Tanisha Suvarna Black Book Report
Tanisha Suvarna Black Book Report
Tanisha Suvarna Black Book Report
NCRD’S
And has not been submitted to any other university of institute for the
award of any degree, diploma etc. the information submitted by me is true and original to the
best of my knowledge.
This is the bonafide project work and the information presented is true and original
to the best of our knowledge and belief.
(________________________) (________________________)
(_________________________) (________________________)
___________________________________________________________________________
Plot no.43,sector -19, D.G. wales patil marg, Nerul East, NaviMumbai-400706, Maharashtra
tel.no. o22-27708059, website: sterlingcollege.edu.in
___________________________________________________________________________
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A co-operative bank is a financial entity which belongs to its members, who are at the same
time the owners and the customers of their bank. Co-operative banks are often created by
persons belonging to the same local or professional community or sharing a common interest.
These banks generally provide their members with a wide range of banking and financial
services (loans, deposits, banking accounts…). Co-operative banks differ from stockholder
banks by their organization, their goals, their Values and their governance. Cooperative banks
are owned by their customers and follow the cooperative principle of one person, one vote.
Co-operative banks are often regulated under both banking and cooperative legislation. They
provide services such as savings and loans to non-members as well as to members, and some
participate in the wholesale markets for bonds, money and even equities. Many cooperative
banks are traded on public stock markets, with the result that they are partly owned by non-
members. Member control is diluted by these outside stakes, so they may be regarded as
semi-cooperative.
Cooperative banking systems are also usually more integrated than credit union systems.
Local branches of co-operative banks select their own boards of directors and manage their
own operations, but most strategic decisions require approval from a central office. Credit
unions usually retain strategic decision-making at a local level, though they share back-office
functions, such as access to the global payments system, by federating.
Some cooperative banks are criticized for diluting their cooperative principles. Principles 2-4
of the "Statement on the Co-operative Identity" can be interpreted to require that members
must control both the governance systems and capital of their cooperatives. A cooperative
bank that raises capital on public stock markets creates a second class of shareholders who
compete with the members for control. In some circumstances, the members may lose
control. This effectively means that the bank ceases to be a cooperative. Accepting deposits
from non-members may also lead to a dilution of member contribution
CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
NO. DESCRIPTION NO.
I INTRODUCTION
II LITERATURE REVIEW
V FINDINGS
ANNEXURE
BIBILOGRAPHY
CHAPTER- I
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
The Co-operative Banking System in India is characterized by a relatively comprehensive
network to the grass root level. This sector mainly focuses on the local population and micro-
banking among middle and low income strata of the society. These banks operate mainly for
the benefit of rural areas, particularly the agricultural sector. Banking business has done
wonders for the world economy. The simple looking method of accepting money deposits
from savers and then lending the same money to borrowers, banking activity encourages the
flow of money to productive use and investments. This in turn allows the economy to grow.
In the absence of banking business, savings would sit idle in our homes, the entrepreneurs
would not be in a position to raise the money, ordinary people dreaming for a new car or
house would not be able to purchase cars or houses. The government of India started the
cooperative movement of India in 1904. Then the government therefore decided to develop
the cooperatives as the institutional agency to tackle the problem of usury and rural
indebtedness, which has become a curse for population. In such a situation cooperative banks
operate as a balancing centre. At present there are several cooperative banks which are
performing multipurpose functions of financial, administrative, supervisory and development
in nature of expansion and development of cooperative credit system. In brief, the
cooperative banks have to act as a friend, philosopher and guide to entire cooperative
structure. The study is based on some successful co-op banks in Delhi (India). The study of
the banks performance along with the lending practices provided to the customers is herewith
undertaken. The customer has taken more than one type of loan from the banks. Moreover
they suggested that the bank should adopt the latest technology of the banking like ATMs,
internet / online banking, credit cards etc. so as to bring the bank at par with the private sector
banks.
