Samsung Electronics: From National Champion' To Global Leader'
Samsung Electronics: From National Champion' To Global Leader'
9.1 Introduction
179
C. G. Alvstam et al. (eds.), Asian Inward and Outward FDI
© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014
180 Sang-Chul Park, Claes G. Alvstam, Harald Dolles, and Patrik Ström
1998. This deal accounted for US$ 700 million, and was at that time the
single largest inward FDI in South Korea.
In the mid-1990s Samsung Electronics chose the Swedish company
Ericsson to be one of its benchmarking companies along with General
Electric and Sony, in order to strengthen its image as a state-of-the-art
technology-based company. It adopted Ericsson’s business strategy of aspir-
ing to be the leader in its own field, mobile communication technology
equipment. By importing bluetooth technology from Ericsson at the end
of the 1990s, the company managed to launch its own mobile telephone
business and had become the second largest mobile phone producer in the
world by 2005. Finally, in 2012 it overtook Nokia’s fourteen-year-long ten-
ure as the world’s biggest seller of mobile handsets (Milne, 2013). Samsung
Electronics had set its target in the field of home appliances as taking over
Sony’s position in the global market. Sony produced luxury TV sets and
held its largest market share in the 1990s and 2000s. Samsung’s TV sets,
compared with Sony’s, were regarded as medium-range price products in the
advanced nations, although it was the world’s largest producer in the 1990s.
Entry into the luxury TV market at the beginning of the 2000s seemed
therefore to involve a high risk, given the high technological barriers and
Sony’s strong market position. The majority of the Board of Directors were
sceptical about the adoption of this strategic target, but were persuaded by
Chairman Lee Kun-Hee, who pointed to the opportunities to increase the
brand’s power in private households. Since Samsung supplied more than 20
per cent of total IC chips and had become the largest producer in the world,
it was more known as a business-to-business-actor. The move to become
a global player within the high-end consumers’ market was in addition a
measure to strengthen the brand image. This strategy proved to be success-
ful as Samsung Electronics took over Sony’s place in 2005.
Since then, the company’s vision for worldwide activities has been to be
the leader in the global digital convergence movement. In order to con-
tinuously strengthen its position, it aims to develop efficient and innovative
technologies in its products portfolio. The present mission to become the
best ‘Digital eCompany’ affects its overall corporate strategies and opera-
tions. Indeed, the success of Samsung Electronics to first become a ‘national
champion’ in South Korea, and later to reach global leadership, is closely
linked to the industrial policy of the domestic government as well as an
aggressive investment strategy based on the strong entrepreneurship of its
founder within a conglomerate, family-dominated structure. This is a pattern
that is typical for Asian business in general, but may be particularly apparent
in the Korean corporate culture. In this context we refer for broad surveys
of the fundaments of the Korean business culture and its underlying insti-
tutional structure, including Amsden (1989), Chen (2004), Chung, Lee and
Jung (1997), Ungson et al. (1997) and, more recently, Hemmert (2008, 2012).
In this chapter we focus on how a company in an emerging economy can
succeed in becoming a ‘global leader’ in the industry, where the main aim