Forensic Psycology Tutorial
Forensic Psycology Tutorial
CLASS : A8
b) Substance Abuse
Chronic abuse of drugs and alcohol is a precursor to other dangerous behaviors,
including criminal activity. Although some degree of experimentation with drugs
and alcohol is not unusual during adolescence, excessive use is a risk factor for
delinquency.
c) Cognitive Deficits
Cognitive deficits have also been implicated as a risk factor for delinquent
behavior. Low intelligence quotient (IQ) scores, weak verbal abilities, learning
disabilities, and difficulty with concentration or attention have all been associated
with subsequent delinquent behavior. Social-cognitive development is especially
important because it affects one’s ability to learn social norms and expectations.
For example, studies have shown that delinquent youths are more likely than their
peers to think that other children’s behavior is deliberately hostile, even when it is
not. Though not conclusive, studies suggest that such cognitive deficits usually
precede the development of delinquency and not vice versa.
2. What are the signs of deception among children and juveniles? (5m)
- Physical- Based on changes in the face that show a face that is afraid of the
reasons given for children. For juveniles they do not see the face that questions
them for fear of the answer given.
There’s a saying in communication: “physical distance equals emotional distance.”
When you communicate with a young person on an important issue, observe whether
she or he is crossing her arms or legs, turning the body sideways from you, holding an
object in front of her chest to shield herself from you, or stepping behind a piece of
furniture to establish a physical barrier with you. These non-verbal cues may not
signify lying, but at the minimum, they suggest an emotional distance and less than
complete openness.Again, it’s important to keep in mind that just because a child or
teenager exhibits some of the traits outlined in this chapter, it doesn’t necessarily
mean that she or he is lying. People who are confident and secure with what they say,
however, generally do not exhibit the incongruous cues above. It’s useful to keep
these tips in mind when assessing the communication authenticity of a young person.
- Emotions- For children they will be silent when questioned. For example they
will cry when the things they do are wrong in law but persist not to be blame.
In many Western societies, avoiding natural eye contact when speaking can be
interpreted as dishonesty, evasiveness, or shedding responsibility. Most of us have
heard of the saying: “I don’t trust a person who can’t look me in the eye.” There’s
some truth to this statement under proper cultural, social, and psychological
contexts.In addition, both eyes looking straight down can be discerned as feeling
negative emotions (such as sadness, discouragement, or guilt), and eyes looking down
but to one side can be interpreted as feeling negative, but not truly dealing with the
experience.Here’s an example: An adolescent is being called into account for
wrongdoing, and you ask: “Do you know why you’re being punished?” If the young
person answers “yes,” but looks down to the side, he probably doesn’t want to face
the problem squarely and sincerely. He wants to say the right thing, and then be
excused.
- Language in speech- They will try to raise their voices and there are also those
who try to curse those who question them in this way so that they can save
themselves from guilt.
When a person who normally doesn’t do so suddenly stutters when being put on a
spot, it could be due to nervousness, self-consciousness, or defensiveness. It could
also include the possibility of lying.In addition to Furnham’s tips, here are additional
non-verbal communication cues that may hint at a child or teenager being dishonest,
inhibited, or, at the minimum, insecure. These signals are particularly telling when
exhibited under direct questioning
- Social detect - They are easy to do things they never did and connect with friends
who are older than them.
a) Bad Language
Explain why bad language should not be used in your family. It is important for
your child to know the consequences of using such language on the people it uses
and on themselves. Tell your child that they can ask you if they are not sure if a
word is 'bad' and that you are ready to help if needed.
b) Unacceptable Social Behavior
This includes stealing, hitting other children, bullying and so on. Explain that the
behavior is morally wrong. Emphasize how such behavior can hurt others. If you
have previously explained the consequences of doing the behavior, hold your
child accountable for his actions if he repeats them.
3. What are the methods that can be used to detect deception among children and
juveniles? (10 m)
Research on detecting children’s truth- and lie-telling behaviors has been conducted
in both laboratory and field studies. Laboratory studies have usually used one of two
methodologies to detect deception. In the first, children are told to make a false report
about an event. These reports are examined using one or both of the following
measurement techniques: Trained coders observe the reports for behavioral markers,
or video clips of the children’s reports are shown to adults, who are asked to
discriminate between the truth and lie tellers. This methodology allows examination
of children’s false reports about specifically designed events that may be analogous to
legally relevant settings, such as children reporting about a medical examination.
However, such reports may be unnatural due to children being instructed to lie or
“pretend,” making the act of lying in these cases of very low perceived consequences
and thereby unlike certain real-life situations. In the second commonly used
laboratory-based methodology, naturalistic situations are created in which children
can choose to lie spontaneously about an event, such as committing a transgression
(e.g., peeking at a forbidden toy). Video clips of children’s behaviors in these
situations are used for detecting the truthfulness of their claims. In these naturalistic
lie-telling situations, children may have greater motivation to lie due to the perceived
increased risk of consequences of the situation (e.g., getting caught), and thus, they
have greater ecological validity. However, current laboratory procedures tend to
create situations where children produce only short verbal reports, and the situations
created are not necessarily similar to the types of reports given in the legal system.
Field study reports, another methodology, use children’s actual reports of events (e.g.,
sexual abuse) to analyze statements for markers of deception. This methodology has
the advantage of being realistic and having ecological validity because actual forensic
reports are used. However, unlike the other methodologies where it is known for
certain that the child is lying, it is impossible to know for certain which reports are
fabricated and which are true.