The cooperative banks, however, differ from joint stock banks in the following manner:
(i) Cooperative banks issue shares of unlimited liability, while the joint stock banks issue
shares of limited liability.
(ii) In a cooperative bank, one shareholder has one vote whatever the number of shares he
may hold. In a joint stock bank, the voting right of a shareholder is determined by the number
of shares he possesses.
(iii) Cooperative banks are generally concerned with the rural credit and provide financial
assistance for agricultural and rural activities. Joint stock companies are primarily concerned
with the credit requirements of trade and industry.
(iv) Cooperative banking in India is federal in structure. Primary credit societies are at the
lowest rung. Then, there are central cooperative banks at the district level and state
cooperative banks at the state level. Joint stock banks do not have such a federal structure.
v) Cooperative credit societies are located in the villages spread over entire country. Joint
stock banks and their branches mainly concentrate in the urban areas, particularly in the big
cities
THE BEGINNING
A dedicated group of social workers and labour movement activists, imbued with the spirit of
service to the cause of mill workers, other industrial and hitherto neglected economically
weaker sections of society started Abhyudaya Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. in 1964, with a
small share capital of Rs. 5,000. The area of Kalachowki, Sewri, Parel and their surroundings
were predominantly populated by low income industrial labour and lower middle class people
at that time. In a short period of time Abhyudaya Co-op. Credit Society got converted into an
Urban Co-op. Bank. Finally in June 1965, Abhyudaya Co-op. Bank Ltd. was established with
the motto of "Prosperity through Co-operation.’’
A FORWARD MARCH
The Bank was conferred with Scheduled Bank Status by Reserve Bank of India in September
1988. Over a span of 51 years, it became one of the leading Urban Co-op. Bank in the
country with branches in Metropolitan Mumbai, Navi Mumbai, Pune, Thane, Raigad,
Nagpur, Nashik, Nanded, Kankavali, Aurangabad, Ahmednagar & Pen in Maharashtra State,
Vadodara and Ahmedabad in Gujarat State, Udupi and Mangalore in Karnataka State. On
11th January, 2007 the Bank was registered as a Multi-State Co-op. Bank by the Central
Registrar, New Delhi. The area of operation of the bank is confined to 3 States - Maharashtra,
Gujarat and Karnataka. The merger of Shree Krishna Sahakari Bank Ltd., Vadodara, Gujarat
State, Janatha Co-op. Bank Ltd., Udupi, Karnataka State and Manekchowk Co-op. Bank Ltd.,
Ahmedabad, Gujarat State has been effected.
VISION
Our Bank’s plunge to excellence in all directions will be powered by the VISION that
provides overarching inspiration, The VALUES that serve to guide taught & action, The
VITALITY that embarks on strategy formation & execution. The immense potential of our
Bank will be realized by the distinctive amalgam of the ‘Vision, Values & Vitality.
MISSION
To continuously strive for synergy between technology, systems & human resources for
providing products & services that meet the quality, performance & aspirations of the vast
clientele & to maintain the highest standards of ethics & societal responsibilities, constantly
innovate products & processes & develop teams that keep the momentum going to take the
Bank to excellence.
Bank has won the prestigious IDRBT Banking Technology Excellence Award for the
year 2014-15 for ‘Best IT enabled Co- operative Bank’ Award.
Bank has won Lokmat Corporate Excellence Award for Brand Excellence in Banking.
Das (1997), in his paper, studied the productivity in nationalised banks. He observed that
labour productivity in nationalised banks, over the time, had not only remained low but also
substantially declined. He advocated the restructuring of banks to improve productivity in
Indian banks
Ramamoorthy (1997), in his paper titled, “Profitability and Productivity in Indian Banking −
International Comparisons and Implications for Indian Banking” observed that the old order
of regulated market banks were not conscious of their profitability and productivity levels.
