Exploring The Factors Affecting Teacher's Effectiveness in Higher Education: An Empirical Analysis of District Gujranwala, Pakistan
Exploring The Factors Affecting Teacher's Effectiveness in Higher Education: An Empirical Analysis of District Gujranwala, Pakistan
Abstract
The paper highlights the factors that influence the effectiveness of teachers in higher
education. Teachers are the most important part of society as they considered as nation
builders. In this paper, factors such as mental well-being and work stress over teacher’s
effectiveness are investigated. This paper is based on quantitative data and collected
through structured questionnaires from 150 male and female teachers of public and
private colleges and universities in district Gujranwala using a cluster sampling
technique. According to the results, work stress has a statistically significant difference
in teacher’s effectiveness while mental well-being and demographics have no significant
difference in the teacher’s effectiveness. The findings of the study indicate that external
factors play a more important role than individual factors in terms of effectiveness. The
paper recommends that simulated social skill training should be adopted for achieving the
teacher’s effectiveness. By providing a favorable environment under teacher training and
development programs, non-cognitive aptitudes i.e., self-esteem, personality, confidence
can be enhanced. Meditation and Yoga should be used to overcome stress among
teachers.
Keywords: Teacher’s Effectiveness, Job Stress, Mental Well-being
JEL Classification: A20, I23, I31
How to Cite:
Hameed S., & Khan, K. S. (2020). Exploring the Factors affecting Teacher’s
Effectiveness in Higher Education: An Empirical Analysis of District Gujranwala,
Pakistan. International Journal of Business, Economics and Finance, 1(1), 13-29.
1. Introduction
It is an undeniable fact that education makes a man and knowledge is power.
Development of nations depends on how educated their nationals are who productively
http://thessri.com/Archives.php 13
International Journal of Business, Economics and Finance
2020, Vol. 1(1), 13-29
14 http://thessri.com/Archives.php
Hameed & Khan
Exploring the Factors affecting Teacher’s Effectiveness in Higher Education
http://thessri.com/Archives.php 15
International Journal of Business, Economics and Finance
2020, Vol. 1(1), 13-29
16 http://thessri.com/Archives.php
Hameed & Khan
Exploring the Factors affecting Teacher’s Effectiveness in Higher Education
university teachers in Pakistan and Finland. The web-based questionnaire has four
subscales, namely workplace bullying, good working conditions, promotion &
development opportunities and social support at work. The results of univariate analyses
illustrated that in Finland, three variables have significant effect i.e. promotion &
development, social work at support and good working conditions are higher than
Pakistan. While workplace bullying variable effect was highest in Pakistani male teachers
than Finnish males. Stress symptoms were scored higher in Finnish females than male
teachers; it showed a slightly weak but significant relation in gender difference.
Gandhi (2017) explained that teachers can be more productive and creative if a good
working environment, handsome salary packages and opportunity for promotions are
provided to them. The present study was applied to the 100 teachers of Degree Colleges
situated in district Abohar, India using occupational stress index (OSI) and work
satisfaction scale (JSS). Descriptive statistics results reported that a considerable negative
relationship was found between work stress and work satisfaction (coefficient of
correlation value -0.30 at a significance level of 0.05 and 0.01) in line with the findings
of Kyriacou and Sutcliffe (1978). The higher the work stress the lower will be work
satisfaction and vice versa.
Good student-teacher relationship increases teacher’s productivity, while, misbehavior of
students decrease the mental wellbeing of a teacher. This relationship exists as a mediator
in the model of teacher’s wellbeing. To test this hypothesis, Aldrup et.al (2018) collected
data through a self-designed questionnaire to assess student misbehaviour; Mashlach
burnout inventory MBI to measure emotional fatigues and student-teacher relationship
scale (Pianta, 2001) from 227 teachers of 106 secondary schools located in Germany. The
results of descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation and correlation) showed a
significant relationship between student misbehavior and teacher wellbeing (r = 0.51, p <
.001). These negative mediating variables effect on teacher’s wellbeing i.e. an increase in
emotional exhaustion and a decrease in zeal and zest. Teacher’s wellbeing is enhanced
with a good and friendly relationship with students (emotional exhaustion: r = -0.36, p <
.001. work enthusiasm: r = .42, p < .001).
Jeffrey and Gretchen (2018) explored how teacher’s emotions, reality insightful and
performance is affected by classroom circumstances. The respondents of 21 elementary
school teachers located in Southeast of United States participated in this study through
semi-structured interviews using consensual qualitative research technique. This
technique was recommended in a study by Hill et al. (1997). The aim of using CQR is to
know the teacher's perceptions through consensual data analysis. 20 females and one
male participated in this study, their teaching experiences range up to more than twenty
years (M=10.04 years). Findings of the study exposed that psychosocial hurdles are
prevailing among teachers that are disrupting their effective teaching methods.
