10 - Segismundo - Rate Currency
10 - Segismundo - Rate Currency
10 - Segismundo - Rate Currency
According to BSP data, the peso was valued at P16.70 per dollar
in 1984, before falling to P18.60 the following year.
The pace of economic growth has slowed. According to Penn
World Tables, while real GDP per capita growth averaged 3.5 percent
from 1951 to 1965, annual average growth was only 1.4 percent
during the Marcos regime (1966 to 1986). So, according to the Library
of Congress, how could the Philippines have surpassed Singapore,
which experienced "unprecedented economic growth" of 12.7 percent
of real GDP on average from 1965 to 1973? Following that, Singapore
experienced growth rates of 8-10 percent on a regular basis.
Wages for workers have plummeted. Between 1982 and 1986,
the real wages of unskilled laborers in Metro Manila fell by 5.8%
annually, while skilled laborers saw a 5.2 percent decline. According
to James K. Boyce, associate professor of economics at the University
of Massachusetts, in his book The Political Economy of Growth and
Impoverishment in the Marcos Era, agricultural wages declined at the
same rate.
The wealthy, on the other hand, became even wealthier.
According to Charles C. McDougald's book The Marcos File, the top
12.9 percent of Filipinos received 22.1 percent of total income in
1980, while the bottom 11 percent received only 16.6 percent. The
top 12.9 percent of earners received 45.5 percent of total income in
1983, while the bottom 11 percent received only 6.4 percent. The
poor became even poorer.
The national debt has risen dramatically. When Marcos became
president in 1966, the official peso-dollar exchange rate was P3.90 to
the dollar. In 1986, it was P20.53 to the dollar. According to Boyce,
the Philippines' foreign debt increased from $360 million in 1962 to
$28.3 billion in 1986. As a result, Marcos contributed more than half
of the country's current $53 billion external debt. It is now costing our
government over 40% of its budget in debt service, forcing the Aquino
II administration to reduce budgetary allocations for essential
services such as education, health, and infrastructure.
The insurgency grew in strength. “. . . The longer Marcos' excesses
went on, the faster the Communist insurgency spread, according to
US foreign policy experts. . . As a result, his wastefulness, corruption,
and repression posed a threat to America's strategic interests,"
Karnow explained. Not only did the Communist insurgency grow
stronger, but a Muslim insurgency also erupted, forcing the Marcos
government to sign the humiliating Tripoli Agreement, which granted
concessions to the Moro National Liberation Front after a protracted
war.
Hunger was spreading. "In the 1950s, Filipinos were probably the
best fed in Asia; now [during the Marcos era], Indians, Indonesians,
and possibly Bangladeshis were eating better than they were."
Malnutrition was responsible for 40 percent of all deaths in the
country. In the Philippines, infant mortality was nearly twice as high
as in South Korea" (Raymond Bonner, Waltzing With A Dictator: The
Marcoses and the Making of American Policy, 1978.)
Marcos allegedly stole $30 billion from the economy, foreign aid,
private investors, and government revenues, according to some
estimates. Under the pseudonyms of President Marcos and Imelda
Marcos, $450 million was discovered stashed in a Swiss bank.
Millions more were discovered in US properties, which were
monetized by private lawyers and US courts, and are now being
distributed to martial law victims. The ramifications of the Marcos
legacy of corruption are still being felt.
By all economic, political, social, and moral standards, the Marcos
administration's 20-year reign from 1966 to 1986 was a complete
disaster for the country. It demonstrated unequivocally that
dictatorship is not the path to progress, a lesson that the Arab
nations are currently learning. It created a vast fortune for the Marcos
family, which now funds a flourishing political dynasty that could run
for president again in six years.
THE END
THAT’S ALL
AND
THANK YOU!
REFERENCES:
Almario, M. F., Detainee, M. L., Spokesman, & Movement for Truth in History. (2011, February 27).
The dismal record of the marcos regime. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/other-
sections/letters-to-the-editor/2011/02/27/660957/dismal-record-marcos-regime
Biography.com Editors. (2014, April 2). Ferdinand marcos. Biography.
https://www.biography.com/dictator/ferdinand-marcos
-, J. L. R., By, -, Rousselhttps://tbhabitat.com, J. L., & Roussel, J. L. (2021, September 30). Vera
files fact check: Article on 'revised history books' against Marcoses makes false claims. TB
Habitat. Retrieved December 17, 2021, https://verafiles.org/articles/vera-files-fact-check-
post-revised-history-books-against-mar