Microbial Spoilage
Microbial Spoilage
net/publication/311333187
CITATIONS READS
15 859
2 authors, including:
Khadija Fouad
Appalachian State University
5 PUBLICATIONS 45 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Novel method for teaching the difference and relationship between scientific theories and laws View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Khadija Fouad on 05 June 2017.
Two food poisoning outbreaks related to tofu have appropriate dilutions were made in PBS, and aerobic and anaero-
been reported. Yersinia enterocolitica was implicated in bic counts performed, as described above. A sample was prepared
one outbreak (3) and Shigella sonnei in the other (8). The for a total direct cell count by adding 0.04 ml glutaraldehyde
ability of foodborne pathogens to grow and produce toxins (50% weight to weight, Fisher), 0.001 ml 4'6-diamidino-2-
phenylindole (DAPI) (1 mg/ml), and 0.001 ml Triton X-100 to
in tofu has also been evaluated (7).
0.96 ml of tofu homogenate diluted 1:1 in PBS. A total direct cell
The object of the present project was to determine some count using a Petroff-Hauser cell counter was performed using
of the organisms that cause spoilage of tofu. It was also to epifluorescence microscopy with optics as described by Porter and
ascertain at what point these organisms are introduced during Feig (11).
the manufacturing process. In addition, the microbial quality
of the commercial tofu product used was evaluated. Taxonomy
For the experiment concerning tofu of differing ages all
MATERIALS AND METHODS gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic bacteria were classified
using the Enterotube IIR or OxifermR tube identification systems.
Tofu Other strains were characterized using established methods, as
Tofu samples used in all experiments were obtained from a described in Holt (6). All tests were performed as described by
nearby soyfood company. Their method of tofu production is as Smiebert and Krieg (15), except the DNAase test, described by
follows: 6.8 kg dry weight of yellow soybeans is placed in a large Difco (2).
plastic barrel. To wash the beans, the barrel is filled with water, Strains obtained during manufacture of tofu were classified
stirred, and drained. The beans are soaked in water from between as described above, except that rather than using prepared testing
8 h in the summer to 12 h in the winter, which increases the systems, the tests were prepared by us and then were keyed
volume of the beans 2 1/4 to 3 times. Soaked beans are put in to according to the material provided with the prepared tests. A test
a hopper to drain the water and then are rinsed in running water. for the presence of Escherichia coli was performed on all
The beans are ground into meal in a grinder. The ground beans are samples according to established methods by Mehlman and
cooked in a steam pressure cooker which starts at 54.4-60°C and Andrews (9).
finishes at 102-103CC and 0.68 atm after about 15 min. The slurry
is drained out through a valve into two filter bags, one coarse, one Sampling during tofu manufacture
fine. A hydraulic press extrudes milk into a large plastic barrel. Samples were taken at different stages during the production
This yields 121-127 L of milk and 13.6-18 kg okara. The milk of a single batch of tofu. All samples were placed in sterile
temperature is about 93CC and is reduced to 76.7-82.2°C. In WhirlpakR bags (NASCO) which were stored until use at <7CC.
summer, a fan blowing across the surface of the milk is used to A collection control was made by opening one of the bags in the
speed cooling. The tofu samples from different aged lots were factory, leaving it open long enough to have put a sample into it,
prepared during the winter months. The sampling during tofu and then closing it and storing it with the other samples. A bag of
manufacture was performed during the summer. Approximately tapwater served as a temperature control. All samples were plated
250 g calcium sulfate is added. The mixture is stirred, then left within 36 h.