As limited studies have done to explore the effect of mental well-being and work stress
on teacher’s effectiveness, by taking presage, product, process and economic standards
specifically in higher education in Pakistan. The investigator feels the need for
conducting a systematic study of measuring determinants of teacher’s effectiveness
http://thessri.com/Archives.php 17
International Journal of Business, Economics and Finance
2020, Vol. 1(1), 13-29
among teachers working in a different type of colleges and universities. Literature shows
there have been studies on teacher stress and mental well-being, particularly in primary
and secondary schools level. There is still a gap in higher education context where studies
are requisite on teacher effectiveness.
3. Theoretical Framework
This section demonstrated the theoretical framework for the job stress & mental health
impact on teacher’s effectiveness based on the literature.
3.4 Job Stress
According to Selye, stress is a condition recognized by a disorder that comprises all the
non-specifically triggered fluctuations in the body (Krohne, 2001). Stress can be
Affirmative as well as negative as different people perceive different levels of stress. The
euphoric state has Affirmative effects as the amount of stress is moderate for those who
are experiencing it while the dysphoric state has negative effects as the amount of stress,
in this case, is extreme for those who are experiencing it.
3.5 Mental Well-being
World Health Organization (WHO, 1999) defines mental well-being as a situation in
which an individual has no disease, disability or any kind of sickness and led a peaceful
life. The ability to deal with one’s environment where gut feelings are contented is
termed as mental well-being. A mentally healthy person faces the reality of life
confidently and demonstrates balanced behavior in every sphere of life. Mental well-
being is considered as an important element of well-built personality.
3.4 Teacher Effectiveness
Snyder et al. (1991) stated that a teacher is effective who constantly accomplished desired
goals which emphasize students learning either directly or indirectly.
Dunkin (1997) define teacher proficiency as the possession of necessary skills and
knowledge and performance of the teacher as he or she acts in the process of teaching
while using teaching practices and practical implications. The term effectiveness refers to
the examination of cognitive and non-cognitive abilities of a teacher, his skills and
capabilities as well as learning outcomes and performances of the students.
3.4 Determinants of Teacher Effectiveness
Teacher’s effectiveness can be characterized to the given standards;
Presage Standards
Process Standards
Product Standards
Economic Standards
18 http://thessri.com/Archives.php
Hameed & Khan
Exploring the Factors affecting Teacher’s Effectiveness in Higher Education
http://thessri.com/Archives.php 19
International Journal of Business, Economics and Finance
2020, Vol. 1(1), 13-29
The conceptual framework explains the theoretical framework, which shows the impact
of work stress and mental well-being on the effectiveness of teachers.
Affirmative Reality
Self-analysis insightful
Unified Self-
Personality sufficiency
Teamwork Ecological
synergy Mastery
WORK Demographic
MENTAL
STRESS Factors
WELL-BEING
Employee
Empowerment
TEACHER's
EFFECTIVENESS
Work Work Age
Burden Ambiguity
Gender
Policy
Job Hazard PRESAGE
Violation
STANDARDS Qualification
PROCESS
STANDARDS Experience
PRODUCT Level of
STANDARDS Teaching
Mode of Employ
ECONOMIC
STANDARDS
Marital Status
20 http://thessri.com/Archives.php
Hameed & Khan
Exploring the Factors affecting Teacher’s Effectiveness in Higher Education
4 Methodology
4.1 Sample
The unit of perception in the current study is teachers working in Private and Public
Colleges and Universities of Gujranwala District. The investigation depends on the
overview because of cross-sectional information, where every representative was
considered as the unit of perception alongside data was accumulated in regards to the
teachers currently employed. Cluster sampling techniques are used and data is collected
from 150 teachers working in private and public colleges and universities in Gujranwala
district.
The response rate was 75.66% which was acceptable in social sciences (Fowler, 1988).
The participants were 80% female and 20% male with a mean age of 37.6 years. More
than 50% of them were married (107 respondent or 52.71%), 71 single, 17 separated, 8
divorced. The sample represented 192 were Malays, 7 Chinese, 3 Indian and only 1
foreigner. The average experience of the participants in their present profession was 7.2
years. The response rate was 67.66% which was very much acceptable in social science
research (Fowler, 1988). The participants were 62.56% female and 37.44% male, 50% of
them were married (76 respondent or 50.6%), 64 single, 05 separated, 05 divorced. The
sample represented 101 were Master’s degree holder, 40 were MPhil and 9 were PhD.
The average experience of the participants in their present profession was 1-5 years.
50.6% teachers were working in the private sector while 49.4% belongs to public sector
institutions.