But new economic order has compelled these banks to shift towards market-oriented,
commercially driven banking system. He also observed in his study that performance of
banks operating in different economic systems with different levels of economic development
and varying degrees of regulations were not comparable. The results further revealed that
profitability of a bank was a function of allocation efficiency, volume of credit, provisioning
for loan losses, interest rate movements and operating cost structure. He suggested that
performance incentive plans, motivation, training and leadership of human resources and
level of technology absorption can improve the productivity and profitability of the banks.
Kapoor (1999), in recognition of the relevance and catalytic role of co-operative banks in the
development of agriculture and non-agriculture sector of Indian rural economy, Government
of India on 9 th April 1999, appointed a task force under the chairmanship of Jagdish Kapoor
for revival of co-operative banks. The main objective of the committee was to review the
functioning of co-operative credit structure and suggest measures to make them member
driven professional business enterprises.
Niranjanraj and Chitanbaram (2000), in their study titled, “Measuring the Performance of
DCCBs” observed that suitable models should be developed to evaluate the performance of
co-operative banks. They considered 23 parameters falling into four major groups for
measuring the performance of District Central Cooperative Banks and assigned appropriate
weights to each parameter. They ranked 14 District Central Co-operative Banks of Kerala
based on composite marks. They suggested that performance of co-operative banks should
not be measured in terms of financial/ economic achievements only but their performance as
co-operative organizations (social achievements) should also be evaluated.
Satyasai and Badatya (2000) conducted a study regarding restructuring Rural Credit Co-
operative Institutions. They analysed performance of rural co-operative credit institutions on
the basis of borrowings and lending operations, cost structure, financial viability, etc. and
found that co-operative system, in general, had failed to perform its functions properly. They
advised the co-operative banks to diversify their business and also to overcome internal
(rising transaction cost, declining business level, mismanagement of overdues) and external
(excessive bureaucratization, politicization) weaknesses.
Carlos et al. (2005) studied productivity changes in European co- operative banks and
concluded that an effective use of technology between 1996 and 2003 had increased
productivity for majority of the European co-operative banks under study. An appropriate
policy recommendation by the researchers was for larger or centralized co-operative banks to
develop and franchise technology to smaller cooperatives.
Bagchi (2006), in his study titled “Agriculture and Rural Development are Synonymous in
Reality: Suggested Role of CAs in Accelerating Process” analyzed the performance of
Primary Agriculture Credit Societies, and observed that PACS could not match up to the
increasing requirements of growth dimensions in the Agriculture /Rural development in the
Post-independence period, although till the late 50s, they were the only available source of
institutional rural finance.
Singh and Singh (2006) in their study titled, “Funds Management in Central Cooperative
Banks−Analysis of Financial Margin” attempted to estimate the impact of identified variables
on the financial margin of the central co-operative banks in Punjab with the help of
correlation and multiple step-wise regression approach. The ratio of own funds to working
funds and the ratio of recovery to demand were observed to be having positive significant
influence on financial margin, whereas overdues to total loans were found to be negatively
associated with the concerned parameter. A high percentage of own funds and timely
recovery of previous loans outstanding, as a source of funding new loans by the bank,
increased the financial margin in these banks.
Heiko and Martin (2007) of IMF conducted a study on co-operative banks and their
financial stability. The study was based on individual bank data drawn from the Bank Scope
Database for 29 major advanced economies and emerging markets that were members of the
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OCED). They found that co-
operative banks in advanced economies and emerging markets had higher scores than
commercial banks, suggesting that co-operative banks were more stable. These findings,
perhaps somewhat surprising at first, were due to much lower volatility of co-operative
banks’ returns, which offsets their relatively lower profitability and capitalisation.
Shah (2007) conducted a case study of Sangli and Buldana District Central Cooperative
Banks regarding the financial health of credit co-operatives in Maharashtra and found NPAs
or overdues as the main factors for deterioration in health of these banks. The study revealed
that both these banks showed a decline in their financial health and economic viability during
the late nineties as against the early nineties period.
