Structural Theory Geometric Methods Supplementary Notes
Structural Theory Geometric Methods Supplementary Notes
Structural Theory Geometric Methods Supplementary Notes
[Problem No. 1] Determine the maximum deflection δ in a simply supported beam of length 𝐿 carrying a
concentrated load at the midspan.
Solution:
𝑥
𝑃
𝐴 𝐶
𝛿 𝐵
𝐴𝑦 = 𝑃/2 𝐵𝑦 = 𝑃/2
𝐿
Figure 1.1
Boundary Conditions:
When 𝑥 = 0, 𝑦 = 0; therefore 𝐶2 = 0
When 𝑥 = 𝐿, 𝑦 = 0:
1 1 1
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 0 = 𝑃(𝐿)3 − 𝑃 〈𝐿 − 𝐿〉3 + 𝐶1 (𝐿) + 0
12 6 2
1 1
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 0 = 𝑃𝐿3 − 𝑃𝐿3 + 𝐶1 𝐿
12 48
1 2
𝐶1 = − 𝑃𝐿
16
Therefore,
𝑑𝑦 1 1 1 1
𝐸𝐼 = 𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 𝑃𝑥 2 − 𝑃 〈𝑥 − 𝐿〉2 − 𝑃𝐿2
𝑑𝑥 4 2 2 16
1 1 1 1
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 𝑃𝑥 3 − 𝑃 〈𝑥 − 𝐿〉3 − 𝑃𝐿2 𝑥
12 6 2 16
[Problem No. 2] Determine the maximum deflection δ in a simply supported beam of length 𝐿 carrying a uniformly
distributed load of intensity 𝑤 applied over its entire span.
Solution:
𝑥
𝑤
𝐴 𝐵
𝛿
𝐴𝑦 = 𝑤𝐿/2 𝐵𝑦 = 𝑤𝐿/2
𝐿
Figure 1.2
Boundary Conditions:
When 𝑥 = 0, 𝑦 = 0; therefore 𝐶2 = 0
When 𝑥 = 𝐿, 𝑦 = 0:
1 1
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 0 = 𝑤𝐿(𝐿)3 − 𝑤(𝐿)4 + 𝐶1 (𝐿) + 0
12 24
1 1
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 0 = 𝑤𝐿4 − 𝑤𝐿4 + 𝐶1 𝐿
12 24
1
𝐶1 = − 𝑤𝐿3
24
Therefore,
𝑑𝑦 1 1 1
𝐸𝐼 = 𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 𝑤𝐿𝑥 2 − 𝑤𝑥 3 − 𝑤𝐿3
𝑑𝑥 4 6 24
1 1 1
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 𝑤𝐿𝑥 3 − 𝑤𝑥 4 − 𝑤𝐿3 𝑥
12 24 24
1 1 1
𝐸𝐼𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑤𝐿4 − 𝑤𝐿4 − 𝑤𝐿4
96 384 48
5𝑤𝐿4
𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = −
384𝐸𝐼
5𝑤𝐿4
𝒚𝒎𝒂𝒙 = ↓
𝟑𝟖𝟒𝑬𝑰
[Problem No. 3] The simply supported beam shown below carries a load of intensity 𝑤 symmetrically distributed
over part of its length. Determine the maximum deflection δ.
Solution:
𝑥
𝑤
𝐴 𝐵
𝛿
𝐴𝑦 = 𝑏𝑤 𝐵𝑦 = 𝑏𝑤
𝑎 2𝑏 𝑎
𝐿
Figure 1.3
Boundary Conditions:
When 𝑥 = 0, 𝑦 = 0; therefore 𝐶2 = 0
When 𝑥 = 𝑎 + 𝑏 (midspan), 𝜃 = 0:
1 1
𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 0 = 𝑏𝑤(𝑎 + 𝑏)2 − 𝑤〈𝑎 + 𝑏 − 𝑎〉3 + 𝐶1
2 6
1 1
0 = 𝑏𝑤(𝑎 + 𝑏)2 − 𝑤𝑏 3 + 𝐶1
2 6
1 1
𝐶1 = 𝑤𝑏 − 𝑏𝑤(𝑎 + 𝑏)2
3
6 2
Therefore,
𝑑𝑦 1 1 1 1
𝐸𝐼 = 𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 𝑏𝑤𝑥 2 − 𝑤〈𝑥 − 𝑎〉3 + 𝑤𝑏 3 − 𝑏𝑤(𝑎 + 𝑏)2
𝑑𝑥 2 6 6 2
1 3
1 1 1
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 𝑏𝑤𝑥 − 𝑤〈𝑥 − 𝑎〉 + [ 𝑤𝑏 − 𝑏𝑤(𝑎 + 𝑏)2 ] 𝑥
4 3
6 24 6 2
1 3
1 1 1
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 𝑏𝑤𝑥 − 𝑤〈𝑥 − 𝑎〉 + 𝑤𝑏 𝑥 − 𝑏𝑤(𝑎 + 𝑏)2 𝑥
4 3
6 24 6 2
1 1 1
𝐸𝐼𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = − 𝑏𝑤(𝑎 + 𝑏)3 − 𝑤𝑏 4 + 𝑤𝑏 3 (𝑎 + 𝑏)
3 24 6
1 3 3 2 (𝑎
𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = − 𝑤𝑏[8(𝑎 + 𝑏) + 𝑏 − 4𝑏 + 𝑏)]
24
𝒘𝒃
𝒚𝒎𝒂𝒙 = [𝟖(𝒂 + 𝒃)𝟑 + 𝒃𝟑 − 𝟒𝒃𝟐 (𝒂 + 𝒃)] ↓
𝟐𝟒𝑬𝑰
[Problem No. 4] The simply supported beam carries a uniformly distributed load and a concentrated load as shown
in the figure below. Calculate the maximum deflection that occurs on the beam using the slope and deflection
equations considering 𝐸𝐼 to be constant.
135 kN
22 kN/m
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
2m 1.3 m 1.7 m
𝐸 = 10.5 𝐺𝑃𝑎
4
𝐼 = 8325 × 106 mm
Figure 1.4a
Solution:
𝑥
22 kN/m 135 kN
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝛿𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝐶
2m 1.3 m 1.7 m
81.1 kN 97.9 kN
Figure 1.4b
Therefore,
𝑑𝑦 97.9 2 135 11
𝐸𝐼 = 𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 𝑥 − 〈𝑥 − 1.7〉2 − 〈𝑥 − 3〉3 − 243.267
𝑑𝑥 2 2 3
97.9 3 45 11
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 𝑥 − 〈𝑥 − 1.7〉3 − 〈𝑥 − 3〉4 − 243.267𝑥
6 2 12
Locating for the distance 𝑥𝑚𝑎𝑥 by setting the slope to zero (𝜃 = 0), we have
97.9 2 135 11
𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 0 = 𝑥 − 〈𝑥 − 1.7〉2 − 〈𝑥 − 3〉3 − 243.267
2 2 3
𝑥 = 2.35 m → Invalid!
97.9 2 135
𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 0 = 𝑥 − 〈𝑥 − 1.7〉2 − 243.267
2 2
𝑥1 = 2.36 m → Okay!
𝑥 = 10.01 m → Invalid!
Solving for the maximum deflection, 𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 by substituting 𝑥𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 2.36 m to the deflection equation, we have
97.9 45
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = (2.36)3 − 〈2.36 − 1.7〉3 − 243.267(2.36)
6 2
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = −366.11 kN-m3
−366.11(1000)3
𝑦=
10.5(8325 × 106 )
𝑦 = −4.19 mm
𝒚 = 𝟒. 𝟏𝟗 mm ↓ → answer
[Problem No. 5] The beam in the figure below is loaded as shown. Calculate the maximum deflection that occurs
on the beam considering 𝐸𝐼 to be constant.
200 kN/m
1800 kN-m
𝐴 𝐸
𝐵 𝐶 𝐷
2m 2m 2m 2m
𝐸 = 200 𝐺𝑃𝑎
𝐼 = 710 × 106 mm4
Figure 1.5a
Solution:
𝑥
200 kN/m
1800 kN-m
𝐴 𝐸
𝐵 𝐶 𝐷
2m 2m 2m 2m
300 kN 500 kN
Figure 1.5b
Boundary Conditions:
When 𝑥 = 0, 𝑦 = 0; therefore 𝐶2 = 0
When 𝑥 = 6 m, 𝑦 = 0:
25 250
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 0 = 50(6)3 − 900〈6 − 2〉2 − 〈6 − 4〉4 + 〈6 − 6〉3 + 𝐶1 (6) + 0
3 3
𝐶1 = 622.22 kN-m2
Therefore,
𝑑𝑦 100
𝐸𝐼 = 𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 150𝑥 2 − 1800〈𝑥 − 2〉2 − 〈𝑥 − 4〉3 + 250〈𝑥 − 6〉2 + 622.22
𝑑𝑥 3
25 250
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 50𝑥 3 − 900〈𝑥 − 2〉2 − 〈𝑥 − 4〉4 + 〈𝑥 − 6〉3 + 622.22𝑥
3 3
Locating for the distance 𝑥𝑚𝑎𝑥 by setting the slope to zero (𝜃 = 0), we have
100
𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 0 = 150𝑥 2 − 1800〈𝑥 − 2〉2 − 〈𝑥 − 4〉3 + 250〈𝑥 − 6〉2 + 622.22
3
𝑥 = 3.50 m → Invalid!
100
𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 0 = 150𝑥 2 − 1800〈𝑥 − 2〉2 − 〈𝑥 − 4〉3 + 622.22
3
𝑥 = 3.07 m → Invalid!
𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 0 = 150𝑥 2 − 1800〈𝑥 − 2〉2 + 622.22
𝑥1 = 1.30 m → Invalid!
𝑥2 = 3.06 m → Okay!
Solving for the deflection, 𝑦 by substituting 𝑥 = 3.06 m to the deflection equation, we have
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 50(3.06)3 − 900(3.06 − 2)2 + 622.22(3.06)
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 2325.56 kN-m3
2325.56(1000)3
𝑦=
200(710 × 106 )
𝑦 = 16.31 mm ↑
Solving for the deflection, 𝑦 by substituting 𝑥 = 1.30 m to the deflection equation, we have
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 50(1.30)3 + 622.22(1.30)
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 918.74 kN-m3
918.74(1000)3
𝑦=
200(710 × 106 )
𝑦 = 6.47 mm ↑
Solving for the deflection, 𝑦 by substituting 𝑥 = 8.0 m to the deflection equation, we have
25 250
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 50(8)3 − 900〈8 − 2〉2 − 〈8 − 4〉4 + 〈8 − 6〉3 + 622.22(8)
3 3
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = −3288.91 kN-m3
−3288.91(1000)3
𝑦=
200(710 × 106 )
𝑦 = −23.16 mm
𝒚 = 𝟐𝟑. 𝟏𝟔 mm ↓
[Problem No. 6] Compute the midspan value of 𝐸𝐼δ for the beam loaded as shown below.
