Scribd
Upload
131 views2 pages

School Activities Attendance Monitoring System: Evaluators

This document is an evaluation form for a School Activities Attendance Monitoring System used at the Republic of the Philippines Dr. Emilio B. Espinosa Sr. Memorial State College of Agriculture and Technology. The evaluation form rates the system in terms of graphic design, security, usability, and accuracy on a scale of 1 to 5. Evaluators include students, instructors/teachers, and employees. Space is also provided for comments and suggestions.

Uploaded by

regie castillo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
131 views2 pages

School Activities Attendance Monitoring System: Evaluators

This document is an evaluation form for a School Activities Attendance Monitoring System used at the Republic of the Philippines Dr. Emilio B. Espinosa Sr. Memorial State College of Agriculture and Technology. The evaluation form rates the system in terms of graphic design, security, usability, and accuracy on a scale of 1 to 5. Evaluators include students, instructors/teachers, and employees. Space is also provided for comments and suggestions.

Uploaded by

regie castillo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Republic of the Philippines

Dr. Emilio B. Espinosa Sr. Memorial State


College of Agriculture and Technology
(Masbate State College)
Cabitan, Mandaon, Masbate

SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ATTENDANCE MONITORING SYSTEM

Evaluators:

Student Instructor/Teacher Employee

Instruction: Please evaluate our system using the scale below. Check your rating.

Scale Descriptive Rating Qualitative Description


5 Outstanding The requirement of the system was accomplish.
4 Very Satisfactory The performance is effective to the client.
3 Satisfactory The performance meets requirements.
2 Fair The performance needs some functionality.
1 Poor The performance of the system fails to meet the
requirements.

5 4 3 2 1
A. Graphic Design

1. The used design in the system mere accurate &


extraordinary.

2. Attractiveness & effects of the graphics in the system


module.

3. The creativity used design in the system.


Total Score
B. Security
1. The safeties of data build in the system.
2. The appropriateness of security style used.
3. The established data confidentially in the system
between the user & administrator.
Total Score
C. Usability
1. The user friendliness of the software based on
system.
2. The advanced variation made in the system flow is
better than the system.
3. Elasticity of the software based system scheme.
Total Score
D. Accuracy
1. The correctness of data input & output build in the
system.
2. The preciseness of users post results.
3. The process of system capable to the users.
Total Score

Comments/Suggestion:
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
____

Signature of Evaluator: __________________________


Name of Evaluator: __________________________
Position of Evaluator: __________________________
Date: __________________________

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy