WAC11 01 MSC 20200123
WAC11 01 MSC 20200123
WAC11 01 MSC 20200123
October 2019
In Accounting (WAC11)
Paper 01 The Accounting System and
Costing
Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications
Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s largest awarding body. We provide
a wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational, occupational and specific programmes
for employers. For further information visit our qualifications websites at www.edexcel.com or
www.btec.co.uk. Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the details on our contact us page
at www.edexcel.com/contactus.
Pearson aspires to be the world’s leading learning company. Our aim is to help everyone progress
in their lives through education. We believe in every kind of learning, for all kinds of people, wherever
they are in the world. We’ve been involved in education for over 150 years, and by working across
70 countries, in 100 languages, we have built an international reputation for our commitment to high
standards and raising achievement through innovation in education. Find out more about how we
can help you and your students at: www.pearson.com/uk
October 2019
Publications Code WAC11_01_MS_1910
All the material in this publication is copyright
© Pearson Education Ltd 2019
General Marking Guidance
Alvor Bernie
£ £
Assets
Goodwill 18 000 -
Non-current assets 9 000 21 000
(1) AO2
Inventory 5 500 8 600
(1)AO2
Trade receivables 5 700 9 500
(1) AO2 (1) AO2
Other receivables 300 900
Bank 4 500 -
43 000 40 000
Liabilities
5% bank loan (repayable - 12 000
2022)
Trade payables 3 800 5 400
Other payables 1 200 500
Bank overdraft - 6 100 (1) AO2
5 000 24 000
Alvor:
(6)
Non -current assets 14000- 5000 = 9000
Inventory 7000- 1500 = 5500
Trade receivables 6000- 300 = 5700
Bernie:
Trade receivables 11600 – 1600 – 500 = 9500
Question Answer Mark
Number
1 (b) AO1:(1)AO2(3):AO3(2)
AO1: One mark for totalling sub section
A02: Three marks for calculating the bank overdraft
AO3: Two marks for adjusting capital for goodwill not retained
Current assets
Inventory 14 100
Trade receivables 15 200
Other receivables 1 200
30 500 (1of) AO2
No alien
Total assets 60 500
Current liabilities
Trade payables 9 200
Other payables 1 700
Bank overdraft 4 500 – 6 100 1 600 (1) AO2
12 500 (1of) AO2
Total capital and liabilities 60 500 (6)
Question Answer Mark
Number
1 (c) AO1:(5)AO2(11):AO3(3)
AO1: Five marks for transferring balances to the income
statement
A02: Eleven marks for calculating or adjusting balances for the
income statement
AO3: Three marks for balances requiring two levels of adjustment
£ £
Revenue 300 000
Less
Cost of sales:
Opening inventory 14 100
Purchases 148 000
Carriage inwards 7 900
170 000 (1of) AO2
Closing inventory (17 600)
(152 400) (1of) +w AO2
Gross profit 147 600
Plus
Other income:
Commission receivable 11 750 + 900 12 650 (1) AO2
160 250
Less
Electricity and water 5 650 - 800 4 850 (1) AO2
Telephone and communications 6 150 (1) AO1
Supervision salaries 24 000 (1) AO1
Rent 16 700 – 6 700 10 000 (1) AO2
Wages 38 300 + 2 300 40 600 (1) AO2
Bank loan interest 600 (1) AO2
General expenses 7 400 (1) AO1
Insurance 1 800 (1) AO1
Computer repairs 2 900 (1) AO1
Depreciation:
Motor vehicles 3 200 (1) AO2
Computers 1 500 (1) AO2
Fixtures and fittings 800 (1) AO2
Increase in allowance for
doubtful debts 2 050 -800 1 250 (1) AO3
(105 050)
Profit for the year 55 200
Add
Interest on drawings:
Alvor 12 000 - 10 000 x 10% 200
Bernie 14 000 - 6 000 x 10% 800
1 000 (1) AO3
Less Salaries:
Alvor 10 000
Bernie 6 000
(16 000) (1) AO2
40 200
Share of profit:
Alvor 26 800 (1of) AO3 If correct split
no aliens
Bernie 13 400 _____ (19)
40 200
Question Answer Mark
Number
1 (d) AO1:(6)
AO1: Six marks for identifying and explaining the characteristics
Supervision salaries
Semi-fixed (1) AO1
Additional supervisors would be required as production or the service expands.
