Paper No. 609
Paper No. 609
Paper No. 609
609
varies from 1.9 to 1.4 for grades M65, to M90. Hence, 1) Evaluation of total force under parabolic
it will become more difficult to compute the total force rectangular stress block diagram.
for grades of concrete from M65 to M90. Therefore,
in order to simplify the calculation, the average stress a) Evaluation of force in the curved portion of
concept will be introduced. diagram which is shaded.
20 7.2317 0.416
25 9.0396 0.416
30 10.847 0.416
35 12.655 0.416
75 23.28 0.377 For mix grade less than M 60, the depth of stress block
will be restricted to 80% of neutral axis depth. In the
80 23.92 0.370 average stress block concept the depth of the block
will be increased to full depth of neutral axis. Hence,
the stress will be reduced to 80% of the fcd value.
85 24.39 0.365
The average stress upto M 60 grade concrete will
out to 23.40 MPa. The CG of the compressive diagram For mix grade upto M 60 the factor is 0.361587 to
will be at distance from the top of the diagram. get the average stress. For other grades the respective
factor can be taken from the table.
Table 3 Average Stress and the CG Distance
Factor of the Compressive Force from the Top MR=0.3615 fck bx [d - 0.416x] - (1)
Grades η λ fav factor fav stress Ratio of The depth of NA axis for balanced section for concrete
of =λχηχ in MPa distance of grades upto M 60 using fy=500 N/mm2
Con- 0.446666 centroid to
crete For grades the depth
in MPa up to M 60 of NA axis
β2
20 1.0 0.8 0.35733 fck 7.146 0.40
25 1.0 0.8 0.35733 fck 8.933 0.40
30 1.0 0.8 0.35733 fck 10.719 0.40
35 1.0 0.8 0.35733 fck 12.506 0.40
40 1.0 0.8 0.35733 fck 14.293 0.40
45 1.0 0.8 0.35733 fck 16.079 0.40
50 1.0 0.8 0.35733 fck 17.866 0.40
55 1.0 0.8 0.35733 fck 19.650 0.40
60 1.0 0.8 0.35733 fck 21.430 0.40
65 0.98 0.79 0.345 fck 22.425 0.395
70 0.96 0.78 0.3344 fck 23.408 0.390
75 0.94 0.77 0.323 fck 24.225 0.385
80 0.92 0.76 0.3122 fck 24.98 0.380
0.90 0.75 0.314 fck 25.623 0.375
85
This expression is known to all engineers. The term
90 0.88 0.74 0.2908 fck 26.17 0.370 0.3615 is a factor to convert the allowable stress into
average stress. Substituting for M 60 grade 0.1658 x 60
4 Examples x bd^2 = 9.948 bd2.
The design engineer will come across two sets of Suppose if an engineer wants to use the average stress
problems. One is to design the section and another straight away from the table, the moment of resistance
is to check the capacity of the section. Some typical will be 21.696 x b x 0.617d x 0.7438d = 9.95 bd2. One
worked out examples will be covering both these sets can estimate the depth for a given moment or depth
of problems will be presented. adequacy can be checked.
4.1 Capacity of Balanced Section B. Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block
The capacity of balanced section will be worked out for The factor for rectangular stress block is
both the stress blocks.
0.3573 fck Moment of resistance =
A. Parabolic Rectangular Stress Block
0.3573 fck b x 0.617 d = 0.1660 fck bd2
Taking moment about steel level
4.2 Design of Section In the above example the steel will yield and it is correct
to assume steel stress as fyk.
A. In a design Dituation where the moment is
available and the section has to be designed, B. Next section is available, moment is also
the following steps may be followed. available, steel to be worked out
D. Strain compatibility method Step: 3 Assume N. A axis as 150 mm for 1st trial.
In case the steel does not yield the strain Step 4: Proceed as shown in the table and repeat the
compatibility method shall be used. operations.
1 150 40
2 130 60
3 120 70
4 127 63 = 2066
It can be seen that the change in the moment Example 6: Design of Doubly Reinforced Beam.
carrying capacity is only 2% and maximum it can
Design a beam to carry a moment of 5000 kNm.
go upto 7%. Hence, it may not be worthwhile to
do this exercise. In case if someone is interested to B = 500 mm, D = 1000 mm, Cover 40 mm,
use the upper branch assume N.A axis for the trail Grade M 45, Fe = 500, dia of bars 20 mm.
taking the steel force as constant and the NA axis
position shall be verified. The steel force will not Step 1:
change much but the NA axis will be dictated by
the compressive force. The balanced section moment carrying capacity
Step 1: Assume 3 layers of reinforcement: Step 7: Slightly increase the depth of Neutral axis
and use parabolic rectangular stress block. Neutral
Effective d = 1400 - 50 - 28 - 28 =1280 mm
2 axis:Assume 289 mm.
Step 2: Assume NA axis to lie in the flange to calculate
the lever arm for the first trial.
Provide slightly extra steel to compensate the reduction Distance of Start of parabola =
in lever arm as NA axis will come down and the NA
axis will lie in the web.
Provide 8 x 3: 24 bars of 28 φ Area = 6.157 x 24 = Rectangular portion of stress block in flange = 289-165
14778 mm2 = 124 mm.
Step 4: Strain in steel = 176) = 0.1792 > Parabolic stress block in flange = 200-124 = 76 mm.
.00217 in 1st layer of steel.
Steel will yield and the force in the steel = 14778 x Stress at bottom of flange =
434.78 = 6425 kN
Step 5: Use rectangular compression stress block to
fix the position of neutral axis. Let x be the depth of
neutral axis from top. Average stress in parabolic portion =
Natural axis assumed position is ok. The strain in outer fiber has to be limited as the flange
will have compressive strain only. At h from
1. CG of force in flange, from top for top of the flange the strain has to be .002. The distance
rectangular stress block = 62 mm will work out to 0.4285 x 200 = 85.7 mm.
Fig. 10 Limited Strain Diagram Average stress = 2/3 (20.097 – 15.15) + 15.15 = 18.45
It can be seen from the figure that when the strain in N / mm2
limited, the NA axis has to go down to compensate the
loss of stress block area. Force due to rectangular block stress diagram in
flange.
The position of NA axis can be got only by trial and
error. = 20.097 x 1500 x 85.7 x 10-3=
Earlier in the parabolic stress block, the depth of neutral 42.85 mm from top.
axis has been worked out as 289 mm. Increase the depth
Force in the flange due to parabolic stress diagram
of neutral axis to 316 mm for 1st trial.
5 Conclusion
The views expressed in the paper are personal views of the Authors. For any query, the author may be contacted at: E-mail : tvish123@hotmail.com