600 N/m
𝐴 𝐵
1m 3m 2m
𝐸𝐼 = constant
Figure 1.6a
Solution:
𝑥
600 N/m
𝐴 𝐵
1m 3m 2m
Boundary Conditions:
When 𝑥 = 0, 𝑦 = 0; therefore 𝐶2 = 0
When 𝑥 = 6 m, 𝑦 = 0:
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 175(6)3 − 25〈6 − 1〉4 + 25〈6 − 4〉4 + 𝐶1 (6) + 0
𝐶1 = −3762.5 N-m2
Therefore,
𝑑𝑦
𝐸𝐼 = 𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 525𝑥 2 − 100〈𝑥 − 1〉3 + 100〈𝑥 − 4〉3 − 3762.5
𝑑𝑥
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 175𝑥 3 − 25〈𝑥 − 1〉4 + 25〈𝑥 − 4〉4 − 3762.5𝑥
[Problem No. 7] Determine the midspan and the maximum deflection of the beam shown below.
600 N/m
𝐴 𝐶
𝐵
4m 2m
𝐸𝐼 = constant
𝐸 = 80 GPa
𝐼 = 753 × 103 mm4
Figure 3.2a
Solution:
600 N/m 𝑥
𝐴 𝐶
𝐵
4m 2m
2800/3 N 800/3 N
Figure 3.2a
Boundary Conditions:
When 𝑥 = 0, 𝑦 = 0; therefore 𝐶2 = 0
When 𝑥 = 6 m, 𝑦 = 0:
400
0= (6)3 − 1.25〈6 − 2〉5 + 𝐶1 (6) + 0
9
𝐶1 = −4160/3 N-m2
Therefore,
𝑑𝑦 400 2 25 4160
𝐸𝐼 = 𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 𝑥 − 〈𝑥 − 2〉4 −
𝑑𝑥 3 4 3
400 3 5
4160
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 𝑥 − 1.25〈𝑥 − 2〉 − 𝑥
9 3
Locating for the distance 𝑥𝑚𝑎𝑥 by setting the slope to zero (𝜃 = 0), we have
400 2 25 4160
𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 0 = 𝑥 − 〈𝑥 − 2〉4 −
3 4 3
𝑥1 = 7.67 m → Invalid!
𝑥2 = 3.24 m → Okay!
Solving for the deflection, 𝑦 by substituting 𝑥 = 3.24 m to the deflection equation, we have
400 4160
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = (3.24)3 − 1.25〈3.24 − 2〉5 − (3.24 )
9 3
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = −2984.78 N-m3
−2984.78 (1000)2
𝑦=
200(710 × 103 )
𝒚𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 𝟒𝟗. 𝟓𝟓 mm ↓ → answer
[Problem No. 8] Solve for the maximum deflection of a simply supported beam spanning to 5 m, loaded with a
concentrated couple with magnitude of 60 kN-m at one of its supports. Take 𝐸𝐼 as constant with 𝐸 = 80 GPa, 𝐼 =
210 × 106 mm4. Indicate correct direction of the deflection in accordance to the given load.
Solution:
60 kN-m 𝑥
𝐴 𝐵
5m
12 kN 12 kN
Figure 1.8a
Boundary Conditions:
When 𝑥 = 0, 𝑦 = 0; therefore 𝐶2 = 0
When 𝑥 = 5 m, 𝑦 = 0:
0 = 2(5)3 + 𝐶1 (5) + 0
𝐶1 = −50 kN-m2
Therefore,
𝑑𝑦
𝐸𝐼 = 𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 6𝑥 2 − 50
𝑑𝑥
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 2𝑥 3 − 50𝑥
Locating for the distance 𝑥𝑚𝑎𝑥 by setting the slope to zero (𝜃 = 0), we have
𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 0 = 6𝑥 2 − 50
𝑥1 = 2.89 m → Okay!
𝑥2 = −2.89 m → Invalid!
Solving for the maximum deflection, 𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 by substituting 𝑥𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 2.89 m to the deflection equation, we have
𝐸𝐼𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 2𝑥 3 − 50𝑥
𝐸𝐼𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 2(2.89)3 − 50(2.89)
𝐸𝐼𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = −96.22 kN-m3
−96.22 (1000)3
𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 =
80(210 × 106 )
𝒚𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 𝟓. 𝟕𝟑 mm ↓ → answer
Area-Moment Method
1
𝜃𝐴𝐵 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝐵
𝐸𝐼
1
𝑡𝐴/𝐵 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝐵 ∙ 𝑥̅𝐴
𝐸𝐼
1
𝑡𝐵/𝐴 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝐵 ∙ 𝑥̅𝐵
𝐸𝐼
[Problem No. 1] Determine the deflection 6 ft from the wall for the beam loaded as shown in the figure below.
80 lb/ft
𝐶
𝐴 𝐵
6 ft 2 ft
𝐸𝐼 = constant
𝐸 = 1.5 × 106 psi
𝐼 = 40 in4
Figure 2.1a
Solution:
80 lb/ft
𝐶
2560 lb-ft 𝐴 𝐵
6 ft 2 ft
640 lb 3840
𝐴 𝐵 𝐶
-2560
2’ 1.5’
3’
𝑀
− 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 (𝑘𝑁 ∙ 𝑚)
𝐸𝐼
Figure 2.1b
𝐴 6 ft 𝐵 2 ft 𝐶
𝛿𝐵 = 𝑡𝐵/𝐴 Tangent line at 𝐴
Figure 2.1c
(Beam Geometry)
[Problem No. 2] Use the area-moment method to determine the deflections at points 𝐵 and 𝐶 of the beam shown.
