Lesson Compilation
Lesson Compilation
Lesson Compilation
Professional Etiquette
• Avoid talking badly about another practitioner (especially in front of patients)
• Maintain appropriate relationships at the worksite
• Stay within role boundaries of your specialty
• Rules of etiquette help maintain order and civility
Health Care Ethics
- Ethical questions: values, morals, individual culture, intense personal beliefs, and faith
- Ethics: how we make judgments in regard to right and wrong
Value Development
As humans we are born with a series of undifferentiated potentials. As an example, we have the
capacity to learn a language,but the particular language is not prescribed by our genetic heritage. In
the same sense, humans have an innate ability toacquire ethical beliefs. But the value system we
develop is dependent on the cultural framework in which we live in.
• World view or value system
– An inner subjective set of feelings, attitudes, beliefs, and opinions
• Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
– Survival or Physiological (foods, shelter, water)
– Safety (security like purchasing a weapon)
– Belonging and Love (love, affection, intimacy, family, joining a club)
– Prestige and Esteem (becoming president of the club)
– Self-actualization (fulfillment of personal potential)
According to Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs, feelings of isolation result in needs satisfying activities like
joining a bowling team.Under most situations, our actions are explainable using this model as we
seem to satisfy a given set of needs. As each need level is satisfied the needs of the next level become
the dominant motivators of our actions. If hierarchy of needs is correct, an observer who could
determine what level of need you were operating on could predict the nature of your next actions.
• Hume’s Law
– Unbridgeable gap between fact and value; between “is” and “ought”
• Facts of physical universe can tell us what is
• Our values guide us to understanding what ought to be as it relates to our behavior
-Individuals experiences will shape the way these values will be considered in personal decision
making.
-Difference between needs and values: Our needs tell us what “is” in a particular situation, for
example we are broke and find a wallet. Our needs may tell us to take the money in the wallet,
whereas our values provide guidance in regard to what “ought” to be done as it relates to human
behavior.
Kohlberg concluded in his original research model that females were often found not to progress to
the final autonomousstage of value development (Post conventional level) but seemed arrested in the
conventional level. Females seem to reach plateau in value orientation based on pleasing others
rather than being true to their own moral compass.
Carol Gilligan argued that Kohlberg’s research methods flawed and gender biased that’s why she
made a separate value development pathway for females results in different highest values for each
sex. Personality responsibility for female and legalistic equality for males.
And this was confirmed by profile developed by Isabel Myers and Katherine Briggs. According to
Myers Briggs instrument men and women score equally on the major dimensions. Except on decision
making where men are predominantly on “thinking” category more comfortable following rules, laws
and “feeling” category for women decisions are based on personal relationship and outcomes.
Moral nihilism
- There are no moral truths, moral rules, moral knowledge or responsibilities
- Heinous acts would not necessarily be wrong
Ethical relativism
- All morality is relative to society in which one is brought up
- is the theory hold morality is relative to the norms of one’s culture? Whether action is right or wrong
depends on moral norms of the society
• Acts considered ethically wrong regardless of cultural orientation:
– Rape-forcing someone on sexual activity
– Slavery- exhausting a person in labor
– Genocide- Deliberate killing of a large group of people those of a particular ethnic group
– Torture- inflicting severe pain on someone as punishment
– Sexism- is a prejudice or discrimination based on a person’s sex or gender but it primarily affects
women and girls. It is linked to gender roles and may include the belief that in sex or gender is
intrinsically superior to another.
• Hedonistic value systems
– Is and ought the same; individual devoid of other-regarding impulses. For such an individual, the
major guideposts for decisions are desire and aversion and nothing can be right or wrong apart from
them. Value associated with this world view would include:
● Power
● Self preservation
● Self aggrandizement
● Maneuverability
● Pleasure
● Security
• Standpoint theory
– Try to adopt or listen to standpoint of most marginalized and vulnerable persons involved
– One of the useful concept that helps avoid the problems of self interest in deciding ethical issues.
• Public Law
– Deals with relationships between private parties and the government; concerned with the state in
its political or sovereign capacity
• Constitutional
• Administrative
• Criminal
Public Law consists in the following forms:
• Constitution supreme law of the land; highest level of American law
o If any conflicts exist between federal and state laws, federal laws must govern
o Constitutional Law: national and state law that deals with organization, invested powers, and
framework of government
Act Utilitarianism
- Decision based on possible alternatives for action
- Weighing each to amount of pleasure or utility it provides
- Selecting course of action that maximizes pleasure
Equal Consideration of Interest
- Individual not allowed to increase his share of happiness at expense of another
- One ought to act to produce greatest balance of happiness over unhappiness, everyone considered
Consequence-OrientedReasoning
(FLOW) DESCRIBE PROBLEM- LIST SOLUTIONS- COMPARE SOLUTIONS WITH UTILITY- ARRIVE AT
CORRECT ANSWERS
• Criticisms of Utilitarianism
– Calculation of all possible consequences of our actions, or inactions, appears impossible
– May be used to sanction unfairness and violation of rights
– Not sensitive to agent-relativity of duty
– Does not seem to give enough respect to persons
– Justifiable to prevent others from doing what we believe to be harmful acts to themselves
– Does not provide basis for our own moral attitudes and presuppositions
• Rule Utilitarianism
– Action deemed to be right if it conforms to a rule validated by the principle of utility
– Principle of utility: rule brings about positive results when generalized to variety of situations
Categorical emperative- an action is known to be right when it was in accordance with rule that
satisfied a principle.
Duty-Oriented Reasoning
• Criticisms of Kant
– Too rigid for real life
– Morality cannot be derived from pure reason
– Disregard of consequences of our actions can lead to disastrous results
– Even though nonhuman animals feel pain and pleasure, they do not have independent moral
standing since they are not rational beings
– Possible to be faced with a conflict between two duties equally supported by an imperative
• Contract Theory of John Rawls
– Individual in social situation requiring value choice without knowing role he was playing in situation
– Individual would choose alternative that best supported or favored most disadvantaged person
– Secure basic liberties for all
• Divine being set down finite series of rules that adherents claim can provide guidance to most, if not
all, moral decisions
– Judeo-Christian Ten Commandments
– Buddhism’s Four Noble Truths and Eight-Fold Path
Private Law
– Recognition and enforcement of rights and duties of private citizens and organizations
– Two basic types are tort and contract law
– Tort action
• Existence of legal duty from defendant to plaintiff
• Breach of that duty
• Damages which are a proximate result
• Tort Categories
– Negligent torts
– Intentional torts
– Liability assessed irrespective of fault
• Negligence
– Unintentional commission or omission of act a person would or would not do under same or similar
circumstances
Common forms of negligence
– Malfeasance: execution of unlawful or improper act
– Misfeasance: improper performance of act that leads to injury
– Nonfeasance: failure to perform an act, when there is a duty to act
– Criminal negligence: reckless disregard for safety of another
LESSON 6 TITLE: Basic Principles of Health Care and the Nature of Rights in Ethical Discourse
1. A competent elderly tells you,” I want to go home.” You respond with, “We won’t let you go home;
you’re not capable of taking care of yourself.” You may have just created the elements for what tort?
ANSWER: False imprisonment, you are illegally confining a competent individual against his or her will
in a manner that violates the confined individual’s right to go home or to be free.
2. The patient tells you, “I don’t want the treatment.” You respond with, “Your doctor ordered the
treatment and told me to make sure you take it, even If I have to hold you down.” You may have just
created the elements of what tort?
ANSWER: forcing a patient to give treatment by holding him or his down is unlawful and this is an
example of Battery.
● Hierarchy of thinking in regard to biomedical ethics: proceed from general worldview, to universal
principles, to rules and codes, to decisions
UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES
Autonomy
- Form of personal liberty
- Ability to decide
- Power to act on your decisions
- Respect for the individual autonomy of other
--- Self-determination often used synonymously with autonomy
– Informed consent- derived from basic principles of autonomy
• Legal exceptions: under therapeutic privilege and implied consent
– Paternalism: intentional limitation of autonomy of one person by another
– Health care professionals fiduciary relationship with patients
1. Veracity
- Binds both health practitioner and patient in an association of truth
- Harm to patient autonomy and potential loss of practitioner credibility makes lying to patients a
practice to be avoided
2. Beneficence
- Acts of mercy and charity
- Any action that benefits another
Hippocratic Oath: physician will “apply measures for the benefit of the sick”
3. Nonmalefiecnce
- One ought not to inflict evil or harm
*Beneficence
- One ought to prevent evil or harm
- One ought to remove evil or harm
- One ought to do or promote good
*Nonmaleficence
- Principle of double effect: secondary effects may be foreseen, but can never be intended outcomes.
E.g. administering morphine for pain, ethically prescribe but the analgesics suppresses respiration
- Under what circumstances can one act morally when some of the foreseeable effects of that action
are harmful?
• Principles of Double Effect (Guiding Elements)
– Course chosen must be good or at least morally neutral
– Good must not follow as a consequence of secondary harmful effects
– Harm must never be intended but merely tolerated as casually connected with good intended
– Good must outweigh harm
4. Confidentiality
- American Hospital Association’s The Patient Care Partnership: Understanding Expectations, Rights
and Responsibilities
- Outline of current state of practice with regard to individual’s right to privacy in health care
5. Justice
- Procedural justice or due process: disputes between individuals
- Distributive justice: distribution of scarce resources
- Compensatory justice: individuals seek compensation for a wrong that has been done
6. Role Fidelity
- Modern health care is the practice of a team
- Allied health over 100 individual professions
- Ethics of health care require practitioner practice faithfully within constraints of role
- Prescribed by scope of practice of state legislation
Rights
- Entitlements, interests, powers, claims, needs
- If one possesses a right, one need not feel gratitude to others for its possession
- In moral philosophy and political theory thought of as justified claims
- A right creates obligation in others to behave in a certain way
- Symbolic language of covenants, charters, manifestos, and conventions
- Expressions of hope for future of humanity
- Not meant to outline a reality grounded in law or claims that can be enforced
LESSON 7 TITLE: Basic Principles of Health Care and the Nature of Rights in Ethical
Discourse
Legal Rights
• Not only asserted as moral prerogatives but afforded governmental guarantees
• Created through constitutional guarantees, legislative statutes, judicial review, governmental
agencies
• Easier to put into place laws that protect negative rights
• Characteristics of a Legal Person
– Persons can be injured
– Persons can be thought to have interests
– Persons can be benefited
• Legal rights often used to reaffirm moral rights, do not necessarily coincide
Moral and Legal Rights
• Universal
• Moral rights provide equality among humans
• Moral rights not product of human creativity, but are inherent to our species
The Problem of Rights
• Multiplication of claims to personal rights
• Human imagination and creativity can create more claims to rights than we could possibly honor
CHECK FOR UNDERSTANDING
1. “Right to bear arms” are example under what kind of legal right?
A. Human rights
B. Personal right
C. Negative rights
D. Positive rights
2. Which of the following characteristics commonly attributed to legal person?
A. Person can be benefitted
B. Person can be injured
C. Person can be thought to have interest
D. All of the above
3. can be thought of as recipient or welfare rights as they require goods or service provided.
A. Positive rights
B. Negative rights
C. Human rights
D. Natural rights
4. A power, privilege, or immunity guaranteed under a constitution, statutes, or decisional law.
A. Legal Rights
B. Justice
C. Confidentiality
D. Natural rights
5. Right to a public education is under what type of legal rights?
A. Natural Rights
B. Positive Rights
C. Negative Rights
D. Human Rights
DATA PRIVACY ACT- In 2012 the Philippines passed the Data Privacy Act 2012,
comprehensive and strict privacy legislation “to protect the fundamental human right of privacy, of
communication while ensuring free flow of information to promote innovation and growth.”
https://www.privacy.gov.ph/wp-content/files/attachments/ppt/DPO7_Health_IDP.pdf
Medical Record
• Property of hospital or clinic
• Patient has legal interest and right to information
• Record is confidential
Macro-allocation
– Province of Congress, state legislatures, insurance companies, private foundations, and health
organizations
• Micro-allocation
– More personal determination of who will receive scarce resources
• Two-Tier System
– Everyone guaranteed coverage for basic care and catastrophic health needs
• Cultural and social barriers bar the way for many citizens to receive health care
• Lifeboat Ethics
– Who shall be saved from drowning, and what will be the criteria for our selection?
• Triage
– Allocating scarce resources practiced and justified in crises of war or disaster
Micro-Allocation
• Medical Utility
– Which patient has best prognosis?
– Often difficult to assess
• Social Utility
– Which patient has greatest social worth?