Markand (1979), in his book titled, “Social Priority Index of Public Sector Banks” evaluated
the performance of public sector banks. With the help of performance index consisting six
quantitative indicators such as branch expansion, priority sector credit, and wage cost, he
concluded that the priority sector financing was essential, and necessary. For better
performance in this sector he suggested that lending power should be delegated to the branch
managers.
Chopra (1987), in her book, studied operational efficiency of some selected public sectors
banks. She found the lack of professionalism in banking industry and stressed for the
introduction of scientific management practices to enhance profits and profitability of public
sector banks. She recommended comprehensive management of costs as well as earning of
the banks.
Anil Matkar [2012] in their article “A Glance in financial performance and retail banking
products of Maharashtra state co op. Bank” published in ABHINAV, Volume 1,Issue No.
3,(Page No. 142-156) concluded that the increase in the net non – interest income, profit per
employee, business per employee, capital adequacy ratio and decrease in the operating
expenses, staff cost level of non performing assets by the last few years indicates that the
financial performance of the MSC Bank in retail banking products has been good and retail
banking has also contributed well to overall progress of thje MSC Bank.
Ms. Vidya Ramchandra Shelke [November, 2011] in their article “A study of performance
and challenges before the D.C.C. Bank Ltd , Sangli” published in Golden research thoughts
Volume 1, Issue No. V, (Page No. 1-4) concluded that in nutshell, the Cooperative Banks are
the life blood of Indian economy and the mechanisms for any development programs. In this
LPG era the cooperatives are an ideal instrument in economic and social development
through strong local community.
Rajiv Kumar and Kaur Jasmindeep [ December, 2010] in their article “Financial
Appraisal of Haryana State Co operative Apex Bank” published in Advances in management,
Volume3,Issue No. 12, (Page No. 41-48) concluded that results of the study showed that in
the membership of the bank, major share was of cooperatives. Whereas, individuals and
government had very less percentage share and in paid up share capital, the maximum share
was in the hands of cooperative, government share was minimum in it.
Ramesh Chander and Jai Kishan Chandel [November - April, 2011] in their article “An
Evaluation of financial performance and viability of cooperative banks – A study of four
DCCBs in Haryana (INDIA)” published in KAIM journal of management and research,
Volume 3,Issue No. 2, (Page No. 1-12) concluded that the present study has been an attempt
to identify the financial performance and efficiency of District Central Cooperaive
Bank(DCCBs) operating in Hisar division in Haryana comprising of Hisar, Bhiwani,
Fatehabad and Sirsa.
Sanjay Kanti Das [March, 2012] in their article “Operational and financial performance
analysis of Meghalaya cooperative Apex Bank” published in Journal on banking financial
services and insurance research, Volume 2,Issue No. 3, (Page No. 20-39) concluded that
MCAB is one of the top most cooperative banking institutions in Meghalaya and renders
services towards the common people as friend, philosopher and guide. The bank earned
consistent profit during the years from inception except a few years.
Vijay Hooda [May, 2011] in their article “State cooperative banks versus scheduled
commercial banks: A comparison of three financial ratios” published in International journal
of computing and business research, Volume 2, Issue No.2, (Page No. 40-50) concluded that
Even though the objectives of cooperative banks and commercial banks primarily differ, both
types of banks are important for financial inclusion in particular and socio-economic
development of our population in general. The present study has compared the performance
of StCBs with SCBs by considering the three financial ratios.
3.2 SCOPE
1. level of profitability earned by cooperative bank.
2. To study the existing modern transaction system in the financial sector mainly in
cooperative bank.
3. finding the problems faced by cooperative bank.
3.3 LIMITATIONS
Besides the success of the research work, there were certain limitations which were faced
by the researcher.
The information collected is mainly primary data and the accuracy is subject to the
responses received.
Due to lack of time the good amount of data collection was not possible so research
had to rely on limited data of samples size of 60 respondents only.
The research was only focused on limited area of navi Mumbai.
The people were not interested in filling questionnaire because of their busy schedule.
The bank employees were not interested in filling questionnaire because of their busy
schedule.
3.5 METHODOLOGY
The research was an explanatory.
3.6 DATA SOURCES
Primary Sources: This data include both qualitative and quantitative data. Data were
generated through questionnaire as a research instrument.
RESEARCH APPROACH: survey method
METHOD: Questionnaire
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT: Questionnaire
TYPES OF QUESTIONNAIRE: Structured
TYPE OF QUESTIONS: Open-ended and Closed-ended questions
Secondary Sources: The data was collected from internet.
CHAPTER-IV
The data was collected from 45 respondents by means of Questionnaire. The analysis were as
follows:
A. General data
1. Gender
Table 1: gender
Male 52%
Female 48%
GENDER
MALE FEMALE
Interpretation
The response obtained for the question “Gender” has been presented in Table.1 above. From
the table it is evident that 51.1% are male respondents and 48.9% are female respondents.
2. Age
Table 2: age
Age No. of respondents %
Above 60 years 0%
AGE
ABOVE 60 YRS
51-60YRS
7% 0%
41-50YRS 15-25YRS
24% 38%
31-40YRS
16%
26-30YRS
15%
Interpretation
The response obtained for the question “Age” has been presented in Table 2 above. From the
table it is evident that 37.8% Respondents are aged between 15-25 years, 15.6% Respondents
are aged between 26-30 years, 15.6% Respondents are aged between 31-40 years, 24.4%
Respondents are aged between 41-50 years, 6.6% Respondents are aged between 51-60 years
and there is no respondent aged above 60 years.
B. Survey Questions
3. Education
Figure 3.Education
Illiterate 0
High school 2
Intermediate 8
Degree 18
ILLITERATE
INTERMEDIATE
OTHER
18% HIGH SCHOOL
38%
INTERMEDIATE
DEGREE
DEGREE OTHER
40%
Interpretation
The response obtained for question “Education” has been presented in table 3 above. From
the above table it is evident that out of 45 respondents 2 of respondents are high school
qualified, 8 of them did intermediate, 18 respondents are graduated and 17 respondents did
other higher studies such as postgraduation, etc.
4. Profession
Figure 4. profession
PROFESSION NO. OF
RESPONDENTS
GOVERNMENT 12
EMPLOYEES
PRIVATE 20
EMPLOYEES
SELF-EMPLOYEED 5
STUDENTS 8
profession
18%
27%
govt employees
44%
Interpretation
The above table 4. Shows us response given by Respondents for Question
“profession”. As it is evident form above chart that 44% respondents are private employees,
27% are government employee, 18% respondents are self employed and 11% respondents are
students.
5. Monthly Income
Figure 5. monthly income
UPTO 10,000 17 %
monthly income
17%
27%
upto 10000
10000-20000
20000-30000
27% above 30000
29%
Interpretation
The response obtained for the Question “Monthly income” has been presented in
Table 5 Above. From the table it is evident that 17% Respondents has up to 10,000 salary per
month, 27% Respondents has salary between 10,000-20,000 per month. 29% Respondents
has salary between 20,000-30,000 per month. 27% Respondents has salary above 30,000 per
month.
Savings Account 80 %
Recurring Account 7%
Fixed Deposit 9%
Current Account 4%
4%
9%
7%
80%
Interpretation
The Response obtained for the Question “Type of bank account hold by respondents”
has been presented in table 6 above. From the above table it is evident that most of
respondents hold savings account in abyudaya cooperative bank i.e 80% of respondents, 7%
of respondents hold recurring account , 9% of them has fixed deposits and only 4% of them
holds current account.
