CASE STUDY: 3.1 Airport Security and Aircraft Hijacking: A Long History

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

CASE STUDY: 3.

1 Airport security and aircraft hijacking: A long history

Airport security and aircraft hijacking: a long history

                Certainly it’s not a new phenomenon: aircraft hijacking began many decades ago. The
first reported incident took place on 21 February 1931, in Arequipa, Peru when Byron Rickards
(USA) was flying a Ford Tri-motor from Lima to Arequipa. Upon landing, he was surrounded by a
group of armed people belonging to a revolutionary group, but later he was freed.
Subsequently, hijacking of aircraft has turned into a horrifying reality for the industry, which has
killed many people over the intervening years. It’s not restricted to any region – it happens in all
corners of the world. The September 11 attacks in the US alone caused the death of almost
3,000 people.

                In 1948, a flight was on its way from Macau to Hong Kong when it was hijacked, killing
all 25 people who were on board when the flight crashed into the Pacific Ocean. Another serious
hijacking event took place in 1968. PFLP (Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine) followers
hijacked Flight 426 of El Al Airlines of Israel which was flying from London to Rome. Every
hostage was released at different points. Hijacking became a serious issue as the number of
aircraft hijacked began increasing. Between 1958 and 1967, almost 50 aircraft were hijacked. In
1977, Lufthansa Flight 181 was hijacked, again by PFLP supporters. All hostages were saved,
while two of the hijackers were killed during the rescue operation. A similar incident occurred in
1976 when two PFLP supporters and two members of the German Revolutionary Cells hijacked
in midair Air France Flight 139 from Athens. The hijackers’ demands were political, including
releasing imprisoned supporters. After a commando operation, 105 hostages were freed.

          In 1977, a Malaysian aircraft was hijacked. The plane crashed in Kampong Ladang killing
seven crew members and 93 passengers. In 1985, Air India Flight 182 was hijacked and the plane
went down after a planted bomb exploded, killing 329 passengers. In 1985, an Iraqi Airways
flight was hijacked, and 60 people died, and in 1986, an Egypt Air flight was hijacked. Another
major incident was the hijacking of Ethiopian Airlines Flight 961, which led to the deaths of 122
people in 1996. And there have been many other deadly incidents in the history of commercial
air transport.

           After every hijacking, the aviation sector has tried to improve security measures. By the
1970s and 1980s, countries started to have stringent security checks before the commencement
of each flight. In 1973, Cuba and the USA entered into an agreement to prosecute hijackers.
Better scanning machines had been introduced by then. The number of hijacking incidents
dropped as a result of such measures, though they found ways and means of getting around
them. September 11th was the result of such efforts. On September 11, 2001, four commercial
airline flights were hijacked and used in suicide attacks on major landmarks in New York City
and Washington, DC. Boeing 767 aircraft (American Airlines and United Airlines) departed
Boston’s Logan International Airport and were flown into the 110-storey buildings of World
Trade Centre, resulting in the collapse of those buildings and the death of a large number of
people. Simultaneously, the other hijacked flight of American Airlines departed Washington,
DC’s Dulles Airport and was flown into a portion of the Pentagon, the headquarters of the US
Department of Defense. Another flight was also hijacked but did not end up in the targeted
destination. What set this hijacking apart was that the target of the hijackers was not just the
passengers and crew on board, but other people on the ground. The attacks forced the airline
industry to renew and strengthen its focus on security. Bulletproof and locked cockpit doors
became standard on commercial passenger aircraft. Passengers could not enter the cockpit.
Monitoring of cabins is also possible nowadays. Hand luggage and body checks became very
stringent, with each and every passenger manually checked. The items one was permitted to
carry in hand luggage were strictly limited. Despite having these stringent measures on aviation
security in place, a few incidents have occurred in the intervening years.

Read the case study carefully and answer the following questions:

1. Discuss the changes in the focus of hijacking attempts since they began.

2. Describe how security measures were improved over the last eight decades.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy