National Security Washington Post

Biden will withdraw all U.S. forces from

President Biden will withdraw all American troops from Afghanistan over the coming months,
U.S. officials said, completing the military exit by the 20th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001,
attacks that drew the United States into its longest war.

The decision, which Biden is expected to announce Wednesday, will keep thousands of U.S.
forces in the country beyond the May 1 exit deadline that the Trump administration negotiated
last year with the Taliban, according to a senior administration official who briefed reporters
Tuesday under rules of anonymity set by the White House.

While the Taliban has promised to renew attacks on U.S. and NATO personnel if foreign troops
are not out by the deadline — and said in a statement it would not continue to participate in “any
conference” about Afghanistan’s future until all “foreign forces” have departed — it is not clear
whether the militants will follow through with the earlier threats given Biden’s plan for a phased
withdrawal between now and September. The Taliban has conducted sputtering talks with the
Afghan government, begun under the Trump deal, since last fall. It was also invited to
an additional high-level inter-Afghan discussion in Turkey later this month.

How 20 years of war have reshaped Afghanistan’s capital

Officially, there are 2,500 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, although the number fluctuates and is
currently about 1,000 more than that. There are also up to an additional 7,000 foreign forces in
the coalition there, the majority of them NATO troops.

Biden’s decision comes after an administration review of U.S. options in Afghanistan, where
U.S.-midwifed peace talks have failed to advance as hoped and the Taliban remains a potent
force despite two decades of effort by the United States to defeat the militants and establish
stable, democratic governance. The war has cost trillions of dollars in addition to the lives of
more than 2,000 U.S. service members. At least 100,000 Afghan civilians have been injured or
killed.

“This is the immediate, practical reality that our policy review discovered,” said one person
familiar with the closed-door deliberations who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity
to discuss policy planning. “If we break the May 1st deadline negotiated by the previous

1
administration with no clear plan to exit, we will be back at war with the Taliban, and that was
not something President Biden believed was in the national interest.”

The goal is to move to “zero” troops by September, the senior administration official said. “This
is not conditions-based. The president has judged that a conditions-based approach . . . is a recipe
for staying in Afghanistan forever. He has reached the conclusion that the United States will
complete its drawdown and will remove its forces from Afghanistan before September 11th.”

The decision highlights the trade-offs the Biden administration is willing to make to shift the
U.S. global focus from the counterinsurgency campaigns that dominated the post-9/11 world to
current priorities, including increasing military competition with China.

In addition to major domestic challenges, “the reality is that the United States has big strategic
interests in the world,” the person familiar with the deliberations said, “like nonproliferation; like
an increasingly aggressive and assertive Russia; like North Korea and Iran, whose nuclear
programs pose a threat to the United States;” like China. “The main threats to the American
homeland are actually from other places: from Africa, from parts of the Middle East — Syria and
Yemen.”

“Afghanistan just does not rise to the level of those other threats at this point,” the person said.
“That does not mean we’re turning away from Afghanistan. We are going to remain committed
to the government, remain committed diplomatically. But in terms of where we will be investing
force posture, our blood and treasure, we believe that other priorities merit that investment.”

Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, center, meets with U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, top
left, and their delegations at the presidential palace in Kabul last month. (Afghan Presidential
Palace/AP)

Reaction in Washington was divided. In a statement on the Senate floor, Minority Leader Mitch
McConnell (R-Ky.) called the plan “reckless” and “a grave mistake. It is retreat in the face of an
enemy that has not yet been vanquished and abdication of American leadership.”

McConnell pointed to a 2019 amendment — passed by a supermajority of senators when

“Can President Biden certify that right now?” McConnell asked.

But while McConnell cited “broad political support” for an ongoing military presence in -
Afghanistan, other lawmakers called it the right decision.

“There are no good, easy decisions here,” said Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), chairman of the
House Armed Services Committee. “Given the options, I think this is the best choice.”

2
“We cannot impose a solution on Afghanistan,” Smith said in an interview. “I don’t doubt for a
second there is going to continue to be violence and turbulence,” but the main transnational
terrorist threat is now elsewhere. “We can only be in so many places. We have to make choices,
and those choices are not easy. It’s not as if we didn’t put in the time in Afghanistan.”

Some officials have warned that a U.S. exit will lead to the collapse of the Kabul government
while jeopardizing gains made over the past two decades in health, education and women’s
rights.

Biden administration officials say the United States intends to remain closely involved in the
peace process and will continue to provide humanitarian aid and assistance to the Afghan
government and security forces, which remain almost totally dependent on foreign support.

“What we will not do is use our troops as bargaining chips,” the senior official said.

“We went to Afghanistan to deliver justice to those who attacked us on September 11th. . . . We
believe we achieved that objective some years ago,” the senior official said, and now judge the
threat to the United States “to be at a level that we can address it without a persistent military
footprint.”

The Afghanistan papers: A secret history of the war

Biden, who argued unsuccessfully during the Obama administration for a small,
counterterrorism-focused presence, had already hinted that the United States would remain for
only a limited time beyond the May 1 deadline.

Then-Vice President Joe Biden, seen in 2011 at a U.S. base in Maidan Shar Wardak province,
had unsuccessfully lobbied for a small, counterterrorism-focused presence in Afghanistan during
his time in the Obama administration. (Shah Marai/AFP/Getty Images)

Late last month, he said he did not expect U.S. troops to be deployed there next year. “We will
leave,” he said at a White House news conference. “But the question is when we leave.”

Administration officials were in the process of notifying officials in NATO nations as well as
Afghan officials and the Taliban on Tuesday. Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, in a statement
from his office, said he would have no comment until an upcoming phone call with Biden “to
officially share details of the new withdrawal plan.”

