President Election Process Notes
President Election Process Notes
President Election Process Notes
The entire conduct of the Presidential election is held under the watchful eye of the Election
Commission of India, which has the following responsibilities:
Preparation of the electoral roll.
Planning and execution of the electoral process.
Ensuring that the election is conducted in a free and fair manner.
Calculation of votes and declaration of the winning candidate.
An indirect election, on the other hand, is a process in which the ultimate voters (i.e. the
citizens) don’t get to choose the candidate, but rather choose electors who will subsequently
make the decision for them.
Elected members:
These are legislators that have been chosen after undergoing the process of an election. In
the case of the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies, this refers to individuals who
have become members as a result of the general elections and state legislative elections,
respectively, and in the case of the Rajya Sabha it refers to individuals who have become MPs
after an election has been held in their relevant State Assemblies.
Nominated members:
These are legislators that are appointed to their post by the President or Governor (as the
case may be) without undergoing an electoral process. Nominated members include the
following:
Are legislators from Union Territories eligible to be part of the electoral college?
As a result of the 70th Amendment Act to the Indian Constitution, elected Legislative
Assembly members of the Union Territories of Delhi and Puducherry are also to be included
in the electoral college. The other UTs do not have a Legislative Assembly.
Given that the national parliament as well as the state legislatures participate in this electoral
process, the formula calculating the weightage of votes is based on two fundamental
principles:
Uniformity
The formula aims to secure uniformity in the scale of representation of all the different States
in the country, to emphasize the equivalent status of all States despite the differences in their
size, population, or other characteristics.
The formula provides for different methods of computing the vote weightage for MPs and
MLAs.
The formula for calculating the vote share of an MLA can be represented as follows:
Calculation Note:
Calculations that end in fractions exceeding 1/2 will be rounded up to the nearest whole
number, whereas fractions of less than 1/2 will be rounded down.
The way this formula operates can be better illustrated through the following hypothetical
example of the State of Andhra Pradesh:
Step 1: -
294×1000 = 2,94,000
EMAIL:- DEEPAKCHAUHAN5893@GAMIL.COM MOBILE:-8750356062
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA NOTES
Step 2: -
4,35,02,708/2,94,000 = 147.968
Step 3: -
Given the fact that the result of step 2 is a decimal number, and the decimal part is a fraction
greater than 1/2 (or, in other words, more than .5), the number will be rounded up to the
nearest whole number, giving us the value of 148.
It can be deduced from this formula that the value of an MP’s vote is directly dependent on
the vote value of all MLAs. The following steps will be required in order to get the final value:
For instance, if the value of the vote of an MLA from Andhra Pradesh is 148 and there are
294 elected MLAs, then the total vote share of Andhra Pradesh will be 148×294 = 43,512
Repeat this process for each state and then add up all the total vote shares of each state to
find the sum of vote value of elected members of all the Legislative Assemblies.
Step 2: -
Divide the grand total value found in Step 1 with the total number of elected members in
both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha (543+233 = 776). The resulting number will be value of
the vote held by every MP.
As can be seen from everything detailed above, the “voting power” of each elector varies
depending on whether they belong to the Union or the State legislature, or which State they
belong to in the latter case.
In order to secure one’s Presidential candidature and contest the elections, the interested
individual has to complete a few specific procedural tasks, aside from filling out the requisite
paperwork and declarations:
Securing nominations
To be eligible for the electoral process, a candidate must get his nomination papers signed
by 50 electors as proposers as well as 50 electors as seconders.
System of Election
The election of the President of India is achieved through the system of proportional
representation by single transferable vote.
The value of votes a contesting candidate gets in the first round is determined in the
following way:
Number of ballots on which candidate is first preference X Value of vote which each ballot
paper of a member (MP or MLA) represents.
If the election took place under the rules of the first-past-the-post system, then figuring out
the winning candidate would have been quite straightforward – the candidate with the most
number of votes, no matter by how small a margin, would be elected President. However,
under the proportional representation by single transferable vote system, it is not
necessary that the election will be completed in a single round.
In fact, there are a number of different ways the electoral process could pan out, depending
on the total value of votes each candidate obtains in the first round.
To understand this process better, assume that the total value of all votes in an electoral
college is 200.
Scenario A
FIRST ROUND OF COUNTING
If the breakup of the votes polled ends up the way described above, then Candidate B will
be declared the winner.
Scenario B
However, what if after the first round of counting, no clear winner emerges?
Given that nobody managed to reach the necessary quota of 101 votes, there will be a need
to rely on subsequent rounds of counting.
The returning officer will exclude the candidate with the lowest number of first preference
votes, which in this case is Candidate D. The 23 votes obtained by candidate D will be
distributed amongst the remaining candidates.
This is where the preferences of each elector become relevant. Those 23 votes which
originally belonged to D will be distributed among the remaining candidates keeping in mind
the second preference of each elector.
As can be observed here, even after distributing the vote shares of the eliminated candidate,
none of the remaining candidates have managed to reach the winning quota. Therefore, the
process of elimination will have to be undertaken once again.
Now it can be seen that Candidate A has the lowest tallied votes. As a result, the number of
votes he has gotten will be distributed among the remaining candidates.
Important note:
It must be remembered that in the first round of distribution, one of Candidate D’s original
vote shares had labelled Candidate A as the second preference. Therefore, when distributing
that particular vote share, the returning officer will look at the third preference. The rest of
the votes being distributed have A marked as the first preference, therefore the returning
officer will look at the second preference marked and allots them accordingly (except for
cases where the second preference is a candidate who has already been eliminated, in which
case the returning officer will look at the third preference).
Given that Candidate B has attained the winning quota after the third round of counting, he
shall be declared the winner of the Presidential Election.