A Study On Satisfaction Level of Employees With Special Reference Textile Industry
A Study On Satisfaction Level of Employees With Special Reference Textile Industry
1
Aranithi.M.A, 2Dr.Murugan Ramu
1
Student, First Year, BBA.LLB(Hons), Saveetha School of law, Saveetha University,
Saveetha institute of medical and technical sciences ,Chennai -77,Tamilnadu, India
2
Assistant Professor of Management , Saveetha School of law, Saveetha University,
Saveetha institute of medical and technical sciences, Chennai -77,Tamilnadu, India
1
nithisandy@gmail.com, 2muruganramu.ssl@saveetha.com
Abstract:
The main objective of the exploratory study reported in this paper on employee
satisfaction was to examine the level of satisfaction of the employee regarding their job.
Employee satisfaction has a major influence on human performance through its impact on
individual motivation and job satisfaction. Individual in the organization have certain
expectations and fulfilment of these expectations depends upon their perceptions as to how
the ambience suits to the satisfaction of the employee needs. It has been pointed out that the
major factors that influence and decide the Quality of Work Life are attitude, environment,
opportunities, nature of job, people, stress level, career prospects, challenges, growth and
development and risk involved in the work and rewards. The knowledge management
processing system shows how to mend employees in the calamity of work issues mainly
using e-platforms in textile industries. The main purpose of the study is to analyses work
related factors in textile industries. Employees perpetually involved for his or her quality of
life, career progression and higher financial returns from the employers. It is believed that
majority of employees are glad with their salary and education possibilities in their
organisation. It is located that wages and profits provide satisfaction, proceeding to co-
workers to be cordial with each other, working conditions and promotion possibilities , Jobs
safety, agency policies and regulations and education and development are the necessities for
an employee satisfaction.
Keywords:
Employees, Factors, Job, Organization, Satisfaction.
533
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
1.Introduction:
Employee satisfaction has continuously been a very important issue for organizations.
workers square measure viewed because the greatest strengths and resources of a corporation.
associate degree organization‟s success depends on the workers and so they must not be
empty what they merit reciprocally for his or her commitment to the organization. Its terribly
crucial that the workers of a corporation derive sensible quantity of satisfaction from the task.
However, only a few organizations have created worker satisfaction a high priority, maybe as
a result of they fail to grasp the significant chance that lies ahead of them. Several
organizations fail to grasp the fundamental that means of worker satisfaction.
Employee satisfaction is that the language accustomed describe whether or not
workers square measure happy and self-satisfied and Peul lling their needs and desires at
work. worker satisfaction additionally describes however content a personal is together with
his or her job. The happier individuals square measure at intervals their job, the a lot of satis
impotence they're same to be. worker satisfaction isn't constant as motivation or ability,
though it's coupled with them. Job style aims to boost job satisfaction and
performance,methods embody job rotation, job enlargement, job enrichment and job re-
engineering. several measures purport that worker satisfaction may be a consider worker
motivation, worker goal accomplishment, and positive worker morale within the geographic
point. worker satisfaction, whereas usually positive in a corporation, may also be a
medicament if mediocre workers keep as a result of theere satisfactory importance with the
work atmosphere.The success of any company is directly coupled to the satisfaction of the
workers UN agency embody that company. holding gifted individuals is crucial to the success
of any organization. notwithstanding however briefly challenged the economy is also,
ultimately, a company‟s most gifted performers continuously produce other employment
choices.
2.Review of literature
● Robinson (2004) and Penna (2007) developed a model of engagement which
incorporates employee satisfaction, feeling valued at work, communication and
training and development as key influences on staff engagement and overall
satisfaction at work.
● Beery and Paton‟s (2008) studied selected 200 UAE middle level managers, from
banking, insurance and real estate industries. The study revealed that employee
satisfaction reinforces employee commitment and reduces turnover rates.
534
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
● Mobley‟s (1982) theory of turnover suggests that the job satisfaction level is as a
function of evaluation (or re-evaluation) of current job conditions and characteristics.
● Pena‟s model (2007) adopted a similar position. This model indicates that employees
seek to find “meaning” at work. Penna defines “meaning” as fulfillment from the job.
Organizational culture has been defined by Schwartz and Davis (1981) as a pattern of
beliefs and an expectation shared by the organization‟s members and is work-related values,
ideologies, philosophies and beliefs.
