2022 Media Materiality Report
2022 Media Materiality Report
2022 Media Materiality Report
MATERIALITY
2022
The material sustainability issues
for the media sector
2022 Media Materiality Report
This report was researched and written by Daniel Witte, Valentina Okolo and Rosie
Towe, Carnstone Partners Ltd
Established formally in 2003, the Responsible Media Forum is a partnership between 26 leading media
companies to identify and take action on the social and environmental challenges facing the sector.
Starting as a UK initiative, participants now come from all over the world covering the full sector
spectrum. We work on the principle that CR in a media company has many features that set it apart
from other sectors, and a unique ‘brainprint’. The Responsible Media Forum is a multi-client project run
and chaired by Carnstone Partners Ltd.
responsiblemediaforum.org / @WeAreRMF
carnstone.com / @carnstone
02 Foreword 5
03 Methodology 6
06 Conclusion 15
07 Acknowledgments 16
03
insights on materiality to date:
Does it Matter?
In 2013, we published an updated list of 33 relevant issues,
using the issues identified in ‘Mapping the Landscape’ and
the 2012 study on the European Sustainable Investment
Forum. For the first time, we went beyond identifying issues
based on their relevance to the media sector. We prioritized
them into ‘material’, ‘strategic’, and ‘operational’ bands with
the help of input from media investors and analysts.
04
external ratings agencies. We identified 36
relevant material CSR issues, seven of which 2018 Media Materiality
were unique to the media sector.
Building on our previous insights, combined with
research and conversations with the forum participants,
media analysts and investors, we produced the 2018
media materiality report. Issues were prioritised in the
material, strategic and operational bands as well as
listed under three new headings; ‘new on the radar’;
‘growing in importance’; and ‘decreasing in importance’.
Net Neutrality and Disinformation (Fake News) were
added to the list of material issues.
Media Materiality Report 2022 All four reports are available to download from our website: 4
www.responsiblemediaforum.org/forum
Foreword
Nathan Fabian
Chief Responsible Investment Officer,
United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment
Resilient, democratic societies rely on healthy media ecosystems. Media This report sets out the material issues for the media sector. Some are
(in its broadest sense: news media, broadcasters, educational and scientific media-specific – for example the separation between ownership and
publishers, entertainment and streaming companies, amongst others) is editorial decision-making in privately-held companies. Others are more
the major source of information for all of us. Without access to high-quality generally applicable – such as business ethics – but may still apply to
media, there is no access to high-quality information. A healthy media media in a particular way. It also provides commentary on how general
ecosystem plays a crucial role in helping citizens decide who to vote for, issues apply to the media sector; it offers case studies of good practice;
consumers decide who to buy from, and investors decide who to invest and it pinpoints the opportunities. It is a status quo of what matters to
in. No sector has more cultural relevance than media, and therefore the media companies and their stakeholders, and a blueprint of what a future
material sustainability issues that face media companies should be of sustainable media sector could look like.
paramount interest to consumers, investors and policymakers alike.
Clearly, the biggest opportunity lies within ‘Responsible content’: how media
Every sector has a moral code – a set of common principles that codify how companies govern the content they produce and ensure it has a positive
it should act in the context in which it operates. As a sector that touches all impact on peoples’ lives and the world at large. While progress has been
our lives, media’s moral code is particularly significant. With the dramatic made on governing content portfolios and measuring the impact of content
changes to the operating environment of every sector over the last two (also known as the ‘brainprint’), there is still too much focus on ‘traditional’
years, media’s moral code will need revision. The last two years have sustainability impacts and too little on content. Yet it is clear that the
seen challenges to science, increasing social polarisation, and a blurring brainprint of any media company is far larger than the footprint, although
of the line between fact and opinion. COVID-19 has changed the way we we do not know exactly how much larger as we lack the approaches and
connect with each other, accelerating the switch to digital channels. Media tools to measure the brainprint accurately.
companies will need to constantly refine their balance between tackling COVID-19 has been called the largest public health crisis in living memory.
heated social discussions without alienating segments of their audiences, It is in moments of crisis that we come together, and we must now ensure
while finding their place in a world increasingly dominated by digital our media ecosystem contributes to resilient societies, delivers sustainable
communications and platforms. They will need to ensure that they remain value and is safeguarded for the future. Of course, no company can do this
a connecting force, bringing together people from different backgrounds on its own. I look forward to seeing how the Responsible Media Forum and
and with different beliefs and viewpoints, while retaining their ability and other collaborative initiatives can turn the ideas contained in this excellent
courage to take a stand on issues where there is broad societal consensus. report into action.
NARROW WIDE
There are three further categories that issues can fall into if they do not meet our threshold for materiality.
Strategic: an issue that has the potential to Operational: an issue that matters for other Emerging: an issue that is not yet widely on
significantly affect the ability of the company to reasons – internal, reputational, efficiency – but the radar of a company or its stakeholders, but
deliver its strategy in the medium to long term. is neither material nor strategic. Under normal is increasing in importance and expected to
circumstances, it does not represent a significant become a material or strategic issue within the
threat to the company. next two years.
The emerging category is new compared to our 2018 Media Materiality report. Increasing levels of interest and urgency on sustainability topics has led to
greater dynamism and relatively rapid change; not least those driven by the investor community. We have added this category to capture those issues that are
rising fast on the agenda.
Impact on media
Key
Issues upgraded in importance
Issues downgraded in importance
New issues
Opportunities
Media Materiality Report 2022 8
Expanding on the issues
In this section, we expand on the meaning and relevance to media of a selection of issues that were
singled out in our interviews or recent external research and commentary.
Climate change. Climate change has risen up every agenda as the negative consequences of
global warming, and the widescale societal implications of a low-carbon transition (see below) have
become clear. It is an issue for all industries. It is linked with various other issues in this list, including
Climate resilience, Green production, Low-carbon transition, and Climate justice.
While media’s own carbon footprint is relatively small, by integrating climate change across content
portfolios, media can create societal and behavioural shifts. Christiana Figueres calls this media’s
“superpower” in her foreword to Mirrors or Movers II. This is further explored in Responsible content
and Consumer environmental awareness.
Some companies have made large strides in both their carbon footprint and brainprint, for example
through the Responsible Media Forum’s Media Climate Pact. The year one progress summary released
in November 2021 finds that if all the signatories’ commitments on operational emissions are met, at
least 1.9m tonnes of CO2-equivalent would be eliminated and 2.5m tonnes balanced through GHG
removal, the equivalent of taking over 3m cars off the UK’s roads. In addition, under the content
commitment, signatories have released a plethora of new programmes, formats and campaigns to
increase the reach and availability of climate-related content, such as Sky’s Daily Climate Show and
RELX’s SDG Resource Centre.
Data privacy. Data privacy is highly material for the media sector, as companies regularly handle
personal consumer data. For some, such as consumer comparison websites or those funded mainly by
advertisements, this is core to their business and earnings models. While the General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR) has driven up standards across the sector and beyond, progress can still be made on
how information about how data is used is provided to consumers, to enable them to make
informed decisions.
Diversity of output. Diversity of output is the content ‘brother’ of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion. It
refers to the diversity of content, which can be split into various angles: gender, racial, age, sexual
orientation, disability, and class.
In the UK broadcast industry, diversity of output is measured annually through the Project Diamond
reports. The most recent report found that representation of female, Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic
(BAME) and Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual (LGB) individuals is similar to or even significantly higher than
the share of those population groups in the UK population, while Transgender, 50 and Over, and
Disabled people were severely under-represented. The largest representation gap, that of Disabled
people, is a factor larger than three.
Holding leaders to account. [As Nathan Fabian writes in his foreword], media plays a crucial role
in providing information that enables democratic citizens to hold their politicians to account. From
investigative journalism to candidate debates during elections, the media is a key actor in our political
landscape. Consumers of media content expect to be provided with high-quality content that informs,
challenges and uncovers. They need this to be able to form a view on what their leaders should be
doing on issues such as climate change, human rights and nature protection.
Human Rights. Human Rights is an issue increasing in importance for large corporates. In the UK,
the Modern Slavery Act 2015 requires companies to report on the risks of modern slavery in their
business and supply chain, and the actions they are taking to address it. In Europe, the European
Due Diligence Act was announced in March 2021, and various European countries including France,
Germany and the Netherlands are bringing in their own specific provisions or have already done so.
In media, Human Rights risks are often centred in supply chains or support workers. For example, in
publishing Human Rights risks are often a concern at suppliers such as printers or paper manufacturers.
26 publishing houses collaborate through the Book Chain Project’s Labour & Environment
workstream to assess and manage these risks. In TV production, a recent report by the TV Industry
Human Right Forum highlight that support workers are often freelancers, without access to insurance,
safety equipment or training, and feel pressured to take risks and fear raising concerns due to uneven
power relationships. Media companies involved in sports also have to consider the human rights
risks related to sporting events, such as migrant labour, where they may have broadcast deals and
sponsorships in place.
• Anna Lungley, Chief Sustainability Officer & Rowena Mearley, Global Policy & Advocacy Director –
Social Impact & Sustainability, dentsu international
• Barbara Kutscher, Senior Director Corporate Responsibility & Kristina Rehm, Corporate
Responsibility Manager, Bertelsmann
• Britt Nilsen, Head of Sustainability & Markus Ahlberg, Head of Sustainable Business Development,
Schibsted
• David Pitt-Watson, former Co-Chair, United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative &
Visiting Fellow, Cambridge Judge Business School
• Greg Waters, Associate Director of Research & Sam Wallace, Analyst, Technology &
Communications Sector lead, SASB
• Hemini Mehta, Sustainability Lead, European Broadcasting Union
• Jeremy Mathieu, Senior Sustainability Manager, ITV
• Laurie Laybourn-Langton, Associate Fellow, IPPR
• Marcus Werner-Blank, Head of Sustainability, Axel Springer
• Nathan Fabian, Chief Responsible Investment Officer, UN Principles for Responsible Investment
• Robert McCann, Head of Environment, Climate and Nature & Phoebe Whittome, Sustainability
Manager, Virgin Media O2
• Vikki Cook, Director, Content Media Policy, Ofcom