I. O. Macari, Morpho-Syntax, Lecture 4, Lecture 4 Sem. I, 2020
I. O. Macari, Morpho-Syntax, Lecture 4, Lecture 4 Sem. I, 2020
I. O. Macari, Morpho-Syntax, Lecture 4, Lecture 4 Sem. I, 2020
I, 2020 , Lectur
Table of Contents
3.4.3. Transitive and intransitive verbs. ................................................................................................................................. 2
Direct, indirect and prepositional objects ............................................................................................................................. 2
EXERCISES .......................................................................................................................................................................... 18
1
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
1
Verb/clause patterns will be discussed further on.
2
Downing and Locke use the abbreviation ‘Od’ for direct object.
2
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
transitive More recently these organizations have started receiving corporate support.
(thesunmagazine.org)
intransitive Your book starts close to home with the story of Yosemite National Park. (thesunmagazine.org)
The same Downing & Locke argue that “we should talk about transitive or intransitive uses of certain
verbs, as a great many verbs can be used in English both transitively and intransitively [...]. Land is
transitive in The pilot landed the plane safely, but intransitive in The plane landed. Carry is transitive in
They carried backpacks, but it has an intransitive use in His voice carries well (= ‘projects’)” (2006, p.
37).
In Romanian, transitivity is defined as the capacity of a verb to govern a direct object. According to this
feature, verbs are divided into a) transitive verbs (= have or can have a direct object) and b) intransitive
verbs (= do not have and cannot have a direct object). One observation can be especially useful for this
discussion, because it goes in line with Downing and Locke’s suggestion above: the transitive verbs with
no direct object present3 (= with their transitivity valency free) are called tranzitive absolute/ folosite
absolut, as in Am mâncat la ora opt. (Neamțu, 1989, p. 171).
To further highlight the similarities between the approaches to transitivity in the two languages, it can be
useful to translate the examples for eat in the table above into Romanian, and thus to see the comparable
behaviour of the verbs with regard to transitivity.
a mânca
transitive Poți, de altfel, să sfârșești prin a mânca mai mult decât ai fi mâncat...
intransitive Dacă mănânci la un restaurant sau bufet, poți să alegi ....
As I have already pointed out, the valency of the verb decides how many clause elements need to be
present to form a complete clause. In the two examples above, as well as in their English counterparts,
mânca and eat used transitively have a valency of 2 in Poți, de altfel, să sfârșești prin a mânca mai mult
decât ai fi mâncat.../You can also end up eating more than you would have done... Mânca and eat used
intransitively have a valency of 1 in Dacă mănânci la un restaurant sau bufet, poți să alegi ..../If you're
eating at a restaurant or cafe, you can make choices ...
However, if a verb that can be used transitively is used intransitively, then we can say that its valency is
reduced to 1, because in English finite clauses normally require a subject (also see 3.2. and 3.9.).
Depending on their valency, transitive verbs fall into three classes:
1. monotransitive verbs have only one object, a direct object, as in She knows you. and He hurt
himself.
3
Al căror complement direct nu este exprimat.
3
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
2. ditransitive verbs have two objects. There are two main patterns for ditransitive verbs: a. direct
object preceded by indirect object (SViOdO) and b. direct object followed by prepositional object
(SVdOppO).
a. The basic ditransitive pattern contains verbs of transfer (give, lend) and intended transfer (buy, get), as
in I gave her a present and I got her a present. Downing and Locke argue that ”three-place verbs like
give have a subject and two Objects, representing the transfer of goods or information from one person
to another. They also include speech act verbs such as ‘offer’ and ‘promise’” (2006, p. 92).
Other verbs in the give category are: hand, lend, offer, owe, pass, promise, read, send, show, teach,
throw, write.
The get category includes: book, bring, build, buy, cash, cut, fetch, find, leave, spare, keep, make, pour,
save.
The same authors illustrate the existence of a prepositional counterpart for the indirect object, the give
type with to, the get type with for (I gave a present to her. I got/bought a present for her). In the
examples, the PP functions as a prepositional/oblique object, defined by Hasselgård, Lysvåg and
Johansson as
a clause element with a semantic role characteristic of an object (affected, effected or
beneficiary), but realized by a prepositional phrase. An oblique object may occur in the same
clause as a direct object. An oblique object may be a variation on an indirect object, as in I
gave some flowers to my neighbours. (Cf. I gave my neighbours some flowers). Alternatively,
an oblique object may be an element which might have been expressed as a direct object, but
which has lost that status in competition with another phrase, as in He stuffed his mouth with
peanuts. (Cf. He stuffed peanuts into his mouth.) [...]. (Hasselgård, Lysvåg, & Johansson, n.d.)
In simpler terms, three object types are generally acknowledged in mainstream English grammars:
direct objects, indirect objects, and prepositional/oblique objects, all illustrated in the following
table.
type description example
direct object (dO) entity acted upon I gave her a present.
indirect object (iO) entity indirectly affected by the action I gave her a present/I gave a present to her.
prepositional/oblique object (ppO/oO) object introduced by a preposition I was looking for a present for her.
Note that there are iOs that consist of a prepositional phrase, just like the ppO/oO. The difference is that
an indirect object cannot occur without a dO, while a ppO/oO can.
Downing and Locke (2006, pp. , 93) also point to the existence of two passives with the give type:
Active: I gave Jo a copy.
Passive 1: Jo was given a copy. (Oi in active clause → S in passive clause)
Passive 2: A copy was given to Jo. (Od in active clause → S in passive clause)
4
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
4
Downing and Locke use ? to indicate divided acceptability.
5
They are called verbe bitranzitive or dublu tranzitive.
6
According to Neamțu, pe Ion = complement direct al persoanei, reluat prin pronumele personal l-; lecția = complement
direct al obiectului, nedublabil.
5
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
tranzitiv intranzitiv
Mi-l amintesc pe Ion. Îmi amintesc de Ion.
3 Verbs with a reflexive meaning: He shaved (himself), She dressed (herself).
4 Verbs with a reciprocal meaning: Tom and Jo met at a concert. (met each other)
There are some verbs that are always intransitive. They are grouped by Downing and Locke (2006, p. 85) in
verbs of behaviour which is typically involuntary or semi-voluntary: laugh, smile, cry, blink, blush, cough, sneeze,
sigh, tremble, yawn; wait, stay; die, collapse, faint, fall.
They all laughed, someone yawned, one soldier fainted.
verbs of weather: rain, snow
It’s raining. It’s snowing. The sun rose.
verbs of occurrence: appear, disappear, go, come, arrive, depart, vanish, fade, happen.
Has everyone arrived?
Hopes of avoiding war are now fading.
idiomatic intransitive phrasal verbs7.
7
You can find some examples at https://www.espressoenglish.net/intransitive-phrasal-verbs-in-english/.
8
In Romanian, the indirect object is defined very similarly.
6
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
Note that the indirect object consisting of a prepositional phrase normally comes after the direct object;
consequently, there are two possible variants of a SVOO clause, I will give Jane my umbrella. (SViOdO)
and I will give my umbrella to Jane. (SVdOiO). The two structures differ to some extent in their use,
because of the general tendency for the more important information to come at the end. For example, if
Jane has already been mentioned, but not the umbrella, we would expect the first to be used rather than
the second, though in speech the focus can be indicated by giving it prominence in the intonation
pattern.
In line with Kies, Downing and Locke (2006, p. 56) identify the following realisations of the indirect object
and illustrate them with examples:
7
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
8
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
An indirect object is normally a person who receives something, such as a gift or a favour, or who
beneficiates from an activity performed by the subject.
The direct object answers the question << subject + verbal + what/whom? >>.
I told the children a story. I told what? A story (dO).
The indirect object answers the question << subject + verbal + to/for/from whom? >>.
I told the children a story./ I told a story to the children. I told to whom? The children (indirect
object).
If the direct object is omitted, the meaning of the sentence will alter or no longer make sense.
I told the children a story.
I baked my daughter a cake.
If you remove the indirect object, the sentence will make sense but will be less clear, as the
recipient/beneficiary remains unknown.
I told the children a story.
I baked my daughter a cake.
9
These authors, as well as others, call the object complement object predicative.
9
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
Much on the same line, in Kies’ view, the object complement completes a reference and/or an
implication suggested by the object of the clause. The object complement is recognizable by a
combination of the following formal and functional properties.
property property description example
form Object complements are most usually NPs They appointed Jane the new manager. [NP]
or AdjPs, although gerund and PpPs, as They found her very accomplished. [AdjP]
well as nominal clauses may assume this
My supervisor considers his least favorite duty
function on occasion. (the last three
dealing with customers.[gerund-Cl]
examples are from suite101.com)
Students declare the best time of year during the
summer. [PpP]
I declare the problem that you do not want to
learn about grammar. [nominal-Cl]
position Object complements only occur if there is They appointed Jane the new manager.
an object in the clause and they occur They appointed the new manager.
normally after that object.
They appointed the new manager Jane.
Unlike objects themselves, object The new manager was appointed Jane by them.
complements do not have any passive
voice corresponding clauses, in which the
complement appears in the subject position.
refer- Object complements complete a reference They appointed Jane (O) the new manager (oC).
ence to the object of the clause. There is in effect {They performed an action directed at Jane.}
a copular relation that exists between the {Jane is the new manager.} SVC
object and its complement, in that the
object and its complement can be
paraphrased by an SVC structure.
agree- Object complements usually agree with the They appointed Jane (O) the new manager (oC).
ment object in number (singular or plural). They appointed them (O) the new managers (oC).
