American Voices - Questions For Analysis

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

American Voices- Questions for Analysis

Mexican American War: Expansion and Slavery

Directions: As a class we will read the primary sources on pages 422-423 in your textbook. In the
end, please answer the questions below using complete sentences and answering all parts of the
questions. Be specific in your responses. Please change your responses to either blue or red.

1) What arguments do Buchanan and Sumner make about the boundaries of Texas, the issue
that sparked the fighting? Whose argument is more persuasive and why?
● James Buchanan urges John Slidell to speak of Texas' independence as fact. He argues that the
western border of Texas is the Rio Grande. Buchanan claims this boundary because "the
jurisdiction of Texas has been extended beyond that river." Charles Sumner argues that the
"State of Texas, since its Declaration of Independence, never exercised any jurisdiction
beyond the Nueces." He also argues that if they viewed Texas as a province of Mexico, the
Nueces would recognize Mexico as the western boundary. Sumner's argument is more
persuasive because he used the historic geographic boundaries as evidence. He also makes a
strong case for America being the aggressor by taking the disputed region from a neighboring
Republic.

2) Do o’Sullivans and Buchanana’s assertions support or undercut the claim that the Mexican
War was an aggressive act of imperialism?
● Both O'Sullivan and Buchanan's assertions unintentionally support the claim that the Mexican
War was an aggressive act of imperialism. O'Sullivan uses the argument of Manifest Destiny,
"the fulfillment of our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for
the free development of our yearly multiplying millions," as justification. Buchanan also
regards the territory as belonging to the U.S. They both bring up that Britain, France, and the
U.S. all had an interest in the region, especially California, with little regard from the people
already occupying the land.

3) Why does Whitman oppose the expansion of slavery? Given Whitman;s views, who might have
gotten his vote in the election of 1848? Why?
● Whitman opposed the expansion of slavery because slavery benefitted only the rich while
hurting the "white workingmen, the millions of merchants, farmers, and operatives of our
country." He argues, using the experiences of the South, that respectable workingmen cannot
flourish in a slave state. Whitman believed that slavery, in "practice and theory," was
destructive to the dignity and independence of all laborers and to "labor itself." Given his
views in "favor of limiting slavery to where it already exists," Whitman may have voted for
Zachary Taylor, a Louisiana slave owner committed to defending slavery but did not support
the expansion of slavery in the territories. He may have been attracted to the Free-Soil Party
and voted for Martin Van Buren, who opposed any expansion of slavery.

4) Two of the sources are newspaper editorials; two are letters written by or addressed to public
officials. How does the nature of each of these sources influence its content?
● The two newspaper editorials are opinion pieces meant to move the public. Their authors
were freer to discuss the subject at hand. The two letters to public officials are more
fact-based and serious because they deal with official government business.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy