Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region VIII
DIVISION OF SAMAR
Catbalogan City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

FOR ELEMENTARY HEAD TEACHERS 1-III

Name of School Head : _________________________________________ Name of Rater : _________________________________________________
Position : _________________________________________ Position : _________________________________________________
Review Period : _________________________________________ Date of Review : _________________________________________________
Bureau/Center/Service/Division : ________________________________

WEIGH PERFORMANCE
ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE T PER INDICATORS (QUALITY, RATING SCORE
RESULTS
KRA EFFICIENCY, TIMELESS)
1. Instructional
31%
Leadership

1. Increased Academic Achievement of Pupils.

1.1.Attained at least 75% MPS in the June -March (6) 5 - NAT Performance is 75%
A. NAT/LAPG and above
Thru : 4 - NAT Performance is 66-74%
 Enhancement Activities for the 3 - NAT Performance is 56-65
identified least learned skills % MPS
  Construction of Parallel Test 2 - NAT Performance is 28-55%
Questions 1 - NAT Performance is 27%
and below

MOVs: NAT RESULTS

2. Observed at least 12 classes a month with June - March (4) 5 - Observed 16 and more
Post Observation Conference (POC). classes a month with POC
4 - Observed 13-15 classes a
month with POC.
3 - Observed 12 classes a
month with POC.
2 - Observed 7 - 11 classes a
month with POC.
1 - Observed 6 classes and
below a month with POC.

MOV: FORM 3B-1

Observation Checklist
Monthly Supervisory Report

3. Checked and gave technical assistance of June - March (2) 5 - Checked all teachers’ lesson
daily lesson plans preparation plans daily with 100% as to
correctness and congruency
4 - Checked teachers’ lesson
plans with 81-90% TA given
3 - Checked teachers’ lesson
plans with 75-80% TA given
2 - Checked teachers’ lesson
plans with 50-74% TA given
1 - Checked teachers’ lesson
plans with 49% and below
TA given

MOVs: CHECKLIST OF CHECKED

DAILY LESSON PLANS AND
RECORDS OF TECHNICAL
 ASSISTANCE GIVEN

4. Conducted test-visits in all grade levels June - March (4) 5 - 10 and more test-visits
and all subject areas with at least 75% conducted with at least 86-
mastery. 100% mastery
4 - test-visits conducted with
76-85% mastery
3 - test-visits conducted with
66-75% mastery
2 - test-visits conducted with
46-65% mastery
1 - test-visits conducted with
45% and below mastery

MOV: Compilation of Test

Result,Compilation of Test
Questions per grade level

5. Implemented the Project HI-TEACH/and June - March (2) 5 - Implemented Project HI-
other printed materials together with any of TEACH with 5 and above
the other DepEd Programs as listed below DepEd Programs
such as, but not limited to; 4 - Implemented Project HI-
- SRT - MLT TEACH with 4 DepEd
- RRE - Pure Reading Programs
- Peer Tutoring 3 - Implemented Project HI-
- Individualized Instruction TEACH with 3 DepEd
- Project HI-TEACH Implementation(All grade Programs
1 teachers) 2 - Implemented Project HI-
Others, pls specify. _____ TEACH with 2 DepEd
Programs
1 - Implemented Project HI-
TEACH with 1 DepEd
Program.

MOV: Checklist of Teachers

Implementing Project TIED
Classroom Program
Oral Reading Compilations
 Lesson Plan

6. Zero-out non-readers.. June - March (6)

(Note : for Grade 1 teachers only)

6.1. Zero-out non-readers in Grade 1 at the end 3 5 - 0 non- readers
of school year. 4 - 0.1-1% non- readers.
3 - 1.1-2% non-readers
2 - 2.1-3% non- readers.
1 - 3.1% and above non-
readers

MOV:
Compiled Test Results
EGRA
Oral Reading Test Result
Oral Reading Progress Chart
PHIL-IRI test Result
(Note: for Grade 2 to VI)
6.2. Zero-out non-readers in Grade 2 to six at June - March 2 5 - 0 non- readers
the end of school year. 4 - 0.1-1% non- readers.
3 - 1.1-2% non-readers
2 - 2.1-3% non- readers.
1 - 3.1% and above non-
readers

MOV: Compiled Test Results

Oral Reading Test Result
PHIL-IRI test Result

6.3. Improved the reading proficiency level of

Grade 2 to Grade 6 pupils to a higher level
to at least 75% proficiency.

6.3.1. Increased reading performance of 5 - 90% and above Grade 2 to

June - March 2
pupils from frustration level to Grade 6 pupils had
Instructional Level. improved reading
proficiency level.
 4 - 80% - 89% of Grade 2 to
Grade 6 pupils had
improved reading
proficiency level.
3 - 75% - 79% of Grade 2 to
Grade 6 pupils had
improved reading
proficiency level.
2 - 38% - 74% of Grade 2 to
Grade 6 pupils had
improved reading
proficiency level.
1 - 37% and below Grade 2 to
Grade 6 pupils had
improved reading
proficiency level

MOV: Compiled Test Results

Oral Reading Test Result
PHIL-IRI test Result

6.3.2. Increased reading performance of June - March 2 5 - 98% and above Grade 2 to
pupils from instructional level to Grade 6 pupils had
Independent Level. improved reading
proficiency level.
4 - 86% - 97% of Grade 2 to
Grade 6 pupils had
improved reading
proficiency level.
3 - 75% - 85% of Grade 2 to
Grade 6 pupils had
improved reading
proficiency level.
2 - 38% - 74% of Grade 2 to
Grade 6 pupils had
improved reading
proficiency level.
1 - 37% and below Grade 2 to
Grade 6 pupils had
 improved reading
proficiency level

MOV: Compiled Test Results

Oral Reading Test Result
PHIL-IRI test Result

7. Zero-out non-numerates June - March (3) 5 - 0 non- numerates

4 - 0.1-1% non- numerates
3 - 1.1-2% non- numerates
2 - 2.1-3% non- numerates
1 - 3.1% and above non-
numerates
MOV:
Numeracy Test Result
Non-numerates Form

8. Supported in the participation of pupils and Year round (4)

teachers in various activities:

8.1 academic activities/competitions such as, 2 5 - Supported 5 and above

but not limited to ; academic / non-academic
a. math challenge competitions.
b. quiz bee 4 - Supported 4 academic/
c. scouting non-academic
d. literary-musical competition/festival of competitions.
talents 3 - Supported 3 academic /
e. Math, Science & YES O Camp non-academic competitions.
f. Press Conference 2 - Supported 2 academic/
non-academic competitions.
1 - Supported 1 academic/
non-academic competition.
 8.2 non- academic activities/competitions 2 5- Supported 5 and above
such as, but not limited to ; non-academic competition .
4- Supported 4 non-academic
a. SPG Leadership Training competitions.
b. Techno-lympics 3- Supported 3 non-
c. sports competition academic competition s.
d. fun-run 2- Supported 2 non-academic
e. alay-lakad competitions .
f. religious activities 1- Supported 1 non-academic
g. DepEd night competitions..
h. Tree Planting
Others please specify. MOV:
Certificate of Participation
Certificate of Recognition
Certificate of appearance
Pictorials
Financial Report

2. 17%
LEARNING
ENVIRONMENT

1.Prepared the whole school during Brigada Year Round (5) 5 - five indicators had been
Eskwela and Oplan Balik Eskwela period. met with complete
Indicators: documents
a. Well-trimmed school plaza 4 - four indicators had been
b. Well-painted school buildings met with complete
c. Painted and improved land structures documents
d. Well-structured classrooms 3 - three indicators had been
e. Well-structured office of the school met with complete
heads documents
2 - two indicators had been
met with complete
documents
1 - one indicator had been met
with complete documents

MOV:
 BrigadaEskwela Report
Pictorials
Program of work
Accomplishment Report
Financial Report

2. Created an environment that promotes Year Round (2) 5 - five indicators had been
fairness among stakeholders in appreciating met
one’s achievement in their own diverse 4 - four indicators had been
capacities and resources. met
3 - three indicators had been
Indicators: met
a. Recognized the achievement of teachers 2 - two indicators had been
b. Recognized the achievement of pupils met
c. Recognized the contributions of parents 1 - one indicator had been met
d. Recognized the contributions of
Barangay/Municipal Officials
e. Recognized the contributions of NGO’s MOVs: CERTIFICATES OF
APPRECIATION, PICTORIALS,
LIST OF DONORS/DONATION

3. Facilitated the repair in any part of the

reported school building based on the Year round (3) 5 - Met 100% accomplishment
program of work which need rehabilitation – 4 - Met 75-99%
roof/ walls / partition/ceilings/ painting . accomplishment
3 - Met 50-74%
accomplishment
2 - Met 25-49%
accomplishment
1 - Met 24% and below
accomplishment

MOVs: PROGRAM OF WORK,

PICTORIALS, LIQUIDATION
REPORT
 Year round (2) 5 - No academic classrooms
4. Maximized the utilization of all available left unused.
academic classrooms in the school. 4 - One (1) academic
classrooms left unused.
3 - Two (2) Academic
classrooms left unused.
2 - Three (3) academic
classrooms left unused.
1 - Four (4) or more classrooms
left unused.