535
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
536
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
● Work professional le: each job content and job security ar found to have an effect on
the job satisfaction of staff, inexperienced and Tsitsianis, 2005; Benz and Norse deity
(2008).
● Relationship with immediate supervisor: it's typically aforementioned “people leave
managers and not companies”. Cordial supervisor-subordinate relationships
contribute to job satisfaction and worker retention. Participative and informatory
leadership designs are found to be completely and signi cantly correlated to job
satisfaction and indirectly associated with structure commitment (Ismail et. al.,
2010).
● give the tools associate degreed coaching an worker must succeed: Bradley, Petrescu
and Simmons (2004) justify that making on-going learning in addition as coaching in
work contains a extremely significant impact on job satisfaction.
● provide a competitive compensation/pay package: Pay satisfaction is American state
ned because the quantity of overall positive have an effect on (or feelings) people
have toward pay (Miceliand Lane, 1991)
● Management recognition of worker job performance: Rewards, as a method of
worker involvement correlate to higher recognition of feat, thereby increasing worker
satisfaction (Bushe et. al., 1996).
● certificatory management style: worker direction practices completely have an effect
on worker satisfaction (Voisard, 2008; Dewettinck et. al., 2003; Halvorsen, 2005;
Kirkmanand Rosen, 1999).
● Offers career development opportunities: to boost retention, firms ought to adopt
career development policies in alignment with the wants of the workers (Wetprasit,
2006).
● Honest communication: Communication helps produce shared which means, the
norms, values and culture of the organization (Wiesenfeld et. al., 1998).
● .Organization Culture: in a very study of structure culture and climate, Johnson and
McIntye (1998) found that the measures of culture most powerfully associated with
job Satisfactions were direction, involvement, and recognition.
537
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
8.1Dispositional approach:
The scope of the dispositional approach was the Core Self-evaluations Model,
projected by Timothy A. Judge, Edwin A. Locke, and Cathy C. Durham in 1997, choose et
al.The dispositional approach suggests that people vary in their tendency to be glad with their
jobs, in alternative words, job satisfaction is to some extent a private attribute or individual
quality. analysis conjointly indicates that identical twins raised apart have similar levels of
job satisfaction.They argued that there area unit four Core Self-evaluations that verify one‟s
538
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
disposition towards job satisfaction: vanity, general self-efficacy, locus of management, and
psychological disorder.
(A) Higher levels of vanity - the worth one places on his/her self.
(B) Self-efficacy - General belief in one‟s own competency.
(C) Internal locus of management - basic cognitive process one has management over her\his
own life, as opposition outside forces having management and
(D) psychological disorder –Low psychological disorder results in job satisfaction.
539
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
formulation of the model could are a method. moreover, the idea doesn't take into account
individual variations, conversely predicting all workers can react in a standardized manner to
changes in motivating/hygiene factors. Finally, the model has been criticised therein it doesn't
specify however motivating/hygiene factors square measure to be measured.
9.Findings
It is seen from the study that the employees are the contributors to production. Job
satisfaction of the employees is said to their financial, non financial wants. Job satisfaction
shall offer impetus to the productivity.
10.Suggestions:
Employees must be pleased with the social operating surroundings, coaching facilities,
feedback system, workers feels that management discrimination on the bases of faith, gender
and age there's communication gap within the manufacturing plant, team conferences don't
seem to be helpful gazing this a model (open forum) has been urged which can improve
communication between all the hirechary levels, it helps to scale back wastage, motivates
workers , encourages workers to be participative in rising operations of the manufacturing
plant. It‟s been discovered that compulsorily they need a chance for private growth and
development.
11.Conclusion:
Being a core plus of organization employees‟ role towards property and growth is
entirely ignorable by the management. Employees‟ satisfaction towards the organisation is
overriding force resulting in higher performance. it's finished that employees‟ satisfaction is
very coupled with culture of organization. Organizations guaranteeing higher work
atmosphere, facilities and awards and compensation plans for an individual worker square
measure proved house of happy and motivated workers. This study any valid that worker
and leader relationship relies on a trade-off of give-and-take. Organizations that guarantee
implementation of human resource management follow have a lot of happy workers than the
organization with least serious behavior towards adoption of human resource management
practices. The scope of this study is it will help to understand exactly what matters most to
your employees. The study on employee satisfaction will help the textile industry to
understand what are major factors which lead to satisfaction and dissatisfaction of employees
in an organization. The industry will also understand how employee satisfaction has a direct
540
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
and positive impact on productivity which in turn leads to organization profits. This type of
study helps management of textile factories to understand where their employees are satisfied
and dissatisfied what are the reasons for dissatisfaction and what can be done to improve their
employee satisfaction level, also help them in making required changes in their policies &
procedures.
