Curtain Wall Manual - Section 8 Installation
Curtain Wall Manual - Section 8 Installation
Curtain Wall Manual - Section 8 Installation
8.1 FOREWORD
This section is devoted principally to an in- depth discussion of metal curtain wall installation procedures. Some
architects may think that this subject is of only minor concern to them; that once they have designed the wall,
approved the contracts and checked the shop drawings; it’s the contractor’s business to see that the wall is
correctly put in place. In part this is true, but the architect has certain responsibilities in this work, too. And without
a clear knowledge of how the wall is to be installed, what problems may arise in the field and how to avoid them,
there are likely to be serious deficiencies in the design of the wall.
To ensure good curtain wall performance, proper installation is just as essential as intelligent design and good
fabrication. And the keys to proper installation are coordination and communication. Teamwork is required, and
each member of the team—the architect, the general contractor and the wall contractor—must understand the
needs and the problems of the others, if the work is to progress smoothly and efficiently.
Careful attention to details is essential, too. And because the critical importance of these details is explained in
this article perhaps more fully than ever before, we commend it to the architect’s attention. We believe he will find
that there’s much he can do to facilitate the proper installation of the wall..
NOTE: Illustrative details have been purposely omitted from “Installation” Section 8 of the AAMA Curtain Wall
Manual. A given detail’s applicability to the myriad of projects and building construction methods cannot be
determined. A design appropriate for one construction method may be inappropriate or even hazardous when
used in conjunction with another method. For example, a standard face-of-slab anchor may be acceptable for a
concrete slab poured in steel decking, but unworkable and inadvisable for use with a post-tensioned slab.
Recommendations and discussion are presented in narrative form only, for purely educational purposes, and are
not intended to supersede or modify project-specific contractual, regulatory or statutory requirements.
8.2 3 INTRODUCTION
The importance of proper installation, in providing a good aluminum curtain wall, cannot be too strongly
emphasized. What happens in the field during its installation may well determine whether the wall is a success or
a failure. The inherent faults of a poorly designed wall cannot be magically remedied by even the most skillful field
work, but a well designed and carefully fabricated wall, on the other hand, can easily be degraded by faulty
installation. Any good wall must first be designed with a full understanding of the problems likely to be
encountered in the field, and then must be carefully installed with due regard to its de sign features. Unless both
of these conditions are met, its successful performance is endangered and trouble may follow. Noteworthy
Perhaps the major reason has been a lack of good communication. Too often the architect is not made aware of
problems encountered or likely to occur in the field. He, or may not have been advised as to how the Wwall
should be detailed to facilitate its installation. And even those architects who are knowledgeable in these areas
may not realize to what extent their well designed and beautifully fabricated walls may suffer if they are not
carefully installed. It is in the hope of narrowing this communications gap that this article is being presented.
Unlike masonry curtain walls, which are usually built in place on the job, aluminum curtain wall is a highly
engineered factory-made product, whose components are manufactured to close tolerances. Its installation
requires the marriage of precision parts to a field-built structure of a much lower degree of dimensional accuracy.
Teamwork between the architect, the general contractor and the wall contractor is therefore highly essential. Each
of these parties has certain responsibilities, and if any member of the team shirks their his responsibilities, or
neglects to communicate freely with the others, the quality of the end product—the curtain wall—is bound to be
adversely affected.
The type of system chosen necessarily dictates to some ex tent how the wall will be installed. The stick system
usually offers the greatest flexibility, as work may proceed both horizontally and vertically over the face of the
building at the same time, because sequential placement is less critical than with pre-assembled units, several
crews may be working simultaneously at different locations around the building. Pre-assembled frame units with
interlocking edges must usually be placed sequentially around a building floor before the next floor of units can be
installed, In the case of a curtain wall installed outside of the building frame, rather than between floor slabs or
between masonry columns or piers, work must proceed progressively, rather than in several locations at the same
time
Whatever the wall type, it must be installed in an orderly fashion, according to schedule. Seldom, if ever, is it
practicable to install material in random locations around the building. It is always more advantageous, from the
wall con tractor’s standpoint, to complete the installation of all similar parts on one floor before moving to the next,
as this minimizes the moving of tools, equipment and manpower. Furthermore, the completion of installation floor
by floor may allows the general contractor to schedule other interior work to follow immediately after the curtain
wall is in place.
