Blum-Kulka Shoshana p2
Blum-Kulka Shoshana p2
Blum-Kulka Shoshana p2
ZOHAR KAMPF
questionnaire (the Discourse Completion Test), which became widely popular for the quick
collection of speech act data from large samples. Among the major contributions related
to this project is Blum-Kulka’s finding (1987) that different cultures exhibit diverse scales
for the perception of politeness that do not conform to Brown and Levinson’s equation of
politeness with indirectness. This finding may be viewed as one of the first to challenge
the universal claim of politeness theory.
Concurrently, in the mid-1980s, Blum-Kulka was also involved in studies of natural
discourse, focusing on issues of (mis)understanding (with Weizman, 1988), and cultural
ways of speaking in family discourse. These studies, which focused on the interactive
nature of communication as a process of meaning making, were the basis for formulating
her discourse pragmatic approach during the 1990s (e.g., 1997b). In her studies on family
discourse she explored cross-cultural differences in natural family discourse at dinnertime
between native Israelis, native Americans, and American immigrants in Israel. Blum-Kulka
showed that family dinnertime, at least in the communities studied, share several basic
characteristics related to the nature of the speech event, yet differ deeply in patterns of
sociability and socialization, providing culturally distinct sites for children’s pragmatic
development (1997a). Dinner Talk was a major contribution to the study of pragmatic
socialization in that it devoted close attention to the many-faceted contributions of multiparty,
intergenerational talk for children’s pragmatic development whereas other contemporary
research tended to focus mainly on dyadic mother–child interaction. Further work along
these lines showed the benefits of multiparty talk for pragmatic development across dif-
ferent cultures and genres (see Blum-Kulka & Snow, 2002). Best known from Blum-Kulka’s
work on specific genres are her studies on narratives, in which she developed a three-
dimensional model (telling, tales, and tellers) to account for cultural variability in the
unfolding of stories in conversation (e.g., 1993).
Blum-Kulka’s interest in pragmatic development led her (by the mid-1990s) to the study
of young child–child peer interactions in natural discourse, developing a theoretical view
of peer talk as a “double opportunity space,” which functions concurrently on the plane of
meaning making within childhood culture as a locus for the co-construction of children’s
social world and peer culture, while at the same time affording opportunities for the
development of discursive learning (e.g., 2005). Her studies of natural peer talk of preschool
and preadolescent children demonstrate the cultural co-construction and discursive
affordances for pragmatic development of peer talk in a gamut of genres, including casual
conversation, narratives, explanations, pretend play, and argumentative talk (e.g., Hamo
& Blum-Kulka, 2007).
Blum-Kulka’s broad intellectual interests found further expression in her important
contributions to the field of mediated political discourse. Her pioneer studies on political
interviews (1983), and later on debates and talk shows (2001), made significant contribu-
tions to the contemporary field of broadcast talk. In her studies during the late 1990s and
the 2000s Blum-Kulka integrated methods of conversation analysis, ethnographic observa-
tions, and pragmatic methods and theories, thus defining the methodological tool box used
by scholars of discourse analysis (Tracy & Haspel, 2005).
To conclude, Blum-Kulka is among the first to introduce pragmatics to the field of applied
linguistics, to develop an integrative approach (discursive pragmatics) to the study of
language use, and to apply this approach innovatively and fruitfully to relatively under-
studied areas of interest, such as media discourse, family discourse, and, more recently,
first- and second-language child peer talk.
SEE ALSO: Discourse Analysis and Conversation Analysis; Politeness and Face Research;
Pragmatic Socialization
blum-kulka, shoshana 3
References
Suggested Readings
Blum-Kulka, S., & Snow, C. (2004). The potential of peer talk. Thematic issue of Discourse Studies:
Peer talk and pragmatic development, 6(3), 291–307.
Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (Eds.). (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford, England: Oxford
University Press.