Human Resource Management Organizational: It Has Been Suggested That This Article or Section Be With
Human Resource Management Organizational: It Has Been Suggested That This Article or Section Be With
Human Resource Management Organizational: It Has Been Suggested That This Article or Section Be With
Training: This activity is both focused upon, and evaluated against, the job
that an individual currently holds.[3]
Education: This activity focuses upon the jobs that an individual may
potentially hold in the future, and is evaluated against those jobs.[3]
Development: This activity focuses upon the activities that the
organization employing the individual, or that the individual is part of, may
partake in the future, and is almost impossible to evaluate.[3]
The "stakeholders" in training and development are categorized into several
classes. The sponsors of training and development are senior managers.
The clients of training and development are business planners. Line managers
are responsible for coaching, resources, and performance. The participants are
those who actually undergo the processes. The facilitators are Human Resource
Management staff. And the providers are specialists in the field. Each of these
groups has its own agenda and motivations, which sometimes conflict with the
agendas and motivations of the others.[4]
The conflicts are the best part of career consequences are those that take place
between employees and their bosses. The number one reason people leave their
jobs is conflict with their bosses. And yet, as author, workplace relationship
authority, and executive coach, Dr. John Hoover[5] points out, "Tempting as it is,
nobody ever enhanced his or her career by making the boss look
stupid." [1] Training an employee to get along well with authority and with people
who entertain diverse points of view is one of the best guarantees of long-term
success. Talent, knowledge, and skill alone won't compensate for a sour
relationship with a superior, peer, or customer.
[edit]