This would lead to a stepped increase in costs. (1) AO1
Rent
Fixed (1) AO1
The rent would be constant for the accounting period irrespective of the activity
undertaken within the premises. (1) AO1
(6)
Question Answer Mark
Number
1 (f) AO1 (1), AO2 (1), AO3 (5), AO4 (5)
NOT
Time consuming without development.
Discussion of the figures derived from the question.
Decision
Candidates may conclude that projections are or are not of value to the
partnership. Candidates should support that decision with an appropriate
rationale.
Level Mark Descriptor
0 A completely incorrect response.
Level 1 1-3 Isolated elements of knowledge and understanding recall based.
Weak or no relevant application to the scenario set.
Generic assertions may be present.
Level 2 4-6 Elements of knowledge and understanding, which are applied to the scenario.
Chains of reasoning are present, but may be incomplete or invalid.
A generic or superficial assessment is present.
Level 3 7-9 Accurate and thorough understanding, supported throughout by relevant
application to the scenario.
Some analytical perspectives are present, with developed chains of reasoning,
showing causes and/or effects.
An attempt at an assessment is presented, using financial and non-financial
information, in an appropriate format and communicates reasoned
explanations
Level 4 10 - 12 Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding, supported throughout
by relevant and effective application to the scenario.
A coherent and logical chain of reasoning, showing causes and effects.
Assessment is balanced, wide ranging and well contextualised using financial
and non-financial information and makes informed recommendations and
decisions.
(TOTAL FOR QUESTION 1 = 55 MARKS)
Question Answer Mark
Number
2 (a) (i) AO1:(10)
AO1: Ten marks for posting to account
Subscriptions Account
Date Details £ Date Details £
2018 2018
1 Balance b/d 810 1 Sept Balance b/d 900
Sept (1) AO2
Both
2019 2018/9 Receipts & 15 970
payment/bank (1) AO2 +
w
31 Income & 16 200 31 Aug Bad debts 360
Aug expenditure (1) + W (1) AO2
AO2
31 Balance c/d 940 31Aug Balance c/d 720
Aug
17 950 17 950
1 Balance b/d 720 1 Sept Balance b/d 940
(5)
Sept (1) AO2
Both
Question Answer Mark
Number
2 (a) (iii) AO2(5)
A02: Five marks for identifying entering balances correctly with
correct narrative
Accruals concept
The concept which matches the expenses for an accounting period to the
income for the same accounting period. (1) AO1
Example: Wages, subscriptions, rent, rates and insurance, depreciation.
(1) AO1 (2)
Prudence concept
The concept ensures that profits/surplus and assets are not overstated and
the liabilities are not understated. (1) AO1
Examples: Allowance for irrecoverable debts, depreciation. (1) AO1 (2)
Question Answer Mark
Number
2 (c) AO1: (4)
AO1: Four marks for explaining the concept of ethics
• Ethics begin where the law ends. Actions may be legal but not
necessarily ethical.
e.g applying only minimum safety standards. (1) AO1
• Profitability should not be only consideration in business policies,
social and moral aspects should also be considered. (1) AO1
• Policy should consider honesty and trustworthiness. (1) AO1
• Fraud and corruption should be prevented. (1) AO1
• Accounting organisations should actively encourage members to
apply a minimum code of conduct. (1) AO1
(4)
• To give a true and fair view of the business. (1) AO1
4 points x 1 mark
Question Answer Mark
Number
2 (d) AO1 (1), AO2 (1), AO3 (5), AO4 (5)
Positive points for ICT
Increases accuracy and reduces errors
Automatically prepares reconciliations e.g subscriptions
Can prepare financial statements automatically
Less paperwork easier storage
Will be more secure with passwords used
Speed of processing
You need to input data once and the computer will make the second
entry
Decision
Candidates may conclude that ICT is or is not valuable to the club.
Candidates should support that decision with an appropriate rationale.
Level Mark Descriptor
0 A completely incorrect response.
Level 1 1-3 Isolated elements of knowledge and understanding recall based.
Weak or no relevant application to the scenario set.
Generic assertions may be present.
Level 2 4-6 Elements of knowledge and understanding, which are applied to the
scenario.
Chains of reasoning are present, but may be incomplete or invalid.
A generic or superficial assessment is present.
