The Use of Local Ceramic Materials For The Production of Dental Porcelain
The Use of Local Ceramic Materials For The Production of Dental Porcelain
The Use of Local Ceramic Materials For The Production of Dental Porcelain
ABSTRACT: The use of local ceramic raw materials (Edda clay as source of Kaolin, Feldspar and Quartz)
sourced in Nigeria was studied in this research. The Edda clay sample was chemically analyzed using the
atomic absorption spectroscopy AAS (Model AA 320N) to determine its chemical (oxides) composition.The
dental porcelain was produced by pressing method using POP mould. The specimens produced were tested for
linear shrinkage and apparent porosity properties in order to ascertain their compatibility and acceptability.
The chemical analysis showed that the local clay is kaolinite in nature with silica (SiO 2), alumina (Al2O3) and
iron oxide (Fe2O3) contents of 56..00%, 21.64% and 0.12% respectively. The physical test results reveal a firing
linear shrinkage value of 2.40%, and apparent porosity value of 4.21%. These test results fall within the range
of acceptable values for the production of standard dental porcelain.
KEYWORDS: Atomic absorption spectroscopy, dental porcelain, POP mould, linear shrinkage, apparent
porosity.
I. INTRODUCTION
Porcelain is an inorganic compound made by heating a blend of three silicate clay minerals: Kaolin,
Quartz and Feldspar, each of which reacts upon one another when subjected to appropriate high temperature
(Eke, 2006). Kaolin serves as the plastic material while quartz (silica) and feldspar are the non-plastic materials.
Porcelain generally can be classified into dental, electrical, translucent and hard porcelain. Porcelain as a clay
body when fired becomes very hard, strong and translucent. It is normally very white with smooth surface when
glazed. Porcelain also is unreactive and must contain little or no iron impurities.Dental porcelain, also known as
dental ceramic is a material designed with the purpose of producing dental prostheses which is used to replace
missing or damaged dental structures, e.g. teeth (Rosenblum & Schulman, 1997). The procedure consists of
rebuilding the missing tooth with a porcelain covering (Jacket).
The raw material of dental porcelain contains crystalline ingredients; feldspar (K 2Al2O3.6SiO2), Silica
(SiO2) and Kaolin (Al2O3.2Si)2 2H2O held together in a clear liquid like glass structure (Craig, et al., 1979). The
feldspar is an alkali flux which lowers the firing temperature and controls density and porosity of the clay body.
Silica controls shrinkage and gives rigidity and support to the porcelain body. Kaolin gives soft plastic base,
shape and opacity to the fired porcelain (Eke, 2006).
Jones (1985) classified dental porcelain according to its fusing temperature into:
High fusing (1200 – 14500C) which is used for denture teeth.
Medium fusing (1050 – 12000C) used for inlays, jacket crown and bridge pontic construction.
Low fusing (850 – 10500C) used mainly in the fabrication of porcelain bonded to metal crowns.
Many dental ceramics are fixed permanently into the patient’s month and removed only intermittently
for cleaning. Such materials must have the capacity to withstand the effect of most hazardous environment,
variations in temperature, acidity/alkalinity and high stresses. The dental ceramics fabricated for use as
replacement for natural tissues place a very high demand upon the chemical, physical and biological properties.
For effective functionality as a dental aid, the dental porcelain must be:
Compatible with biological tissues and without eliciting any adverse reactions.
Capable of responding successfully to the stresses and strains.
Able to withstand the corrosive or chemical environment.
Capable of stimulating in most cases, the appearance of natural tissues in terms of both colour and
translucency.
Capable of being reasonably easy to fabricate by traditional methods. (McCabe & Walls, 1998).
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS : The chemical composition of the raw Edda clay sample was carried out at the
Research Centre, Caritas University, Enugu, Nigeria using Atomic Absorption Spectrophometer, AAS (Model
No. AA 320N).
MODEL PREPARATION : The design of the proposed dental porcelain (8cm x 1cm) was drawn on a plain
sheet of paper, and spread on a smooth table surface. A blend of 100g Plaster of Paris (POP) and 100ml water
was stirred vigorously and poured into the design on the table. The mixture poured was allowed to set, forming
leather hard clay. It was later shaped and trimmed accordingly using saw blade and scrapper. The carved model
was allowed to dry in air for 24 hours.
MOULD PRODUCTION : 150ml of water and 250g of POP were measured using measuring cylinder and
digital electronic weighing balance respectively. The water measured was poured into a plastic 150ml of
water and 250g of POP were measured using measuring cylinder and digital electronic weighing balance
respectively. The water measured was poured into a plastic bucket while the POP was gently sprinkled into it.
The blend was stirred thoroughly till flocculation. The suspension was gradually poured into the retaining wall
of the model and allowed for 15 – 20 minutes to set. Therefore, the retaining wall was dismantled, hence the
produced mould was trimmed using scrapper and saw blade.Lock was created on the two sites of the mould
produced to enable it lock effectively when in use. The same procedure was repeated to produce the other side
of the mould. The mould was finally dried in the oven for 24 hours at 110 0C.
PRODUCTION OF DENTAL PORCELAIN : The production sequence adopted in producing the dental
ceramics was; communition, sieving, batching and mixing, forming/shaping, drying, firing and glazing. The air
dried raw materials were crushed and ground to fine aggregates to liberate the mineral constituents. The
powdered samples were also sieved using 100 mesh sieve. Thereafter, the raw samples were batched (with a
total weight of 500g) and mixed thoroughly with water forming a plastic paste. This paste was allowed to age
for 24 hours in order to obtain a workable mix.The aged plastic paste was pressed into the mould and tapped
adequately. After one hour, the formed sample was removed from the mould and air dried for 48 hours in the
ceramic workshop. Thereafter, the dental porcelain was dried in a drying cabinet for 3 days at a temperature of
1100C. Consequently the product was high bisque fired with an electric kiln to a temperature of 12000C.
Finally, the dental porcelain was glazed, after which it was subjected to gloss firing at 1230 0C for 8 hours in the
kiln.
PHYSICAL TESTING OF DENTAL PORCELAIN :The following properties associated with dental
ceramics were determined:
Linear Shrinkage :Linear shrinkage was determined by measuring the dimensional changes that occurred in
the green (wet), dry and fired test samples of the porcelain with the same body composition.
In the green state, the test sample was marked with a shrinkage line of 8.5cm and noted as the original
(green) length. After drying, the linear length of the test sample at this state was measured using vernier calipers.
The linear drying shrinkage was calculated using the relationship:
……………………. (1)
Where, Sd = Linear drying shrinkage
Lg = Green/original length of sample
Ld = Dry length of sample
Consequently, the dried test sample was fired in the kiln at a temperature of 1230 0C. Upon cooling, it
was removed and its fired length, Lf measured. The linear firing shrinkage, Sf was calculated using the formula:
……………………. (2)
The combined effect of the drying and firing known as the total linear shrinkage, was determined
and calculated thus:
……………………. (3)
Apparent Porosity : The test sample was dried in a dry cabinet at 1100C for 24 hours and fired to 12300C in an
electric kiln. The fired test sample was weighed in air and later transferred into a beaker of water, boiled for
5 hours and allowed to cool. The sample was removed from the water, cleaned and weighed to determine the
boiled weight, Apparent porosity, AP was determined using the relationship:
……………………. (4)
Composition Weight %
SiO2 56.00
Al2O3 21.64
MgO 1.23
Fe2O3 0.12
Na2O 2.10
K2O 1.90
LOl 15.34
Materials Composition
g %
Edda Clay 150 30
Feldspar 300 60
Quartz 50 10
VIII. BIOCOMPATIBILITY
According to UIPAC recommendation (2012), biocompatibility is the ability of a material to be in
contact with a living system without producing an adverse effect.Ceramic materials have been used in dentistry
for over 200 years. Hence, they are the most biocompatible of dental restorative materials because they are
chemically very stable (Derek Jones, 1998).
Aesthetics : Aesthetics also known as the judgements of sentiment and taste is scientifically defined as the study
of sensory or sensori-emotional values. A desirable feature of ceramics is that their appearance can be
customized to stimulate the colour, translucency and fluorescence of natural teeth.
Chemical Analysis :The chemical composition of the Edda clay (source of kaolin) is presented in table 1. The
silica (SiO2) and alumina (Al2O3) contents are 56% and 21.64% respectively. The iron oxide content is 0.12%.
These results indicate that the Edda clay is actually kaolinite clay, hence a source of kaolin.
Furthermore, the iron content is very low and is of required acceptable standard for a dental porcelain.
Linear Shrinkage :The results of the linear shrinkage (drying, firing and total) are shown in table 3. It revealed
low shrinkage values of 1.10%, 2.40% and 2.35% for the drying linear shrinkage, linear firing shrinkage and
total linear shrinkage respectively. Thus, these values fall within the acceptable shrinkage values of dental
porcelain.
Apparent Porosity : Table 4 shows the apparent porosity test result of the dental porcelain. An apparent
porosity of 4.2% was obtained. This low value (4.21%) indicated that the dental ceramic depicts increase in
durability and strength, less porous, and confirmed with the suggested evidence (acceptable standard) of Della
and Kelly, 2008.
IX. CONCLUSION
From the production and physio-chemical tests, the following can be concluded.
The local clay (Edda clay) is kaolinite in nature, hence a source of kaolin.
The chemical analysis revealed a very low iron impurity (0.12%) required of an acceptable standard dental
porcelain.
Though the investigated properties gave results that are acceptable for a standard dental porcelain, the
dental ceramic produced using local raw materials is a prototype, hence requires a clinical/medical
compatibility test.
REFERENCES
[1] Craig R. C. et al. (1979). Dental Materials: Properties and Manipulation. 2 nd edition. C. V. Mosby Company, USA. Pp. 238-247.
[2] Della Bona. A & Kelly J. R. (2008). The clinical success of all ceramic restorations. JAM Dent Assoc; 2008 Sept. 139 Suppl: 85-135.
[3] Derek W. Jones (1998). Brief Overview of Dental Ceramics. J. Can Dent Assoc. 64:648-50.
[4] Eke H. O. (2006). Electrical Porcelain Insulators. NIRAN Publications, Owerri, Nigeria. ISBN: 978-38215-2-0.
[5] Jones D. W. (1985). Development of Dental Ceramics, an Historical Perspective. Dent Clin North AM. 29:621-645.
[6] McCabe J. F. & Walls Angus (1998). Applied Dental Materials. Willey-Blackwell Publishers. ISBN 10:0632042087/SBN
13:9780632081.
[7] McLean J. W. (1974). Science and Art of Dental Ceramics: A Collection of Monogrpahs. Lonisiana State University, School of
Dentistry, Continuing Education Program.
[8] McLean J. W. (1979). Science and Art of Dental Ceramics: The nature of ceramics and their Clinical use. 1st Ed. Quintessence
Publishing Co.
[9] RMRDC (2009). Research and Development update of raw materials in Nigeria.
[10] Rosenblum M. A. & Schulman. A. (1997). A Review of all-ceramic restorations. J. AM Dent. Assoc. 1997 Mar. 128(3): 297-307.