Levels of Measurement: Nominal
Levels of Measurement: Nominal
What a scale actually means and what we can do with it depends on what its numbers represent. Numbers
can be grouped into 4 types or levels: nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio. Nominal is the most simple, and
ratio the most sophisticated. Each level possesses the characteristics of the preceding level, plus an
additional quality.
Nominal
Nominal is hardly measurement. It refers to quality more than quantity. A nominal level of measurement is
simply a matter of distinguishing by name, e.g., 1 = male, 2 = female. Even though we are using the
numbers 1 and 2, they do not denote quantity. The binary category of 0 and 1 used for computers is a
nominal level of measurement. They are categories or classifications. Nominal measurement is like using
categorical levels of variables, described in the Doing Scientific Research section of the Introduction
module.
Examples:
Ordinal
Ordinal refers to order in measurement. An ordinal scale indicates direction, in addition to providing
nominal information. Low/Medium/High; or Faster/Slower are examples of ordinal levels of
measurement. Ranking an experience as a "nine" on a scale of 1 to 10 tells us that it was higher than an
experience ranked as a "six." Many psychological scales or inventories are at the ordinal level of
measurement.
Examples:
Interval
Interval scales provide information about order, and also possess equal intervals. From the previous
example, if we knew that the distance between 1 and 2 was the same as that between 7 and 8 on our
10-point rating scale, then we would have an interval scale. An example of an interval scale is
temperature, either measured on a Fahrenheit or Celsius scale. A degree represents the same
underlying amount of heat, regardless of where it occurs on the scale. Measured in Fahrenheit units, the
difference between a temperature of 46 and 42 is the same as the difference between 72 and 68. Equal-
interval scales of measurement can be devised for opinions and attitudes. Constructing them involves an
understanding of mathematical and statistical principles beyond those covered in this course. But it is
important to understand the different levels of measurement when using and interpreting scales.
Examples:
Interval time of day - equal intervals; analog (12-hr.) clock, difference between 1 and 2 pm is same as
difference between 11 and 12 am
Ratio
In addition to possessing the qualities of nominal, ordinal, and interval scales, a ratio scale has an
absolute zero (a point where none of the quality being measured exists). Using a ratio scale permits
comparisons such as being twice as high, or one-half as much. Reaction time (how long it takes to
respond to a signal of some sort) uses a ratio scale of measurement -- time. Although an individual's
reaction time is always greater than zero, we conceptualize a zero point in time, and can state that a
response of 24 milliseconds is twice as fast as a response time of 48 milliseconds.
Examples:
Ratio - 24-hr. time has an absolute 0 (midnight); 14 o'clock is twice as long from midnight as 7 o'clock
Applications
The level of measurement for a particular variable is defined by the highest category that it achieves. For
example, categorizing someone as extroverted (outgoing) or introverted (shy) is nominal. If we categorize
people 1 = shy, 2 = neither shy nor outgoing, 3 = outgoing, then we have an ordinal level of measurement.
If we use a standardized measure of shyness (and there are such inventories), we would probably assume
the shyness variable meets the standards of an interval level of measurement. As to whether or not we
might have a ratio scale of shyness, although we might be able to measure zero shyness, it would be
difficult to devise a scale where we would be comfortable talking about someone's being 3 times as shy as
someone else.
Measurement at the interval or ratio level is desirable because we can use the more powerful statistical
procedures available for Means and Standard Deviations. To have this advantage, often ordinal data are
treated as though they were interval; for example, subjective ratings scales (1 = terrible, 2= poor, 3 = fair,
4 = good, 5 = excellent). The scale probably does not meet the requirement of equal intervals -- we don't
know that the difference between 2 (poor) and 3 (fair) is the same as the difference between 4 (good) and 5
(excellent). In order to take advantage of more powerful statistical techniques, researchers often assume
that the intervals are equal.
Self-test #2
Self-test #3
On to consumer ratings