MOV: CHECKLIST

Year round (5) 5 - Implemented

5. Implemented ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental Education
EDUCATION together with any of the and 4 indicators with
following programs listed below such as, but documents
not limited to ; 4 - Implemented
 Eco-friendly Environmental Education
 Child-friendly and 3 indicators with
 Drug free documents
 Smoke free 3 - Implemented
 Zone of peace Environmental Education
 WASH PROGRAM and 2 indicators with
 Hazard free (Geographical) documents
Others, pls specify: ________ 2 - Implemented
Environmental Education
and 1 indicator with
documents
1 - Implemented
Environmental Education

MOV:
Signage, Pictorials
Documents required of the
program

3.
Human Resource
Management and 23%
Development

1. Conducted at least three (3) School-Based Year round (5) 5 - Conducted five (5) School-
Training with approved training design and Based INSET with complete
with proper documentations. documentations and 3
implemented
4 - Conducted four (4) School-
Based INSET with complete
documentations and 2
implemented
3 - Conducted three (3) School-
Based INSET with complete
documentations and 1
implemented
2 - Conducted two (2) School-
Based INSET with complete
documentations
1 - Conducted one (1) School-
Based INSET with complete
documentations

MOVs: TRAINING DESIGN

APPROVED BY THE SDS,
NARRATIVE REPORTS

2.Observed 100% punctuality in all school- Year round (3) 5 - Zero tardiness
related activities 4 - One to two times tardy
3 - Three to four times tardy
2 - Five to six times tardy
1 - Seven or more times tardy

MOVs: FORM 48, LOG BOOK

3. Observed 100% attendance in all school- Year round (3) 5 - 100% attendance
related activities. 4 - One to two days absent
3 - Three to four days absent
2 - Five to six days absent
1 - Seven or more days absent
 MOVs: FORM 48, LOG BOOK

4. Conducted at least ten (10) conferences with Year round (3) 5 - 13 and more conferences
teachers . conducted
4 - 11-12 conferences
conducted
3 - 10 conferences conducted
2 - 6-9 conferences conducted
1 - 5 and below Conferences
conducted

MOVs: MINUTES OF MEETING,

ATTENDANCE, LETTER TO
THE TEACHERS

5. Conducted at least one (1) action research on Year round (5) 5 - Conducted the action
management for every two years with 100% research with proper
implementation of the intervention. implementation
4 - Conducted the action
research with
recommendations
3 - Conducted action research
2 - Crafted an action research
1 - Unfinished action research

MOV:
Approved Action Research
Accomplishment Report

6. Rated Teachers with signed IPCRF within End of every (4) 5 - Rated all Teachers with
target date. semester signed IPCRF 5 days before
the deadline
4 - Rated Teachers with
signed IPCRF 3 days before
the deadline
3 - Rated Teachers with signed
IPCRF within target date
2 - Rated Teachers with signed
 IPCRF 2 days after the
deadline
1 - Rated Teachers with signed
IPCRF 1 week after the
deadline

MOVs: ACCOMPLISHED IPCRF

4.
Parents
Involvement and 12%
Community
Partnership
1. Conducted quarterly GPTA meetings June to (4) 5 - Conducted six (6) or more
within a school year with MOV’s. March GPTA meetings with MOV’s
4 - Conducted five (5) GPTA
meeting with MOV’s.
3 - Conducted four (4) GPTA
meetings with MOV’s
2 - Conducted three (3) GPTA
meetings with MOV’s
1 - Conducted two (2) and
below GPTA meeting/s with
MOV’s

MOV:
Attendance
Minutes of Meetings
Pictorials

2. Conducted General assembly and SOSA Year round 2 5-Conducted 3 assembly and
within the School Year SOSA with MOV’s
4-Conducted 2 assembly and
SOSA with MOV’s.
3-Conducted assembly and
SOSA with MOV’s
 2-Conducted assembly with
MOV’s
1-Conducted SOSA with
MOV’s

MOV:
Attendance
Minutes of Meetings
Pictorials

3. Generated 100% support from Year round (3) 5 - 98% and above
stakeholders in all school programs stakeholders’ involvement.
and projects. 4 - 86% - 97% stakeholders’
involvement.
3 - 75% - 85% stakeholders’
involvement.
2 - 38% - 74% stakeholders’
involvement.
1 - 37% and below
stakeholders’
Involvement.

