Maxwell Nweke - W05 Fiel Report (Number Memorization)
Maxwell Nweke - W05 Fiel Report (Number Memorization)
Maxwell Nweke - W05 Fiel Report (Number Memorization)
Nweke
Date: Thursday, October 14, 2021
Memory
Week 05
Number Memorization
Participants
● Participant 1: A male friend, age 30 and interior design contractor
● Participant 2: Female colleague, age 38, Administrative Assistant
● Participant 3: Male colleague, age 45, Institute Instructor
● Participant 4: Male colleague, age 43, Facilities Manager
Procedures
I invited some of my colleagues and a friend during my break period at the office if they would like
to participate in an activity, I would use for my Psychology class, and they all agreed. We met
physically at my office, and I informed them that the activity would require them to try to
memorize a certain group of numbers that would be read out to them, and they would replicate
the numbers in writing on a piece of paper in the correct order it was given to them. I further
explained to them that it was not a test of their knowledge but just a study for short-term
memory. I explained to them that after the exercise, I would take the numbers that they wrote
down and do a report on how people retain short-term memory. I told them that I would not use
their names in the report, but I was going to use their information as shown on the demographics
above.
I did not use any sequence or pattern in selecting the numbers I wrote, this was done randomly, I
just wrote them down as they came to my mind. However, I was very conscious that it required
just single digit numbers. I explained to the participants that I would only write down their
individual number sequence that they were able to remember correctly on my report and
determine if they fall under Miller’s range of seven plus or minus two. The numbers I used were 6,
3, 8, 4, 7, 9, 2, 1, 5, 8, 2, and 5
1
Although, benign deception was not necessary here, I explained to them during the debrief that I
was watching their behavior when calling out the numbers, this was what I used in ascertaining
Results
I was able to gather that all the participants fell under the Miller’s 5-9 range except one of the
participants who exceeded the range and was able to remember all the numbers in their right
sequence. Participant one got the first nine numbers correctly, the second participants got the first
seven number sequence correctly, participant 3 got the first 8 numbers in the correct sequence
Table 1
Digits recalled
Participant (P) Digit stream used Digits prior to 1st error Miller’s 5-9 range?
P1 6, 3, 8, 4, 7, 9, 2, 1, 5, 8, 2, 6, 3, 8, 4, 7, 9, 2, 1, 5 Yes
5
P2 6, 3, 8, 4, 7, 9, 2, 1, 5, 8, 2, 6, 3, 8, 4, 7, 9, 2, Yes
5
P3 6, 3, 8, 4, 7, 9, 2, 1, 5, 8, 2, 6, 3, 8, 4, 7, 9, 2, 1 Yes
5
P4 6, 3, 8, 4, 7, 9, 2, 1, 5, 8, 2, 6, 3, 8, 4, 7, 9, 2, 1, 5, 8, 2, No
5 5
Discussion
All the participants but one which was participant 4 who was able to replicate the numbers
sequence in their correct order, fell in Miller’s 5-9 range. I think participant 4 was the least
distracted and he was able to remember the correct sequence because he deals with numbers a lot
as a facilities Manager. From my interactions with him over the years, I have noticed that he is a
very attentive person and seeks out details in everything, I could almost tell that he was going to
2
get all the numbers in their correct order. Participant 1 is also an attentive person as he tried to
take out all distractions, but I had to convince him to give me 10 minutes of his time because he
was just about to leave when I asked him to stay for the exercise, so I think his attention was a bit
divided. Participant 2 seemed like she was writing the numbers in the air, I think that in itself is a
kind of distraction although she was able to get the first 7 numbers in their correct order. I also
think she was feeling a bit exhausted that day. Participant 3 is a teacher and I think teachers are
people with good memory as they must always study, he got the first 8 numbers correctly which
There was nothing that could be a distraction in the surrounding because we used my office and I
made sure that I got their attention. Distractions may have probably come from what their minds
Implications
I saw an evidence of motivation play out with participant 4 as we already had an extensive
conversation about memory and retention. I had started having discussions with him about the
things I have been learning this week without telling him that it is what I have been learning. When
I called him to participate, he was excited, and it was until we were through with the exercise and
after the debriefing that he was able to connect my discussions with him earlier this week. I feel
an eagerness to try out something serves as motivation to perform better. Although all other
participants fell under the 5-9 range, I feel they were a bit distracted, but they would have been
able to remember more of the numbers if they were fully involved mentally in the whole process.
It is important that when learning new things, you have the intention to want to remember and
understand. Attention to details play a major role in helping any learning grasp and understand for
it to make sense. A learner has to be sure that after a while, you try to make meaning of all you
3
have been either reading or hearing, that way they would know whether they have understood or
not.
Peer Feedback
I corrected the text formatting on the result section to align with other parts of the report and