to set about 10 min. It is periodically "lifted" with a paddle for The samples taken and the method used to prepare them for
15-20 min to cause the curds to drop. The yield is about half dilutions and plate counts were as follows: 5 g of raw beans was
curds, or tofu, and half whey, or leftover liquid from the soymilk. washed in 5 ml of PBS by manually rubbing the beans in the
Whey is removed by siphoning and dipping. Curds are put into a sampling bag, and this wash was used. Then, 10 ml of PBS were
pressing form lined with cheesecloth and then are covered with added to 15 ml of the two washed bean samples. These were
cheesecloth. A pressing board is placed on top and weighted with agitated by hand and the wash was used. The go and okara
large jugs of water for 15-30 min. The warm tofu is sliced into samples were diluted 1:1 in PBS, and then the liquid portions were
blocks. The tofu blocks are placed in ice water and cooled to diluted and plated. The soymilk, whey, and cooling water were
15.6°C. They are then weighed, packaged, and stored at 2-3°C. diluted and plated without prior treatment. The calcium sulfate
powder was suspended in PBS in a 1:1 weight/volume ratio and
Tofu of different ages the suspension was used undiluted. The sample taken just after the
Tofu samples were held at 2-3°C by the manufacture until coagulant was added to the soymilk and stirred was homogenized.
they were brought to the laboratory. Samples were 1, 30, 37, 62, The trim from the freshly pressed cakes and the sample from the
and 101 d old. Tofu cakes from each sample were homogenized final packaged product were diluted 1:1 with PBS and homog-
in an equal volume of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (75), enized. The sample control bag and a sample of the packaging
diluted in PBS, and 0.1 ml of 103, 105, and 10"7 dilutions were were rinsed with 5 and 9 ml, respectively, of PBS, and this wash
plated on trypticase soy agar (TSA). Some of the liquid from each was plated undiluted.
sample was used as an inoculum for streak plates. Plates were All samples were plated on TSA and incubated both aerobi-
incubated both aerobically and anaerobically at room temperature cally and anaerobically at 25°C. Plate counts were performed after
for 4 d. BBL GasPakR anaerobic systems were used for anaerobic 4 d. Plates were examined and samples of each and every colony
incubations. After counting, well-isolated colonies of the most type observed in each sample were counted, transferred, purified,
common colony types were picked from the 10~5 or 10"7 plates. and identified.
These were incubated at 30°C, except for a few strains which
failed to grow at 30°C and were incubated at 20°C. All strains Introduction of spoilage organisms into sterile tofu
were purified by streak plating. Strains incubated in anaerobic jars Samples of tofu obtained within 24 h of manufacture were
during isolation were incubated in anaerobic jars during purifica- cut into chunks of 40 + 4 g .and then autoclaved in side-arm flasks
tion. All strains found to be facultative anaerobes upon purifica- containing 250 ml water. Bacterial strains isolated from the tofu
tion were subsequently maintained aerobically. of differing ages were chosen arbitrarily and then grown in
Trypticase soy broth to density of 15 to 20 Klett units [red (#66)
Total direct cell counts filter, Klett-Summerson photoelectric colorimeter], which is about
A package of tofu was purchased from a retail outlet 18 d 108 CFU/ml. In order to put about 107 CFU/g into each block of
after manufacture. A sample from the tofu was homogenized, tofu, 0.1 ml of this cell suspension per g of tofu was injected into
MICROBIAL SPOILAGE OF TOFU 159
the middle of each block of tofu using a glass pipet. The flasks
were aseptically sealed with sterile rubber stoppers, covered with
aluminum foil, and then incubated at 5°C until the end of the
period indicated by the manufacturer's pull date (23 d). The
organisms present at the end of the spoilage experiment were
examined microscopically, macroscopically, and biochemically
for purity and for identity with the starting organisms. Samples
were diluted in PBS and plated as before. Due to the change in
texture of the tofu caused by autoclaving, it was not possible to
homogenize the tofu cakes completely. Tofu cakes were ground
by placing them in a sterile Waring Blender cup with sufficient
1 3037 62 101
PBS to make a 10' dilution, and then blending them three times
for a few seconds each time. This produced a suspension of finer, Age of tofu (days)
sand-sized chunks which were diluted and plated. Both the sus- Figure 2. Bacterial counts of tofu of differing ages. Hatched bars
pension of the cakes and liquid surrounding the tofu were exam- represent aerobic plate counts. Solid bars represent anaerobic
ined microscopically. Plates were incubated at room temperature plate counts.
for 3 d prior to counting.