4.2 Survey Instrumentation
In the present study, primary data is employed for analytical purposes. The data was
collected using a demographic questionnaire, work Stress questionnaire developed by
Srivastava and Singh (1981). The scale is subdivided into subscales of Work burden
(RO), Work Hazard (JH), Employee Empowerment (EE), and Work ambiguity (RA) and
Policy violation (RV). Mental well-being inventory (M.H.I) is being used in the current
paper to measure the Affirmative mental well-being of teachers. It has been designed and
standardized by Jagdish and Srivastava (1983). The prominent features of the M.H.I are
the symptoms of mental wellbeing and the absence of mental ill well-being of
individuals. Teacher effectiveness scale (TES) is a self-administrative scale and is
designed by D. N. Mutha and Pramod Kumar in 1974.
4.3 Scoring of the Scale
All the 28 items of teacher effectiveness scales were false keyed statements. These were
given the score of 1,2,3,4, and 5 for strongly disagree, disagree, undecided, agree and
strongly agree respectively. The total sum of these values gives the teacher effectiveness
score for the subject content. Total score varies from 28 to 140 showing high teacher
effectiveness to low teacher effectiveness. In the present paper, cluster sampling
techniques are used and data is collected from 150 teachers working in private and public
colleges and universities in Gujranwala district.
http://thessri.com/Archives.php 21
International Journal of Business, Economics and Finance
2020, Vol. 1(1), 13-29
22 http://thessri.com/Archives.php
Hameed & Khan
Exploring the Factors affecting Teacher’s Effectiveness in Higher Education
http://thessri.com/Archives.php 23
International Journal of Business, Economics and Finance
2020, Vol. 1(1), 13-29
Summary of all results of the measurement model (i.e. common factor analysis and
confirmatory factor analysis) are presented in Table 4.
Table 4: Summary of Measurement Model Results
Outer Cronbach
Latent Variables Items Retained CR
Loading Alpha
Employee
EE1, EE2, EE4 0.55-0.73 0.66
empowerment
RO1, RO2, RO3, RO4,
Work burden 0.53-0.62 0.77 0.93
RO5
Work ambiguity RA1, RA2, RA3 0.60-0.76 0.75
Policy violation RV1, RV2, RV3 0.57-0.59 0.76
Affirmative Self
PSE2, PSE4, PSE5 0.50-0.68 0.82
Evaluation
Unified Personality IP2, IP3, IP4, IP5 0.53-0.69 0.79 0.87
Teamwork synergy GOA1, GOA2, GOA3 0.50-0.75 0.73
Reality insightful PR1, PR2, PR3, PR4, PR5 0.54-0.64 0.72
Self-sufficiency A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 0.54-0.64 0.84
Environment Mystery EM1 0.57 0.50
5.3 Structural Model
After a thorough checkup of the measurement model, the structural model is tested for
research hypotheses.
5.3.1 Specification of the Structural Model
The structural model is presented in Figure 1. The structural model is presenting a mean
score of eleven latent variables. Out of these variables, mental well-being and work stress
are exogenous variables (independent variable). Teacher effectiveness is endogenous
variables (dependent variable).
5.3.2 Exogenous Variable
This research has two exogenous variables i.e. mental well-being and work stress. Mental
well-being is measured through 6 items i.e. Affirmative Self Evaluation, Unified
Personality, Teamwork synergy, Reality insightful, Self-sufficiency and Ecological
Mystery, while work stress is measure through 4 items i.e. Work burden, Employee
Empowerment, Work ambiguity, Policy violation.
24 http://thessri.com/Archives.php
Hameed & Khan
Exploring the Factors affecting Teacher’s Effectiveness in Higher Education
http://thessri.com/Archives.php 25
International Journal of Business, Economics and Finance
2020, Vol. 1(1), 13-29
6 Conclusion
Three null hypotheses are formulated for the present study. First was hypothesized that
demographic factors have no significant difference in the teacher’s effectiveness. Results
revealed that β=0.10, p>0.05 (0.43) demographic factors has no significant impact on
teachers effectiveness. The findings of the study might indicate that external factors may
play a more important role than individual factors in terms of teacher’s effectiveness.
Second was hypothesized that mental well-being has a significant difference in teacher’s
effectiveness. Results revealed that β=-0.14, p>0.05 (0.10) which showed that mental
well-being negatively correlates with teacher’s effectiveness. The results revealed that
perhaps there exist some discrepancies over the age of respondents, the radius of the
population included in the study. Perhaps this negative impact is due to the region of the
population selected or the understanding and exposure level of the respondents. With this
respect, it might be inferred that institution administration could have a crucial impact on
regulating the working conditions and thus, affecting the mental well-being of the
teachers.
This suggests that teachers in this sample may believe that they can perform the
behaviors necessary to produce the desired outcome but, at the same time, feel quite
negatively about themselves generally (Passer and Smith, 2008).
