Characterization of Hemp-Lime Bio-Composite
Characterization of Hemp-Lime Bio-Composite
Characterization of Hemp-Lime Bio-Composite
b.pietruszka@itb.pl
1. Introduction
Construction has a huge share in overall energy use and consequently GHG emission. It is estimated that
the production and transport of building materials is responsible for from 7 up to 9 % of global emission
in western Europe [1]. Lowering its negative impact on the environment is one of the main challenges.
To satisfy the sustainable development criteria, new constructions need to use recycled materials from
existing buildings or bio-based materials which have a low carbon footprint [2,3,4,5,6]. Wider
implementation of materials with organic infill such as hemp-lime composites seems to be one of the
solutions as its current use is still inconsiderable in comparison with commonly used materials. Research
on such materials should bring a better understanding of its properties and wider use in practice.
Hemp is a plant which played a significant role throughout ages in many countries around the world.
Products such as fibres, seeds, flowers were widely used in numerous industries. There are historical
traces of intentional use of hemp-binder composites for building purposes (e.g. India). In modern times
it was applied for the first time during renovation works of historical wattle and daub buildings in north-
east France in 1986. Due to unique properties, it worked well with other organic materials like old and
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
Central Europe towards Sustainable Building 2019 (CESB19) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 290 (2019) 012027 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012027
damp timber [2,4,5]. Success in renovation works led to the development of a technology and the use of
the material in new buildings.
The material, so-called “hempcrete”, has two main constituents: hemp shiv, obtained from Cannabis
Sativa (industrial hemp) plant in a decortication process and chopped to particles of proper size; and
special binder whose main ingredient is hydrated lime. There are four main building techniques using
hemp-lime composites:
• bricklaying of precast hempcrete blocks or bricks,
• tamping of the material in two-sided formwork in order to form a monolithic partition,
• spraying the material onto one-side formwork in order to form a monolithic partition or insulation
layer,
• prefabrication of entire partitions.
Hempcrete can be characterized as a non-load-bearing material with low mechanical strength, medium
density and good insulating properties [7]. Other features are biological and chemical corrosion
resistance, good fire resistance and high vapour permeability [7]. Due to low mechanical strength in
most cases, hempcrete is combined with a load-bearing structure – timber, steel or reinforced concrete
frame. Less dense mixes in loose form are also utilized for horizontal insulation layers of roofs and
floors [5]. Aforementioned ecological values of the material are the result of low embodied energy and
low (or even negative) carbon footprint mostly due to organic infill (of fast-growing and absorbing huge
amounts of CO2 plant [8]) but also lime carbonatation which lowers final emission. Employing materials
with low thermal conductivity also reduces the heating demand, thus decreases the ecological footprint
of the building in the course of its operation [9]. In addition, the hemp-lime layer may absorb and expel
heat and humidity in relation to the environment and act as a thermal storage by reducing the flow of
energy through the wall [3,4,5,6,9,10]. This paper covers selected properties of hemp-lime bio-
composites: compressive strength, thermal conductivity, sorption characteristics and vapour
permeability. Microstructure of various composites is also shown.
First the possibility of manual compression of the mix was tested and three densities of the fresh mix
were chosen – 750 kg m-3 (the highest possible), 650 kg m-3 (the medium) and 550 kg m-3 (the lowest
that guarantee integrity of the sample). Both mixes (T and B) were prepared in the same procedure: first,
the binder was mixed with water for 2-3 minutes then hemp shiv was added and mixed together for
another 5-6 minutes (to obtain a homogeneous mixture). The samples were created by tamping the mix
2
Central Europe towards Sustainable Building 2019 (CESB19) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 290 (2019) 012027 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012027
manually with the use of wooden rammer: in steel forms (10 x 10 x 10 cm) for compressive strength
tests and in plywood forms (30 x 30 x 10 cm) for other tests (when required, smaller samples for testing
were cut out from these blocks). Forms were opened after 1 ÷ 2 hours and samples were moved to curing
chamber for first 28 days (temperature 18ºC ± 2 ºC, relative humidity 90% ± 10%). Rest of the time
samples were stored in temperature 23 ºC ± 2 ºC and relative humidity 55% ± 10%.
3. Experimental part
The experimental programme consisted of mechanical strength, density, thermal conductivity, sorption
and vapour permeability tests.