If the curtain wall is to be installed reasonably “plumb, level am and true;’ the actual location of all surfaces
affecting it alignment, including the levels of floor slabs and beams, must be known before the installation begins.
The architect, in his the specifications, should clearly define the maximum tolerances to be permitted in the
building frame alignment, then should see that the general contractor frequently checks to see that these
tolerances are being held. Tolerances and clearances are matters of major concern, and are discussed at greater
length later in this article.
the term “curtain wall” should be used wherever applicable, in preference to “window wall” or similar terms, as the
latter may inadvertently lead to disputes between several trades claiming their rights to the work;
a metal panel installation should not be described in such a way that it may be interpreted as a glazing operation;
flashing work is essential in many curtain wall designs, but it should be remembered that when the term “flashing”
is used in specifications or on drawings, work so identified will be claimed by one specific trade; and
the terms “venetian blind pocket,’ “drapery pocket” and “convector cover” may invite jurisdictional arguments.
The National Joint Board’s Award of Record and inter-building Trade Agreements publications should be carefully
studied, to avoid using terms and details which can cause jurisdictional disputes and costly strikes. To obtain
information as to local trade jurisdictions, the architect should consult an experienced wall contractor or
installation contractor.
8.34.6 Inspection
The architect is normally responsible for the quality and performance of the completed project, and inspection
during construction is a very important part of this responsibility. Only by insisting that his the specifications and
the approved shop drawings are faithfully followed by all parties can he the architect ensure that his the design is
properly executed.
Inspection of the work affecting the curtain wall begins with the layout of the building frame to which the wall will
be attached. As emphasized earlier, it is highly essential that the dimensions of the frame and of any other
surfaces adjacent to the wall, be accurately controlled, within the tolerances specified. This frequently requires
continual alert inspection. Failure to see that correct dimensions and alignment are maintained can easily lead to
expensive de lays for corrective work later, involving extra costs that could have been avoided. It is equally
essential, of course, that vigilant inspection be continued throughout the wall installation process, to ensure the
proper correlation of all work adjoining or related to the wall.
The planning of a realistic schedule for the wall installation must take into consideration the time required for
preparatory work required of the wall contractor before he can even begin to wall fabricate the wall can even
begin. Adequate time must be provided for such work as:
When the installation work is to be done under a separate subcontract, it is important that the architect check the
qualifications of the parties bidding this work. It is his prerogative to approve or disapprove any proposed bidder
on the basis of his own judgment, after reviewing the bidder’s credentials. Some installation contractors are much
more experienced and competent than others and, as emphasized at the outset, aA poor installation job can
detract from not only the performance but the appearance of even the best- designed curtain wall.
As a guide in judging the merits of the firms bidding the installation work, the following are some of the more
important qualifications to be considered:
• a background of successful experience commensurate with the requirements of the job being bid;
• financial responsibility, and sufficient resources to meet payroll demands and other job costs for a period
of at least two months;
• an adequate supply of, or sufficient funds to acquire, all necessary tools and equipment needed to
perform the work efficiently; and
• satisfactory references pertaining to work previously completed.
Tolerances are addressed in detail in the AAMA Curtainwall Manual Guide Specifications Section 5.
For any aluminum curtain wall, the metal and glass components are made in the plant to relatively exact
dimensions, in accordance with the approved shop drawings. Thus both the overall dimensions of the wall and the
location of its members are pre-fixed to conform with the planned location and size of the building structure to
which they will be attached. But the building frame cannot be constructed with anywhere near the same degree of
accuracy. Therefore, if the dimensionally accurate wall is to fit the roughly constructed frame, and yet be
essentially “plumb, square and true” proper allowances must be made in its design for certain deviations in the
frame, and such deviations must be held within the specified limits. In other words, the deviation limits, or
tolerances, must be established and must be observed in designing the wall, and clearances must be pro vided to
accommodate these tolerances and provide necessary working space.
The terms “tolerance” and “clearance,” as applied to curtain wall work, are obviously closely related, and
consequently are often confused. They have distinctly different meanings, however, and this distinction must be
clearly understood. A tolerance is a permissible amount of deviation from a specified or nominal characteristic
The failure to make proper provision for, or to properly control, both tolerances and clearances is the reason for
most many problems encountered in curtain wall installations. Obviously their unique importance in curtain wall
construction is either not completely understood or is not properly respected by the majority of architects and
construction superintendents.
It might be questioned why field dimensions cannot first be taken, then the curtain wall fabricated accordingly, but
in modern construction practice this would be highly impractical. By the time field measurements can be taken,
the structure is ready to receive the curtain wall, and it should be ready for delivery. On high-rise structures
installation of the wall is often started on the lower floors even before the framing at the top of the building is
completed to have the curtain wall ready when needed, its engineering and fabrication must be started months in
advance. The long delay necessitated by fabricating from field measurements would be intolerable, and
furthermore, the necessity of producing a range of slightly differing sizes would raise havoc with both the
production schedule and with costs.
To ensure that tolerance considerations are properly taken into account it is recommended that the architect
coordinate his the design work with the wall contractor and that the out-of-tolerance which the wall system can
accommodate be clearly indicated by the wall contractor on the shop drawings. Figures 1 and 2 show examples
of how maximum allowable variations in tolerance for wall and window systems and doors should be indicated by
the wall contractor on the shop drawings.
Tolerances for structural steel framing should be specified to conform with the American Institute of Steel
Construction (AISC) Code of Standard Practice, Section 7, paragraph 7.11, the provisions of which are shown in
Table A. Particular attention is directed to the “Commentary” included in the latest edition of this Code, which
provides a detailed explanation of the specified erection tolerances. For a poured concrete frame, the maximum
tolerances that should be permitted, unless otherwise specifically stated in the architect specifications, are those
given in Section 3.3.1 of the American Concrete Institute Standard Recommended Practice for Concrete
Formwork (ACI 347-78 Reaffirmed 1984) as show in Table B..
Erection tolerances for precast and prestressed concrete should be specified in accordance with the
recommendations of the Prestressed Concrete Institute. These tolerances are published in Chapter 8 of the PCI
Design Handboc4 Precast and Prestressed Concrete. Shown here in Table are the tolerances for beams,
spandrels, roof and floor members, and columns. The Design Handbook also has tolerances for structural panels
and architectural panels. In addition to the Handbook, reference should be made to the PCI Journal of January—
February 1985 (Vol. 30, No. 1) for further information on erection tolerances and clearances including information
on interfacing tolerances.
It must be recognized;, however, that these three standards do not cover some commonly used composite
constructions such as concrete fireproofing on steel or masonry piers over steel columns. Obviously, the
dimensional control of such constructions is even more critical than the alignment of the steel framing members
themselves. As the alignment of composite constructions, fireproofing and masonry work are not controlled by
referencing these standards, the architect should require that the location and alignment of all materials
contiguous to the curtain wall be controlled within tolerances which are, at most, no more than those specified in
AC 347.
An aluminum extrusion may be relatively exact in its cross sectional dimensions, but standard mill tolerances
1
permit a bow of /4” and a twist of 5° or more in a 20-foot lengthas well. There are standard manufacturing
tolerances also, applying to both the thickness and size of glass, generally proportional to the glass thickness.
3 1 3
Glass of /8” nominal thickness, for ex ample, may vary ± /32” in thickness and ± /32” from its nominal size
3
dimensions, and the length and width of heat- strengthened or tempered glass may be /16” more or less than their
specified nominal dimensions.
Obviously, such tolerances must be recognized in detailing the wall. The designer should check not only for
possible dimensional variations in cross section or thickness, but for permissible variations in length, size and
straightness
8.78.2 Clearances
The failure to provide adequate clearances is an all-too-common deficiency of curtain wall designs. They are
absolutely essential for any of several reasons: 1) to accommodate movement between adjacent parts; 2) to pro
vide for possible size variations and misalignment; 3) to pro vide working space for anchoring the wall in place; or
4) to provide adequate clearance for joint sealant. When in stalling the wall it is the latter two reasons that are of
prime concern.
