Political Secularism
Political Secularism
Fox's third central finding is his conclution on that one of the most
important factors driving the religion policy landscape is a clash between political
secularism and religious political actors what he calls the “secular religious
competition perspective.” Each country has people who believe that the state is
not secular enough, and people who believe the state is insufficiently religious.
When they act totry torealize their preferences, there ispol cal competition. Fox
call “political secularism” an ideology “advocating that religion ought to be
separate from all orsome aspects of politi or public life (or both)" . He does not
con- fuse that with people who are secular in their private lives, or with
secularizationas a societal process. Similarly, he is interested in political religious
aetors to the extent that they are trying to influence state policy. Fox recognizes
that state support for religion or hostility to religion (either in general or toward
specific religions) can have nonreligious motives. The tight linkages between
religion, culture, and ethnicy often mean that the purposes behind state policies
are not “purely” religious or secular. I say “amen” to that. Thinking that one can
isolate the “religious” factor from its lived expression in cultures made up of
people with ethnic, racial, and gendered identities as if they are all betas in a
multiple regression eguation is tempting but deeply misleading. Further, a
political secular outlook can urge state policy to be more involved with religion,
restricting and controlling it, or it can urge less involvement with religion a
complete withdrawal and neutrality.