BRANCH MANAGER 0%
ADVERTISING 11.4%
OTHERS 50%
factors convinced to open bank account
0%
12%
BRANCH MANAGER
ADVERTISING
50% GOODWILL OF BANK
36% EMPLOYEE OF BANK
OTHERS
2%
Interpretation
The response obtained for the question “ factors that convinced to open bank
account or avail banking services” has been presented in table 7. Above. From the table it is
evident that 50% of respondents has opened account or availed banking in abyudaya
cooperative bank by personal reason , 12% of them through Advertisement, 2% through
employees of bank and 36% of respondents has opened bank account or availed banking
services by goodwill of bank.
Cash credit 04
De mat 06
Insurance 08
Fixed deposit 14
Pension 13
Interpretation
The response obtained for the question “additional financial investment scheme given
by bank for individual customer” has been presented in above table. The additional financial
schemes are cash credit, de mat, insurance, fixed deposit, pension. Out of 45 four respondents
agreed on cash credit, 6 respondents on de mat, 8 respondents on insurance, 14 respondents
on fixed deposits and 13 respondents on pension.
9. Additional financial investing scheme are offered by bank for co operates
Mutual funds 12
LIC 3
De mat 5
yes 75%
no 3%
maybe 22%
22%
1st Qtr
3% yes
maybe
75%
Interpretation
The response obtained for the Question “level of satisfaction obtained by financial
services of abhyudaya cooperative bank” has been presented in above table 10. From the
table it is evident that 75% of respondents are satisfied, 3% of them are not satisfied and 22%
of respondents answered maybe.
QUESTIONNAIRE OF BANKERS
The data was collected from 15 banker respondents by means of Questionnaire. The analysis
were as follows:
A. General data
1. Gender
Table 1. Gender
Gender (%) no. of Respondents
MALE 60%
FEMALE 40%
gender
MALE FEMALE
Interpretation
The response obtained for the Question “gender” has been presented in table 1 above.
From above table it is evident that 60% of respondent are male and 40% of respondent are
female.
2. Age Group
Table 2. Age Group
15-25 years 0%
Above 60 years 0%
Age group
3…
0%
10% 0%
27%
60%
LOW COMPETITION 0%
NO COMPETITION 0%
LEVEL OF COMPETITION
0% 0…
HIGH COMPETITION
LOW COMPETITION
NO COMPETITION
100%
Interpretation
The response obtained for the question “Business Environment for banking
sector” has been presented in table 3 above. From the above table it is evident that the level
of competition is 100% i.e high competition.
Reducing manpower 0%
strategies
RESOURCES NO.OF
RESPONDENTS (%)
manpower 0%
Machines 100%
money 0%
material 0%
resources
0%
manpower
machines
money
material
100%
Interpretation
The response obtained for the Question “Resources used in bank for business
activities” has been presented in table 5 above . from the above table it is evident that
according to importance, machine is the resource being used in bank for business activities.
Communication, coaching
,feedback 15
Performance appraisal
15
25% 25%
settings goals and performance
communication,coaching,feedback
performance appraisal
development planning for future
25% 25%
Interpretation
The response obtained for the question “function performed by performance
manager” has been presented in above table 6. From the table it is evident that all 15 banker
respondent agreed to all the four function i.e 1. setting goals and performance, 2.
Communication, coaching, feedback. 3. Performance appraisal 4. Development planning for
future .
Financial gains 15
Non-financial gains 0
Effective management 0
control
Interpretation
The response obtained for the question “benefits from performance management” has
been presented in table above. From the above table it is evident that by performance
management there is financial gains .
no. of respondents
Maybe 0%
Yes 100%
No 0%
No idea 0%
Column1
Interpretation
The response obtained for the above question has been presented in table 8. Above .
from the table it is evident that performance appraisal is regularly carried by the responsible
manager or supervisor.