The amount of clearance required for proper installation depends upon the type of wall design, the dimensional ac
$ curacy accuracy of the building frame or other construction to which the wall is attached, and the method of
It should not be assumed that clearance problems are con fined to multi-storied buildings. One- and two-story
structures with light framing and inadequate engineering and supervision may also have clearance problems.
Lightweight, inadequately braced steel framing is very difficult to keep aligned and plumb, and details which show
pre-assembled wall units attached directly to light steel columns or other basic framing members are unrealistic.
Adequate clearance to accommodate irregularities, and an easily installed closure between the curtain wall and
such members, must always be provided.
Accurate placing of the wall and its elements is vitally important because of the tie-in with adjoining elements
within the building—partitions, window stools, drapery pockets, mechanical equipment and other items. As most
such tie-ins involve various trades, the architect, both when detailing the wall and in later checking the shop
drawings of these trades, must see that all such work is properly coordinated. As the building progresses, this
coordination becomes the responsibility of the general contractor.
There must be adequate protected space on each floor of the building to store the wall material for that floor until
in stalled and, if possible, the space should be at the same location on each floor. These storage areas should be
safely removed from possible damage to the material by the work of other trades. Once placed on the building
floor, the wall units are not easily moved, and should not have to be relocated until needed for installation. The
general contractor, in designating the storage areas, should carefully consider how their location may affect the
work of other trades. Usually the wall contractor takes pains to see that his materials are in prime condition when
delivered, but unfortunately often finds that the site storage provisions are in adequate and/or unsafe, exposing
his material to damage. When this happens, his costs of handling and protection are, of course, increased.
The curtain wall materials for each story of a building are normally stored on the floor of that story, being hoisted
to the proper floor upon delivery to the site. It is not unusual, in large buildings, to require storage for at least one
48-foot van load of material per floor. Unless hoisting facilities for the wall materials are needed during most of the
normal working hours, it is usually more economical for the general contractor to arrange to provide them, as they
can be used much of the time to hoist materials for other trades. The type of hoisting facilities required will vary
from job to job, depending on the size, shape and weight of the materials to be hoisted. Generally the preference
is either a hod hoist of adequate size and ample head beam clearance, a “Chicago boom,” or some type of
overhead derrick. If the general contractor is to provide the facilities it is essential that he there is a firm
understanding with and the wall contractor have a firm understanding, before any wall materials are delivered to
the job as to what type of hoisting equipment is required and when it will be available for the wall contractor’s use.
Adequate clear working space must be made available to the installation contractor at the building perimeter on
each floor, if he is to perform his workfor efficiently work. If these areas are cluttered with material belonging to
other trades, or if the general contractor has left a ragged uncompleted edge on the floor slabs, his the work is
hampered and more unnecessary costs are incurred. Sometimes it’s found that the concrete floor slabs have not
been poured in areas extending two or three ftfeet back from the designated edge lines, and the installation crew
has to devise makeshift working plat forms in order to install the wall. Working under such difficult conditions is
not only aggravating, inefficient and unsafe, but inevitably affects the quality of installation and may degrade the
performance of the wall.
To ensure proper installation, the architect should demand, both in his specifications and by his field supervision,
that the general contractor provides proper and easily accessible hoist facilities, adequate protected storage
For additional information on this subject refer to AAMA Aluminum Curtain Wall Series Volume 10CW-10, “Care
and Handling of Architectural Aluminum from Shop to Site.”
The exact number and location of hoistways should be included in the curtain wall specifications since they
usually involve additional costs to have the installation crew return and fill in such hoistway areas. Consequently,
in the interest of economy, the number of exterior hoists on a job should be held to a minimum. Or better yet,
interior elevators or cranes or derricks should be used instead, as a means of reducing overall wall costs. If the
use of exterior hoistways is considered advisable, however, necessitating the delay of wall installation in these
areas, the architect should understand that:
• the details of wail units in these fill-in areas may have to be modified to permit installation between
previously in stalled units;
• wall elements adjacent to hoistways may be soiled or damaged, and special precautions should be taken
to prevent this; and
• when the wall is finally installed in a hoistway area it may look different than the adjacent wall which has
been ex posed to the weather for some time.
