TQM Module 1
TQM Module 1
TQM Module 1
BA-MGT 103
OPERATION MANAGEMENT
(TQM)
RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
Cities of Mandaluyong and Pasig
SESSION NO. 1
Objective
1. Define quality.
2. Identify primary elements, core concepts and benefits of total quality
management.
3. Distinguish between traditional management and TQM.
4. Compare and contrast reengineering and TQM.
Total Quality Management (TQM) is not a fresh idea. The approaches advocated
by Deming, Juran, Crosby, and others have long been used by well effective
manages. The most noteworthy feature is the level of mutual trust that is needed
by both management program and staff to create a culture in which effective quality
management program can be successful. Quality is currently everyone’s task, not
just the inspection department. People are anticipated is currently everyone’s task,
not just 5the inspection department. People are anticipated to serious weigh up
their jobs and make the first move to improve their part of the process. Open,
objective measurements are necessary.
Define Quality:
Quality is lot more than the non-existence of defects which allow companies to
meet customer expectations. Quality needs-controlled process improvement, allowing
companies to exceed customer’s expectations. Quality will let companies to re-
establish pride and loyalty in their organizations. Quality can only be attained by non-
stop improvement of all systems and processes in the organizations, not simply the
production of products and services but also the design, development, service,
purchasing, administration and indeed, all aspects of the transaction with the
customer. Each one must work in concert toward similar end.
Quality can only be observed through the eyes of the customers. An
understanding of the customer’s expectations is the first step. Then exceeding those
expectations is required. Communications will be the key. Going beyond customer
expectations guarantees meeting all the definitions of quality.
3. User based This definition is founded on the idea that quality is an individual
issue and products that best please their preferences are those with the highest
quality. This is an approach based on reason but directs to two problems. First
consumer preferences differ extensively and it is not ways to combine these
preferences into products with broad demand. This leads to the selection
between a niche strategy and a market aggregation approach which strives to
identify those product attributes that support the needs of the biggest number
of customers. Another concerns whether quality and customer satisfaction is
the same. Probably not. One may confess a Montero has many quality
attributes, but contentment may be better realized with an Adventure. One has
only to remember the box office success of recent motion pictures that endure
from poor quality but are obviously favored by the largest number of
moviegoers.
5. Valued based - It is defined using costs and prices as well as the number of
attributes. Hence, the consumer’s purchase decision is founded on quality at
an up to standard price. This approach is based on two criteria which quality
and value. The highest quality product is not typically the best value. The
description is given to the “best buy” product or service.
Quality Types
In general, quality is meeting and exceeding customer expectations at a price
that he is willing to pay to possess the product or service. There are three types of
quality which are quality of design, quality of conformance and quality of performance.
1. Quality of Design – is all about set characteristics that the product or
service must minimally have to satisfy the requirements of the customer based
on market research. Thus, the product or service must be designed in such a
way so as to meet at least minimally the needs of the consumer at a given cost.
However, the design must be simple and also less expensive so as to meet the
customers’ product or service expectations. Quality of design is influenced by
many factors such as products type, cost, profit policy, demand of the product,
availability of part and materials, and product reliability.
This process of developing a product requires effective exchange of ideas
among marketing, sales, services, manufacturing, research and development
departments. Market research and service call analysis are the center of this
process. Market research on consumer shall indicate the customer need
(current and potential) and sales call analysis will provided investigation about
problems customers face with the product performance.
2. Quality of Conformance – is basically meeting the standards or user-based
characteristics defined in the design phase after the product is manufactured
or while the service is delivered. It refers to the extent in which the firm and its
suppliers are able to manufacturing products with expected level of reliability
and uniformity at a specified cost with quality requirements based on the study
made on quality design. This phase is also concerned about quality control
starting from raw material to the finished product. Three broad aspects are
covered in definition, namely defect detection, defect root cause analysis, and
defect prevention. Defect prevention deals with the means to deter the
occurrence of defects and usually achieved using statistical process control
analysis collected from process. Subsequently, the root causes behind the
presence of defects are investigated, and finally corrective actions are taken to
prevent recurrence of the defect.
Quality Levels
Quality focused organization must evaluate at three levels namely
organization, process and individual. Quality system and standards must be defined
at each level and then manage quality through improvement efforts. The organization,
process and individual are co-dependent and are linked together in a total system that
eventually decides the quality of products and services of an organization, having
received faulty parts by a customer would mean a problem at any or all levels. Perhaps
an operator has assembled the faulty part incorrectly or allows the faulty part shipped.
Or probably there just problems in the basic processes such as design, production,
order entry or material acquisition processes. Organization, represented by top
management could also be blamed because of not being able to identify the quality
necessary to be competitive, inappropriate strategy, unable to establish necessary
policies, budgets, goals and measures.
Organizational Level
The organizational level quality requirements revolve around its customers’
quality requirements. A customer is anyone who receives one or more of the
organization’s products or services who could be an internal or external one. The
following issues may help define quality at this level:
1. Products or services that meet customer expectations.
2. Products or services that do not meet customer expectations.
3. Products or services that are needed by the customers but they do not receive.
4. Products or services that are not needed by the customers but they do not
receive.
The resolution to these issues will include productivity and cost requirements and
those that are traditionally linked to quality. Timeliness, accessibility and value for
money are quality features for a customer. During interviews identified customer
requirements are converted into specific measures and then into performance
standards.
Most quality-focused organizations, aside from data gathering use
benchmarking to compare its functions with the same functions as other organizations.
Benchmarking should be a continuing concern to make certain that the organization
employs ongoing improvement to compete and deliver demanded customer
requirements. Customer feedback is also essential to ensure that organizational
quality management is a constant concern. Feedback on a a regular basis must come
from both internal and external customers. Standards coming from customer
requirements must be the foundation for goal-setting, problem solving, performance
evaluation, incentive compensation, nonfinancial rewards and resource allocation.
Process Level
At the process level, units of the organization are categorized into functions or
departments like marketing, operations, finance, human resource and so on. Most
innovativeness, and reliability, ease of used, timeliness volume, rate, cost and
flexibility.
Three issues have to be answered for each ouput of the individual tasks in
order to develop individual qualities which are:
1. The requirement of both internal and external customers
2. The manner of measuring the requirements
3. The specific standards for each measure
Under the human performance system, the quality of each individual work on
performance is shaped by these factors:
1. The input an individual receives which consists of how clear the
performance expectation is, the reasoning of the work procedures, the
sufficiency of resources, the appropriateness of skills and knowledge and
how clear the cues that prompt performance.
2. The positive/negative results for performing as desired/not desired.
3. The feedback an individual obtains such as the nature of the information
given, when how frequent it is given and the manner in which it is provided.
4. An individual’s physical, mental and emotional capacity.
Quality Paradigms
1. Custom Craft paradigm – In this paradigm the focus is on the product or
service and performance should be exactly as what customer demands. Each
products or service and performance should be exactly as what customer
demands,. Each product unit is designed and built exactly the way the
customer wants it. The requirements include skilled craftsperson, basic hand
tools, and demand for unique product. Some examples of this pattern are from
bank loans, coffee shops, tailor shop s and furniture suppliers.
Cost of Quality
Cost of quality is a method that permits an organization to decide on the level
to which its resources are used for activities that avoid poor quality, that assess the
quality of the organization’s products or services, and that result from internal and
external failures. An organization is able to determine the potential savings to be
gained by implementing process improvement having such information.
Quality-related activities that incur costs may be divided into prevention costs,
appraisal costs, and internal and external failure costs.
1. Prevention Costs – These are incurred to prevent or avoid failure problems.
Prevention activities lead to reduce of failure and appraisal cos. These costs are
associated with the design, implementation, and maintenance of the quality
management system. They are planned and incurred before actual operations, and
they could include:
a. Product or Service Requirements – Establishment of qualifications for inward
bound materials, processes, finished products, and services.
b. Quality Planning- Drawing of plans for quality, reliability, operations,
production, and inspection.
c. Quality Assurance – Planning and continuance of the quality system.
D, Training – Development, preparation, and continuance of programs.
2. Appraisal Cost. – These costs are associated with measuring and monitoring
activities related to quality standards and performance requirements. These cost tale
place from spotting defects rather than prevention. These costs are associated with
the supplier’s and customer’s evaluation of purchased materials, processes, products,
and services to ensure that they conform to specifications. They could include:
a. Verification – Checking of inward bound material, process set up and
products against contracted specifications.
b. Quality Audits – Confirmation that the quality system is operating properly.
c. Supplier Rating – Appraisal and endorsement of suppliers of products and
services.
3. Internal Failure Costs – These costs are acquired to treat defects revealed earlier
when the product or service is delivered to the customer. These costs happen when
the results of work fail to attain design quality standards and are noticed before they
are transferred to the customer. They could include:
a. Waste – Performance of needless work or holding of stock as an outcome
of errors, poor organization, or communication.
b. Scrap – Faulty product or material that cannot be repaired, used or sold.
c. Rework or rectification – improvement of flawed material errors.
d. Failure analysis, activity necessary to ascertain to ascertain the reasons of
internal product or service failure.
4. External Failure Costs – These are costs obtained to treat defects exposed by
customers. These costs occur when products or services that fail to attain design
quality standards are not discovered until after transfer to the customer. They could
include:
a. Repairs and Servicing – Of both returned products and those in the field.
b. Warranty Claims – Failed products that are replaced or services that are re-
performed under a guarantee.
c. Complaints – all work costs connected with handling and servicing customers
complain.
d. Returns – Handling and investigation of discarded or recalled products,
including transport costs.
