay for all repairs, it does not say who is responsible for making repairs.
√ The lease states tenants must pay for all repairs; it does not say who is responsible for making repairs.
Written Assessment in the Law School – Legal Writing and Citation 2017
SPELLING - I have…
checked my spelling is correct beyond simply using a spelling checker. Spelling is the most obvious
mistake to see, and spelling checkers do not pick up incorrect word choice or US spelling.
used the Macquarie Dictionary as my guide to spelling. See AGLC Rule 1.9
spelled out abbreviations according to AGLC rules. See AGLC Index: Abbreviations.
For example:
Me and I × Thank you for taking the time to talk √ Thank you for taking the time to talk to
to John and I today. (Tip: If you remove John and me today.
John from the sentence it does not sound
right - taking the time to talk to I today).
Who (subject) × I consulted an attorney who I met in √ I consulted an attorney whom I met in
vs New York. New York.
Whom (object)
Precedence × Having discovered a similar case in the √ Having discovered a similar case in the
(more important) past, the prosecution team used this past, the prosecution team used this
vs precedence to support their argument. precedent to support their argument.
Precedent
(case in point)
Affect (verb) × The legislation takes affect on the first √ The legislation takes effect on the first
vs of June. of June.
Effect (noun)
× This legislation will effect vicious, √ This legislation will affect vicious,
lawless bikies. lawless bikies.
Principal × You could strengthen your argument √ You could strengthen your argument by
(adjective: main) by appealing to relevant legal principals. appealing to relevant legal principles.
vs
Principle × The principle witness in the case √ The principal witness is the case alleged
(noun: a rule) alleged the defendant assaulted him. the defendant assaulted him.
Your (possession) × Are you sure your required to fill in √ Are you sure you’re required to fill in
vs that form? that form?
You’re (You are)
× Is that you’re client in the waiting √ Is that your client in the waiting room?
room?
Their (possession) × They’re misunderstanding of the facts √ Their misunderstanding of the facts led
7
Written Assessment in the Law School – Legal Writing and Citation 2017
× Their not planning to appeal. √ They’re not planning to appeal.
8
Page
Written Assessment in the Law School – Legal Writing and Citation 2017
Part 2: Legal Citation
Why cite?
At QUT, high academic standards are expected to be maintained in all courses and units. See
Manual of Policies and Procedures at C/5.3 Academic Integrity. This expectation is referred
to in all unit outlines:
Academic Honesty
QUT is committed to maintaining high academic standards to protect the value of its
qualifications. To assist you in assuring the academic integrity of your assessment you are
encouraged to make use of the support materials and services available to help you
consider and check your assessment items. Important information about the university's
approach to academic integrity of assessment is on your unit Blackboard site.
A breach of academic integrity is regarded as Student Misconduct and can lead to the
imposition of severe penalties. It can include:
For law students, plagiarism (a breach of academic integrity) has very serious
consequences as it may prevent admission as a legal practitioner. In Re AJG [2004] QCA
88 when considering a one off incident of plagiarism, the court stated: ‘Legal practitioners
must exhibit a degree of integrity which engenders in the Court and in clients
unquestioning confidence in the completely honest discharge of their professional
commitments. Cheating ...must preclude our presently being satisfied of this applicant’s
fitness.’
In some of the Australian jurisdictions the admitting authorities require the Law School to
provide a certificate with a statement as to whether or not the university has a record of any
failure to maintain academic integrity by the student seeking admission. This includes the
student’s law studies or other study.
9
Page
Written Assessment in the Law School – Legal Writing and Citation 2017
When should you cite?
The following is from QUT cite|write:
Citation or citing is when you use information or words written by someone else in your
work to support your argument or illustrate your point.
Avoiding plagiarism
Plagiarism is when you do not give credit to the author/s for information used in your own
work. This means not citing or referencing when:
Note: Some students think citations only need to be included when they are directly
quoting someone. This is not true. All material of an informative nature (i.e. information
you used from your reading) should be acknowledged.
QUT cite|write provides basic examples for commonly cited materials under QUT Legal.
10
1
Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 2012, 3.
2
Ibid.
Written Assessment in the Law School – Legal Writing and Citation 2017
Footnote style/format
The Law School requires that references and citations be included in footnotes (bottom of
each page) which are numbered consecutively, not endnotes.
After the full stop.1 Not before the full stop like this1.
After the comma,1 if applicable. Not before the comma1, like this.
If more than one source is cited in the footnote, the sources are separated by a semicolon.
Personal Injuries Proceeding Act 2002 (Qld); Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld).
Content of footnotes
Footnotes provide authorities for arguments or statements of legal principles that are being
relied upon in the text of the assignment. Therefore, footnotes must not contain any
detailed argument or answer; this must be in the body of the text.
Do not cite a secondary source (eg a text) as authority when a primary source (eg a case) is
available.
If citing a secondary source, ensure that it is a recognised and credible source (eg not
sources such as law firm newsletters available on the Internet, Wikipedia or a tutorial guide).
Study Guides, workbooks and taped lectures must not be cited as authorities for legal
principles.
Repeating references
‘Ibid’ should be used to refer to the source cited in the footnote immediately preceding
except if more than that source is cited in the previous footnote.
‘Above n’ should be used if the source has been cited in a previous footnote, other than the
immediate preceding footnote, or in the immediate preceding footnote as one of multiple
sources. ‘Above n’ cannot be used for legislation, treaties or cases.
The use of ‘supra’ (above), ‘op cit’ (in the work cited), ‘infra’ (below) or ‘loc cit’ (in the place
cited) is not allowed for repeat references to sources appearing in previous footnotes.
Refer to the guide of the particular resource for further information on referring to repeated
references.
11
Page
Written Assessment in the Law School – Legal Writing and Citation 2017
Quotations
Quotes within the text of an assignment that are three lines or less may be incorporated into
the text in single quotation marks. Quotes longer than three lines must be separated from
the text (ie a new paragraph) indented from the left and be without quotation marks.
Examples
In Smythe v Thomas, Rein AJ held:
In circumstances where both the buyer and the seller agree to accept the terms
and conditions of the eBay I see no difficulty in treating the parties as having
accepted that the online auction will have features that are both similar and
different to auctions conducted in other forums.1
It was held that in respect of vending machines, ‘the offer is made when the proprietor of
the machine holds it out as being ready to receive money’. 1
12
Page
Written Assessment in the Law School – Legal Writing and Citation 2017
Part 3: Bibliographies
The bibliography is divided into parts with headings specifying the type of sources which are
relevant for the assessment:
A Articles/ Books/Reports
B Cases
C Legislation
D Treaties
E Other
If the assessment does not include some of the types of sources listed above, the headings
are omitted.
Each part of the bibliography is listed alphabetically, an author’s first name and surname
should be inverted and separated by a comma (see AGLC3 1.16). No pinpoint references are
included in the bibliography.
13
Page
Written Assessment in the Law School – Legal Writing and Citation 2017