250 kN
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
6m 3m 3m
𝐸𝐼 = constant
𝐸 = 200 GPa
𝐼 = 462 × 106 mm4
Figure 2.1a
Solution:
250 kN
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
6m 3m 3m
62.5 N 187.5 N
562.5
375
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶 2m
2m 6m
𝑀
− 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 (𝑘𝑁 ∙ 𝑚)
𝐸𝐼
Figure 2.1b
6m 𝐵 3m 𝐶 3m 𝐷
𝐴
𝛿𝐵 𝛿𝐶
𝑡𝐵/𝐴 𝑡𝐷/𝐴
𝑡𝐶/𝐴
Tangent line at 𝐴
Figure 2.1c
(Beam Geometry)
Create variable relationships using the geometry in Figure 2.1c,
𝑡𝐷/𝐴 𝑡𝐶/𝐴 + 𝛿𝐶
=
12 9
3
𝛿𝐶 = (𝑡𝐷/𝐴 ) − 𝑡𝐶/𝐴
4
𝑡𝐷/𝐴 𝑡𝐵/𝐴 + 𝛿𝐵
=
12 6
1
𝛿𝐵 = (𝑡𝐷/𝐴 ) − 𝑡𝐵/𝐴
2
1
𝑡𝐵/𝐴 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝐵 ∙ 𝑥̅𝐵
𝐸𝐼
1 1
𝑡𝐵/𝐴 = [ (375)(6)(2)]
𝐸𝐼 2
2250
𝑡𝐵/𝐴 =
𝐸𝐼
1 16875 2250
𝛿𝐵 = ( )−
2 𝐸𝐼 𝐸𝐼
𝐸𝐼𝛿𝐵 = 6187.5 kN-m3
6187.5 (1000)3
𝛿𝐵 =
200(462 × 106 )
𝜹𝑩 = 𝟔𝟔. 𝟗𝟔 mm ↓ → answer
[Problem No. 3] Use the area-moment method to determine the slopes at ends of 𝐴 and 𝐷 and the deflections at
points 𝐵 and 𝐶 of the beam shown.
270 kN 180 kN
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
6m 3m 3m
𝐸𝐼 = constant
𝐸 = 12.5 GPa
𝐼 = 1.92 × 1010 mm4
Figure 2.3a
Solution:
270 kN 180 kN
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
6m 3m 3m
180 kN 1620 270 kN
1080
810
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶 2m
-810
8m 4m
6m 6m
𝑀
− 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 (𝑘𝑁 ∙ 𝑚)
𝐸𝐼
Figure 2.3b
𝐴 6m 𝐵 3m 𝐶 3m 𝐷
𝜃𝐴 𝛿𝐵 𝛿𝐶 𝜃𝐷
𝑡𝐵/𝐴
𝑡𝐶/𝐴 𝑡𝐷/𝐴
𝑡𝐴/𝐷 Tangent line at 𝐴 𝜃𝐴𝐷
Tangent line at 𝐷
Figure 2.3c
(Beam Geometry)
𝑡𝐷/𝐴 𝑡𝐵/𝐴 + 𝛿𝐵
=
12 6
1
𝛿𝐵 = (𝑡𝐷/𝐴 ) − 𝑡𝐵/𝐴
2
𝜃𝐴𝐷 = 𝜃𝐴 + 𝜃𝐷
1
𝑡𝐶/𝐴 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝐶 ∙ 𝑥̅𝐶
𝐸𝐼
1 1 1
𝑡𝐶/𝐴 = [ (1620)(9)(3) − (810)(3)(1)]
𝐸𝐼 2 2
𝑡𝐶/𝐴 = 20655/𝐸𝐼 kN-m3
1
𝑡𝐵/𝐴 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝐵 ∙ 𝑥̅𝐵
𝐸𝐼
1 1
𝑡𝐵/𝐴 = [ (1080)(6)(2)]
𝐸𝐼 2
𝑡𝐵/𝐴 = 6480/𝐸𝐼 kN-m3
1
𝜃𝐴𝐷 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝐷
𝐸𝐼
1 1 1 1
𝜃𝐴𝐷 = [ (1620)(9) + (810)(3) − (810)(3)]
𝐸𝐼 2 2 2
𝜃𝐴𝐷 = 7290/𝐸𝐼 kN-m2
[Problem No. 4]For the beam shown in the figure below, find the value of 𝐸𝐼δ at 2 ft from the right support and
the maximum deflection, 𝐸𝐼δM of the beam.
80 lb/ft
𝐴 𝐶
𝐵
4 ft 2 ft
𝐸𝐼 = constant
Figure 2.3a
Solution:
80 lb/ft
𝐴 𝐶
𝐵
4 ft 2 ft
640/3 lb 320/3 lb
640/3
𝑧1
𝐴 𝐶
𝐵
2nd degree 𝑀 4/3’
𝑧2 2/3’
-640
3’ 1’
𝑀
− 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 (𝑙𝑏 ∙ 𝑓𝑡)
𝐸𝐼
Figure 2.3b
𝐴 4 ft 𝑀 𝐵 2 ft 𝐶
𝜃𝐴 𝛿𝑀 𝑡𝐴/𝑀 𝛿𝐵
𝜃𝐴𝑀
𝑡𝐴/𝐶 Tangent line at 𝑀 𝑡𝐶/𝐴
𝑡𝐵/𝐶
Tangent line at 𝐶
Tangent line at 𝐴
Figure 2.3c
(Beam Geometry)
Create variable relationships using the geometry in Figure 2.3c,
𝛿𝐵 + 𝑡𝐵/𝐶 𝑡𝐴/𝐶
=
2 6
1
𝛿𝐵 = (𝑡𝐴/𝐶 ) − 𝑡𝐵/𝐶
3
1
𝑡𝐶/𝐴 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝐶 ∙ 𝑥̅𝐶
𝐸𝐼
1 1 1 1
𝑡𝐶/𝐴 = [ (2560/3)(4)(2 + 4/3) + (640/3)(2)(4/3) − (640)(4)(3)]
𝐸𝐼 2 2 3
10240
𝑡𝐶/𝐴 =
3𝐸𝐼
𝑧2 640
2
= 2
𝑥𝑚 4
2
𝑧2 = 40𝑥𝑚
𝑡𝐶/𝐴
𝜃𝐴 =
6
10240
𝜃𝐴 =
6(3𝐸𝐼)
5120
𝜃𝐴 =
9𝐸𝐼
1
𝜃𝐴𝑀 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝑀
𝐸𝐼
1 1 1
𝜃𝐴𝑀 = 𝜃𝐴 = [ 𝑧1 𝑥𝑚 − 𝑧2 𝑥𝑚 ]
𝐸𝐼 2 3
5120 1 1 640 1 2 )(𝑥 )]
= [ ( 𝑥 ) (𝑥𝑚 ) − (40𝑥𝑚
9𝐸𝐼 𝐸𝐼 2 3 𝑚 3 𝑚
3 2
12𝑥𝑚 − 96𝑥𝑚 + 512 = 0
𝑥1 = −2.059 ft → Invalid!
𝑥2 = 7.170 ft → Invalid!
𝑥3 = 2.889 ft → Okay!
[Problem No. 5] Compute for the slope and deflection at point 𝐵 and the deflection at the overhang of the beam
shown in the figure below.
180 kN 15 kN/m
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
5m 5m 4m
𝐸𝐼 = constant
𝐸 = 70 GPa
4
𝐼 = 2340 × 106 mm
Figure 2.5a
Solution:
180 kN 15 kN/m
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
5m 5m 4m
78 kN 162 kN
20/3 m 10/3 m
780
1m
390
3m
𝐴 𝑐 𝐷
𝐵
-120 2nd degree
5/3 m
-900
5/3 m
𝑀
− 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 (𝑘𝑁 ∙ 𝑚)
𝐸𝐼
Figure 2.5b
𝐷
5m 𝐵 5m 𝐶 𝛿𝐷
𝐴
𝜃𝐴 𝛿𝐵 4m
𝑡𝐵/𝐴 𝜃𝐴𝐵 𝜃𝐵
𝑡𝐶/𝐴 𝑡𝐷/𝐴
Tangent line at 𝐵
Tangent line at 𝐴
Figure 2.5c
(Beam Geometry)
𝑡𝐷/𝐴 − 𝛿𝐷 𝑡𝐶/𝐴
=
14 10
7
𝛿𝐷 = 𝑡𝐷/𝐴 − (𝑡𝐶/𝐴 )
5
1
𝑡𝐵/𝐴 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝐵 ∙ 𝑥̅𝐵
𝐸𝐼
1 1
𝑡𝐵/𝐴 = [ (390)(5)(5/3)]
𝐸𝐼 2
1625
𝑡𝐵/𝐴 =
𝐸𝐼
1
𝑡𝐷/𝐴 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝐷 ∙ 𝑥̅𝐷
𝐸𝐼
1 1 1 5 1
𝑡𝐷/𝐴 = [ (780)(10)(4 + 10/3) − (900)(5) (4 + ) − (120)(4)(3)]
𝐸𝐼 2 2 3 3
15370
𝑡𝐷/𝐴 =
𝐸𝐼
𝑡𝐶/𝐴
𝜃𝐴 =
10
9250
𝜃𝐴 =
10𝐸𝐼
𝜃𝐴 = 925/𝐸𝐼 kN-m2
1
𝜃𝐴𝐵 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝐵
𝐸𝐼
1 1
𝜃𝐴𝐵 = [ (390)(5)]
𝐸𝐼 2
𝜃𝐴𝐵 = 975/𝐸𝐼 kN-m2
975 925
𝜃𝐵 = −
𝐸𝐼 𝐸𝐼
50(1000)2
𝜃𝐵 =
(70)(2340 × 106 )
𝜽𝑩 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟑 radians ↺ → answer
15370 7 9250
𝛿𝐷 = − ( )
𝐸𝐼 5 𝐸𝐼
3
2420(1000)
𝛿𝐷 =
(70)(2340 × 106 )
𝜹𝑫 = 𝟏𝟒. 𝟕𝟕 mm ↑ → answer
[Problem No. 6] Compute the midspan value of 𝐸𝐼δ for the beam load as shown below.
600 N/m
𝐴 𝐵
1m 3m 2m
𝐸𝐼 = constant
Figure 2.6a
Solution:
600 N/m
𝐴 𝐵
1m 2m 1m 2m
1050 N 750 N
2m 1m 1m
3150
2250
𝐴 𝑀 𝐵
𝑀
− 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 (𝑁 ∙ 𝑚)
𝐸𝐼
Figure 2.6b
𝐴 3m 𝑀 3 m 𝐵
𝛿𝑀
𝑡𝑀/𝐵
𝑡𝐴/𝐵
Tangent line at 𝐵
Figure 2.6c
(Beam Geometry)
Conjugate-Beam Method
[Problem No. 1] Use the area-moment method to determine the deflections at points 𝐵 and 𝐶 of the beam shown.
250 kN
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
6m 3m 3m
𝐸𝐼 = constant
𝐸 = 200 GPa
𝐼 = 462 × 106 mm4
Figure 3.1a
Solution:
250 kN
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
6m 3m 3m
62.5 N 187.5 N
Figure 3.1b
(Real Beam)
562.5
375
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
𝑀
− 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 (𝑘𝑁 ∙ 𝑚)
𝐸𝐼
Figure 3.1c
562.5/𝐸𝐼
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
6m 3m 3m
1406.25/𝐸𝐼 1968.75/𝐸𝐼
Figure 3.1d
(Conjugate-Beam under a fictitious load 𝑴/𝑬𝑰 )
2m
562.5/𝐸𝐼 562.5/𝐸𝐼 1m
375/𝐸𝐼
+𝑀𝐵 +𝑀𝐶
𝐴 𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
+𝑉𝐵 +𝑉𝐶
6m 3m
1406.25/𝐸𝐼 1968.75/𝐸𝐼
1125/𝐸𝐼 843.75/𝐸𝐼
[Problem No. 2] Determine the deflection at midspan and at 2 m from the right support of the beam shown below.
600 N/m
𝐴 𝐶
𝐵
4m 2m
𝐸𝐼 = constant
𝐸 = 80 GPa
𝐼 = 753 × 103 mm4
Figure 3.2a
Solution:
600 N/m
𝐴 𝐶
𝐵
4m 2m
2800/3 N 800/3 N
Figure 3.2b
(Real Beam)
1600
3rd degree
-1600
𝑀
− 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 (𝑁 ∙ 𝑚)
𝐸𝐼
Figure 3.2c
1600/𝐸𝐼
𝐴 𝐶
𝐵
3rd degree
1600/𝐸𝐼
25600 4m 2m 4160
𝐴𝑦 = 𝐵𝑦 =
3𝐸𝐼 3𝐸𝐼
Figure 3.2d
(Conjugate-Beam under a fictitious load 𝑴/𝑬𝑰 )
1600/𝐸𝐼
1600/3𝐸𝐼
+𝑀𝐵
𝐴 𝐶
𝐵
+𝑉𝐵
4160
𝐵𝑦 =
1600 3𝐸𝐼
𝐸𝐼 2m
2/3 m 1600/3𝐸𝐼
Figure 3.2e
(Free-body Diagram at the right of B)
[Problem No. 3] Determine the deflection 9 ft from the wall and the slope and deflection at the overhang for the
beam loaded as shown in the figure below.
300 lb/ft
𝐶
𝐴 𝐵
9 ft 3 ft
𝐸𝐼 = constant
𝐸 = 1.5 × 106 psi
𝐼 = 152 in4
Figure 3.3a
Solution:
300 lb/ft
75 lb/ft
𝑀𝐴 = 7200 lb∙ft
𝐶
𝐴 𝐵
9 ft 3 ft
𝐴𝑦 = 1800 lb
Figure 3.3b
(Real Beam)
-112.5
3rd degree
-7200
𝑀
− 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 (𝑁 ∙ 𝑚)
𝐸𝐼
Figure 3.3c
9 ft 3 ft
𝐴 𝐵 𝐶
-112.5/𝐸𝐼 207360
𝑀𝐶 =
𝐸𝐼
3rd degree 21600
-7200/𝐸𝐼 𝐶𝑦 =
Figure 3.3d 𝐸𝐼
(Conjugate-Beam under a fictitious load 𝑴/𝑬𝑰 )
9 ft 3 ft +𝑀𝐶
𝐴 𝐵 𝐶
+𝑉𝐶
3rd degree
-7200/𝐸𝐼 9.6’
21600/𝐸𝐼
Figure 3.3e
(Free-body Diagram at the left of C) 84.375/𝐸𝐼
2.4’
+𝑀𝐵 3’
𝐴 𝐵 𝐶
+𝑉𝐵 207360
𝑀𝐶 =
-112.5/𝐸𝐼 𝐸𝐼
21600
-7200/𝐸𝐼 𝐶𝑦 =
Figure 3.3f 𝐸𝐼
(Free-body Diagram at the right of B)
+↑ ∑𝐹𝑦 = 0
1
𝐶𝑦 − (7200)(12) = 0
4
𝐶𝑦 = 21600/𝐸𝐼 lb-ft2 ↑
Superposition Method
Principle
In the analysis of slopes and deflections on beams on a specific point, the resultant is equal to the algebraic sum
caused by each load acting independently.
The technique is convenient to use for loadings with a combination of the types in Table 4.1 and Table 4.2.
Superposition method may require integration for partially distributed loads. In other cases wherein deflection is
only desired at one location, area-moment method usually works best.
The limitation to this principle is that deflections due to independent loads must not cause excessive deformations
on the original shape or length of the beam. It is also assumed that shear deformations are so small compared to
the bending deformations, which materialize on most beams (except for very deep beams), and thus their effect
may be neglected in the analysis.
