IAS 34 Interim Reporting
IAS 34 Interim Reporting
IAS 34 Interim Reporting
INTERIM REPORTING
1 Business Context
Financial information is used by interested parties to assess an entity’s financial performance
and position, its ability to generate future cash flows and its liquidity. The better the quality of
the information available and the more frequently it is made available, the more informed are
the decisions investors can make leading to greater market efficiency. Good quality interim
accounting information may assist timely feedback on analysts’ predictions of profits for the
current year to date.
While other standards address the quality of information in the annual report, IAS 34 Interim
financial reporting deals with interim reporting and ensures that this information is relevant
and reliable.
2 Chapter Objectives
This chapter deals with the preparation of interim reports under IAS 34. The standard does
not require the preparation of interim financial statements; it merely deals with the information
that should be presented if such a statement is prepared. National regulators often require the
preparation of interim statements where an entity’s equity or debt is publicly traded. IAS 34
specifies the minimum content that should be included in an interim report that is described as
conforming to international standards, and sets out principles on recognition and
measurement.
understand the key items contained within interim financial reports and the form of
those reports;
determine the current and comparative interim reporting periods required by IAS 34;
An interim financial report is defined as being a financial report containing either a complete
set of financial statements (as described in IAS 1 Presentation of financial statements) or a
set of condensed financial statements (as described in IAS 34) for an interim period.
[IAS 34.4]
An 'interim period' is any financial reporting period which is shorter than a full financial year.
[IAS 34.4]
IAS 34 does not set out which entities should be required to publish interim financial reports,
nor how frequently interim reports should be produced (thus while half-yearly or quarterly
interim reports are usual, any period of less than a year can be used) nor how soon after the
end of an interim period interim reports should be produced. However, the IASB encourages
publicly traded entities to prepare interim financial information in accordance with IAS 34. It
also encourages the preparation of interim reports at least at the end of the first half of a
financial year, with this information being presented within 60 days of end of this period.
However, where governments, or other regulators, require entities to publish interim financial
reports, then IAS 34 determines the nature and minimum content that should be included in
them.
4.2 Form
An entity may choose to publish a complete set of financial statements for an interim period.
Where a complete set of financial statements is prepared, it should be in accordance with IAS
1 rather than IAS 34 even if it is for an interim period. However, it is more likely that an entity
will choose to publish condensed information in its interim financial statements, as it is less
onerous to prepare. [IAS 34.9]
IAS 34 requires an entity to present both basic and fully diluted earnings per share (EPS)
figures, calculated for the interim period. [IAS 34.11]
Information presented and measured during an interim period is based on the facts for that
interim period. The overriding goal is for a user of the interim report to understand the
information that is presented within it on a stand alone basis.
The use of estimates is inherent in the preparation of all financial information, including that
contained in an interim report. Where an estimate made in an interim period changes
significantly in the following interim period, but no separate financial information has been
presented for the following interim period, an entity should explain this change in the full
financial statements. This additional disclosure is only required where the change is
significant, for example where the original assessment of a fall in the value of an asset has
changed due to the outcome of an event that happened in the remaining part of the financial
year. [IAS 34.26]
The explanatory information required to be presented in the notes to the interim financial
statements is set out below. [IAS 34.16]
In preparing an interim report an entity should apply the same accounting policies and
methods of computation that were followed and used for the preparation of its most
recent annual financial statements. This provides consistency of measurement and
presentation and assists comparability. An entity is required to disclose this fact
clearly in the interim report. Where it has been necessary to adopt a different policy or
method, for example following the publication of a new international standard, this
should be fully explained, providing a description of the nature and effect of the
change. Where an entity has changed its accounting policy during an interim period, it
should restate comparative interim period results in line with IAS 8 Accounting
policies, changes in accounting estimates and errors. [IAS 34.43]
Many businesses are seasonal in nature or go through cycles; for example, a retail
outlet selling ice-cream will make the majority of its sales during the summer months.
An interim period which only covers the winter months is likely to be very different to
one covering the summer months for such an entity. Information should therefore be
disclosed to explain this difference. In seasonal businesses an entity is encouraged to
present additional comparative information as well as that set out in Section 5 below.