PROGRESS AT GLANCE
272 224 16 8 6 1
2,829 1,632 212 33 9 2
17,501 10,871 1,717 251 12 5
169,662 103,658 18,891 1,556 12 9
700,956 336,457 67,503 4,826 12 19
2,576,739 1,467,060 260,315 17,064 12 27+4
6,552,063 2,633,242 712,171 43,055 15 27+4
13,375,629 4,446,667 1,492,587 116,806 15 34+1
22,075,360 7,841,053 2,082,561 221,701 15 39+1
24,487,040 9,148,729 2,305,573 726,968 15 39+1
29,919,685 12,839,509 2,544,504 187,485 15 39+1
34,342,767 16,161,007 3,322,293 408,120 15 52+1
41,221,485 18,563,868 4,464,513 923,650 15 53
52,376,297 25,647,282 4,356,755 299,040 15 75
66,429,879 34,526,622 6,053,383 779,645 15 87
77,642,906 43,775,277 7,321,160 801,687 15 96
93,678,543 51,088,855 9,778,788 912,177 15 105
111,823,916 57,004,712 10,525,313 980,548 - 105
116,000,480 57,463,215 12,071,601 336,800 - 111
124,034,910 57,114,807 10,899,804 23,647 - 111
132,304,254 56,122,152 11,504,432 35,508 - 111
122,936,367 54,484,198 16,380,217 91,620 5# 111
127,226,524 57,982,520 11,552,282 215,860 111
CHAPTER - V
FINDINGS
2. Reserves in 1965 was Rs1000 over the period of years it was increasing till
2017,in 2017 reserves was Rs15,809,782 thousand but in 2018 it dropped to
Rs11,170,371(in 000) and in 2019 it was Rs 11,833,499 (in 000).
4. Paid up capital which means shares sold to primary market directly to investors
since 2014 paid up capital has increased to 1,117,166 (in 000) and in 2019 it was
1,478,419 (in 000).
5. The net profit earned by bank was high in 2014 that was Rs 980,548 (in 000) and
then dropped down in year 2016 -2018 and then increased in 2019 to Rs. 215,860
(in 000).
6. From 1965 -2019 , from 1 branch to 111 branches abhyudaya cooperative bank
has slowly pushed up to reach their goals.
7. Dividend was higher between year 2000-2013 dividend rate 15% and no dividend
after 2013 was proposed.
8. Gross income was higher in 2018 Rs 16,380,217 (000) and then it dropped down
in 2019 Rs 11,552,282 (000).
9. Loans & Advances for year ended 2018-2019 is Rs 57,982,520 (in 000).
10. Working capital has Rs 127,226,524 (in 000) in 2019 which is good for bank , As
it working capital indicates increase in asset or decrease in liabilities
11. It is observed that the size of holdings of the defaulters, their caste, amount of
borrowings, educational status, age, sex, religion, community and size of
landholding had a direct bearing on the repayment of dues.
CONCLUSION
The study is related to the performance of Co-operative Banks in India in the
light of the financial performance which selected as sample OF ABHYUDAYA
COOPERATIVE BANK , SEAWOODS ,NAVI MUMBAI .
Today, India’s Co-operative Credit Structure (CCS), with over 13 crore
members (including six crore borrowers), constitutes one of the largest rural financial
systems in the world. Over one lakh Primary Agriculture Credit Societies (PACS) can, in
many ways, be regarded as the veritable bedrock of india’s rural economy. Directly or
indirectly, it covers nearly half of india’s total population. The co-operative credit system of
India has the largest network in the world and co-operatives have advanced more credit in the
Indian agricultural sector than commercial banks. Thus, the small quantum of loan demanded
by the rural borrowers, the high administrative costs of these loans apart from a high risk of
default make these loans economically nonviable. Hence, this sector has to be increasingly
served by the co-operative and other rural credit institutions.
At present co-operative banks are under considerable pressure causing decline
in productivity and efficiency, low profitability, un-remunerative direct investment,
deterioration in the quality of portfolio, inadequacy of capital, inadequacy of loan provision,
large scale loan waiver, duplication of infrastructure, over staffing, management weaknesses
etc. these constrains may considerably influence institutional finance for priority sector in the
long run. Non-Performing Assets have various implications on profitability, liquidity and
solvency of the banks. The problem of Non-performing assets has taken the form of monster
Indian banks, for they are not able to get rid of these unwanted assets. In spite of the various
measures taken by banks, Non-performing assets have been at a high level in co-operative
banks. Due to financial impairment, the co-operative credit structure is steadily losing its
ability to meet the rapidly growing credit needs of agriculture.
