Event After Reporting Date
Event After Reporting Date
Articles
Standards
IFRS and Other Courses
Our Services
Contact Us
My Account
Clearly, the biggest effects of pandemic on businesses happened in 2020, after the end of
2019 reporting year.
So, what does IAS 10 says about similar events? Should you adjust or not?
1. WHEN you should adjust your financial statements for the events after the reporting
period; and
2. WHAT you should disclose about those events.
.
So imagine that the end of your reporting period is 31 December 20X1, your accountants
finish the closing works on 31 January 20X2, the board of directors authorizes them for issue
on 15 February 20X2 and the shareholders approve them on 28 February 20X2.
By definition, you need to consider everything that happens between 31 December 20X1 and
15 February 20X2 as an event after the reporting period.
OK, but what if earthquake happens on 16 February 20X2 and destroys your building?
Well, that is the event after the reporting period for sure, but not under the definition of IAS
10, because it falls outside those two important dates.
Special For You! Have you already checked out the IFRS Kit ? It’s a full IFRS learning
package with more than 40 hours of private video tutorials, more than 140 IFRS case studies
solved in Excel, more than 180 pages of handouts and many bonuses included. If you take
action today and subscribe to the IFRS Kit, you’ll get it at discount! Click here to check it
out!
Of course, the date of authorization of the financial statements for issue by the management
might defer based on the specific country legislation.
The standard IAS 10 specifically says that if the financial statements need to be approved by
the supervisory board made up solely of non-executives, still the management’s approval date
is more important and decisive (i.e. you don’t care about the date of approval by the
supervisory board).
What?
1. Adjusting events
These are events that provide evidence of conditions that existed at the end of the reporting
period.
Examples:
The court case is settled after the end of the reporting period and it confirms that an
entity had a present obligation and should have created a provision in line with IAS
37.
Bankruptcy of a customer after the end of the reporting period confirming that a
client was credit-impaired and ECL should have been recognized in line with IFRS 9.
Sale of inventories after the end of the reporting period at below-cost price suggesting
that the inventories’ NRV was lower that their cost.
Profit-sharing or bonus payments determined after the end of the reporting period
suggesting that there was a present obligation at the year-end.
Discovery of errors or fraud showing that the financial statements are incorrect.
In line with IAS 10.8, you should adjust the amounts recognized in your financial
statements to reflect adjusting events after the reporting period.
Short illustration:
DEF faces the court case for selling contaminated food to its customers. DEF denied all
claims and no provision was made in its financial statements at 31 December 20X1.
On 2 February 20X2, the court awards CU 1 mil. damages against DEF. The financial
statements have not yet been authorized for issue at that time.
Therefore, this adjusting event must be reflected in the financial statements at 31 December
20X1.
DEF needs to create a provision for the damages because the present obligation existed at 31
December 20X1 (they sold contaminated food prior that date):
Debit Legal costs in profit or loss: CU 1 mil.;
Credit Provision against legal costs: CU 1 mil.
2. Non-adjusting events
These are events that are indicative of conditions that arose after the reporting period.
Examples:
In line with IAS 10.10, you shall NOT adjust the amounts recognized in your financial
statements to reflect non-adjusting events after the reporting period.
Instead, in line with IAS 10.21, you should disclose, for each material category of non-
adjusting events after the reporting period, both:
Short illustration:
DEF owns a plant. On 15 January 20X2, huge earthquake in the area destroyed the plant.
The financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X1 have not been yet authorized
for issue by the management at the time of earthquakes.
Special For You! Have you already checked out the IFRS Kit ? It’s a full IFRS learning
package with more than 40 hours of private video tutorials, more than 140 IFRS case studies
solved in Excel, more than 180 pages of handouts and many bonuses included. If you take
action today and subscribe to the IFRS Kit, you’ll get it at discount! Click here to check it
out!
DEF should NOT adjust the numbers in the financial statements, because the earthquake is
non-adjusting event.
Instead, DEF discloses this event and its financial effect in the notes to the financial
statements.
In other words, you need to treat them like they are non-adjusting event
Let’s say that in January 20X2 DEF declared dividend in total amount of CU 10 000 from
profit of 20X1.
The dividend liability is recognized when the shareholder’s right to receive them has been
established – that is supposedly in January 20X2, but NOT in 20X1.
Well if any of events after the reporting period trigger liquidation of business or cessation of
trading, then going concern no longer applies and the entity will not operate for at least 12
months after the reporting period.
Let’s say that on 15 January 20X2, DEF’s managers decide to liquidate the business and sell
all the assets and settle all the liabilities of DEF.
Here, going concern no longer applies and the financial statements for the year ended 31
December 20X1 shall not be prepared on a going concern basis.
How shall they be prepared then? I wrote a Q&A episode on this topic here.
Take a look at the earthquake illustration described above, but now imagine that earthquake
was so bad that destroyed most of DEF’s assets and as a result, DEF will not be able to
continue the business.
I have written above that the earthquake was a non-adjusting event and therefore DEF should
just disclose it with its financial effects.
However, that was valid under the assumption that DEF would survive the earthquake and
continue the business in the foreseeable future.
Here, going concern does NOT apply as DEF is forced to stop the business.
As a result, regardless of earthquake being non-adjusting event, the financial statements for
the year ended 31 December 20X1 are NOT prepared under going concern assumption.
In summary, I believe that the current pandemic is a non-adjusting event, because the most
businesses are affected by the measures taken by the governments to stop the spread, and not
by the virus itself.
The measures taken by the governments happened mostly after the end of 2019.
Special For You! Have you already checked out the IFRS Kit ? It’s a full IFRS learning
package with more than 40 hours of private video tutorials, more than 140 IFRS case studies
solved in Excel, more than 180 pages of handouts and many bonuses included. If you take
action today and subscribe to the IFRS Kit, you’ll get it at discount! Click here to check it
out!
However, let me make this point clear:
If the impact of the measures on your business resulting is so severe that your business will
not survive, then the going concern no longer applies and you should NOT prepare the
financial statements under the going concern assumption.
Here’s the video with the summary of IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Period:
Please, share your thoughts and experiences below this article. Thank you!