Level 3 7-9 Accurate and thorough understanding, supported throughout by relevant
application to the scenario.
Some analytical perspectives are present, with developed chains of
reasoning, showing causes and/or effects.
An attempt at an assessment is presented, using financial and non-
financial information, in an appropriate format and communicates
reasoned explanations
Level 4 10 - 12 Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding, supported
throughout by relevant and effective application to the scenario.
A coherent and logical chain of reasoning, showing causes and effects.
Assessment is balanced, wide ranging and well contextualised using
financial and non-financial information and makes informed
recommendations and decisions.
(TOTAL FOR QUESTION 2 = 55 MARKS)
TOTAL FOR SECTION A = 110 MARKS
SECTION B
25 000 + 9 000
= 34 000 (1) AO2 – 16 000 + 10 000 (1) AO2
= 8 000 (1of) A02
OR
15 000 (1) AO2 + 9 000 (1) AO2 – 16 000
(3)
= 8 000 (1of) A02
Question Answer Mark
Number
3 (b) AO1:(4)AO2(6):AO3(3)
AO1: Four marks for transferring balances
A02: Six marks for calculating adjusted balances
AO3: Three marks for disposals and depreciation on disposals
2 x (1) AO1
NOT:
Easy to calculate
(6)
Decision
Candidates may conclude that straight line depreciation for non-current
assets is positive or negative for a club. Candidates should support that
decision with an appropriate rationale.
Level Mark Descriptor
0 A completely incorrect response.
Level 1 1-2 Isolated elements of knowledge and understanding which are recall based.
Generic assertions may be present.
Weak or no relevant application to the scenario set.
Level 2 3-4 Elements of knowledge and understanding, which are applied to the
scenario.
Some analysis is present, with developed chains of reasoning, showing
causes and/or effects applied to the scenario, although these may be
incomplete or invalid.
An attempt at an evaluation is presented, using financial and perhaps non-
financial information, with a decision.
Level 3 5-6 Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding. Application to the
scenario is relevant and effective.
A coherent and logical chain of reasoning, showing causes and effects is
present.
Evaluation is balanced and wide ranging, using financial and perhaps non-
financial information and an appropriate decision is made.
Profit is the difference between income and expenditure (1) AO1 for a
given period recorded in the income statement. (1) AO1
Whereas
(4)
Profitability is the profit for a period compared to another factor usually
revenue or capital employed. (1) AO1 It is the ability to generate profits.
(1) AO1
Wages 77 000
(1) AO2
Depreciation 10 000
Bank loan interest 2 000
General expenses 17 000
(106 000)
Profit for the year 14 000
(1of) AO1 (6)
Question Answer Mark
Number
4 (d) AO2(3):AO3(1)
A02: Three marks for calculating the ratio
AO3: One mark for arriving at the correct capital employed
Or
£255 000 (1of) AO3 = £698.6 per day x 30 days = £20 959 (1of) AO3
365 days (2)
Question Answer Mark
Number
4 (f) AO2 (1), AO3 (2), AO4 (3)
Decision
Candidates may conclude that the use of only financial factors is
acceptable or not acceptable. Candidates should support that decision with
an appropriate rationale.
Level Mark Descriptor
0 A completely incorrect response.
Level 1 1-2 Isolated elements of knowledge and understanding which are recall based.
Generic assertions may be present.
Weak or no relevant application to the scenario set.
Level 2 3-4 Elements of knowledge and understanding, which are applied to the
scenario.
Some analysis is present, with developed chains of reasoning, showing
causes and/or effects applied to the scenario, although these may be
incomplete or invalid.
An attempt at an evaluation is presented, using financial and perhaps non-
financial information, with a decision.
Level 3 5-6 Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding. Application to the
scenario is relevant and effective.
A coherent and logical chain of reasoning, showing causes and effects is
present.
Evaluation is balanced and wide ranging, using financial and perhaps non-
financial information and an appropriate decision is made.