– Invites problems of racism, ageism, sexism, bias against retarded and mentally ill
• First Come, First Served
Random selection treats all patients as equal
Theories of Justice
Egalitarian
Utilitarian
Libertarian
Egalitarian Theories
Emphasize equal access to goods and services
Advocates of a right to health care
Socialistic universal access health care systems
Daniel’s Veiled Prudence
i. Prudent planner does not know her age
ii. Prudent planner ignorant of her conception of the good
iii. Prudent planner guided by a time neutral concern for her well-being over the lifespan
iv. Prudent planner has to plan for each stage of her life under assumption she will live through it
Fair Innings Argument
i. Finite span of years considered reasonable lifetime
ii. Everyone equal chance to have a full set of fair innings, to reach appropriate life expectancy
iii. Injustice when one who has not had full opportunity to reach full allotment of innings
Utilitarian Theories
Criteria so public utility is maximized
Public utility: greatest good for greatest number
Political planning and intervention methods of redistributing goods and wealth
QALY: quality adjusted life years
– Measures cost-benefit of applying a medical procedure
i. Callahan Natural Life Span Argument
1. After a person has lived normal life span, medical care no longer oriented to resisting death
2. Medical care following natural life span limited to relief of suffering
3. Technologies capable of extending life beyond normal life span create no technological
imperative for its use
Libertarian Theories
Emphasize personal rights to social and economic liberty
Choice of allocation system freely chosen
Free-market system operates on material principle of ability to pay
◦Beverage Model
Model originated in Great Britain
Health care financed by government and taxed based rather than insurance based
No medical bills; health care treatment public service
Strong emphasis on primary care
Costs controlled by rationing
Long wait times for non-acute secondary and tertiary care
Newest technologies not easily available
Low costs per capita
Government, as sole payer, controls what doctors can do and what they will charge
◦Bismarck Model
Germany, France, Japan, Belgium, Switzerland
Care providers and payer’s private entities
Private not-for-profit health insurance (“sickness funds”) financed jointly by employees and
employers through payroll deductions
– Basically charities and cover everybody
Scope of Practice
• Role Fidelity
– Requires we remain within scope of clear legitimate practice
– One does not cross line without willful intention
• Nurse-patient Relationship Models
– Bureaucratic model: emphasis on maintenance of social order at expense of individual patient’s
welfare
– Physician advocate model: goal is to enhance authority of physician
Impaired Colleagues
• Impaired colleagues place clients at risk
• Behavioral difficulties: absenteeism, illogical decision making, excessive errors
• Question is not whether practitioner has a duty to intervene, but the manner of the intervention
• Health care provider must be confronted
• Made to seek effective assistance
• Treat impaired colleague humanely
• Gatekeeping
– One looks out for the interests of the profession or of others in a similar practice
– Result of professional obligations and training
– Strong sense of collegiality with others in practice
– Disparaging: talking ill of
“Human” or “Person”?
• Traits Central to Personhood
– Member of the moral community
– Consciousness of objects and events
– Ability to feel pain
– Reasoning
– Self-motivated activity
– Capacity to communicate
– Concept of the self
• Pro-life theorist:
• Will see the social problem as another manifestation of rampant immorality of modern age
• Considers element of autonomy in reproduction a matter of “convenience” than a life plan
MAIN LESSON
The Environmental Perspective
• See humans as members of a biotic community
• Duty to maintain a balance of numbers with other members of that community
• Maintain and perhaps encourage use of abortion as a tool to control world population
• Aggressive attitude toward family planning
In Vitro Fertilization
• Eggs removed from a woman and fertilized in a laboratory dish (by husband or another man)
• Embryos implanted in a woman (donor or other woman), where egg brought to term
• Extra, or spare, embryos
• Implantation process may fail and be repeated
• Freezing of embryos
• Rating them for quality
• Discarding those that hold genetic defects
• Thawing them and disposing of them
– What happens to excess embryos can be a moral dilemma and controversial
• Women could postpone pregnancy without risking infertility or diseases of pregnancy
• Identifying genetic abnormalities
• Embryonic tissue in medical research
– Embryo: mitochondria, cytoplasm, DNA of mother and father
In Vitro Fertilization or IVF is a complex series of procedures used to treat fertility or genetic
problems and assist with the conception of a child.
IVF is a type of assisted reproductive technology used for infertility treatment and gestational
surrogacy, in which a fertilized egg is implanted into a surrogate’s uterus, and the resulting child is
genetically unrelated to the surrogate. Some countries banned or otherwise regulate the
availability of IVF treatment, giving rise to fertility tourism. Restrictions on availability of IVF include
costs and age to carry a healthy pregnancy to term. IVF is mostly attempted if less invasive or
expensive options have failed or are unlikely to work. IVF is a choice for couples who are not able
to conceive without assistance.
(https://www.assignmentpoint.com/science/medical/in-vitro-fertilization.html)
Surrogacy
• When a woman agrees to carry a baby to term and give it up to another set of parents to raise
• Sometimes done for money, sometimes as a favor
– Pregnancy a deeply personal experience that should never be undergone for the sake of others
– Very reason surrogacy supreme gift to another
• Kantians: surrogacy problematic since birth mother is being used as incubator and not regarded
as a rational actor
• Utilitarians: faced with very complicated utility calculations
• Well-accepted practice in spite of misgivings of some people
Brain Death
What does "brain death" mean?
- Brain death is a legal definition of death. It is the complete stopping of all brain function and
cannot be reversed. It means that, because of extreme and serious trauma or injury to the brain,
the body's blood supply to the brain is blocked, and the brain dies. Brain death is death. It is
permanent.
- The diagnosis of brain death is defined as "death based on the absence of all neurologic
function." Families who have had a loved one declared brain dead may have questions about
what the term really means. https://www.kidney.org/atoz/content/braindeath
- With the modern technology of respiratory and cardiac support, in certain cases of severe trauma
we can keep the remainder of the body’s cells alive for days and months with no brain activity
being present.
KEYPOINTS
• No recognizable cognitive function
• Characterized by permanent eyes-open state of unconsciousness
• Patient is not comatose
• Patient is awake but unaware
• Irreversible loss of all neocortical function
• Brain stem functions remain
• Patients can breathe on their own
• Elicitable reflexes, spontaneous respirations, and reactions to external stimuli
• Recovery rather remote
Ordinary Treatment
1. Low risk of harm.
2. Simple, relatively low tech.
3. Routine.
4. Good chance for benefit to the patient.
5. Relatively inexpensive.
6. Available to most people who need it.
7. Causes little pain or distress.
ExtraordinaryTreatment
1. High Risk
2. Complex, relatively high tech.
3. Innovative, experimental, unusual.
4. Relatively small chance for benefit to the patient.
5. Relatively expensive.
6. Available to few (may involve distributive justice issues).
7. Usually a source of pain or distress.
Any treatment is extraordinary if the burdens outweigh the benefits or it offers no hope of benefit
for the patient. (Purtilo, R. Ethical Dimensions in the Health Professions (Saunders, 1999) p220.)
But who defines benefit and burden? And what meets the criteria of hope?
http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~cp28/ordextr.htm
Personhood
• One who could be said to have interests
• One who has cognitive awareness
• One who is capable of relationships
• One who has a sense of futurity
Advanced Directives
• 1990 Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA)
– Federal law regarding advanced directives
– To make people aware of their rights
• Joint Commission
– Developed standards for the documentation of patients’ wishes regarding advanced-directives
• No uniformity in laws on living wills and surrogate decision makers
• Many authorities recommend use of durable power of attorney over a living will.
Living will is one type of advance directive. It is a written, legal document. It describes the
treatments you would want if you were terminally ill or permanently unconscious. These could be
medical treatments or treatments that will help you live longer. A living will doesn’t let you select
someone to make decisions for you.
A durable power of attorney (DPA) for health care is another kind of advance directive. A DPA
states that you have chosen to make health care decisions for you. It becomes active any time you
are unconscious or unable to make medical decisions (and may be called Medical Power of
Attorney, or MPOA). A DPA is generally more useful than a living will. But a DPA may not be a
good choice if you don’t have another person you trust to make these decisions for you.
Supreme Court
– Upheld concept that competent individuals could refuse life-sustaining treatment
– Made no legal distinction between tube feeding and other life-sustaining measures
Informed Nonconsent
- Patients who understand the nature of their conditions and the consequences of refusing care
COURT RULING
• Acuity of patient is irrelevant to the allowance of treatment refusal
• Patient’s own perceived view of her quality of life and treatment requirements necessary to
preserve it are of paramount importance
• There is no meaningful legal distinction between mechanical life support and nasogastric feeding;
both are invasive
• Distinctions between withholding and withdrawing care are legally irrelevant Do Not Resuscitate
(DNR): A do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order placed in a person’s medical record by a doctor informs
the medical staff that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should not be attempted. Because CPR
is not attempted, other resuscitative measures that follow it (such as electric shocks to the heart
and artificial respirations by insertion of a breathing tube) will also be avoided. This order has been
useful in preventing unnecessary and unwanted invasive treatment at the end of life. The success
rate of CPR near the end of life is extremely low. (See also Overview of Legal and Ethical Issues in
Health Care.)