The loading and movement conditions to which anchorage systems are subjected are:
• Dead Loads
• Wind Loads
Curtain wall systems are designed to be installed exterior to the floor slabs or between the floor slabs. Systems
which run continuously past the floor slabs and normally anchored thereto are generally used on high-rise
buildings. Typical of between-the-slabs curtain wall construction are horizontal strip window walls and storefronts.
Different systems for anchoring mullions are shown in the accompanying illustrations. Figures 7 through 15 show
examples of different systems of anchorage for walls installed on the exterior of the floor slabs. Figures 16
through 18 are examples of receptor systems of anchorage used between slabs.
One of the generally accepted methods of attaching the mullion to the wind load anchor is by bolting to allow for
vertical movement. The bolt should be tightened to a predetermined number of inch-pounds with a torque wrench
so as to allow for vertical slip. The bolt should be double-nutted, threads stiffed, or a lock nut applied to prevent
the nut from backing off. Nylon or high impact polystyrene washers, plastic slip pads or other means may be
required to prevent binding of the bolted connection under load.
Negative or suction forces resulting from wind action often exceed the positive, or inward acting forces, and are
often very high near the corners of buildings. Parapets and other areas may have higher wind load requirements
than the flat surfaced walls. All such forces are transferred from the curtain wall to the building structure through
the wall anchors, and all anchors, whether fixed or movable, must be designed to withstand these forces. Equally
important, of course, are the bolts, welds or other fastening devices used to attach the anchors to both the wall
and the structure. They must be sufficiently strong to carry these loads.
Minimum wind load requirements are called for by the governing building codes. However, the designer may find
it desirable to exceed the code requirements. ANSI A5a1ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other
Structures, specifies procedures and methods of calculation for determining wind loads for rectangular buildings
in the United States. It is critical that any and all references to design loads be identified as either Allowable
Stress Design (ASD) or Strength Design (SD) wherever provided. Boundary layer wind tunnel testing may be
necessary to determine wind loads on major buildings, buildings of unusual designs or buildings located in major
urban areas or having unusual surroundings. Reference should be made to AAMA Aluminum Curtain Wall Series
Volume 11, ‘Design Wind Loads for Buildings and Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Testing,” for comprehensive
information on these subjects.
One particular item that often needs checking is bending of fasteners. If verified by design/analysis, a relatively
large gap can be dealt with by the use of appropriate special interlocking shim details or a welded shim stack
provisions to greatly reduce bolt bending stresses. In certain other cases a “solid” shim stack may not be
necessary due to a sufficiently small gap and load. Here the shear and bending resistance of the fastener is relied
upon. Again engineering judgment and design/analysis and/or testing are needed to ensure sufficient load
Note that proper sizing of bolts is required to resist bending. Alternatively, connection details may sometimes be
modified to eliminate fastener bending.
Receptors are made in one or two piece construction and can be integrated with a thermal break. The receptors
can be used at the head, sill, and jamb. Anchors through the web of the receptor channels are the most common
method of anchorage. The type of anchor used depends on surrounding conditions and design loads.
Head receptors must be designed and detailed to provide proper anchorage and allow for building movement.
Design guidelines for masonry bolts vary with manufacturers. Typically, however, the minimum edge distance
from concrete slabs is five times the bolt diameter. This may often require a closer spacing of smaller bolts or an
alternate design. Window and curtain wall manufacturers generally design standard head receptors to permit
vertical and horizontal thermal movement and some differential floor slab deflection due to live load. Floor slab
deflections can vary greatly depending on building design and occupancy and proper attention must be given to
ensure allowance have been made for movement, weatherability and structural integrity. Curtain wall
manufacturers should be consulted for detailing assistance and structural limitations.
Head, sill and jamb receptors may also be used for store front type of curtain walls. Three typical anchor details
are shown in the accompanying illustrations.
Steel does have the disadvantage that it tends to rust. Protective coatings are recommended to resist this
tendency. It also has the disadvantage that if fastened to aluminum without properly insulating the contacting
surfaces galvanic action will take place in the presence of moisture with its resulting corrosive action. There are a
Plastic isolator pads may also be used. Thickness of such pads usually ranges from 0.031” in. to 0.125”.in.
The location of the vertical mullion splice is usually dictated by the optimum length that can be manufactured but
there are times when a curtain wall design demands specific splice locations for overall performance or esthetic
reasons. For example, spanning a mullion only one floor is sometimes advisable in order to distribute large
differential slab movement to more joints. Considering typical optimum manufacturing lengths and typical floor
slab spacings, it would be reasonable to assume that mullions must be spliced at every other floor or every
twenty-four feet, within t of an anchor point. However, other locations may be used if they are accounted for in the
design. Mullion splices must, of course, accommodate thermal movements and building movements.
8.1819.4 Shims
Shims are typically required to fill the clearance between the anchors and the wall system or between the anchors
and the building structure. High impact, load -bearing plastic shims are generally acceptable as long as the height
of the shim stack does not exceed the diameter of the fastener securing the anchor. Beyond a height of one
diameter significant bending stresses will may start to develop in the fastener, and special shim provisions may be
necessitated. If the fastener is unable to withstand the bending stress, welded steel shims or interlocking
aluminum shims will be required. The clear hole through these “solid” shim stacks should be tight enough to bear
The performance of the anchors is monitored in the laboratory by visual inspection and by the use of dial
indicators which record the deflections and residual set of the anchors during structural testing.
The most realistic test results are obtained when the anchors are attached to actual job site substrates. For
example, if a wall is designed to anchor to pre-cast panels, the test should incorporate these same materials.
Another way that specimens are anchored in the test chamber requires that the chamber be designed with “hard”
attachment points to which the job site anchors can be welded or bolted. A typical example of this is the
simulation of steel inserts placed in a concrete floor. The floorline of the chamber will be fabricated to include
these connection points but instead of pouring a concrete floor the attachment points will be structurally reinforced
so as to permit no movement other than the reaction in the anchors from the testing per formed on the specimen.
8.198.2020.1 Whenever possible, locate the anchor in an easily accessible location on top of the floor slab.
Sometimes a location on the slab edge is feasible but in most cases drilling and welding are more difficult here,
and there’s less room for adjustment to accommodate building frame variations. Location on the under side of the
slab or spandrel beam, or on the beam web, should be avoided because these are more difficult locations in
which to work, requiring the use of ladders or scaffolding. Connections in such locations slow down the work of
installation and thus increase costs.
8.198.2020.2 Provide plenty of three-way adjustability in all anchorage details, whether fixed or movable. Anchor
members must be large enough to accommodate the full range of tolerance permitted in the building frame, and
8.198.20.3 On a steel frame, ideally all fireproofing would be done after anchors have been installed, but for
various reasons this is usuallycan be impracticable or impossible. Consequently attachment of the anchors to the
steel must be done after fireproofing. This requires either that block-outs be provided in the fireproofing or that the
fireproofing be removed where necessary, then the anchors be attached, and the fireproofing then be filled in or
patched. As this procedure leaves much to be desired, it is preferable, on a fireproofed steel framed structure, to
anchor to the concrete floor or to the top beam flange directly under the slab through block-outs in the concrete at
anchorage points.
8.198.20.4 For attachment of anchors to a steel frame, welding usually the preferred methodcan be used. If
bolting is required instead, the necessary holes in the steel members should may be factory -punched by the steel
fabricator, because in most cases their thickness is such as to make field drilling impractical and costly. By
requiring the holes to be shop punched, the architect can facilitate the wall installation, thus reducing costs.
8.198.20.5 Most installation contractors prefer to make all anchor connections to the building structure
themselves, but this is not always the case. Generally it is felt that if a structural steel or miscellaneous iron
subcontractor does this work, how the connection is to be used he it is not likely to be fully understanood how the
connection is to be used, and the importance of locating it precisely. This objection may not apply when the
anchorage devices are so designed that accuracy of location is not critical.
8.198.20.6 With the current high wind load requirements for high rise buildings, every anchorage detail should be
carefully checked as to the adequacy of bolted connections and the location and size of welds, using as
references the latest specifications of the AISC and the Aluminum Association Wherever possible, eccentrically
loaded anchors should be avoided.