MOV:
Attendance
Minutes of Meetings
Pictorials

4. Generated school funds in cooperation Year round (3) 5 - Five and more fund raising
with the stakeholders activities
4 - Four fund raising activities
3 - Three fund raising activities
2 - Two fund raising activities
1 - No fund raising activity
conducted

MOVs: RESOLUTIONS,
ATTENDANCE
5.
School
Leadership, 17%
Management and
Operations

1. Submitted accurate financial liquidation Year round (3) 5 - All liquidations were
on time. submitted one week before
the deadline
4 - All liquidations were
submitted two days before
the deadline
3 - All liquidations were
submitted on time
2 - All liquidations were
submitted one to three days
after the deadline
1 - All liquidations were
submitted four days and
above after the deadline

MOVs: LIQUIDATION FORMS,

CLEARANCE, Transparency
board
2. Submitted all accurate required reports Year Round (1) 5 - All required reports were
on time submitted one week before
the deadline
 ISP 4 - All required reports were
 ORS submitted two days before
 MAR the deadline
 MSR 3 - All required reports were
Others, pls specify______ submitted on time
2 - All required reports were
submitted one to three days
after the deadline
1 - All required reports were
submitted four days and
above after the deadline
 MOVs: ORS, ISP, MAR, MSR

3. Crafted workable and comprehensive Year round (1) 5 - Crafted four management
SIP, AIP, APP, SPPD, and IPCRF. tools
4 - Crafted three management
tools
3 - Crafted two management
tools
2 - Crafted one mngt. tool
1 - No management tools
crafted

MOVs: SIP, AIP, APP,

SPPD,IPCRF and others.

4. Saved at least 75% of PARDO. Year round (2) 5 - 100% PARDO saved
4 - 76% - 99% PARDO saved
3 - 75% PARDO saved
2 - 49% -749% PARDO saved
1 - 48% and below PARDO
Saved

MOV: DROP OUT RATE

5. Decreased at least 75% failure rate for June to (1) 5 - 98% and above decreased
the school year from the previous year. March of failure rate.
4 - 86% - 97% decreased of
failure rate.
3 - 75% - 85% decreased of
failure rate.
2 - 38% - 74% decreased of
failure rate.
1 - 37% and below decreased
of Failure rate.

MOV: FAILURE RATE

6. Assigned teachers in-charge of ancillary June to (1) 5 – Five teachers to ancillary

 services with school Special Order; March services with
 Clinic teacher MOV
 School EMIS coordinator 4 - Four ancillary services with
 School Property Custodian MOV
 Physical Facilities coordinator 3 - Three ancillary services
 Reading coordinator MOV
 ICT Coordinator 2 - Two ancillary services with
 GPP Coordinator MOV
 School Paper Adviser 1 - Only one ancillary service
 SPG Adviser with MOV
 Others , pls. specify
MOV: Special Order,
Accomplishment Report

7. Provided at least 10% monthly financial Year round (1) 5 - 13% and above financial
assistance from MOOE to teachers for assistance
the purchase of materials to be used in 4 - 12% financial
IMs construction. assistance
3 - 10% - 11% financial
assistance
2 - 6% - 9% financial
assistance
1 - 5% and below financial
assistance

MOV: Procurement Plan,

Liquidation Report

8. Tapped the services of at least three (3) Year round (1) 5 – Tapped at least five master
of the district master teachers teachers
quarterly on their field of expertise such 4 – Tapped 4 Master teachers
as; 3 – Tapped 3 Master
 Coaching/mentoring teachers
 Resource speaker 2 – Tapped 2 Master teachers
 Demo teacher 1 – Tapped 1 Master
Teachers

MOVs: Form 3B-1, Letter

Request, Accomplishment
 Report, Certificates

9. Organized functional school grievance June (1) 5- Functional grievance

committee committee with 100%
resolution of conflicts
4 - Functional grievance
committee with one (1)
unsolved conflict.
3 - Functional grievance
committee with two (2)
unsolved conflicts
2 - Functional grievance
committee with three (3)
unsolved conflicts
1 - Functional grievance
committee with four (4) or
more unsolved conflicts

MOV: Resolutions, Minutes,

List of Officers

10. Organized functional Child Protection Year round 1 5- Functional Child Protection
Policy Committee. Policy committee with
100% resolution of conflicts
4- Functional Child Protection
Policy committee with one
(1) unsolved conflict.
3-Functional Child Protection
Policy committee with two
(2) unsolved conflicts

2-Functional Child Protection

Policy committee with
three (3) unsolved conflicts
1- Functional Child Protection
Policy committee with four
(4) or more unsolved
 conflicts

MOVs: List of Child Protection

Policy Committee
Resolution

11.Increased SBM Level of Practice Year Round 5) 5 –Reached Level 3 and

PASBE Accredited
4 - reached SBM Level 2
3 - SBM Level 1
2 - Initiated programs for level
1
1 – Poor Implementation of
the Program

MOV: Assessment Result,

Certificates

Overall Rating for

Accomplishments

How to get rating every KRA:

 Get the average of all the results per KRA
 Multiply it by the weight per KRA

PRINCIPAL HEAD TEACHERS EPS

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

(IPCRF)
 Elementary Head Teachers I-III

SOLOMON C. ALCOBER FAIRLY MATOZA MARIA NANCY B. PUNONG

Area I Area II Area III

JANETH ROLLON CLARO C. DE LA TORRE, JR.

Area IV Area V