Chapter 1 What Is Organizational Behavior?
Chapter 1 What Is Organizational Behavior?
Chapter 1 What Is Organizational Behavior?
Meenakshi Dave
Div.- B Roll no. 21
• Manager: Someone who gets things done through other people in organizations.
• Organization: A consciously coordinated social unit composed of two or more people that
functions on a relatively continuous basis to achieve a common goal or set of goals.
– Planning, organizing, leading, and controlling.
• Mintzberg concluded that managers perform ten different, highly interrelated roles or sets
of behaviors attributable to their jobs.
Category Roles
Figurehead
Leader
Interpersonal Liaison
Monitor
Disseminator
Informational Spokesperson
Entrepreneur
Disturbance Handler
Resource Allocator
Decisional Negotiator
• Hidden Disabilities
▪ Sensory disabilities, chronic illness or pain, cognitive or learning
impairments, sleep disorders, and psychological challenges.
▪ U.S. organizations must accommodate employees with a very broad range
of impairments.
– Tenure
▪ Tenure is a good predictor of employee productivity.
▪ Tenure and job performance are positively related.
– Religion
▪ U.S. law prohibits discrimination based on religion, but it is still an issue,
especially for Muslims.
– Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
▪ Federal law does not protect employees against discrimination based on
sexual orientation, though many states and municipalities do.
▪ Many Fortune 500 companies have policies covering sexual orientation and
about half now have policies on gender identity.
– Cultural Identity
▪ Need to accommodate and respect individual cultural identities.
Affects: Defined as a broad range of feelings that people experience. Affect can be experienced in
the form of emotions or moods.
Emotions:
• Caused by specific event
• Very brief in duration (seconds or minutes)
• Specific and numerous in nature (many specific emotions such as anger, fear, sadness,
happiness, disgust, surprise)
• Usually accompanied by distinct
• facial expressions
• Action-oriented in nature
Moods
• Cause is often general and unclear
• Last longer than emotions (hours or days)
• More general (two main dimensions - positive affect and negative affect - that are
composed of multiple specific emotions)
• Generally, not indicated by distinct expressions
• Cognitive in nature
Personality
Time of Day
Day of the week
Weather
Stress
Social Activities
Sleep
Exercise
Age
Sex
Emotions and moods are similar because both are affective in nature. But they’re
also, different—moods are more general and less contextual than emotions. The
time of day, stressful events, and sleep patterns are some of the factors that influence emotions
and moods. OB research on emotional labor, affective events theory, emotional intelligence, and
emotion regulation helps us understand how people deal with emotions. Emotions and moods
have proven relevant for virtually every OB topic we study, with implications for managerial
practices.
Implications for Managers
• Recognize that emotions are a natural part of the workplace, and good management does
not mean creating an emotion-free environment.
• Provide positive feedback to increase the positivity of employees. Of course, it also helps to
hire people who are predisposed to positive moods.
• In the service sector, encourage positive displays of emotion, which make customers feel
more positive and thus improve customer service interactions and negotiations.
• Understand the role of emotions and moods to significantly improve your ability to explain
and predict your co-workers’ and others’ behavior.
Chapter 4: Attitude and Job Satisfaction
Attitude: Attitudes are learned predispositions towards aspects of our environment. They may be
positive or negative directed towards certain people, service or institutions.
Attitude can be precisely defined as a persistent tendency to feel and behave in a particular way
towards some objects, persons or events.
Components of attitude:
Affective = feeling
Behavioral = Action
Cognitive = evaluation
Job Satisfaction:
It is a positive attitude towards one’s job. It is defined as a pleasurable or positive emotional state
resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experience.
supportive
colleagues
Nature of
Working work
conditions
Job
satisfaction
On performance:
In the long run job satisfaction leads to increased productivity
On absenteeism:
There is inverse relationship. When satisfaction is high, absenteeism tends to be lower and vice
versa
On turnover:
Inverse relationship at moderate level.