Table of Formulas
TABLE 4.1 – Slope and Deflection at Free End of Cantilever Beams
𝑀
𝑀𝐿 𝑀𝐿2
1 𝑥 𝑀 0
1 2
𝜃 𝛿
𝐿
𝑦
𝑃
𝑀𝐿 𝑀𝐿2
2 𝑥 𝑃𝐿 1
2 3
𝜃 𝛿
𝐿
𝑦
𝑤
𝑤𝐿2 𝑀𝐿 𝑀𝐿2
3 𝑥 2
𝜃 𝛿 2 3 4
𝐿
𝑦
𝑤
𝑤𝐿2 𝑀𝐿 𝑀𝐿2
4 𝑥
3
6 4 5
𝜃 𝛿
𝑀
𝑀𝐿 𝑀𝑥 2 𝑀𝐿2
1 𝑥 𝑀 = −𝑀 𝜃= 𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 𝛿=
𝐸𝐼 2 2𝐸𝐼
𝜃 𝛿
𝐿
𝑦
𝑃
𝑃𝐿2 𝑃𝑥 2 𝑃𝐿3
2 𝑥 𝑀 = −𝑃𝐿 𝜃= 𝐸𝐼𝑦 = (3𝐿 − 𝑥) 𝛿=
2𝐸𝐼 6 3𝐸𝐼
𝜃 𝛿
𝐿
𝑦 Condition 1: For 0 < 𝑥 < 𝑎:
𝑃
𝑃𝑥 2
𝑎 𝑏 𝐸𝐼𝑦 = (3𝑎 − 𝑥)
𝑃𝑎2 6 𝑃𝑎2
3 𝑥 𝑀 = −𝑃𝑎 𝜃= 𝛿= (3𝐿 − 𝑎)
2𝐸𝐼 Condition 2: For 𝑎 < 𝑥 < 𝐿: 6
𝜃 𝛿
𝑃𝑎2
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = (3𝑥 − 𝑎)
𝐿 6
𝑦
𝑤
𝐿
𝑦
𝑤
𝐿
continues…
𝑅1 𝐿 𝑅2
𝑦 𝑤
7𝑤𝐿3
𝑤𝐿 2 𝜃𝐿 = 𝑤𝑥 5𝑤𝐿4
9 𝑥 𝑀= 360𝐸𝐼 𝐸𝐼𝑦 = (7𝐿4 − 10𝐿2 𝑥 2 + 3𝑥 4 )
8𝑤𝐿3 𝛿=
𝜃𝐿 𝛿 𝜃𝑅 9√3 360𝐿 768𝐸𝐼
𝜃𝑅 =
360𝐸𝐼
𝑅1 𝐿 𝑅2
𝑦 𝐿
𝑤
2
𝑤𝐿2 5𝑤𝐿3 Condition: For 0 < 𝑥 < 𝐿/2 ∶ 𝑤𝐿4
10 𝑥 𝑀= 𝜃𝐿 = 𝜃𝑅 = 𝑤𝑥 𝛿=
8 192𝐸𝐼 𝐸𝐼𝑦 = (25𝐿4 − 40𝐿2 𝑥 2 + 16𝑥 4 ) 120𝐸𝐼
𝜃𝐿 𝛿 𝜃𝑅 960𝐿
𝑅1 𝐿 𝑅2
(Source: Strength of Materials by Pytel and Singer)
𝐴 𝐷
𝐵 𝐶
6m 3m 3m
𝐸𝐼 = constant
𝐸 = 12.5 GPa
𝐼 = 1.92 × 1010 mm4
Figure 4.1a
Solution:
120 kN/m
𝐶
𝐴 𝐵
3m 1m
𝐸𝐼 = constant
𝐸 = 80 GPa
𝐼 = 753 × 103 mm4
Figure 3.2a
Solution:
𝐴 𝐵
4 ft 2 ft
𝐸𝐼 = constant
Figure 4.2a
𝑀𝐵
𝐴 𝐵
4 ft 2 ft 𝐵𝑦
Figure 4.2a
Therefore,
𝑑𝑦 1 40
𝐸𝐼 = 𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 𝐵𝑦 𝑥 2 + 𝑀𝐵 𝑥 − 〈𝑥 − 2〉3
𝑑𝑥 2 3
1 1 10
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 𝐵𝑦 𝑥 3 + 𝑀𝐵 𝑥 2 − 〈𝑥 − 2〉4
6 2 3
Boundary Conditions to create compatibility equations and solve ① and ② simultaneously, we have
When 𝑥 = 6 ft, 𝑦 = 0;
1 1 10
𝐸𝐼𝑦 = 0 = 𝐵𝑦 (6)3 + 𝑀𝐵 (6)2 − 〈6 − 2〉4
6 2 3
108𝐵𝑦 + 54𝑀𝐵 = 2560 →①
When 𝑥 = 6 ft, 𝜃 = 0;
1 40
𝐸𝐼𝜃 = 0 = 𝐵𝑦 (6)2 + 𝑀𝐵 (6) − 〈6 − 2〉3
2 3
54𝐵𝑦 + 18𝑀𝐵 = 2560 →②
𝐵𝑦 = 94.81 kips
𝑀𝐵 = −142.22 kip ∙ ft
Solving for the other unknown reactions by using static equations for equilibrium,
+↺ ∑𝑀𝐴 = 0
𝑀𝐴 + 94.81(6) − 80(4)(2) − 142.22 = 0
𝑀𝐴 = 213.33 kip ∙ ft
+↑ ∑𝐹𝑦 = 0
𝐴𝑦 + 94.81 − 80(4) = 0
𝐴𝑦 = 225.19 kips
𝑨𝒚 = 𝟐𝟐𝟓. 𝟏𝟗 𝐤𝐢𝐩𝐬 ↑
𝑴𝑨 = 𝟐𝟏𝟑. 𝟑𝟑 𝐤𝐢𝐩 ∙ 𝐟𝐭 ↺
𝑩𝒚 = 𝟗𝟒. 𝟖𝟏 𝐤𝐢𝐩𝐬𝐬 ↑
𝑴𝑩 = 𝟏𝟒𝟐. 𝟐𝟐 𝐤𝐢𝐩 ∙ 𝐟𝐭 ↻
𝑀𝐵
𝐴 𝐵
4 ft 2 ft 𝐵𝑦
𝑀𝐵
𝐴 𝐵
-640
1’
2’
3’
𝑀
− 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 (𝑘𝑖𝑝 ∙ 𝑓𝑡)
𝐸𝐼
Figure 2.1b
Tangent line at 𝐵
𝐴 𝐵
4 ft 2 ft
Figure 2.1c
(Beam Geometry)
Writing for the compatibility equations based on the beam geometry in Figure 4.
1
𝜃𝐴𝐵 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝐵
𝐸𝐼
1
𝑡𝐴/𝐵 = (𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎)𝐴𝐵 ∙ 𝑥̅𝐴
𝐸𝐼
𝑡𝐴/𝐵 = 0
1 1 1
𝑡𝐴/𝐵 = [ (6𝐵𝑦 )(6)(2) + 𝑀𝐵 (6)(3) − (640)(4)(1)] = 0
𝐸𝐼 2 3
108𝐵𝑦 + 54𝑀𝐵 = 2560 →②
Solving for the other unknown reactions by using static equations for equilibrium,
+↺ ∑𝑀𝐴 = 0
𝑀𝐴 + 94.81(6) − 80(4)(2) − 142.22 = 0
𝑀𝐴 = 213.33 kip ∙ ft
+↑ ∑𝐹𝑦 = 0
𝐴𝑦 + 94.81 − 80(4) = 0
𝐴𝑦 = 225.19 kips
𝑨𝒚 = 𝟐𝟐𝟓. 𝟏𝟗 𝐤𝐢𝐩𝐬 ↑
𝑴𝑨 = 𝟐𝟏𝟑. 𝟑𝟑 𝐤𝐢𝐩 ∙ 𝐟𝐭 ↺
𝑩𝒚 = 𝟗𝟒. 𝟖𝟏 𝐤𝐢𝐩𝐬 ↑
𝑴𝑩 = 𝟏𝟒𝟐. 𝟐𝟐 𝐤𝐢𝐩 ∙ 𝐟𝐭 ↻
𝑀𝐵
𝐴 𝐶 𝐵
4 ft 2 ft 𝐵𝑦
80 kips/ft
𝛿𝐶
𝜃𝐶 𝛿1
2𝜃𝐶
𝜃2 𝛿2
𝐵𝑦
𝜃3 𝛿3
𝑀𝐵
Figure 2.1c
(Beam Under Superimposed Loads with 𝑩𝒚 and 𝑴𝑩 as Redundants)
Writing for the compatibility equations based on the geometry in Figure 4.2b
𝛿1 = 𝛿2 + 𝛿3 →①
𝛿1 = 𝛿𝐶 + 2𝜃𝐵
𝜃1 = 𝜃𝐵 = 𝜃𝐶
𝜃1 = 𝜃2 + 𝜃3 →②
𝑀𝐵 (6)2 𝑀𝐵 (6)
𝛿3 = 𝜃3 =
2 0+1
𝛿3 = 18𝑀𝐵 𝜃3 = 6𝑀𝐵
Substituting the components to the compatibility equation above and solve ① and ② simultaneously, we have
12800
= 72𝐵𝑦 + 18𝑀𝐵
3
2560
= 18𝐵𝑦 + 6𝑀𝐵
3
𝐵𝑦 = 94.81 kips
𝑀𝐵 = −142.22 kip ∙ ft
Solving for the other unknown reactions by using static equations for equilibrium,
+↺ ∑𝑀𝐴 = 0
𝑀𝐴 + 94.81(6) − 80(4)(2) − 142.22 = 0
𝑀𝐴 = 213.33 kip ∙ ft
+↑ ∑𝐹𝑦 = 0
𝐴𝑦 + 94.81 − 80(4) = 0
𝐴𝑦 = 225.19 kips
𝑨𝒚 = 𝟐𝟐𝟓. 𝟏𝟗 𝐤𝐢𝐩𝐬 ↑
𝑴𝑨 = 𝟐𝟏𝟑. 𝟑𝟑 𝐤𝐢𝐩 ∙ 𝐟𝐭 ↺
𝑩𝒚 = 𝟗𝟒. 𝟖𝟏 𝐤𝐢𝐩𝐬 ↑
𝑴𝑩 = 𝟏𝟒𝟐. 𝟐𝟐 𝐤𝐢𝐩 ∙ 𝐟𝐭 ↻
𝑃𝑎𝑏 2
FEM𝐴𝐶 =
𝐿2
4
80𝑥(6 − 𝑥)2 𝑑𝑥
FEM𝐴𝐶 =∫
0 62
FEM𝐴𝐶 = 213.33 kip ∙ ft ↺
𝑃𝑎2 𝑏
FEM𝐶𝐴 =
𝐿2
4
80𝑥 2 (6 − 𝑥)𝑑𝑥
FEM𝐶𝐴 =∫
0 62
FEM𝐶𝐴 = 142.22 kip ∙ ft ↻
𝑀𝐴 = FEM𝐴𝐶
𝑴𝑨 = 𝟐𝟏𝟑. 𝟑𝟑 𝐤𝐢𝐩 ∙ 𝐟𝐭 ↺
𝑀𝐶 = FEM𝐶𝐴
𝑴𝑪 = 𝟏𝟒𝟐. 𝟐𝟐 𝐤𝐢𝐩 ∙ 𝐟𝐭 ↻