[IAS 34.21]
If an entity’s interim financial reports have been prepared to comply with IAS 34, this fact
should be disclosed. [IAS 34.19]
Illustration 1
An entity has a 31 March financial year end, and is about to present its half-yearly interim
financial statements for the six months to 30 September 2007.
The relevant dates for which each interim financial statement needs to be prepared for the
current period and for the comparative period(s) are:
Statement of
comprehensive income: 30 September 2007 30 September 2006
6 months ending
Statement of changes in
equity:
6 months ending 30 September 2007 30 September 2006
Statement of cash flows:
6 months ending 30 September 2007 30 September 2006
the discrete approach: where each interim period stands alone as an independent
reporting period; or
the integral approach: where each interim period is seen as part of the larger
accounting year to which it belongs, where revenues and costs would be recognised
as a proportion of the annual totals.
In most circumstances IAS 34 requires the discrete approach, i.e. year-to-date basis. As a
result, the entity should apply the same accounting policies in its interim financial statements
as in its annual financial statements, making measurements for the interim period on a year-
to-date basis. This basis may result in a different measurement being used in the full financial
statements compared with that for the interim period, as a result of events that occur following
the interim period. [IAS 34.28]
Illustration 2
An entity’s accounting year ends on 31 December 2008, and it is currently preparing interim
financial statements for the half year to 30 June 2008.
The price of its products tends to vary. At 30 June 2008, it has inventories of 100,000 units, at
a cost per unit of CU1.40. The net realisable value of the inventories is CU1.20 per unit at 30
June 2008. The expected net realisable value of the inventories at 31 December 2008 is
CU1.55 per unit.
The value of the inventories in the interim financial statements at 30 June 2008 is the lower of
cost and NRV at 30 June 2008. This is:
The net realisable value at 31 December 2008 is only relevant to the financial statements for
the full year.
Revenues that are received, or costs that are incurred, only at certain points in time within a
financial year should not be spread over the full year by anticipating or deferring them; instead
they should be recognised as they become receivable or are incurred. As an example, if it is
appropriate to accrue a government grant throughout the year, then a consistent treatment
should be followed during the interim period. [IAS 34.37, 34.39]
Illustration 3
An entity’s accounting year ends on 31 December each year and it is currently preparing
interim financial statements for the half year to 30 June 2008. It has a contractual agreement
with its staff that it will pay them an annual bonus equal to 10% of their annual salary if the
full year’s output exceeds 1 million units. Budgeted output is 1.4 million units and the entity
has achieved budgeted output during the first six months of the year. Annual salaries are
estimated to be CU100 million, with the cost in the first half year to 30 June being CU45
million.
It is probable that the bonus will be paid, given that the actual output already achieved in the
year is in line with budgeted figures, which exceed the required level of output. So a bonus
of CU4.5 million should be recognised in the interim financial statements at 30 June 2008.
Illustration 4
An entity’s accounting year ends on 31 December 2008, and it is currently preparing interim
financial statements for the half year to 30 June 2008.
Its profit before tax for the 6 month period to 30 June 2008 is CU6 million. The business is
seasonal and the profit before tax for the six months to 31 December 2008 is almost certain
to be CU10 million. Income tax is calculated as 25% of reported annual profit before tax if it
does not exceed CU10 million. If annual profit before tax exceeds CU10 million the tax rate
on the whole amount is 30%.
The taxation charge in the interim financial statements is based upon the weighted average
rate for the year. In this case the entity’s tax rate for the year is expected to be 30%. The
taxation charge in the interim financial statements will be CU1.8 million.
The confusion arose because, while IAS 36 and IAS 39 are clear that impairments of goodwill
and these investments should not be reversed in a subsequent reporting period, IAS 34
states that measurement for interim reporting purposes is made on a year-to-date basis. IAS
34 also states that the frequency of an entity’s reporting should not affect measurements
made in its annual financial statements. Applying IAS 34 in isolation might therefore have led
to an impairment which existed at an interim period, but subsequently reversed at the year
end, being reversed in the full annual financial statements.
IAS 34 sets out a number of examples where different estimation methods are used in the
interim period compared with an entity’s financial year-end, for example:
8 Chapter Review
The key issues covered in this chapter deal with recognition, measurement and disclosure in
interim financial statements. IAS 34 does not require the preparation of interim financial
statements, but it does specify the minimum content of such reports where they are prepared
and the principles to be applied within them.