(TOTAL FOR QUESTION 4 = 30 MARKS)
Question Answer Mark
Number
5 (a) AO:1(1):AO2(10):AO3(3)
AO1: One mark for same fuel cost
A02: Ten marks for calculating costs
AO3: Three marks for calculating costs
Option 1
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
£ £ £
Depreciation 2 800 (1) AO2 2 800 2 800
Servicing 150 (1) AO2 300 (1) AO2 550 (1) AO3
Repairs 100 (1) AO2 800 (1) AO2 1 500 (1) AO2
Insurance 600 (1) AO2 600 (1) AO2 630 (1) AO3
Fuel 1 200 (1) AO2 1 500 (1) AO3 1 500 (1) AO1 of
Option2
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
£ £ £
Hire 4 200 4 200 4 200
(1) AO2 All years
Insurance 600 600 630
(1) AO1 All years
Fuel 1 200 1 500 1 500
(1) AO1 All years
Total cost 6 000 6 300 6 330
(1of) AO2 All (4)
years
Question Answer Mark
Number
5 (c) AO1:(6)
AO1: Six marks for comparing the options under the three
headings
One mark for identifying which option is the most profitable in year 3. Plus
one mark state the reason why.
Total cost of running the delivery van over the three years. (6)
Purchase – The total costs are marginally lower at £17 830 (1) AO1
but the yearly costs rise as the vehicle becomes older.
Hire- The total costs are marginally higher at £18 630 which are
distributed evenly over the three years. (1) AO1
One mark calculating the total costs own figure. One mark stating
which is higher and which is lower.
Question Answer Mark
Number
5 (d) AO2 (1), AO3 (2), AO4 (3)
Own Figure Rule Applies
Decision
Candidates may conclude that one option is better than the other.
Candidates should support that decision with an appropriate rationale.
Level Mark Descriptor
0 A completely incorrect response.
Level 1 1-2 Isolated elements of knowledge and understanding which are recall based.
Generic assertions may be present.
Weak or no relevant application to the scenario set.
Level 2 3-4 Elements of knowledge and understanding, which are applied to the
scenario.
Some analysis is present, with developed chains of reasoning, showing
causes and/or effects applied to the scenario, although these may be
incomplete or invalid.
An attempt at an evaluation is presented, using financial and perhaps non-
financial information, with a decision.
Level 3 5-6 Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding. Application to the
scenario is relevant and effective.
A coherent and logical chain of reasoning, showing causes and effects is
present.
Evaluation is balanced and wide ranging, using financial and perhaps non-
financial information and an appropriate decision is made.
Error of commission
The entry has been made on the correct side, correct number (1) AO1 of
the wrong account within the same ledger/ class of account. (1) AO1 (2)
Error of principle
The entry has been made on the correct side, correct number (1) AO1 of
the wrong account within a different ledger/ class of account. (1) AO1 (2)
Question Answer Mark
Number
6 (b) AO2(8)
AO2: Eight marks for naming the correct account and Dr or Cr
correct value.
Journal
Dr Cr
£ £
Inventory (1) AO1 3 500
Income statement 3 500 (1) AO2
£ £ £
Profit for the year 25 000
Increase Decrease
(1) The closing inventory had £3 500
been undervalued by £3 500. (1) AO3
(6)
Question Answer Mark
Number
6 (d) AO2(4):AO3(2)
A02: Four marks for calculating adjusted balances
AO3: Two marks for calculating the closing capital and the bank
overdraft
(6)
Corrected Statement of Financial Position at 31 December 2019
£ Workings £
ASSETS
Non-current assets 30 000 30 000
(carrying value)
Current assets
Inventory 17 000 + 3 500 20 500 (1) AO2
Trade receivables 14 000 -7 200 6 800 (1) AO2
Other receivables 1 500 1 500
32 500 28 800
Total assets 62 500 58 800
Decision (6)
Candidates may conclude that the recording of goodwill is acceptable or
not acceptable. Candidates should support that decision with an
appropriate rationale.
Level Mark Descriptor
0 A completely incorrect response.
Level 1 1-2 Isolated elements of knowledge and understanding which are recall based.
Generic assertions may be present.
Weak or no relevant application to the scenario set.
Level 2 3-4 Elements of knowledge and understanding, which are applied to the
scenario.
Some analysis is present, with developed chains of reasoning, showing
causes and/or effects applied to the scenario, although these may be
incomplete or invalid.
An attempt at an evaluation is presented, using financial and perhaps non-
financial information, with a decision.
Level 3 5-6 Accurate and thorough knowledge and understanding. Application to the
scenario is relevant and effective.
A coherent and logical chain of reasoning, showing causes and effects is
present.
Evaluation is balanced and wide ranging, using financial and perhaps non-
financial information and an appropriate decision is made.