3
Central Europe towards Sustainable Building 2019 (CESB19) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 290 (2019) 012027 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012027
4
Central Europe towards Sustainable Building 2019 (CESB19) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 290 (2019) 012027 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012027
Adhesion of binder to the hemp shives has influence on the behaviour of the composites under loading.
When forming the composite structure, it is important to get reliable contact zones to ensure adequate
material strength characteristics. At the initial phase of the sample loading, the compressive strength is
determined by the binder. Incorrect mixing or compacting of the samples may lower the effectiveness
of the connection. In addition, the contact area between both materials can crack in the course of
composite drying [3,4,5,6,9,10,11,12,13,15]. This may be caused by the different characteristics of
particular components and different volume changing processes during drying, which may weaken the
contact area between the matrix and the filler.
5
Central Europe towards Sustainable Building 2019 (CESB19) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 290 (2019) 012027 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012027
Results of compressive strength test didn't show big data dispersion between the samples of each type.
Standard deviation values were in range from 0,01 to 0,02 [MPa] and variation coefficient didn’t
exceed 0,11.
As expected higher density of samples resulted in higher compressive strength – dependence in
considered range is close to linear. The type T samples showed better results than type B. The TL550
mix was slightly stronger than T550. Presented results are generally similar to those noted in the
literature [11,12,13,14,15,16] and lower than declared by European hempcrete producer (around
0,9 after 90 days for similar mixes) presumably because of lower hemp quality (presence of a greater
amount of silty parts in the shiv may lower hempcrete strength [8]), slight composition differences and
possible methodology differences. Visual inspection of the samples after destruction indicates that the
process of binding inside was not completely finished. Results are summarized in Table 2.
Obtained density of the dry hemp-lime composites varied from 309 kg m-3 for T550 material to 410 kg
m-3 for the T750 type material (Table 2) and a significant decrease in the initial density shown in Table
1 of the composites can be observed. Such a difference is the result of water evaporating during the
samples drying while leaving the untouched material shape.
As shown in Table 2, thermal conductivity of investigated hemp-lime composites depends on the
material density (material type) and moisture content. The thermal conductivity results for the tested
samples varied in a range from 0.080 W m-1K-1 to 0.12 W m-1K-1 for a dry T550 sample and T750
material conditioned at 90% RH, respectively. Observed increase of thermal conductivity goes together
with increase of sample density and water content in the samples, what is observed for many materials
[3,4,5,6,9,10,11,12,13,15]. Pure hemp shiv (without binder) had the lowest thermal conductivity of
0.046 W m-1K-1 (for a dry sample) and density about 92 kg m-3.
The hemp-lime bio-composites gained moisture content in the range of 16–25 kg m-3 for 50% RH
and 27–42 kg m-3 for 90% RH, for the samples of the lowest and the highest densities, respectively
(Table 3).
Concerning the water vapour diffusion resistance factor µ, the obtained values were in the range from
29 to 24 for the T750 and T550, respectively. Such values are characteristic for vapour-permeable
materials e.g. lime-cement mortars or gypsum board. This means that water vapour can flow freely
through the internal structure of such composites. Obtained results indicate that the impact of the type
of binder on hemp shiv concrete permeability is not evident. It is expected, that the large interparticular
spaces between hemp particles strongly contribute to permeability, while the concrete micro/macro
pores contribute to permeability to a lesser extent.
6
Central Europe towards Sustainable Building 2019 (CESB19) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 290 (2019) 012027 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012027
5. Conclusion
The research on the prospective application of hemp shiv acquired from Polish crops showed
a promising potential as an eco-friendly and sustainable building material. The characteristics of these
composites are determined by the composition of the employed hemp-lime mixture. Properties of the
material are not sufficient for typical load-bearing walls as well as typical thermal insulation layers:
mechanical properties are rather too low (their increase will result in worsening of more important
insulation properties) and thermal conductivity is over two times higher than for insulation materials.
Material can be utilized in a specific applications: formation of “breathable” single-layer walls matching
thermal insulation requirements, containing load-bearing structure inside, and as an infill material
(similar to aerated concrete) additionally insulated. Other applications are: renovation of old buildings
(often containing bio-based materials as a structure or infill) and making of additional vapor-permeable
outer or inner thermal insulation layers on existing partitions.
Analysis of the obtained results enables to formulate the following conclusions:
1. The best thermal properties (low value of thermal conductivity) were obtained by using T550
composite. However, for the other tested composites the λ values are promising for the materials
application as an appropriate filling material for timber frame constructions of the external walls,
even without additional insulation.
2. The best compressive strength results were obtained by using T750 composite, because of
formation of the highest area of contact zones.
3. Hemp-lime bio-composite images have shown that quite a homogeneous structure was obtained
using these composite which can be used for the construction of external walls, preventing the
growth of mold and mitigating the negative impact of interstitial condensation.
4. The density of the hemp-lime composite and related thermal conductivity are both determined by
the content of lime and hemp in the mixture. The increase of filler content simultaneously raises
the apparent density and increases thermal conductivity coefficient.
5. All the hemp-lime composites, due to relatively low water vapour diffusion resistance factor µ
(between 24–29), may be appropriate materials for the external walls, when using the suitable
external and internal plasters providing diffusive openness of the whole barrier.
References
[1] Berge B 2009 The Ecology of Building Materials (Oxford: Elsevier) p 33
[2] Balčiūnas G, Vėjelis S, Vaitkus S and Kairytė A 2013 Physical properties and structure of
composite made by using hemp hurds and different binding materials Procedia Eng. 57 159–
66
[3] Bejat T, Piot A, Jay A and Bessette L 2015 Study of two hemp concrete walls in real weather
conditions Energy Procedia 78 1605–10
[4] Florentin Y, Pearlmutter D, Givoni B and Gal E 2017 A life-cycle energy and carbon analysis of
hemp-lime bio-composite building materials Energy and Build 156 293–305
7
Central Europe towards Sustainable Building 2019 (CESB19) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 290 (2019) 012027 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012027
[5] Latif E, Lawrence M, Shea A and Walker P 2015 Moisture buffer potential of experimental wall
assemblies incorporating formulated hemp-lime Build. and Environ. 93 199–209
[6] Williams J, Lawrence M and Walker P 2018 The influence of constituents on the properties of
the bio-aggregate composite hemp-lime Constr. Build. Mater. 159 9–17
[7] Bevan R and Wooley T 2008 Hemp Lime Construction: A Guide to Building with Hemp Lime
(Great Britain: IHS BRE press)
[8] Instytut Włókien Naturalnych i Roślin Zielarskich 2013 Technologia uprawy i przetwórstwa
konopi włóknistej (Poznań: IWNiRZ)
[9] Brzyski P, Barnat-Hunek D, Suchorab Z and Łagód G 2017 Composite materials based on hemp
and flax for low-energy buildings Materials 10 1–23
[10] Martinez R G 2017 Hygrothermal assessment of a prefabricated timber-frame construction based
in hemp Procedia Environ. Sci. 38 729–36
[11] Walker R, Pavia S and Mitchell R 2014 Mechanical properties and durability of hemp-lime
concretes Constr. and Build. Mat. 61 340–8
[12] Benfratello S, Capitano C, Peri G, Rizzo G, Scaccianoce G and Sorrentino G 2013 Thermal and
structural properties of a hemplime biocomposite Constr. and Build. Mat. 48 745–54
[13] Elfordy S, Lucas F, Tancret F, Scudeller Y and Goudet L 2008 Mechanical and thermal properties
of lime and hemp concrete („hempcrete”) manufactured by a projection process Constr. and
Build. Mat. 22 2116–23
[14] Stevulova N, Kidalova L, Cigasova J, Junak J, Sicakova A and Terpakova E 2013 Lightweight
Composites Containing Hemp Hurds Procedia Eng. 65 69–74
[15] Stevulova N, Kidalova L, Junak J, Cigasova J and Terpakova E 2012 Effect of hemp shive sizes
on mechanical properties of lightweight fibrous composites Procedia Eng. 42 496–500
[16] Gołębiewski M and Adamczewski G 2018 Wytrzymałość na ściskanie kompozytów konopno-
wapiennych wytworzonych metodą ubijania Materiały Budowlane 55 86–8
[17] EN 12390-4:2000 Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength. Specification for testing
machines
[18] EN 1602:2013 Thermal insulating products for building applications. Determination of the
apparent density
[19] EN 12667:2001 Thermal performance of building materials and products. Determination of
thermal resistance by means of guarded hot plate and heat flow meter methods. Products of
high and medium thermal resistance
[20] EN ISO 12571:2013 Hygrothermal performance of building materials and products.
Determination of hygroscopic sorption properties
[21] EN 12086:2013 Thermal insulating products for building applications. Determination of water
vapour transmission properties