The Meaning of Money
The Meaning of Money
The Meaning of Money
By
Christopher M. Quigley B.Sc., M.A.
Introduction
In a life spanning over 70 years, one of the greatest students of money,
and its meaning, was the American E.C. Riegel. Many regarded him as a
genius for his understanding of the nature and functioning of money as a
human and social institution. This essay is a direct introduction to his
main ideas on this subject, as, increasingly, people are beginning to
realise the need for a more stable monetary unit. In essence, in his book
"Flight From Inflation" he identified money as the mathematics of value
and argued, that for a democracy to thrive, he believed the "money
power" must be free. He basically viewed any political economic
monetary system as socialist. For this reason he was at odds with Adam
Smith's view of the World. Indeed, he felt that Smith in his "Wealth Of
Nations" pre-empted Marx as a social theorist. Regardless of his views,
Riegel has come to be respected for his unswerving belief in mankind and
his heroic efforts to champion practical freedom based on the realities of
exchange systems, which are based on value.
From the premise of the natural law of money issue, it must be accepted,
that governments cannot qualify as issuers because they are not in the real
situation of personal enterprisers. They cannot qualify, as they do not
barter. They do not bid for money in the market place. Their taxing power
relieves them entirely from selling. They take by taxing. When they are
admitted to the issue power, their issue cannot be a genuine promise to
deliver value in trade. It must, of necessity, be counterfeit, regardless of
any statutory laws intended to validate it. From this failure to discriminate
between money issued through bank credit by personal enterprisers and
by governments, has come an inflationary mixture of true and false
money that will eventually threaten social order. Money cannot be issued
in perpetuity by man-made laws; it operates by its own natural law. To
ignore this law invites uncontrolled inflation.
Adam Smith in his political economy allocated the money power to the
state, thus he ante-ceded Marx as a socialist. It is his followers,
unconscious socialists, and not those of Marx, who constitute the greatest
peril to the order of free exchange. The Smith philosophy is taught in all
the schools and colleges. Students become indoctrinated by this ideology
unaware that in its monetary concept it is contrary to the true philosophy
of personal enterprise and individuality. An unnatural monetary system
begets unnatural economic manifestations. How can a free economy work
with the monetary system socialised? Rampant inflation makes a
mockery of any true accounting for any true contract. When the future
businessman discovers that his pride in cash was a delusion and a snare;
that his cash reserves, which he meant to freeze have melted and
evaporated; that his balances might have been preserved if they had been
cast into materials; that his bonds and money claims on others have
shrunken and that he might have profited had he known enough to get
into debt; that his tax refunds are far less in power than those paid in; that
he must pay capital gain taxes on what are actually losses; then that
businessman will realise that the whole contemporary inflationary
accounting picture is a delusion.
If money is issued under the natural law of issue, unit stability will be in
evidence. Under natural law, if exchange plays no tricks on us, we are all
really working for ourselves. We will all be interested in stability. In
reality we are all buying for ourselves; we are all selling for ourselves.
But just exactly what is it we are buying and selling? In the final analysis,
it is simply human energy, mental and physical. Labour is the basic, or
virgin, commodity. It has no quality of obsolescence, for it is always
associated with the latest, and therefore, the timeliest products. IT IS
THE ONLY VALUE. Others have comprehended this, from the premise
that all value is labour and since money is based on value, they have
reached the correct conclusion that money must be, in actual fact, labour.
However, the fatal error that labour money planners have made is that
they set a measure of labour, such as an hour, as a unit of value. While it
is true that labour, both physical and mental is the only value, and
therefore, the sole commodity that passes through exchange, IT DOES
NOT FOLLOW THAT ALL LABOUR IS OF EQUAL VALUE. Labour
may be so unintelligently applied that it is completely worthless. We are
all labourers, and therefore, fountains of wealth because we all emit
human energy. We must, however, direct that energy to meet the
demands of our fellow labourers. By the measure to which we
successfully respond to this demand will our energy be valued. Money is
not a measure of value, it is a method of stating a value that has already
been determined through exchange.
Source:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/263357742/Flight-From-Inflation-2
Edited By
Spencer Heath MacCallum & George Morton
The Heather Foundation
Los Angeles, California.