Employees with high job satisfaction tend to have better mental health and physical health.
They learn new job-related tasks more easily and quickly
They commit less mistakes including on the job accidents
They have and file less grievances about the job and the management
Last but not the least, the satisfied employees tend to evince prosocial attitude towards their
coworkers and customers.
Job dissatisfaction:
Though job dissatisfaction can be expressed in a number of ways on an overall basis job
dissatisfaction reflects the employees negative or unfavorable feelings towards their jobs.
The following section examines the most important of them:
Constructive Destructive
Active voice Exit
passive loyalty neglect
Personality:
It can be defined as the sum total of ways in which an individual reacts and interacts with others
and environment. In other words, personality is an organized behavior of an individual to react to
a given stimulus in a set manner.
Less important
Strong oral communication
Teamwork
Flexibility/adaptability
Enthusiasm
Listening skills
Weaknesses of any self-report personality instrument (both the MBTI and FFM).
Each of us has blind spots. Sometimes we do not see ourselves as others do. In other words, we
can sometimes engage in unconscious denial.
Then, in certain contexts (such as an employment selection context), we can intentionally mis-
characterize who we are in order to “curry favour.” In other words, people can and do lie with self-
report inventories. The 16PF includes what are called “validity scales” to inform whether or not
the person was misrepresenting himself/herself when answering the questions. The NEO-PI-
R does NOT include such validity scales. Most Five Factor Model inventories, like the NEO-PI-R, do
not include validity scales.
.
Chapter 6: Perception and decision making
• It is important to the study of OB because people’s behaviours are based on their perception
of what reality is, not on reality itself.
• Attribution theory suggests that when we observe an individual’s behaviour, we attempt to
determine whether it was internally or externally caused.
• Self-serving bias
o Individuals attribute their own successes to internal factors.
• Common Shortcuts in Judging Others
o Selective perception
▪ Any characteristic that makes a person, object, or event stand out will
increase the probability that it will be perceived.
▪ Since we can’t observe everything going on around us, we engage in selective
perception.
• Halo effect
o The halo effect occurs when we draw a general impression based on a single
characteristic.
• Contrast effects
• We do not evaluate a person in isolation.
• Our reaction to one person is influenced by other persons we have recently
encountered.
• Stereotyping
o Judging someone based on one’s perception of the group to which that person
belongs.
▪ We have to monitor ourselves to make sure we’re not unfairly applying a
stereotype in our evaluations and decisions.
• Applications of Shortcuts in Organizations
o Employment Interview
▪ Evidence indicates that interviewers make perceptual judgments that are
often inaccurate.
▪ Interviewers generally draw early impressions that become very
quickly entrenched.
▪ Studies indicate that most interviewers’ decisions change very little
after the first four or five minutes of the interview.
• Performance Expectations
o Evidence demonstrates that people will attempt to validate their perceptions of
reality, even when those perceptions are faulty.
▪ Self-fulfilling prophecy, or the Pygmalion effect, characterizes the fact that
people’s expectations determine their behaviour.
▪ Expectations become reality.
• Performance Evaluation
o An employee’s performance appraisal is very much dependent upon the perceptual
process.
▪ Many jobs are evaluated in subjective terms.
▪ Subjective measures are problematic because of selective perception,
contrast effects, halo effects, and so on.
Most decisions in the real world don’t follow the rational model.
• Bounded Rationality
o Most people respond to a complex problem by reducing it to a level at which it can
be readily understood.
▪ People satisfice – they seek solutions that are satisfactory and sufficient.
• Individuals operate within the confines of bounded rationality.
▪ They construct simplified models that extract the essential features.
• Intuition
o Intuitive decision making occurs outside conscious thought; it relies on holistic
associations, or links between disparate pieces of information, is fast, and is
affectively charged, meaning it usually engages the emotions.
o The key is neither to abandon nor rely solely on intuition, but to supplement it with
evidence and good judgment.