The set of verbs which permit an object complement is not large and includes to keep, declare, leave,
call, like, want, consider, find, think, get, make, send, turn, elect, appoint, vote.
In order to make the recognition of this clause element easier for the Romanian speaker of English, I
suggest a correlation between it and the element predicativ suplimentar (EPS), because they share a
number of features.
Property Property description Example
Form EPSs are most usually participles, gerunds, AdjPs or NP s Îi vedem grăbiți. [participle]
(examples belong to Bulgăr, 1995). Îi vedem grăbindu-se.[gerund]
De la gârlă […] zgomotoși copiii vin.
[AdjP]
10
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
Position EPSs normally occur after the predicate, but other See above.
positions are possible.
When EPS consists in an AdjP, the presence of the dO is De la gârlă […] zgomotoși copiii vin.
not compulsory. [AdjP]
Le-am văzut vesele. [AdjP]
When EPS consists in a NP, either the dO or the agent El este socotit de revoluționari ca specialist.
is present. [NP]
I-am găsit directori. [NP]
Refer- EPSs may complete references to the object, the I-am găsit directori.
ence subject and the predicate. There is in effect a copular {I performed an action directed at them.}
relation that exists between the object or subject and {Ei sunt directori.} SVC
the EPS, in that the object or subject and EPS can be
paraphrased by an SVC structure. Another relation is
between the predicate and EPS, in that the action or
state of the verb is described by the EPS (especially
when it consists of an AdjP).
Agree- EPSs agree with the object in gender (feminine, Le credeau studente.[fem., pl.]
ment neuter or masculine) and number (singular or plural). Îi credeau studenți. [masc. pl]
If the object is not present, then EPSs agree with the
Copiii vin voioși. [masc., pl.]
subject.
Fata vine voiasă. [fem., sg.]
In both Romanian and English, the EPS and the oC can be quite easily taken for adverbials of manner,
so extra attention should be paid to their basic features and behaviour.
11
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
Hasselgård, Lysvåg and Johansson define the subject complement as the clause element that comes in
addition to a subject and a link/copular (two-place) verb, normally placed after the verb and realised by a
noun phrase and an adjective phrase (as shown above), or by a nominal subordinate clause, as in The
problem is finding the right person (n.d.). Their definition brings about the issue of valency which has
already been discussed in 2.2. and 3.4.2., and will be reiterated in 3.9.
Because the subject complement is primarily a complement, its basic function is to complete something.
Similar to the oC’s behaviour towards the object, the sC completes a reference or an implication related
to the subject. It both shares some of the features of the oC and has properties unique to itself.
12
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
10
The meanings listed here were identified by Sidney Greenbaum and Gerald Nelson in An Introduction to English Grammar,
Longman, 2002
11
Note that the meaning of the term attribute in English grammar is different from the meaning of atribut in Romanian.
13
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
As be links the subject not only to a characteristic (sC realized by AdjP) or a status (sC realized by NP) but also to
a circumstance of position, place or time (Your mother is on the phone.). The complement, underlined in the
example, is then identified as adverbial complement, as described in 3.8.2.
12
For reasons of clarity, during analysis and discussion, the term adverbial will commonly refer to adjuncts.
14
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
Exactly like their Romanian counterparts, adjuncts answer the questions where, when, how, why etc. and
are named accordingly.
Because of that (adjunct of reason), he took a job in a store (place adjunct) last year (time adjunct).
Another characteristic the two languages have in common at clause level is that more than one adjunct
can occur in a clause (see the example above). This is not true about the other elements of the clause, as
only one subject, verbal, or direct object can occur in the same clause.
b. Conjuncts are adverbials that connect and express relations between independent clauses or
sentences. They are realised by conjunctive/coordinating adverbs that can occur
- at the beginning, in the middle, or at the end of the second of the two clauses in a compound
sentence.
- at the beginning, in the middle, or at the end of the second of two related sentences.
The table below provides examples of conjuncts and the most common types of relation they express.
conjuncts of
time afterward, at one moment...at the next, henceforth, later, meanwhile, now...then, sometimes...sometimes, soon
, then, etc.
addition also, besides, then too, for one thing ...for another (thing), furthermore, in addition, likewise, moreover,
partly...partly, etc.
similarity likewise, similarly, etc.
concession/ exactly the opposite , however, instead, nevertheless, on (the) one hand...on the other hand, on the contrary,
contrast rather, still, etc.
result accordingly, as a result, consequently, hence, then, therefore, thus, etc.
condition otherwise (= if not)
Hasselgård, Lysvåg and Johansson describe conjuncts as “text organizers, in that they guide the
hearer/reader through the text, showing how the different pieces hang together, and where they belong in
the text” (n.d.).
c. Disjuncts are adverbials that are always optional in the clause. According to Hasselgård, Lysvåg and
Johansson, they are evaluative and express
a. the speaker's judgement of the truth of the utterance (modal disjuncts, e.g. probably, certainly, maybe)
b. the speaker's evaluation of a fact (fact-evaluating disjuncts, e.g. fortunately, actually, to my surprise)
c. the speaker's comment on his/her own wording of the sentence (e.g. briefly, in other words, to
tell you the truth)
d. the speaker’s comment on the subject referent (subject-evaluating disjuncts, e.g. Wisely, she
spent the money = 'she was wise to spend the money')
The table below provides further explanations and examples regarding the form, position, meaning and
reference of the adverbial (A).
Property Property description Example
Form The adverbial is normally an AdvP, a PpP, or a clause. She quickly put her gloves on. [AdvP]
Occasionally, a NP can function as adverbial. She put her gloves in her purse. [PpP]
15
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
13
In such contexts, only is a ‘focusing adverb’ that point to one part of a clause, in this example to the subject I. When only
focuses on the subject, it usually comes before it. Other focusing adverbs are: also, either, even, just, mainly, mostly,
neither, nor, etc.
14
In such context, only is an adjective meaning either ‘having no equal or rival for excellence or desirability’ or ‘being the
one or ones of a class with no other members’ (only adjective)
16
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
15
Also called verb pattern.
17
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
Transitive
monotransitive S-V-O He| bought| a video verb used transitively
ditransitive S-V-O-O He| gave| Jo| the video pattern with iO
complex-transitive S-V-O-C I| find| the idea| crazy pattern with oC
The pattern with obligatory adverbial can be added as another type of complementation.
intransitive S-V-A Your mother| is| on the phone. pattern with obligatory A
Each pattern specifies what is required for completeness, in other words, all the elements that are sufficient and
necessary for meaningful complete clauses. However, optional adverbials can always be added, but this does
not affect the description of the basic pattern. For instance, if we add an adverbial to a SVO clause pattern, as in
The man/ is writing/ a poem/ right now, the verb pattern will still be recognized as SVO.
In Hasselgård, Lysvåg and Johansson’s view,
a verb with a valency of one (=a one-place verb) needs only a subject in order to build a
complete sentence. A verb with a valency of two (=a two-place verb) needs two other clause
elements (subject + direct object, subject + subject predicative, or subject + adverbial). A verb
with a valency of three (=a three-place verb) needs three other clause elements (subject+
indirect object + direct object, subject+ direct object + object predicative, or subject + direct
object + adverbial). No English verb has a valency of more than three (n.d.).
There are many verbs in English that admit more than one type of complementation and thus have
different valencies in different patterns. They are mostly verbs of general meaning, such as get, turn and
make, as well as some of the sense verbs (smell, see, etc.). As Downing and Locke’s examples show,
make is a verb that admits all but intransitive patterns:
I|’ll make| some tea. SVdO
I|’ll make| you| a pizza. SViOdO
He| made| the coffee| too strong. SVdOoC
They| make| a good couple. SVsC
It| makes| for good relations. SVpO
To summarize, in English there are one-place verbs, which require a subject only (SV), two-place verbs
which involve a subject and one other element (SVO, SVC and SVA) and three-place verbs, with a
subject and two other elements (SVOO and SVOC).
EXERCISES
18
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
20
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
2. That sort of democracy would mean rule by a black majority, which might feel an understandable urge
for retribution for past oppressions.
3. Whites, equally understandably, want safeguards for white rights, but you cannot ensure safeguards
once you surrender your power.
Exercise 3.11 Linking verbs and subject complement
Underline the subject complement in each sentence below.
1. Outside, the company sign seems modest.
2. Inside, the atmosphere is one of rush and ferment.
3. The company is a genetic engineering firm.
4. It has become a leader of a brand-new industry.
5. The focus of the project is DNA recombination.
Exercise 3.12 Intransitive verbs and adverbials
Underline the adverbials in the sentences below. Some sentences may have more than one adverbial.
1. Opossums frequently appear to be dead.
2. Sometimes they merely pretend to be dead.
3. In that way they avoid attacks by predators.
4. Often they simply are dead.
5. Few opossums remain alive far into the second year.
*Exercise 3.13 Adverbial complement
Complete these sentences by adding an adverbial complement.
1. My parents live __________
2. Unfortunately, nobody is __________
3. Everybody behaved __________
4. You can get __________
5. The soldiers are keeping __________
Exercise 3.14 Direct object and indirect object
Underline the indirect objects in the sentences below. Some sentences do not have an indirect object.
1. Can you tell me the time, please?
2. Who taught you how to do that?
3. Paul’s parents promised him a bicycle for his twelfth birthday.
4. You can save yourself the bother.
21
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
22
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 4 sem. I, 2020 , Lectur
23