SUGGESTIONS
1. If the co-operative movement is to develop on perfect sound lines, the government should
necessarily take immediate steps to curb the growth of vested interests in the movement as
well as necessary action to prevent undue interference of the politicians.
2. In today’s liberalized market driven economic environment, co-operatives have to reorient
and readapt their structural functioning and management in order to protect themselves from
the onslaught of vested interests
3. Overdues can be minimized, if the loan is provided to those farmers who satisfy the test of
technical feasibility and financial viability. Similarly, the measures for improvement in crop
yield, remunerative price to crop produce, reasonable input prices and crop insurance etc. are
also necessary to enhance the repayment capacity of particularly small farmers.
4. The credit co-operative must be free to carry on their operations purely on commercial
lines and matters such as fixation of interest rates, determination of unit costs and scale of
finance, modus operandi of recoveries, hiring and firing employees and so on should be
completely left to them.
5. The health of the credit co-operatives, particularly those in the lower tiers has been
deteriorating over the years. However, there appears to be no panacea for the ailment, which
has severely hampered their growth. There is no second option that these vital links in the
rural financial sector have to survive to meet the noble cause for which they were established.
6. It is suggested that abhuydaya co-operative banks must focus attention on mobilization of
low cost deposits as well as to concentrate on cheap borrowings in order to gain a
comfortable interest spread to ensure profit.
7. It is suggested that at the post disbursement stage, bankers should ensure that the advance
does not become NPAs through proper follow up and supervision. They should also ensure
both asset creation and asset utilization. Bankers can do either off-site surveillance or on site
inspection to detect whether the project is likely to become an NPA.
8. It is suggested that incentives can be given to honest repayers to create a better climate for
repayment. The possibility of honoring best loanees and the best employees during
cooperative weak celebrations can be chalked out.
9. The government should introduce proper measures to help banks in taking possession of
land belonging to willful defaulters.
23. It is highly desirable that bank should strengthen their own funds by requesting members
to take more shares, since, they largely depend on external finance for working capital.
ANNEXURE
QUESTIONNAIRE (FOR CUSTOMERS)
Kindly fill up the questionnaire which is required for collecting data for my research work. I
assure you that I will keep the information confidential and use only for my academic
purpose.
1. Gender
Male
female
2. Age Group
15-25 years
26-30 years
31-40 years
41-50 years
51-60 years
Above 60 years
3. Education
Illiterate
Highschool
Intermediate
Degree
4. Profession
Govt employee
Private employee
Business
Self-employeed
Student
5. Monthly Income
Upto 10,000
10,000-20,000
20,000-30,000
Above 30,000
7. Who have convinced you to open an account or avail banking services from your
bank ?
Branch manager
Advertising
Goodwill of bank
Employees of bank
Others
8. What additional financial investment schemes are offered by bank for individual
customers ?
____________________________________________________________
2. Age group
15-25 years
26-30 years
31-40 years
41-50 years
51-60 years
Above 60 years
5. According to importance, rank the resources being used in your bank for business
activities?
Manpower
Machines
Money
Materials
6. What are the functions being performed by performance management in your bank?
Setting goals and performance
Communication, coaching, feedback
Performance appraisal
Development planning for future
All of the above
7. What are the benefits from performance management to your bank?
Financial gain
Non-financial gains
Effective management control
All the above
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS:
Bank management and financial services
MAGAZINE:
Outlook Money
WEBSITE:
1. https://www.abhyudayabank.co.in/english/Home.aspx#
2. http://www.economicsdiscussion.net/india/cooperative-
banking/cooperative-banking-in-india-history-structure-importance-and-
weaknesses/31365
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_banking
4. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/