The Thematic Apperception Test
The Thematic Apperception Test
The Thematic Apperception Test
Historically, it has been among the most widely researched, taught, and used of such
tests. Its adherents assert that the TAT taps a subject's unconscious to reveal repressed
aspects of personality, motives and needs for achievement, power and intimacy, and
problem-solving abilities.
[edit] Procedure
The TAT is popularly known as the picture interpretation technique because it uses a
standard series of provocative yet ambiguous pictures about which the subject is
asked to tell a story. The subject is asked to tell as dramatic a story as they can for
each picture presented, including the following:
If these elements are omitted, particularly for children or individuals of low cognitive
abilities, the evaluator may ask the subject about them directly.
There are 31 picture cards in the standard form of the TAT. Some of the cards show
male figures, some female, some both male and female figures, some of ambiguous
gender, some adults, some children, and some show no human figures at all. One card
is completely blank. Although the cards were originally designed to be matched to the
subject in terms of age and gender, any card may be used with any subject. Most
practitioners choose a set of approximately ten cards, either using cards that they feel
are generally useful, or that they believe will encourage the subject's expression of
emotional conflicts relevant to their specific history and situation.[1]
• Social Cognition and Object Relations SCOR[3] scale. This assesses four
different dimensions of object relations: Complexity of Representations of
People, Affect-Tone of Relationship Paradigms, Capacity for Emotional
Investment in Relationships and Moral Standards, and Understanding of
Social Causality.
yes
[edit] History
TAT was developed by the American psychologists Henry A. Murray and Christiana
D. Morgan at Harvard during the 1930s to explore the underlying dynamics of
personality, such as internal conflicts, dominant drives, interests, and motives.
Howard P Vincent was a noted scholar of Herman Melville, the American author best
known for his novel Moby-Dick. According to Vincent, the TAT was inspired by the
lesson implicit in Moby-Dick Chapter XCIX - THE DOUBLOON: that morality is not
what users think it may be. Vincent writes that the TAT
"... came into being when Dr. Henry A. Murray, psychologist and Melvillist,
adapted the implicit lesson of Melville’s “Doubloon” chapter to a new and
larger creative, therapeutic purpose.”[citation needed]
After World War II, the TAT was adopted more broadly by psychoanalysts and
clinicians to evaluate emotionally disturbed patients.
Later, in the 1970s, the Human Potential Movement encouraged psychologists to use
the TAT to help their clients understand themselves better and stimulate personal
growth.
[edit] Criticisms
Declining adherence to the Freudian principle of repression on which the test is based
has caused the TAT to be criticized as false or outdated by some professional
psychologists[citation needed]. Their criticisms are that the TAT is unscientific because it
cannot be proved to be valid (that it actually measures what it claims to measure), or
reliable (that it gives consistent results over time, due to the challenge of
standardizing interpretations of the narratives provided by subjects).
Some critics of the TAT cards have observed that the characters and environments are
dated, even ‘old-fashioned,’ creating a ‘cultural or psycho-social distance’ between
the patients and the stimuli that makes identifying with them less likely.[4] Also, in
researching the responses of subjects given photographs versus the TAT, researchers
found that the TAT cards evoked more ‘deviant’ stories (i.e., more negative) than
photographs, leading researchers to conclude that the difference was due to the
differences in the characteristics of the images used as stimuli[citation needed].
The Israeli army uses the test for evaluating potential officers.[citation needed]