• Reducing Biases and Errors
• Focus on Goals. Without goals, you can’t be rational, you don’t know what information you
need, you don’t know which information is relevant and which is irrelevant, you’ll find it
difficult to choose between alternatives, and you’re far more likely to experience regret
over the choices you make. Clear goals make decision making easier and help you eliminate
options that are inconsistent with your interests.
• Look for Information That Disconfirms Your Beliefs. One of the most effective means for
counteracting overconfidence and the confirmation and hindsight biases is to actively look
for information that contradicts your beliefs and assumptions. When we overtly consider
various ways, we could be wrong, we challenge our tendencies to think we’re smarter than
we actually are.
•
Don’t Try to Create Meaning out of Random Events. The educated mind has been trained
to look for cause-and-effect relationships. When something happens, we ask why. And
when we can’t find reasons, we often invent them. You have to accept that there are
events in life that are outside your control. Ask yourself if patterns can be meaningfully
explained or whether they are merely coincidence. Don’t attempt to create meaning out of
coincidence.
• Increase Your Options. No matter how many options you’ve identified, your final choice
can be no better than the best of the option set you’ve selected. This argues for increasing
your decision alternatives and for using creativity in developing a wide range of diverse
choices. The more alternatives you can generate, and the more diverse those alternatives,
the greater your chance of finding an outstanding one.
• Common Biases and Errors in Decision Making
• Availability Bias: tendency for people to base judgments on information that is readily
available.
• Escalation of Commitment: staying with a decision even when there is clear evidence that
it’s wrong.
o Likely to occur when individuals view themselves as responsible for the outcome.
• Randomness Error: our tendency to believe we can predict the outcome of random events.
o Decision making becomes impaired when we try to create meaning out of random
events.
• Risk Aversion: the tendency to prefer a sure thing instead of a risky outcome.
o Ambitious people with power that can be taken away appear to be especially risk
averse.
o People will more likely engage in risk-seeking behaviour for negative outcomes, and
risk-averse behaviour for positive outcomes, when under stress.
• Hindsight Bias: the tendency to believe falsely that one has accurately predicted the
outcome of an event, after that outcome is actually known.
• Utilitarianism: decisions are made solely on the basis of their outcomes or consequences.
• Focus on rights: calls on individuals to make decisions consistent with fundamental liberties
and privileges as set forth in documents such as the Bill of Rights.
o Protects whistle-blowers.
• Impose and enforce rules fairly and impartially to ensure justice or an equitable distribution
of benefits and costs.
• Behavioural ethics: an area of study that analyzes how people behave when confronted
with ethical dilemmas.
o Individuals do not always follow ethical standards promulgated by their
organizations, and we sometimes violate our own standards.
o There are ways to increase ethical decision making in organizations.
o Consider cultural differences.
• Lying
o One of the top unethical activities we may indulge in daily.
o It undermines all efforts toward sound decision making.
• Managers—and organizations—simply cannot make good decisions when facts are
misrepresented and people give false motives for their behaviours.
• Lying is a big ethical problem as well.
• Creativity is the ability to produce novel and useful ideas.
o These are ideas that are different from what has been done before, but that are
also appropriate to the problem.
• Make better decisions by recognizing perceptual biases and decision-making errors we tend
to commit. Learning about these problems doesn’t always prevent us from making mistakes,
but it does help.
• Adjust your decision-making approach to the national culture you’re operating in and to
the criteria your organization values. If you’re in a country that doesn’t value rationality,
don’t feel compelled to follow the rational decision-making model or to try to make your
decisions appear rational. Adjust your decision approach to ensure compatibility with the
organizational culture.
• Combine rational analysis with intuition. These are not conflicting approaches to decision
making. By using both, you can improve your decision-making effectiveness.
• Try to enhance your creativity. Actively look for novel solutions to problems, attempt to
see problems in new ways, use analogies, and hire creative talent. Try to remove work and
organizational barriers that might impede your creativity.