8.198.20.7 Some architects question whether they should show detailed anchorage methods on their drawings or
leave this detailing to the wall contractor. They should be shown or the architectural drawings, because it’s
essential that all sub contractors having work related to the curtain wall know ho the anchors may affect their
work. If the architect show€s complete anchor details in relation to metal decking, rebar concrete, steel frame,
fireproofing and other work, the sub contractors know, when they bid the job, what provisions they must make for
them, and this can invalidates any justification for later backcharges on the grounds that extra work not shown on
the drawings, was required.
Probably the most common condition falling within this category is a concrete floor slab that does not occur where
structural and/or architectural drawings show it should be. When the off-location is in the in or out direction either
one of the following may occur:
a) The gross amount of the off-located slab edge may exceed the size of the horizontally slotted hole for the
anchor connection. This may necessitate field drilling an extra hole in the anchor clip or in the curtain wall
mullion.
b) If the slab edge is too far in, the condition may prevent the supplied anchor from ever reaching the slab edge.
For a bolted connection this condition may be overcome by extra shims and longer connection bolts. Care
must be taken that only properly engineered items of each are used. Excessive shimming or excessively long
bolted connections may cause unrealistic moment loads on fasteners and subsequent anchor failure. If the
anchor design is welded directly to an individual plate in the slab edge or a continuous structural screed angle,
a new and properly engineered anchor with a longer reach will have to be substituted Welding a job-located
steel item, such as a bolt, as a spacer between the anchor and embedment is not an acceptable solution
because of the difficulty in ensuring structural adequacy of the connection.
The effective coordination of curtain wall installations re quires that plates, Unistruts* or other embedments used
for attaching the curtain wall be located in the correct plane. An effective and professional method for
accomplishing this goal is to issue separate shop drawings early in the project, which detail and locate all
embedded items. It is important also to show in the shop drawings the tolerances which can be accepted for the
embedments to be off location from design.
In spite of all well intentioned efforts to prevent problems, embedments can and will end up being off location or
missed entirely. This may happen because hardware did not arrive on site on time, embedment locations were
When concrete is poured, voids are sometimes created in the pour due to air entrapment or inadequate working
of the pour. These are more likely to occur at transition areas such as embedment locations, columns, or corners.
It is not unusual to see several embedded plates only partially surrounded by concrete, leaving their structural
performance highly suspect. It is a good idea for the curtain wall installer to visit the site early in the pouring and
look over the concrete quality, especially immediately adjacent to embedments to which the anchors will attach.
The best solution to a problem is to prevent it from becoming a problem in the first place. To do that effectively,
knowledgeable people must be able to anticipate the problem beforehand and then do something about it early
enough so that it never ends up being a problem. Thus it is averted. This “anticipation” of problems never stops. It
carries through from preliminary design sketches until the final bolt is tightened. Following is a check list of items
that can be considered during the various phases of a project.
• Verify that surround conditions are in accordance with the drawings prior to installation.
• Verify that installation is in accordance with drawings during construction and after completion of
construction.
• If surround conditions or installation are not in accordance with approved design drawings then coordinate
necessary modifications with responsible parties.
The wall units or materials must be carefully stacked, on blocking, in the storage areas designated by the general
contractor. Units which are pre-glazed should be stacked on edge. If protection such as plastic film or plywood is
needed, because of nearby work of other trades, the general contractor should provide such protection as a part
of his responsibility for coordinating the work of all trades on the job.
As the work is installed, the installation contractor should remove any soil or dirt which has been caused by
installation his operations and which is not removed by the normal final cleaning. Cleaning or washing the
installed units at this time would obviously be wasted effort and should not be expected. Thereafter the protection
of the installed work, as well as its final cleaning, which may not be possible until months later, should be done by
the general contractor. It is wholly impractical for the wall or installation contractor to police his installed work
against damage by others after it is put in place.
Recognizing these facts, the general contractor should make certain that:
• adequate temporary storage spaces are provided for the materials of all trades, and stored materials are
protected from damage;
• workmen are cautioned about damaging finished surfaces by the careless use of tools, or by standing or
placing planks, scaffolding or other materials on aluminum surfaces not designed for such purposes, and
• finished metal and glass surfaces are protected from contact with dirty rags or trash of any kind, and from
splashed plaster, cement or fireproofing material and the spatter from welding or burning operations.