There are two main components of cost of quality which are cost of
conformance and cost of non-conformance.
a. Cost of Conformance – is the cost of making available products or services
based on required standard. Simply it is a good amount spent such as
prevention and appraisal cost.
b. Cost of Non-Conformance – means failure costs linked with a process not
functioning based o required standards. Simply it is a pointless amount
spent like internal and external costs.
Essentially quality costs are defined as the total costs acquired by investing in
the prevention of non-conformance to requirements and appraisal of a product
or service for conformance to requirements and failure to meet requirements.
2. Upward communication – Flow of information takes place from the lower level
employees to the top-level management. The lower level employees are able
to offer suggestions on the effect of TQM to the upper level management using
this type of communication. Supervisors should listen effectively and
incorporate the insights and constructive criticism offered by the employees in
correcting the situations that arise through the use of TQM. 5this creates a
level of trust between supervisors and employees. This is also similar to
empowering communication, where supervisors listen to others
6. People make Quality – Most of the quality problems within an organization are
not usually within the control of an individual employee. The system often
comes in the way of employees who are to do a good job. In such as situations,
motivation by itself cannot work. Therefore, managers are required to ensure
that all necessary is prepared to let people to produce quality. This creates an
environment where people are eager to take responsibility for the quality of
their own work. Releasing the talents of everyone within the organization in
this way can generate culture for quality improvement.
BENEFITS OF TQM
There are many benefits of TQM. Essentially TQM refers to the total quality in
fulfilling the needs of the customers, the quality of the products and the quality of life.
Having these focuses leads to better business in several different ways.
1. Creates a good corporate culture – TQM is an approach where the customer is the
center point of the business rather than the department. Therefore, quality is
transformed from an issue of the production department to a strategic business entity
to meet global challenges. The TQM philosophy revolves around developing a culture
that supports total commitment to customer satisfaction through continuous
improvement.
2. Better reviews from customer – Another benefit of TQM is that customers and clients
are highly satisfied with the performance. Given the quality assurance testing
procedures, the procedures, the products of the company will constantly meet the
requirements and needs of clients and customers. Therefore, the cust0mers stay with
the company longer, deepen their relationship with the company and demonstrate less
price sensitivity while recommending the company’s products or services to others.
Customer satisfaction and high-performance results also possibly lead to high reviews
in different publications and newspapers which further enhances the image of the
company and in turn that of the business.
3. Better performance from employees – Through TQM, there is often more attention
placed on meeting the needs of the employees or internal customers. The training
given to the employees as part of the program can boost employee morale at the
workplace resulting in employees working harder to achieve the goals of TQM.
results. This management style is predicated on the “ends justify the means”
philosophy. This “charade of conformance” fosters dishonesty and a juggling of the
facts.
Quality-focused management is predicated instead on the quality of the product
and the satisfaction of the customer. In this style, the goal is to produce an extremely
high-quality product without cutting corners on quality ad without pandering to profits.
This is a radical departure from traditional styles, which applaud profits above quality
and virtually every other consideration. In quality-focused management, profits
improve because the product is better and the customer is willing to pay for it. This
type of management requires detailed quality measurement and observance to
consistent quality standards, since any drop-in quality will be detected by customers
and will weaken the success of this style.
Changing from a traditional style to a quality-focused style of management
requires re-education of managers to become leaders instead of bosses as well as
clear communication of the company’s quality vision. The quality goal must be
championed by everyone, beginning from the top down to the lowest worker. The
alteration to a quality-focused styles forces sweeping changes in every aspect of a
company’s management from the selection of personnel to the function of teams within
the company, but the end result is a better-quality product, a pleased customer, and a
company that operates with greater integrity.
Total Quality Management has changed the traditional management style
forever. It was a very essential movement those days. Some of these changes are
essential even today. Few of these changes are discussed below.
1. Traditional way of management focused on internal activities. Quality gad a
meaning which was totally internally defined. Products or services provided by
organization were assumed to be good in quality, if this organization has done its best
in producing that product or service. But in total quality management, focus is the
customer. So that final decider of the quality is the customer. Fitting t the customer
requirement was the least requirement while delighting them is the ultimate goal.
2. Traditionally people thought bad quality products are due to the workers who do not
perform their job properly. One of the major differences between total quality
management and traditional management style is the assignment of the responsibility
of the quality to the management. Especially responsibility of the quality goes into the
middle level management in the operational level.