The amount of protein in the liquid surrounding the tofu was TABLE 1. Major organisms isolated from tofu of differing ages.
determined by biuret test. Readings were made on a Beckman
spectrophotometer, Model 2400, at 530 nm. The pH readings of Organism Tofu age (days)
the tofu cakes were taken at a distance of about 2 cm from the site 1 30 37 62 101
where the bacteria were originally injected into the cake.
To determine the amount of ammonia released into liquid Lactic acid bacteria
surrounding tofu, measurements were performed in a Klett- Lactobacillus X X X X
Summerson photoelectric colorimeter using a green filter (No. Lactic Streptococcus X X X X
54). Samples were prepared by putting 2 ml of the liquid sur-
rounding the tofu cake into a screw-capped tube, then adding 8 ml Pseudomonas
distilled water and 1 ml Nessler's reagent (15). The sample was Pseudomonas cepacia X X X
mixed by inversion and then inserted into the colorimeter to be Pseudomonas fluorescens X
read. The blank was prepared with 10 ml distilled water and 1 ml Pseudomonas putida X X
reagent. A standard curve was prepared in the same manner by Pseudomonas stutzeri X
using solutions containing a known amount of ammonia, added in Pseudomonas vesicularis X
the form of ammonium chloride (NH4CI), in place of the liquid
from the tofu. Enteric bacteria
Citrobacter freundii x
RESULTS Enterobacter agglomerans x x
Klebsiella pneumoniae X
In tofu from lots of different ages, the pH declined Serratia liquefaciens X X X X X
with increasing tofu age (Fig. 1). The 1- and 30-d aerobic
counts were approximately 106 CFU/g. The older samples Streptococci
had counts of about 108 CFU/g. The anaerobic count was Enterococcus
highest at 30 d at 1.25 x 10" CFU/g, then declined to 9 x
Others
107 CFU/g at 62 d (Fig. 2). The major flora differed in tofu
Staphylococcus epidermidis
of different ages (Table 1). Serratia liquefaciens is the only Rods, gram +, catalase +,
major organism which was found in all age lots. Lactoba- Non-sporeforming
cillus spp. were a major species in all age lots except the
30-d lot. Lactic Streptococcus spp. were major species in the group as a whole was represented by at least one major
all lots except the 101-d lot. Enterococcus spp. were major species in each lot. The other types of bacteria were major
species in all lots except the 1-d-old lot. Although no species in only some of the lots. No attempt was made to
Pseudomonas spp. appeared as a major species in all lots, determine the exact number of the major species found in
each age lot, but each was present in amounts of at least 105
CFU/g.
A total direct cell count performed on a batch of tofu
showed 1.6 x 108 CFU/g of tofu. Aerobic and anaerobic
counts performed on the same batch of tofu were 1.26 x 108
CFU/g and 1.07 x 108 CFU/g, respectively. Of the total,
o 79% were detected by the aerobic plate count and 67% by
X the anaerobic plate count.
Total aerobic and anaerobic counts of organisms found
in samples taken during the manufacture of tofu are shown
in Fig. 3. Organisms originally present on the beans multi-
30 37 101
plied during the time the beans were soaked. Grinding and
Age of tofu (doys) cooking the beans decreased counts of organisms by one
Figure 1. Change in pH of tofu with age. log unit. The lowest numbers were found in the samples
DISCUSSION
10* - r
10«- —>
1o'-
10»-
10»-
J
104- => E
101- u .2
1ft*-
10'-
iaM
20 25 27
21
10'
10*-
10"-
E°.|
10»-
10'-
wo »
10*
12 456 16 21 23 25
t 21 27
24 26
10'
io-H
10'-
10*-
1
10»-
10*-
10-
10*
I
io'H
10*
567 9 14 17 23 26
10 15
10'
11
10-
io'H
10*
10»
10*
10*
10*
io'H
io-
I
2 56789
It
**£
"I o
u
23456 17 19 21 25
20 22
JI
i 1 3 567 1 13
12
17 19 22
23
26
27
SSJJLi T °{ nanisms found during the manufacture of tofu. Bars are numbered as follows: 1 = Lactobacillus, 2 = lactic
v S a r i . s ' Y ^ ° m ° n a S h y d r ° P h l V = ^vobacterium sp., 5 = Pseudomonas cepacia, 6 = Pseudomonas putida, 7 = Pseudomonas
S K - P ^ S S r / i / = * ? ? ° b ? , C t e r freundu; 7 0 = c i t r o b a c t e r freundii or Enterobacter agglomerans, 11 = Enterobacter
E n t e r n r ™ 7n % / ^ ^ " Klebsiella ozaenae, 14 = Serratia liquefaciens, 15 = Serratia rubidea, 16 = Shigella boydii, 17 =
Enterococcus:sp 18 = oral Streptococcus, 79 = Staphylococcus sp., 20 = aerobic coccus, 21 = faculatative coccus, 22 = Actinomyces
§ P
Tnnr/fn7Jno?T T ' TU = aC) US * P - 2 ^ f0*' ?""""' «*"*««-. 2 6 = rods, Sram-, oxidases, 27 = rods, gram+, catalase+, non-
sporeforming, 28 = fungi. The sampling control (not shown) had 50 CFU/ml each of Bacillus sp. and fungi
a
For all tests, n = 1.
pH Water 1.00
pH Cake 0.94 1.00
Protein mg/ml 0.19 0.10 1.00
NH 4 mg/ml -0.65 -0.48 -0.28 1.00
CFU cake -0.22 -0.49 0.20 -0.06 1.00
CFU water 0.43 0.40 0.30 -0.38 0.27 1.00
O.D. -0.87 -0.88 0.03 0.39 0.56 0.02 1.00
Odor 0.16 0.12 0.06 -0.37 0.46 0.88 0.30 1.00
Texture 0.22 0.03 -0.02 -0.62 0.65 0.48 0.15 0.75 1.00
actually present in a cake of tofu. For instance, the lactic bacteria during processing of the samples prior to plating,
Streptococcus used in the spoilage experiment did not grow and to presence of nonviable cells in the sample.
well on TSA or Trypticase soy broth. However, it grew All of the organisms tested in the present work pro-
well in the tofu itself; it was one of the major species found duced changes in tofu which are consistent with normal
in the tofu samples from different age lots. It also grew well spoilage. That is, they altered the smell or texture of tofu,
in autoclaved tofu. Some species, such as Clostridium or lowered its pH, or both. This evidence lends support to
perfringens, that can grow in tofu cannot grow on TSA (L. the idea that organisms found in the older age lots of tofu
S. McClung, personal communication), although it is not are indeed responsible for spoilage. Not all organisms
known if this organism is actually found in tofu. responsible for spoilage were among the major species
Some strict anaerobes which could conceivably grow present in the 1-d-old tofu sample. One possible explana-
in anaerobic microenvironments in tofu may not have been tion for this is that, in the selective environment of pack-
detected by the anaerobic techniques used here. Any anaer- aged tofu, some organisms initially present in low numbers
obes detected using this system would have to be aerotolerant grow to become abundant. An alternative explanation is
in order to survive handling and the lag time before anaero- that the initial flora differed among different lots and,
biosis occurring in the anaerobic jar. C. perfringens and therefore, these organisms were simply not present in the 1-
Clostridium sporogenes strains were capable of growth d-old lot. Since none of the species present only in small
under these conditions on appropriate media (data not numbers were characterized, it is not possible to decide
shown), but more research is needed in order to determine between these two alternatives. Another possibility is that
whether other anaerobes which might be present in tofu part of the initial flora was missed due to sampling error.
would be detected under these conditions. A visit was made to a tofu manufacturer to attempt to
The comparison between direct cell count of a sample determine where and how spoilage organisms enter tofu. A
and counts obtained by plating the sample showed that the reasonable assumption is that they come from the soybeans.
majority of organisms present in tofu are detectable by The beans did indeed have high bacterial counts, but none
plating them on TSA, aerobically and in anaerobic jars. of the spoilage organisms were found on the raw beans.