The senior official also said the Taliban was reminded of its commitments under the Trump deal
and warned against attacking departing U.S. forces. Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said
the militants would officially respond “when the U.S. formally announces” its plans, presumably
by Biden on Wednesday.

The official said the U.S. withdrawal would be fully coordinated with NATO and other coalition
partners. Citing NATO’s “in together, out together” mantra, the senior official said, “We will

3
take the time we need to execute that, and no more time than that.” The official said withdrawal
would begin before May 1 and might well be completed before September.

Advertisement

Many NATO governments have said they have no desire or ability to remain without the
logistical, security and other support the U.S. forces provide.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, in Brussels on Tuesday
and Wednesday, are informing their NATO counterparts. Germany has the second-largest force
in Afghanistan, numbering over 1,000. Officials there have cautioned that they would need
months to organize an orderly departure.

In early March, Blinken launched a last-ditch diplomatic effort to bring the Taliban and the
Afghan government together to end the war with an interim power-sharing deal. He warned
Ghani in a sharply worded letter that time was growing short.

The hope was to accelerate a negotiating process begun under Trump in 2019, when White
House envoy Zalmay Khalilzad started talks with militant leaders in Doha, the capital of Qatar.
That led to a February 2020 agreement signed by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo under which
the United States pledged to withdraw its forces by May 1, 2021, in exchange for Taliban
severance of all ties with al-Qaeda and agreement to begin negotiations with the Afghan
government toward a cease-fire and peace accord.

Advertisement

While the inter-Afghan talks began in September, they have made little progress. At the same
time, the Taliban has increased its attacks on Afghan troops and expanded its territorial control.
As the new administration launched its review, the Pentagon and the United Nations reported
that the militants had not complied with their commitments under the Trump agreement.

Many Afghan experts have concluded that the Taliban is moving closer to a military victory, but
that it may be reluctant to take over as a pariah government, which could result in a loss of
international support and financial aid for the country.

The war in Afghanistan shattered Biden’s faith in American military power

Biden’s choice was a stark one. With U.S. public opinion and Congress divided, staying could
lead to political difficulties at home and renewed Taliban attacks on U.S. forces. But an abrupt
American departure could undermine any achievements made in the past two decades, reduce the
possibility of a peace deal and lead to a Taliban takeover.

John Sopko, the independent special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction, warned
Congress last month that U.S. withdrawal without a peace deal in place would be “a disaster”
and mean government collapse. Others have warned of civil war, as regional warlords have
amassed and armed their own forces.

4
Secretary of State Antony Blinken presented the Taliban and the Afghan government with an
interim power-sharing arrangement in early March that had little effect. (Al Drago/AP)

Blinken’s warning to Ghani, along with the interim government proposal, seemed to have little
effect. He called for a conference of Taliban and Afghan leaders to take place in Turkey this
month and a U.N.-convened meeting of regional governments, including Iran, along with the
United States, to push diplomacy.

Advertisement

Although Turkey announced Tuesday that the Afghan meeting would go ahead on April 24,
Mohammad Naeem, spokesman for the Taliban political office, said in a tweet Tuesday that
“until all foreign forces completely withdraw from our homeland,” the group would “not
participate in any conference that shall make decisions about Afghanistan.”

No U.N. meeting has been confirmed. Khalilzad’s shuttle diplomacy among the Afghans and
with regional leaders has yet to bring the two sides together in agreement.

The person familiar with the administration’s deliberations rejected the suggestion that these
apparent failures precipitated Biden’s decision. The United States, the person said, would
continue its diplomatic efforts to bring peace. But time had proved that the presence of U.S.
troops, even at much higher levels, was not effective leverage at moving the parties beyond
where they have been willing to go, he said.

Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), a former CIA analyst and senior security official in
administrations of both parties, said Congress would need a full accounting of plans to secure
U.S. diplomats in Afghanistan and ensure that global extremists from al-Qaeda and the Islamic
State are unable to gain renewed strength.

The senior official said any potential for a resurgence of al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, where U.S.
intelligence assesses its presence as relatively small, “will be met with vigilance.”

Drawing on the “lesson from Iraq,” where the Islamic State turned into a major fighting force
after the bulk of U.S. troops left, “we have to have the intelligence and military capabilities
positioned in the region and the attention of our national security apparatus sufficiently focused
to ensure” that if al-Qaeda “begins to emerge,” the United States “will deal with it,” the senior
official said.

While officials said Biden would end the military mission entirely, they acknowledged that an
undetermined number of troops would remain to secure the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, where
diplomats would be vulnerable if security deteriorates in the Afghan capital.

During his campaign, Biden said his preference was to leave a counterterrorism force of about
1,500 troops in Afghanistan even as other forces withdrew. That now appears to be off the table.

5
But it’s unclear how the administration may use civilian contractors and intelligence officials
now working with military personnel to retain a capacity to discern and respond to extremist
threats. The U.S. government has routinely assigned military personnel under CIA or other
intelligence agency authority in overseas missions, allowing them to conduct certain activities
without technically counting as part of a military footprint. The senior official declined to
comment on the issue.

Retired Gen. Colin L. Powell, a former secretary of state and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, said the decision to leave was overdue. “I wouldn’t say enough is enough,” said Powell,
who led George W. Bush’s State Department during the 9/11 attacks and the beginning of the
U.S. war in Afghanistan. “I’d say we’ve done all we can do. . . . What are those troops being told
they’re there for? It’s time to bring it to an end.”

The Soviet Union, which occupied Afghanistan for a decade until it abruptly withdrew in 1989,
“did it the same way,” Powell said. “They got tired, and they marched out and back home. How
long did anybody remember that?”

Susannah George in Kabul contributed to this report.