Third was hypothesized that work stress has a significant difference in teacher’s
effectiveness among higher education teachers. Results revealed that β=0.23, p=0.01
which showed that work stress has a significant difference in the teacher’s effectiveness.
High-stress level brings a low level of effectiveness and vice versa.
6.1 Proposed Recommendations
Simulated social skill training should be adopted for achieving the teacher’s
effectiveness. By providing a favorable environment under teacher training and
development programs, non-cognitive aptitudes i.e., self-esteem, personality, confidence
can be enhanced.
Teachers are dissatisfied with the educational policies and administration, pay and other
benefits, material rewards and advancement. All the institution administrators and higher
authorities should take a keen interest in developing and maintaining the positive mental
health of teachers. Also, it will increase the teacher’s performance by influencing
decisions based on mental health.
The development and adaptation reforms of teacher’s activities in the classroom
environment must be addressed effectively to achieve good results. The rules and
regulations of service organizations should be amended and they should be compulsorily
observed keeping in view the future security of their employees.
Increase in salary enhanced the social and economic status of a teacher. They regard
themselves among the superior class in society and also reduce many of their mental
well-being problems, tensions, anxieties. Healthy minds are more creative and productive
and are more efficient.
26 http://thessri.com/Archives.php
Hameed & Khan
Exploring the Factors affecting Teacher’s Effectiveness in Higher Education
References
Adams, E. (2001). A proposed causal model of vocational teacher stress. Journal of
Vocational Education and Training, 53(2), 223–246.
Adawo, M. A. (2011). Has education (human capital) contributed to the economic growth
of Nigeria?. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 3(1), 46-58.
Ahsan, N., Abdullah, Z., Fie, D. Y. G., & Alam, S. S. (2009). A study of work stress on
work satisfaction among university staff in Malaysia: Empirical study. European
journal of social sciences, 8(1), 121-131.
Alavi, S. H. R., & Benadeki, M. D. (2005). Mental hygiene of the special schools
teachers in Kerman, Iran. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental
Health Services Research, 32(3), 293-296.
http://thessri.com/Archives.php 27
International Journal of Business, Economics and Finance
2020, Vol. 1(1), 13-29
Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., Ludtke, O., Gollner, R., & Trautwein, U. (2018). Student
misbehavior and teacher well-being: Testing the mediating role of the teacher-
student relationship. Learning and Instruction, 58, 126-136.
Arikewuyo, M. O. (2004). Stress management strategies of secondary school teachers in
Nigeria. Educational Research, 46(2), 195-207.
Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2003). Hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of
retailing, 79(2), 77-95.
Nowak, A. Z., & Dahal, G. (2016). he contribution of education to economic growth:
Evidence from Nepal. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 5(2), 22-41.
Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher
education. Journal of teacher education, 60(5), 497-511.
Bhardwaj, J.S. and Singh, P. (2013). Study of Teacher Effectiveness of Senior
Secondary School Teachers with Regard to Their Personality Type. Journal
of Teacher Education and Research. Vol. 8 (1), pp. 52-60.
Dunkin, M. J. (1997). Assessing teachers’ effectiveness. Issues in educational
research, 7(1), 37-51.
Fowler, J. W. (1988). Faith development and pastoral care. Fortress press.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable
variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing
Research 18(3), 382-388
Gandhi N., (2017) Relationship between Occupational Stress and Work Satisfaction.
International Journal of Advanced Educational Research 2(6), 255-257.
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least
squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business
research", European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Nutt Williams, E. (1997). A guide to conducting
consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517–571.
Jagdish, D., & Srivastava, A. K. (1983). Mental health inventory. Varanasi:
Manovaigyanik Parikshan Sansthan.
Jeffrey M. W., Gretchen G. R. (2018). A Consensual Inquiry of Teachers’ Responses to
Classroom Situations: Implications for School Counselors. Journal of Educational
Research and Practice, 8(1), 19-30.
Jorm, A.F., Kitchener, B.A., Sawyer, M.G., Scales, H., and Cvetkovski, S. (2010).
Mental Well-being First Aid Training for High School Teachers: A Cluster
Randomized Trial. BMC Psychiatry 10, 51, 1-12.
Kaur, R., Ranu, S.K., and Kaur, H. (2014). Teacher Effectiveness among Women
Teachers in Relation to Work Satisfaction. Malwa Journal of Education,
1(4), 26-32.
Kim, Y. J., & Terada-Hagiwara, A. (2013). A survey on the relationship between
education and growth with implications for developing Asia. Journal of
International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 4(1), 1350005.
Kingdon K, Aslam M, Rawal S, Das S (2013). Are contract teachers and para-teachers a
cost-effective intervention to address teacher shortage and improve learning
outcomes? EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education,
28 http://thessri.com/Archives.php
Hameed & Khan
Exploring the Factors affecting Teacher’s Effectiveness in Higher Education
http://thessri.com/Archives.php 29