Chapter 4 CLC PDF
Chapter 4 CLC PDF
CHAPTER 4
INVESTMENT APPRAISALS
1
Chapter content
• Payback period
• Profitability index
2
Percentage of CFOs Who Use a Given Technique
3
Frequency of Use of Capital Budgeting Methods
4
PART 1
5
NPV
6
NPV RULE
❑ If funds are limited and all positive NPV projects cannot be initiated,
those with the high discounted value should be accepted.
7
NPV examples
9
IRR
❑ The IRR is the interest rate (also known as the discount rate) that will
bring a series of cash flows to a net present value (NPV) of zero.
❑ The IRR formula can be very complex depending on the timing and
variances in cash flow amounts. Without a computer or financial
calculator, IRR can only be computed by trial and error.
N
CFn
NPV = =0
n =1 (1 + IRR )
n
10
IRR
11
IRR
❑ Consider the simple project (−$100, $110)
❑ If R = 8%, NPV =
❑ If R = 12%, NPV =
❑ If R = 10%, NPV =
13
IRR RULE
In the example below, the IRR is 15%. If the firm's actual discount rate for
discounted cash flow models is less than 15%, the project should be accepted.
Investment Inflows
NPV and IRR are formally equivalent, however, the IRR rule contains several pitfalls
14
IRR pitfall 1: Lending or Borrowing?
Not all cash-flow streams have NPVs that decline as the discount rate increases.
o In the case of A, where we are initially paying out $1,000, we are lending money at
50% → we want a high rate of return
o In the case of B, where we are initially receiving $1,000, we are borrowing money
at 50% → we want a low rate of return.
15
IRR pitfall 1: Lending or Borrowing?
A: Accept the project if the IRR is greater than the discount rate. Reject the
project if the IRR is less than the discount rate.
B: Accept the project when the IRR is less than the discount rate. Reject the
project when the IRR is greater than the discount rate.
16
IRR pitfall 2: Multiple rates of return
Helmsley Iron is proposing to develop a new strip mine in Western Australia. The mine involves
an initial investment of A$30 billion and is expected to produce a cash inflow of A$10 billion a
year for the next 9 years. At the end of that time the company will incur A$65 billion of
cleanup costs. Thus the cash flows from the project are:
17
IRR pitfall 2: Multiple rates of return
As the discount rate increases, NPV initially rises and then declines.
The reason for this is the double change in the sign of the cash-flow stream.
→ There can be as many IRR for a project as there are changes in the sign of the cash flows.
18
IRR pitfall 2: Multiple rates of return
19
IRR pitfall 3: Mutually exclusive projects
Firms often need to choose from among mutually exclusive projects: choose
from among several alternative ways of doing the same job or using the same
facility → IRR rule can be misleading.
20
IRR pitfall 3: Mutually exclusive projects
The IRR on the incremental investment is 50% > 10% opportunity cost of capital. So you
should prefer project E to project D.
21
IRR pitfall 3: Mutually exclusive projects
IRR is also unreliable in ranking projects that offer different patterns of cash
flow over time. For example, suppose the firm can take project F or project G
but not both:
→Project F has a higher IRR, but project G, which is a perpetuity, has the higher NPV.
Reason: the total cash inflow of project G is larger but tends to occur later.
Therefore, when the discount rate is low, G has the higher NPV; when the discount
rate is high, F has the higher NPV.
→ If you want to use IRR rule, look at the IRR of incremental flows
22
IRR pitfall 3: Mutually exclusive projects
First, you check that project F has a satisfactory IRR. Then you look at the return on
the incremental cash flows from G:
The IRR on the incremental cash flows from G is 15.6%, greater than the opportunity
cost of capital → you should undertake G rather than F
23
IRR pitfall 4: More than One Opportunity Cost of Capital
The IRR rule tells us to accept a project if the IRR is greater than the opportunity cost
of capital. But what do we do when we have several opportunity costs? Do we
compare IRR with r1, r2, r3, . . .?
→we would have to compute a complex weighted average of these rates to obtain a
number comparable to IRR → too complicated!!!
→Many firms use the IRR assuming that there is no difference between short-term
and long-term discount rates.
24
PART 3
OTHER INVESTMENT
CRITERIAS
25
1. Payback period
Example:
We are spending $6 a week, or around $300 a year, at the laundromat.
If we bought a washing machine for $800, it would pay for itself within 3
years. That’s well worth it.
26
Example
NPVA = +$2,624
NPVB = -2$58
NPVc = +$50
How rapidly each project pays back its initial investment?
27
Payback rule
❑ All other things being equal, the better investment is the one with
the shorter payback period.
28
Payback drawbacks
While the payback rule appears very straightforward, there are 2 significant
problems with this method:
2. It ignores any benefits that occur after the payback period and therefore
does not measure profitability.
29
Discounted Payback
Occasionally companies discount the cash flows before they compute the
payback period.
The discounted payback rule asks, how many years does the project have to
last in order for it to make sense in terms of net present value?
30
Discounted Payback example
Going back to our earlier example of Newco and the decision about which machine to purchase, let's
determine the discounted payback period for Machine A and Machine B, and determine which project Newco
should accept. Recall that Newco's cost of capital is 8.4%.
31
2. Accounting Rate of Return - ARR
→ ARR compares the amount invested to the profits earned over the course of a
project's life. The higher the ARR, the better.
32
ARR drawbacks
❑ It uses operating profit rather than cash flows. Some capital investments have high
upkeep and maintenance costs, which bring down profit levels.
❑ Unlike NPV and IRR, it does not account for the time value of money. By ignoring the
time value of money, the capital investment under consideration will appear to have
a higher level of return than what will occur in reality.
33
3. Profitability Index
A profitability index attempts to identify the relationship between the costs and
benefits of a proposed project.
The profitability index rule states that the ratio must be greater than 1.0 for the
project to proceed.
34
PI vs NPV
❑However, the profitability index differs from NPV in one important respect:
being a ratio, it ignores the scale of investment and provides no indication
of the size of the actual cash flows.
35
CHAPTER SUMMARY
3. Other criterias:
• Payback period
• Profitability index
36