Ong Chiu Kwan V CA Digest

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

121. Ong Chiu Kwan v. CA o There is no evidence to support such award.

Hence, we delete the award


GR NO. 113006 of moral damages, exemplary damages, and attorney’s fees.
November 23, 2000
SPV Dispositive
Topic: Unjust Vexation WHEREFORE, the decisions of the lower courts are REVERSED and SET ASIDE. In lieu thereof,
Petitioners: ONG CHIU KWAN Accused Ong Chiu Kwan is hereby sentenced to pay a fine of P200.00, and the costs. The
Respondents: PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES award of moral and exemplary damages and attorney’s fees is hereby deleted.
Ponente: Pardo

FACTS
- On April 23, 1990, at around 10AM, Ong Chiu Kwan (OCK) ordered Wilfredo Infante
to relocate the telephone, electric and water lines of Crazy Feet, owned and
operated by Mildred Ong, because the lines posed as a disturbance.
o Ong Chiu Kwan failed to present a permit from appropriate authorities to
allow him to cut the wires of the business establishment.
- On January 31, 1991, Asst. Prosec Andres Bayona of Bacolod filed an Information
charging Ong Chiu Kwan with unjust vexation.
- MTC found him guilty of such and sentenced him to imprisonment for 20 days.
o He was also ordered to pay moral damages, finding that the wrongful act
of abruptly cutting off the electric, water pipe and telephone lines of
"Crazy Feet" caused the interruption of its business operations during
peak hours, to the detriment of its owner, Mildred Ong.
o Exemplary damages were also awarded to complainant "as a deterrent to
the accused not to follow similar act in the future and to pay attorney’s
fees
- On appeal to RTC, it affirmed the decision of MTC
- OCK then filed a petition for review with the CA
- CA affirmed RTC
- Hence this petition to the Supreme Court

ISSUE: W/N OCK is guilty of unjust vexation - YES

HELD:
- OCK admitted having ordered the cutting of the electric, water and telephone .lines
of complainant’s business establishment because these lines crossed his property
line.
o He failed, however, to show evidence that he had the necessary permits
or authorization to relocate the lines.
o Also, he timed the interruption of electric, water and telephone services
during peak hours of the operation of business of the complainant.
- Thus, his act unjustly annoyed or vexed the complainant.
o Consequently, petitioner Ong Chiu Kwan is liable for unjust vexation.
- The award of moral and exemplary damages and attorney’s fees to be without
basis.
o Moral damages may be recovered if they were the proximate result of
defendant’s wrongful act or omission.
o An award of exemplary damages is justified if the crime was committed
with one or more aggravating circumstances.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy