Crisis Management Age of Disruption
Crisis Management Age of Disruption
Crisis Management Age of Disruption
in the age
of disruption
Rethink risk.
The age of disruption is upon us – we point to three main This vulnerability is amplified when you consider the
drivers which set the context for the 10 considerations concentration risk: the scale and power of a relatively small
below. They include systemic interdependency and number of tech giants upon whom such offerings depend.
concentration risk, velocity and declining trust.
This web of dependencies has created a situation where
1. Systemic interdependency and concentration risk the origins and possible impacts of disruption are harder to
predict – the entire system is becoming increasingly complex.
Many organisations are more entangled than they
realise in far reaching, deeply embedded value chains
All of this means you may not know where the weakest
– from interconnected in-house systems to data feeds
points in your system are, and this knowledge gap translates
between cloud mega-providers. Data and technology
into vulnerabilities that will be exposed when it matters
underpin operating models, drive decision making,
most: in times of crisis.
and propel value creation – a trend that has only been
accelerated by COVID-19 as many organisations switched
2. Velocity
to remote working.
Whilst the outward face of the organisation may rightly be
On the surface, this is a smart strategy: leveraging the harnessing the pace of change and innovation, inwardly
core competencies of well-matched counterparts in order you must work harder to protect your organisation from
to compete in an agile, accelerated fashion. But there is a the velocity of these emergent and unpredictable digital
downside: the inherent risk of systemic interdependencies. risks. The investment required to fully understand the
If your organisation relies on processes being performed by consequences of a catastrophic failure of technologies
another organisation and something far beyond your control and third parties remains significant.
disrupts their business, such as a pandemic, then your
resilience and continuity will be challenged.
4. Prepare to manage your issues to prevent 5. Review your crisis response structure
crises
Well established three-tiered crisis response
As well as preparing your organisation to structures, such as gold-silver-bronze or
respond to an incident driven crisis, such as a strategic-operational-tactical, have their place.
ransomware attack, recognise that your crises However, it’s important to recognise that today’s
may come from issues, a non-acute threat to an risk landscape requires crisis managers to evolve
organisation’s strategic goals. their preparedness strategies.
Organisations would benefit from recognising The three tiered structure may not be agile
that issues should not be managed as business enough for an effective organisational response
as usual; if left unmanaged they can be triggered to technology-driven crises or indeed be
by an external event (eg a whistleblower) and appropriate for increasingly lean and agile
escalate into a crisis. organisational structures. The response to high
impact events, driven by global technologies,
Treat issues with the same degree of seriousness cannot rely on escalation through multiple layers
as an incident-driven crisis, such as a weather of teams that may have a limited understanding
event. Review your organisation’s capability of their remits. Tactical actions in these scenarios
to identify and manage issues. An issues generate strategic challenges, such as technical
management capability does not need to decisions taken during a cyber attack that
be complex and should be simple to drive limit strategic response options. Far too often
effective and swift decision-making to gain decision making is postponed or delegated
control – manage an issue with a clear structure, because of a lack of technical understanding at
procedures and agreed pathways for escalation – the strategic level.
before they can threaten the strategic objectives
of your organisation. To enable swift decision-making when
responding to technology or digital-driven
crises, consider establishing a structure aligned
to impact categories, with clear accountable
owners, rather than a three tiered response.
6. G
ather the technical tacticians and 7. Appoint a data subject matter expert and
strategic decision makers have a crisis data strategy in place
When it comes to crises, specifically those with For many organisations, one of the most
technology impacts, less can be more. Isolate significant challenges during COVID-19
a small group of designated people who have was difficulty gathering data to inform and
the knowledge, the ability to triage the event, support their response – specifically their
and the authority to make decisions quickly. decision-making and communication to
Typically, this will require close cooperation stakeholders. In a crisis, managers must make
between technologists – who have the crucial decisions quickly – and those decisions
information upon which the decisions can will hinge on the availability, accuracy and
be made – and key senior members of the comprehensiveness of information. Ensure you
organisation, who have the power to make have a crisis-specific data strategy. It should
those decisions. enable you to quickly access large volumes of
structured, validated data, at pace, and have a
plan for how to visualise that data to inform swift
decision-making in a crisis.
Bobbie Ramsden-Knowles
Director
Crisis and Resilience
M: +44 (0)7483 422701
E: roberta.ramsden-knowles@pwc.com
Johanna Peterson
Manager
Crisis and Resilience
M: +44 (0)7483 416849
E: johanna.peterson@pwc.com
Melanie Butler
Partner
Global Crisis Centre Lead
M: +44 (0)7801 216737
E: melanie.butler@pwc.com
© 2021 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the UK member firm, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity.
Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.