All of these precautions are critically important, but the latter deserves special emphasis. A major cause of
staining and damage of aluminum finishes is the splashing, spattering and run-down from adjacent or overhead
masonry work. Acids used in the cleaning of masonry also pose serious protection problem. But good
housekeeping practices can prevent damage from all such hazards. All mortar, plaster, cement, fireproofing
materials, sprays, paints another wet materials should be washed off before they dry on aluminum. Dried
spatterings can be removed with wood or plastic scraper; metal scrapers should not be used because they may
scratch the surface.
The responsibility for sealing the various types of joints in and around the curtain wall is sometimes solely that of
the wall contractor, but more often is divided between two or more parties. Those metal-to-metal joints which
require sealing for weather protection are usually sealed by the parts installing the wall. Metal-to-glass joints are
sealed by the subcontractor doing the glazing work, who may be the wall contractor, an installation subcontractor
or another subcontractor doing the glazing work only. Periphery joints between metal and masonry work or
concrete are usually sealed b a caulking subcontractor, but on the smaller jobs, where the amount of such work is
limited, it may be done by the wall contractor.
Sealants play a critical role in metal curtain walls, and the importance of their proper selection and application can
not be over-emphasized. A variety of sealing materials is available, some of which are more expensive than
others. Generally, only the more expensive “high range” sealants of the elastomeric type are appropriate for use
on aluminum curtain walls, Because of the amount of joint movement to which they are subjected, high
performance capability is a critical essential. Initial cost of the sealant should not be a determining factor in its
selection, as the cost of even the most expensive sealant is small in comparison with the cost of its application.
Even the best sealants cannot be expected to perform well unless they are properly installed. As a rule, all
surfaces to which the sealant is to bond must be thoroughly clean and dry, and only trained applicators should be
entrusted with the sealing work. Every precaution should be taken to ensure that the work is done correctly, as cal
actions to remedy defective applications can be very expensive.
Working conditions are unsafe in high winds and when the area is wet, icy or covered with snow. The amount of
work that can be performed under such conditions is relatively small, the quality of the work necessarily suffers,
Small connections and fasteners are difficult to handle, especially if workmen wear gloves for protection from the
cold.
Sealants should not be applied to wet or icy surfaces. If they are the chemically curing type, they may cure or set
before they can bond to the surface. It is generally recommended by the manufacturers of sealants that they not
be applied in temperatures below 40°F. Moisture from condensation is likely to be present, though perhaps not
visible, on metal and glass surfaces, preventing a satisfactory bond.
Elastomeric Ggaskets of neoprene or other rubber-like materials can become stiff and unworkable in cold
weather, and those of the lock-strip type must be heated and kept warm, to be properly installed. Workmen may
fail to condition them properly and are likely to may damage them by forcing them into place.
A hose test, to be meaningful and worthwhile, must be con ducted methodically and carefully. A standard method
being used for such a field check is described in AAMA Standard 501.2, “Field Check of Metal Curtain Walls for
Water Leak age.” In brief, this prescribes the use of a ¾” garden hose with a specified nozzle from which water
sprayed at a controlled rate is directed at the joints. At least two floors of a curtain wall, 75 ftfeet in width, must
first be completely erected, glazed and sealed, with indoor wall finish omitted. Waterproof masking tape is then
applied to all joints. Starting at the bottom of the installed area, the tape is removed from one joint at a time and
the spray is applied perpendicular to the wall, moving slowly back and forth along the joint for about five minutes.
This process is repeated on all joints in turn, while workmen inside the building check for leaks.
The architect may wish to specify such field checks as a precautionary measure. It must be recognized, however,
that the procedure is not a completely controlled test, and should be considered a supplement to, but not a
substitute for, the more comprehensive, more precise and more rigorous laboratory tests for water leakage
usually specified for testing wall mockups.
AAMA 609: Voluntary Guide Specification for Cleaning and Maintenance of Architectural Anodized Aluminum;
and AAMA 610: Voluntary Guide Specification for Cleaning and Maintenance of Painted Aluminum extrusions and
Curtain Wall Panels, should be followed. It is vitally important, of course, that all cleaning solutions and materials
used be not only compatible with the sealants used in the installation but harmless as well to all other materials
and finishes.