References:
● Ashwathapa K., (2005), „Human Resource Management‟ Tata McGraw Hills, Fifth
edition.
● Bradley, S., Petrescu, A. and Simmons, R. (2004). The Impacts of Human Resource
● Management Practices and Pay Inequality on Workers‟ Job Satisfaction. Paper
presented at the Western Economic Association 79th Annual Conference Vancouver.
● Brief, A. P. (1998). Attitudes in and around organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
● Burnfield, J. L., Rogelberg, S. G., Leach, D. J., and Warr, P., (2003), Building a solid
foundation for Internet research: An international case study, Journal of e-Commerce
and Psychology, 3, 89–103.
● Comer, J. M., Machleit, K. A., and Lagace, R. R. (1989). Psychometric assessment of
a reduced version of INDSALES. Journal of Business Research, 18(4), 291–302.
● Cooper, D. and Schindler, (2007), Business
● research meth- ods, Tata Mcgraw hill, New Delhi, 138 -170.
● Churchill, G. A., Jr., Ford, N., and Walker, O. C., Jr. (1974),measuring the job
satisfaction of industrial sales- men. Journal of Marketing Research, 11(3), 254–260.
● Griffeth, R. W. and Hom, P. W. (1988), A comparison of different conceptualizations
of perceived alternatives in turnover research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9:
103–111.
● Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., and Eberly, M. B (2008), Turnover and
retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture
into the future. In J. P. Walsh and A. P. Brief (Eds.), Academy of Management
annals, 2, 231–274.
● Ismail I, Hassan MA, Abdul Rahman N, Chen SS (2010). Thermophilic biohydrogen
production from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using suspended mixed culture.
Biomass and Bioenergy, 34: 42-47.
● Johnson, J. J., and McIntye, C. L. (1998). Organizational culture and climate
correlates of job satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 82, 843–850.
541
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
● Judge, Timothy A., Parker, Sharon, Colbert, Amy E., Heller, Daniel and Ilies,
Remus, (2001), “Job Satisfaction: A Cross-Cultural Review”, in Handbook of
Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology, Volume 2 Organizational Psychology
(Anderson etal. edited), SAGE.
● Judge, T. A., Thoreson, C. J., Bono, J. E., and Patton, G.K. (2001), The job
satisfaction–job performance relation- ship: A quantitative and qualitative review.
Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376–407.
Volume 1 Issue 1 January 2012
● Kinicki, A. J., McKee-Ryan, F. J., Schriesheim, C. A., and Carson, K. P. (2002),
Assessing the construct validity of the Job Descriptive Index: A review and meta-
analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 14–32.
● Kothari, C.R. (1999), Research methodology: methods and techniques, Vishwa
Prakashan, New Delhi, 21-151.
● Lagace, R. R., Goolsby, J. R., and Gassenheimer, J. B. (1993), Scaling and
measurement: A quasi-replicative assessment of revised version of INDSALES
.Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 13(1), 65–72.
● MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., and Williams, J. (2004), Confidence limits for
the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate
Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.
● Miceli, M.P., and Lane, M.C. (1991). Antecedents of pay satisfaction: A review and
extension. In G.R. Ferris and K.M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human
resources management (Vol. 9, pp. 235-309). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
● Dr.Lakshmi T and Rajeshkumar S 2018“In Vitro Evaluation of Anticariogenic
Activity of Acacia Catechu against Selected Microbes”, International Research
Journal of Multidisciplinary Science & Technology, (Vol3 ,Pp20-25).
● Trishala A , Lakshmi T and Rajeshkumar S,2018“ Physicochemical profile of Acacia
catechu bark extract –An In vitro study”, International Research Journal of
Multidisciplinary Science & Technology, (Vol3 , pP 26-30).
542
543
544