Doctors should discuss with seriously ill patients the possibility of cardiopulmonary arrest (when
the heart stops and breathing ceases) in light of their immediate medical condition, describe CPR
procedures and likely outcomes, and ask patients about treatment preferences. If a person is
incapable of making a decision about CPR, an authorized surrogate may make the decision. A
DNR order does not mean "do not treat." Rather, it means only that CPR will not be attempted.
Other treatments (for example, antibiotic therapy, transfusions, dialysis, or use of a ventilator) that
may prolong life can still be provided. Depending on the person's condition, these other treatments
are usually more likely to be successful than CPR. Treatment that keeps the person free of pain
and comfortable (called palliative care) should always be given.
https://www.msdmanuals.com/home/fundamentals/legal-and-ethical-issues/do-not-resuscitate-dnr-
orders
Languages of DNR
- Code
- No code
- Slow code
- Chemical code
Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Guidelines
1. DNR order should be documented in the written medical record.
2. DNR orders should specify the exact nature of the treatments to be withheld.
3. Patients, when they are able, should participate in DNR decision. Their involvement and wishes
should be documented in the medical record.
4. Decisions to withhold CPR should be discussed with the health care team.
5. DNR status should be reviewed on a regular basis.
Euthanasia
Euthanasia refers to deliberately ending someone’s life, usually to relieve suffering. Doctors
sometimes perform euthanasia when it’s requested by people who have a terminal illness and are
in a lot of pain. It’s a complex process and involves weighing many factors. Local laws, someone’s
physical and mental health, and their personal beliefs and wishes all play a role.
Are there different types?
There are several types of euthanasia. What’s chosen depends on a variety of factors, including
someone’s outlook and level of consciousness.
Assisted suicide vs. euthanasia
Assisted suicide is sometimes called physician-assisted suicide (PAS). PAS means a doctor
knowingly helps someone end their life. This person is likely experiencing persistent and unending
suffering. They may have also received a terminally ill diagnosis. Their doctor will determine the
most effective, painless method. In many Trusted Source cases, doctors will provide people with a
drug they can take to end their life. A lethal dose of opioids, for example, may be prescribed for
this. In the end, it’s up to the person to decide whether they take the drug. With euthanasia, a
doctor is allowed to end the person’s life by painless means. For example, an injection of a lethal
drug may be used.
Key points
• Passive Euthanasia
• Doing nothing to preserve life
• Active Euthanasia
• Requires actions that speed process of dying
• InvoluntaryEuthanasia
• Ignores individual’s autonomous rights
• Could bring about death of unwilling victim
• A person has committed suicide when:
• That person brings about his or her own death
• Others do not coerce him or her to do the action
• Death caused by conditions arranged by person for purpose of bringing about his or her death
MAIN LESSON
Mercy Killing
• Health care practitioner deliberately hastens death of a patient
• Practice prohibited under homicide laws
• ―Consent and humanitarian motive‖ is never a defense under the law for murder
Huntington’s Disease
• Affects men and women equally across all ethnic and racial lines
• 30,000 people in United States
• Devastating disease, without a cure
• Affects patient’s ability to think, talk, and move
• Develops between a person’s 30s and 50s
• Huntington gene has been found
• 20 percent of birth defects caused by genetic or hereditary factors
• Should we just let genetic disease continue if we have power to stop it or at least lessen its
impact?
There are two ways to make an exact genetic copy of an organism in a lab: artificial embryo
twinning and somatic cell nuclear transfer.
Human Enhancement
• Is human enhancement, beyond that needed to restore health, acceptable therapy?
– Modifications to appearance
– Neurological enhancements
• Posthumanists
– Believe evolution is far from over
– “Cyborg” existence is not to be resisted
– Do not question ethics of contemporary uses of technology
– Technopian vision of a pain-free, unlimited, eternal humanity
• Advancements currently underway will:
– Change the quality of our lives
– Extend our lives
– Make the lives of our children healthier and longer