Since aerobic plate counts were one-fifth lower, and anaero- Beans that had been soaked overnight, then had the excess
bic plate counts one-third lower than direct cell counts, it is water drained off and were washed once again in tap water,
probable that some types of organisms were missed en- yielded a wide variety of organisms, including all organ-
tirely, and that other methods would be needed to detect isms which tested positive for their ability to spoil tofu.
them. Some of the difference between the total direct cell Many of these organisms were also seen in the go. In
count and plate counts was probably due to killing of subsequent steps, total bacterial count decreased drastically,
MICROBIAL SPOILAGE OF TOFU 163
and none of these organisms were detected again until they 109 CFU/ml. It is also important to perform total direct cell
appeared in the pressed tofu cake. counts when attempting to estimate the total numbers of
Lactic acid bacteria first reappeared in the pressed tofu bacteria in a sample to insure that a large proportion of the
cake, Pseudomonas sp. in the cooling water, and enteric organisms present is not being missed by the plating tech-
bacteria in the final packaged product. This suggests that niques employed.
these bacteria are reintroduced into the tofu from the General tests for "coliforms" should not be considered
equipment, cooling water, and personnel handling the tofu. relevant for evaluation of tofu. Specific tests for known
In addition, two bacterial species, E. coli and Bacillus pathogens in this group should be performed instead. Many
group I (possibly Bacillus cereus), that could potentially organisms that are harmless from a public health standpoint
pose a health hazard to consumers, were found in the will appear in a coliform enrichment. If the focus of the
finished product. E. coli is usually of human or animal research is spoilage rather than safety, general tests for
origin, so it was probably introduced by persons who Enterobacteriaceae might be appropriate, since we have
weighed and packaged the tofu. Bacillus group I (possibly shown that some members of this group can spoil tofu.
B. cereus) may have come from the same source, or from However, it is not known if this is a general characteristic
surfaces the tofu contacted during packaging, or from the of the group or is peculiar to some species only. Further
soybeans. research is needed before a general test could be deemed
A standard test for E. coli in foods was performed on appropriate.
all samples obtained from the tofu factory, but results were One major problem with evaluations of microbial qual-
negative. This could have been due to sampling error; that ity of tofu is lack of appropriate microbiological standards.
is, the sample used for the test had no E. coli, whereas the If standards are set, they should take into account the
sample that was plated and characterized did. Alternatively, microbial flora present in actual samples of tofu and the
the strain of E. coli present might have been too few in likelihood that these organisms would potentially threaten
numbers or might have an atypical reaction under the test the health of consumers. Because the types and numbers of
conditions. organisms that constitute a hazard in tofu and in other foods
are different, it is not sufficient to "borrow" standards from
Recommendations for improving the shelf life of tofu another food and apply them to tofu. In studies requiring
It is unlikely that the bacterial load present on the sterile tofu, it would usually be preferable to prepare tofu
beans contributes significantly to spoilage organisms in the in a sterile manner, according to Kovats et al. (7) because
finished product. They are probably reintroduced late in autoclaving introduces additional variables by changing the
processing. Therefore, efforts to reduce bacterial load should characteristics of the tofu.
be concentrated on later stages of manufacture. Care should
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
be taken to insure cleanliness of equipment between batches
to prevent contamination from an earlier batch. The cooling The authors wish to thank the Zakhi Soy Foods Co. of Fort Wayne,
water is a likely source of contamination, especially of IN, for kindly supplying the tofu for this project. We would also like to
Pseudomonas spp., and should be changed between batches. thank Kent Murphy for his help and advice. The authors wish to thank
Good sanitary practices are particularly important to Karen Redmond for assisting the research by performing tasks for the
experiment in which spoilage organisms were introduced into sterile tofu
those persons who handle the tofu press and pressed tofu, and helping in characterizing some organisms.
and who weigh and package tofu. Cleaning of all surfaces
with which tofu comes in contact and handwashing before REFERENCES
handling each individual batch would also decrease con-
tamination from previous batches of tofu. This is important 1. Anonymous. 1983. Tofu bacteriological qualities called into question
because bacteria could accumulate from batch to batch and by report. Soyfoods. Summer, 1983:8-12.
