Scribd
Upload
106 views

Questionnaire

This document contains surveys assessing the effectiveness and problems in implementing Republic Act 10054, which mandates the use of protective motorcycle helmets in the Philippines. Respondents were asked to rate statements about the law's aims and effectiveness on a scale from very effective to ineffective. They were also asked to rate problems in enforcing the law on a scale from very serious to not a problem. The document collects consent from participants and collects their demographic information such as age, gender, civil status, education level, and years of service or driving.

Uploaded by

Jaden Fate Salida
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
106 views

Questionnaire

This document contains surveys assessing the effectiveness and problems in implementing Republic Act 10054, which mandates the use of protective motorcycle helmets in the Philippines. Respondents were asked to rate statements about the law's aims and effectiveness on a scale from very effective to ineffective. They were also asked to rate problems in enforcing the law on a scale from very serious to not a problem. The document collects consent from participants and collects their demographic information such as age, gender, civil status, education level, and years of service or driving.

Uploaded by

Jaden Fate Salida
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Please respond to the following questions by placing a check mark (√) in the

answer box that corresponds to your response.

 VE-VERY EFFECTIVE
 E-EFFECTIVE
 FE-FAIRLY EFFECTIVE
 NE-NOT EFFECTIVE
 I-INEFFECTIVE
The Level of Effectiveness of the Implementation of R.A 10054 as Assessed by
the PNP-HPG/LTO personnel and Motorist
STATEMENT VE E FE NE I
1.R.A 10054 aims to protect motorcycle drivers, back-riders
as well as pedestrians from injuries and death cause by
accidents.
2.The R.A 10054 greatly reduce fatalities in road
accidents.
3.The law would also foster a sense of discipline in all
motorcycle riders.
4.It mandates that all motorcycle riders, including drivers
and back riders, shall wear standard protective motorcycle
helmets at all times while driving, whether long or short
drives, in any type of road and highway.

5. The law aims to secure the safety of motorist,


passengers, ad pedestrians through the mandatory
enforcement of the use of standard protective motorcycle
helmet.

 VS-VERY SERIOUS
 S-SERIOUS
 MS-MODERATE SERIOUS
 NS-NOT SERIOUS
 NAP-NOT A PROBLEM
Degree of problems encountered by the PNP-HPG/LTO Personnel and Motorist in the
implementation of R.A 10054
STATEMENT VS S MS NS NAP
1.Non cooperative on the part of motorist.
2.Some of the motorist cannot afford to buy helmet because
of their short income.
3.Unable to fine motorist because of motorists’ financial
difficulties.
4.Violators are seeking alternative routes to avoid the
PNP-HPG/LTO personnel.
5.Palakasan system to the apprehending PNP-HPG/LTO
personnel
6.Negative feedback on the performance of the PNP-HPG/LTO
Personnel.
7. Supervising style/ management style of the PNP-HPG/LTO
Personnel.
8.Lack of commitment of the PNP-HPG/LTO personnel in
performing their duties.
9. The PNP-HPG/LTO personnel were performing their duty
while under the influence of alcohol.
10.Impatience and low tolerance of PNP-HPG/LTO personnel to
the motorist.

Consent Form
Participant Understands

 I agree to participate in this study that I will be submitted in


partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Bachelor of
Science in Criminology.
 I understand that my participation is voluntary.
 I understand that all data collected will be used only for this
research.
 I understand that I will not identify by name in the final product.
 I am aware that all records will be kept confidential in the secure
possession of the researchers,
 I understand that I may withdraw from the study at any time with no
diverse repercussions.

Participant’s Full name: _________________________


Participant’s Signature: _________________________
Date Signed: _________________________

Please respond to the following questions by placing a checkmark (√) in


the answer box that corresponds to your response.
Profile of the respondents described in terms of:

1. Age 2. Gender 3. Civil Status


( ) 18-25 ( ) Male ( ) Single
( ) 26-30 ( )Female ( ) Married
( ) 31-35 ( ) Widowed
( ) 36-45 ( ) Separated
( ) 46 above

4.Highest Educational Attainment 5. Years in


Service/Driving
( ) College Graduate ( ) 6-11 months
( ) High School Graduate ( ) 1-5 years
( ) Elementary Graduate ( ) 6-10 years
( ) 11 years above
KALINGA COLLEGES OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Purok 05, provincial Road Bulanao Tabuk City
3800, Kalinga Province

“RA 10054: ITS IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPLICATION


TO THE DRIVERS’ SAFETY IN TABUK CITY”

GROUP 7

AMANGAN, JUDY ANN I.


DAWATON, JAYSON B.
LIGAD, ELMAR B.
LINGBAWAN, ALEX B.
SALIDA, JADEN FATE S.
SALINAS, HOMER P.
SUYAO GEORGE B.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy