Constructing Multiple-Choice Tests: Silliman University
Constructing Multiple-Choice Tests: Silliman University
Constructing Multiple-
Choice Tests
Mary Ann M. Temprosa
College of Education
Silliman University
Objectives of the Session
By the end of the session, the group shall
1. Have reviewed on the guidelines of
constructing quality multiple-choice tests ;
2. Have constructed sample test items
applying the guidelines discussed;
3. Have distinguished well-constructed
items from poorly constructed ones; and
4. Have presented and have critiqued sample
test items based on lesson guides made.
2
Two parts of a M-CT item
1. Stem
2. Alternatives/Options-the distracters and the
right answer or the best answer
Lesson guide
3
Two ways of stating the stem
1. Question form
2. Completion form
Don’t leave a blank in the beginning or
middle of the stemLesson guide
Avoid window dressing ( excessive verbiage)
4
A regional office starts using a
computerized database to locate past stem
students. What kind of change does
this tracking system represent?
7
Example
Educational Objective Multiple Reason
Choice (Appropriate item type if
Item Okay? not Multiple Choice)
Writes complete
sentences
Identifies errors in
punctuation
Expresses own ideas
clearly
Uses gestures
appropriately in giving a
speech
Identifies the parts of a 8
Example
Educational Objective Multiple Reason
Choice (Appropriate item type if
Item Okay? not Multiple Choice)
Writes complete No Response must be supplied.
sentences (Essay)
Identifies errors in Yes Response may be selected.
punctuation
Expresses own ideas No Response must be supplied.
clearly (Essay)
Uses gestures No Response must be supplied.
appropriately in giving a (Response)
speech
Identifies the parts of a No Response may be selected 9
Misconception
10
Real Value
11
Suggestions for Constructing
High-level M-CT items
1. Present practical or real-world
situations.
2. Present a diagram of equipment and ask
for application, analysis or evaluation.
Lesson guide
3. Present actual quotations taken from
newspapers or other published sources
and ask for the interpretation or evaluation
of these quotations. 12
Suggestions for Constructing
High-level M-CT question
13
14
Domain #1: School Leadership
1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F TOTAL
Remembering
Understanding
Applying
Lesson guide
Analyzing
Evaluating
Creating
15
TOTAL
Situational analysis
A superintendent works with a principal and staff
members of a low-performing school to implement
the following research-based recommendations :
1. support change with strong leadership
2. maintain a consistent focus on
improving instruction
Lesson guide
answer
19
Varieties of M-C Items
2. Best Answer
the alternatives differ in their degree of
correctness;
some may be completely
Lesson guide incorrect and
some correct, but one is clearly more
correct than the others;
the examinee identifies the best answer
20
Varieties of M-C Items
3. Combined Response
the examinee selects one set of letters
representing a combination of
alternatives;
Also known as complex
Lesson guide Multiple-choice,
21
Varieties of M-C Items
4. Negative
the examinee identifies either the
alternative that is an incorrect answer,
or the alternative that is the worst
answer; the reverse of 1 & 2
Lesson guide
22
Varieties of M-C Items
4. Negative
can be used occasionally, esp. when
dealing with issues where knowing
what not to do is important;
Must be carefullyLesson
worded
guide to avoid
confusion;
the negative word should be placed in
the stem, not in the alternatives;
23
Varieties of M-C Items
4. Negative
must be emphasized by using underline,
italics, bold face, or CAPITALS;
Alternatives be phrased positively to
avoid forming a confusing
Lesson guide double
negative with stem
24
Strengths
1. Learning outcome from simple to
complex can be measured.
2. It is highly structured and clear tasks
are provided.
3. A broad sample ofguide
Lesson achievement can
be measured.
4. Incorrect alternatives provide
diagnostic information.
25
Strengths
5. Scores are less influenced by guessing
than true-false items.
6. Scores are more reliable than
subjectively scored items (essays).
Lesson guide
7. Scoring is easy, objective and reliable.
8. Item analysis can reveal how difficult
each item was and how well it is
discriminated between the strong and
the weaker examinee. 26
Strengths
9. Performance can be compared from
class/cluster to class/cluster.
10. Can cover a lot of material very
efficiently (about one item per minute
of testing time).
Lesson guideperformance can be
28
Limitations
4. Real-world problem solving differs- a
different process is involved in
proposing a solution versus selecting
a solution from a set of alternatives.
5. Scores can be Lesson
influenced
guide by reading
ability.
29
Limitations
6. There is lack of feedback on individual
thought processes- it is difficult to
determine why individual students
selected incorrect responses.
Lesson guide
7. Students can sometimes read more
into the question than was intended.
30
Limitations
6. There is lack of feedback on individual
thought processes- it is difficult to
determine why individual students
selected incorrect responses.
Lesson guide
7. Students can sometimes read more
into the question than was intended.
31
Limitations
8. Often focus on testing factual
information and fails to test higher levels
of cognitive thinking.
9. Sometimes there is more than one
defensible “correct” answer.
Lesson guide
Lesson guide
33
Helpful Hints
1. Based each item on an educational
objective of the lesson, not trivial
information.
2. Try to write items in which there is
one and only one correct and clearly
Lesson guide
best answer.
34
Helpful Hints
3. The phrase that introduces the item
(stem) should clearly state the
problem.
4. Test only a single idea in each item
and test only for
Lessonsignificant
guide and
important information.
5. Be sure wrong choices (distractors)
are at least plausible.
35
Helpful Hints
6. Incorporate common errors in
distractors.
7. The position of the correct answer
should vary randomly from item to
item. Lesson guide
36
Helpful Hints
9. Avoid overlapping alternatives.
10. The response options should be
parallel and similar in length
(preferably short).
11. There should be no
Lesson grammatical clues
guide
37
Helpful Hints
12. Format the items vertically, not
horizontally (list the choices
vertically).
13. The response options should be
indented and in column
Lesson guide form.
14. Avoid excessive use of negative and
/or double negatives.
38
Helpful Hints
15. Word the stem positively; avoid
negative phrasing such as “not” or
“except.” If cannot be avoided, the
negative word should always be
highlighted byLesson
underlining
guide or
capitalization.
39
Helpful Hints
16. Avoid the use of “All of the above” or
“None of the above” in the response
alternative.
In the case of “All of the above”,
learners only need
Lessonto have partial
guide
40
Helpful Hints
answer choice.
41
Helpful Hints
42
Helpful Hints
44
Helpful Hints
21. Have your items peer reviewed.
22. Present the answer in each of the
alternative positions approximately
an equal number of times, in a
Lesson guide
random order.
45
Logical sequencing of
alternatives
Logical Order Example
Numerical a. 1939
b. 1940
c. 1941
d. 1942
Lesson guide
Alphabetical a. Changing alpha from .01 to .05
b. Decreasing the degrees of freedom
c. Increasing the spread of the exam scores
d. Reducing the size of the treatment effect
Sequential a. Heating ice
b. Melting ice
c. Heating water
d. Evaporating water
46
e. Heating steam
Helpful Hints
23. Lay out the items in a clear and
consistent manner
24. Avoid textbook, verbatim phrasing.
25. Be sensitive to cultural and gender
Lesson guide
issues.
47
Writeshop
Lesson guide
48
Thank you
and
God bless us all!
Mary Ann Mansing-Temprosa
Silliman University College of Education
Dumaguete City, Philippines
marymtemprosa@su.edu.ph