2. Anonymous. 1984. Difco manual: Dehydrated culture media and
multiply rapidly at room temperature in small pieces of tofu
reagents for microbiology. Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI.
left on surfaces. Room temperature is often elevated in tofu 3. Aulisio, C. C. G., J. T. Stanfield, S. D. Weagant, and W. E. Hill.
manufacturing plants due to heat-producing machinery. 1983. Yersinosis associated with tofu consumption: serological,
biochemical and pathogenicity studies of Yersinia enterocolitica
isolates. J. Food Prot. 46:226-230.
Recommendations for further study of microbial quality 4. Dotson, C. R., H. A. Frank, and C. G. Cavaletto. 1977. Indirect
and spoilage of tofu methods as criteria of spoilage in tofu (soybean curd). J. Food Sci.
Many studies, including this one, have used TSA as the 42:273-274.
medium for microbiologically evaluating tofu. Although 5. Hankin, L., and J. G. Hanna. 1983. Quality of tofu and other soy
products. The Conn. A. E. S., New Haven. Bull. 810.
this medium is capable of detecting a wide variety of 6. Holt. J. G. (ed.). 1984. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology.
significant organisms, some important organisms, such as 8th ed. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore.
C. perfringens, do not grow on it. A better strategy would 7. Kovats, S. K., M. P. Doyle, and N. Tanaka. 1984. Evaluation of the
be to employ a variety of media, including one specific for microbiological safety of tofu. I. Food Prot. 47:618-622.
8. Lee, L. A., S. M. Ostroff, H. B. McGee, D. R. Johnson, F. P.
this species. Downes, D. N. Cameron, N. H. Bean, and P. M. Griffin. 1991. An
Aerobic incubations are generally used for evaluation outbreak of shigellosis at an outdoor music festival. Am. J. Epidemiol.
of tofu. These underestimate the number of organisms 133:608-615.
present in samples, especially those packed in airtight 9. Mehlman, 1. J., and W. H. Andrews. 1978. Coliform bacteria, Chap.
V. In Bacteriological analytical manual, 5th ed. United States Food
containers. For instance, our 30-d sample had an aerobic and Drug Administration Division of Microbiology. Association of
count of 5 x 106 CFU/ml and an anaerobic count of 1.25 x Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
10. Pontecorvo, A. J., and M. C. Boume. 1978. Simple methods for Wood, N. R. Krieg, and G. B. Phillips (ed.), Manual of methods for
extending the shelf life of soy curd (tofu) in tropical areas. J. Food general bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washing-
Sci. 43:969-972. ton, DC.
11. Porter, K. G., and Y. S. Feig. 1980. The use of DAPI for identifying 16. Szabo, R. A., G. A. Jarvis, K. F. Weiss, K. Rayman, G. Lachapelle,
and counting aquatic microflora. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25:943-948. and A. Jean. 1989. Microbiological quality of tofu and related
12. Rehberger. T. G., L. A. Wilson, and B. A. Glatz. 1984. Microbio- products in Canada. J. Food Prot. 52:727-730.
logical quality of commercial tofu. J. Food Prot. 47:177-181. 17. Tuitemwong, K., and D. Y. C. Fung. 1991. Microbiological study of
13. Roquib, M. A. 1983. Unfermented soybean (Glycine Max L. Merr.) Tofu. J. Food Prot. 54:212-216.
foods to combat protein malnutrition. The Muslim Scientist 12:39-48. 18. Van Kooij, J. A., and E. de Boer. 1985. A survey of the microbio-
14. Shurtleff, W., and A. Aoyagi. 1983. The Book of Tofu. Ten Speed logical quality of commercial tofu in the Netherlands. Int. J. Food
Press, Berkeley, CA. Microbiol. 2:349-354.
15. Smibert, R. M., and N. R. Krieg. 1981. General characterization. In 19. Wang, H. L. 1986. Uses of soybeans as foods in the west with
P. Gerhardt, R. G. E. Murray, R. N. Chostilow, E. W. Nester, W. A. emphasis on tofu and tempeh. ACS Symp. Ser. 312:45-60.