3. Total Quality Management is an organization wide movement. All the organization
has to agree to apply TQM principles. TQM, unlike traditional management calls for
high amount of tam working. Team building, especially cross functional teams is
feature of TQM. These teams will present the necessary thrust to the implementation
process and will push the system forward, with vey less struggle.
4. TQM believes in quality assurance rather than checking. Quality is inbuilt to the
system, so that products are assured to be in good quality. Some decision like
narrowing down the supplier base is total quality management concepts used for his
purpose, which is revolutionary still today.
5. Unlike in traditional management style, total quality makes decisions on facts and
figures. Therefore, problems are identified properly. Therefore, solutions are well
planned.
6. TQM depends on cyclic thinking. Also, it is continuous. Therefore, improvements
are small, stable and continuous in nature. This is also known as Kaizen. These
events are used in team building, brains storming and decision making.
There are many other differences between the old or the traditional way of
management to the total quality management. In the bigger picture, TQM has basically
changed the culture and the thinking patterns of the organization.
TQM and Reengineering
Business process can be defined as "a set of logically related tasks performed
to achieve a defined business outcome." It is "a structured, measured set of activities
designed to produce a specified output for a particular customer or market." Improving
business processes is important for businesses to stay ahead of competition in today's
marketplace. Over the last 10 to 15 years, companies have been forced to improve
their business processes because customers are demanding better products and
services. Many companies begin business process improvement with a continuous
improvement model. The BPR methodology comprises of developing the business
vision and process objectives, identifying the processes to be redesigned,
understanding and measuring the existing processes, identifying IT levers and
designing and building a prototype of the new process. In this context it can be
mentioned that, some of the biggest obstacles faced by reengineering are lack of
sustained management commitment and leadership, unrealistic scope and
expectations, and resistance to change.
thus reducing cost. Alternatively, a new and less costly process, which implements the
function of the current process can be developed to replace the present one.
The stakeholders are key business leaders ultimately accountable for the
success of the project. Their role is to provide high-level guidance to the team, help
remove barriers, and provide funding. The core team is the group responsible for the
design and implementation of the solution. Your extended team includes other people
in the organization contributing to the project on an as-needed basis. These extended-
team members include subject-matter experts. A well-rounded team includes a mix of
people and skills. Such a team may include individuals who thoroughly understand the
current process, who actively use the process and also work closely with customers,
technical experts, and consultants, if necessary. But the main criterion is that the entire
team should work together for the project to succeed.
Some people have said that both TQM and Reengineering are the same, while
others have argued that they are incompatible. Michael Hammer argues that the two
concepts are compatible and actually complement each other. Both concepts have the
same focus – customer satisfaction.
First, the process is enhanced until its useful life time is over, at which point it
is reengineered. Then enhancement is resumed and the entire cycle repeats again.
Hammer points out that this is not a once-in-a-life time endeavor. As business
circumstances change in major ways, so must process design.
The difference that have been identified may generate an idea that
reengineering is outside the area of quality management. Hammer, the reengineering
guru, together with quality gurus such as Deming and Juran, all agree that innovation
and brake through in process are indispensable parts of quality management. TQM
assumes that the design of the process is sound and that all it needs is some
improvement or enhancement. But if he world has changed dramatically since the
process was first designed, the current design may be incompetent of delivering the
necessary performance, Reengineering is then essential.
Table 1. Reengineering vs. TQM
Differences
Level of change Radical Incremental
Starting point Clean Slate Existing process
Participation Top down Bottom up
Typical scope Broad, cross functional Narrow, w/in functional
Risk High Moderate
Primary enabler I.T. Statistical control
Type of change Cultural & Structural Cultural
TQM is the way of achieving the objective of “total quality”. The techniques
used for continuous improvement and process reengineering are the tools of TQM.
In Japan, continuous improvement is referred to as Kaizen. This is incremental,
gradual and continuous improvement. According to Masaaki Imai, who coined the
term, “Kaizen” means improvement, a continuous improvement involving everyone,
both managers and workers. Kaizen strategy maintains and improves the working
standard through small gradual improvements. In general, improvement can be
defined as Kaizen innovation. Innovation calls for the radical improvements as a result
of large investments in technology and/or equipment. But the modern approach to
total quality management includes both incremental and breakthrough improvements
under the the term “continuous improvement”
When the reengineering is implemented, the objective of total quality must
always be foremost to ensure success. Otherwise, implementation can be costly and
still not yield acceptable or long-term result. Process reengineering emphasizes
radically changing to the existing processes under the assumption that those changes
will definitely improve the firm’s global performance or the performance of one of its
specific process.
However, to be effective, a firm’s internal organization and processes should
be directly and formally linked to enhancing profitability through the fulfilment of its
customers’ needs. If this relationship is correctly and explicitly established right from
the beginning, then reengineering can be one of the best tools to achieve total quality
and it will significantly improve the performance of a firm.