MT Garmonia (Yükleme Li̇mani Ev. Shipper Surv)
MT Garmonia (Yükleme Li̇mani Ev. Shipper Surv)
MT Garmonia (Yükleme Li̇mani Ev. Shipper Surv)
*a. T4e immadiate provEous cargo in the tanks was not a eubstance appear ng on, th
GSıFA List-yf-Bsa nn-red Pravinı s Carnnec in force at the dato of tho BiH!s
of,adir , and the tank hac nnf containod any leaded products as
th0 throc prcvfous Cargoes carrıed- etated ta ha e-bee-n"r
*b. The immediate previous cargo in the tanks was a substance on the FOSFA List oi
Acceptable Previous Cargoes in force at the date of the Bili/s of Lading
and the tanks has not contained leaded products as the three previous Cargoes
carried, stated to have been:
TO HAVE BEEN:
jf TBuxap`APM,OY A9
m/tĞAR'~40NtA
FOR VF~SEL
DA~~
THIS ISTO CERTIFY THAT THE UNDERSIGNED CISS GROUP. SEALED THE CARGO TANKS OFTHE
ABOVE-NAMED VESSEL UPON COMPLETION OF LOADING. ALL TANKS AND VALVES HAVE 6EEN PROPERLY
CLOSED AND SEALED AS FOLLOWS:
Port Starboard
Posliion Seals Na: Posltlon Seais Na:
6430461 6430462 6430505 6430506
1P MANHOLE 18 MANHOLE
6430463 6430464 6430507 6430508
TOTAL: 50 SEALS
REMARKS: NO
REMARKS:
FOR TERMİNAL
NAME:
DAt'ED: 30.12.2020
Gommvdities intarnationai
Shipping and Survey
PILE No. SGD00532
VESSEL GARMONIA
COMMODITY CRUDE SUNFLOWEN 5EED OIL
SHIP`S TANKS 1 P/ 1 5/2P/2S/3P/35/4P/45/SP/55/6P AND 6S.
LOADING PORT PORT KAVKAZ, RUSSL
BERTH No 2
PORT OF' D)rSTINATION TURKEY
OUANTIIY, MT 5710,388
DENSrrYAT 20 °C 0,920İ
VEP 0,99827
METRIC TONNES AIR LOADED VEF APPLIED: 5703,555
NAM E:
m/t GARMONIA
DATED: ö~2me AGES
TE PERATURES O
Commoditiea intarnationai
Shipping and Survey
FILE Na. 3GD00532
VESSEL GARMONIA
COMMODITY CRUDE SUNFLOWER SEED OIL
SHIP'S TANKS 1 P/ T S/2P/25/3P/3S/4P/45/5P/55/6P AND 6S.
LOADING PORT PORT KAVKAZ, RUSSIA
BERTH NO 2
PORT OF DESTINATIOI` TURKEY
OUANTrrY, MT ABT.5.700,000 MT
SAMPLING REPORT
WE, CISS GROUP UKRAINE ASA FIRST CLASS SUPEPNTENDING COMPANY, HEREBY CERTIFY THATTHE FOLLOWING
SAC+PLrS WERE D?.AJ AND SEALED.
IiiSp"~ Ci4f
\ a~ 1
Y~
_..::cP rAF .ch 91'
C©mmod[ties Internatienal
Shipping anıt 5urvey
FILE Na. SGD00532
VESSEL GARMONIA
COMMODITY CRUDE SUNFLOWER SEED OIL
SHIP`S TANKS 1 P/ 1 S/2P/25/3P/35/4P/45/5P/55/6P AND 65.
LOADING PORT PORT KAVKAZ, RUSSIA
BERTH No 2
PORT ❑F DESTINATION TURKEY
OUANTI îY, MT ABT.5.700,000 MT
I
SAMPLE RECEIPT
1, THE LNDERSIGNED, CAPTAIN OR AUTHORISED REPRESENTITIVE OF THE VESSEL, DECLARE THAT 1 HAVE
RECEIVED BELOW LİSTED SEALED SAMPLES FOR FURTHER DELNERY TO THE CARGO RECE[VER AT
D(SCi-TARGE PORT.
REMAE.KS :
FOR V EL 4
:,{~~
NAM E:
DATED: 30 / 1 2/202
Tamit G4Rı /A : DATEC 30 / 12/2020
Commodittas tnternattonat
Shipping and Survey
THIS IS TC CERTIFYTHAT PRIOR TO LOADING OPERATIONS WE INSPECTED THE FOLLOWING CARGO TANKS:
BASE ON VISUAL [NSPECTION THE ABOVE TANKS WERE FOUND SUITABLE FOR LOADING OF ABOVE MENTIONED
CARGC.
AIR : S: OK
VESSEL`S PUMPS: OK
VESSIL`S LINES: OK
FOR VESSEL c
N ~'_ I tiR4 a$ ~.r
NAME:
T~H:ep rAPMOHpISi
DATED: 29 / 1 2/2020 IMO ic==s
m/t GARMONIA /o
Commoditles international
shipping and Survoy
f İ
ORIGINALTOTALS , , 107463,028 107649,696 0,99827
EXCLUDED INFORMATION
1.)FIRSTVOYAGEA7 RDRYDOCK,L4STDRYDOCKWAS: VEF rai 0,99827
2)ANYVOYAGEWFIERESHORETANKM ASUREMENTSARENOTAVAIL.4BLE ASAD/V/SOR
3)VOYAGES PRIOR TO SırfUCTURAL CHANGES A VEFMUST CONS/ST OFATLEABT 5 QUALlFY/NG VOY'
41DON'T COMBINELO?4D AND DISPORT/NFO.
T ricîDYEUJFL2Y'S/i7h3V15E%~iCJEbÖYÎiiĞL~~F
Cı7n~F7C~!SL ~'3 /tCLL? SLE 9 E44hiAESPCjr. P!U7ypQ77}IEAGGLraiıYOPSLTı7llhFCA'ft~OM
FOR VFZSF7_
NAME:
DATED: 29 / 12/2020
Conm®Östies FA erı~tone~
Sh upmc and Survey
Hİ E IN/~ ıı.: .
r _ 005
S'~ V.ı J
VESSEL GARMON!P
COMMODI.TY CRUDE SUNFLOWER SEED OL
VOYAGE k10 19/20
SHİP`S T4NK_S 1 Pj 1 S./2P/2S/3~/3S/ 4P/4S/5P./SS;6R AND 6S
_OADtN4 PORT PORT KA`JK~Z.RUSSIA
BERTH N 2
PORT OFI DESi INAT!ON TL'RKEY
LA.NTI ; , MT ART 5 700,000 VT
' 0Lı .OY: N3 -E POS -A HFATıNG NSTRJCT CNS 'N RESPECT OF BULK SH!PMENT OF O!LS AND FATS.
HAL_ !E "S JRE THA THE TEw!PERAT: JREE OF T^,E O!L DUR!NG DEL!VERY INTO THE TANK(S) OF A SHIP !S THAT AT WHICH
-~ C +5 JSLA _LY HANDLED AND WHERE THE HEAT !S APPUED THAT TEMPERATURE !N NO CASE EXCEEDS THAT GIVEN (N
T-lE APPRCPR!ATE TABLE
2 MASTErt SHAL_. SUPPLV TO CARGO RECE'•`✓ERS A S''ATEMENT SHOW!NG THE CARGO TEMPERATURE AT LOADING ANDA CHART
_)N vV'— O
V =._Y EMPE A RES -, "E -. ._DAD NG nAVE BEEN RECORDED.
HE O'rAPT S-.rL_ BE S:c.NED BY ;'-IE MAS'E.R OR AJTHOk,SED OFF:CER
3. SHIPPE S SHALL SUPPLY THE FOLLOW!NG !NSTRUCT!ONS WITH REGARD TO HEATING OF OIL DURİNG THE VOYAGE:
5 . 7'SI TA~İKS "'ED W!-H H=ATING CO LS.
1, :C:' Ji` :F _DAD",G. SH'P`E CO:_S SHAL. . BE C OMPLETE_✓ COVERED W!T H O L.
V _ _ N•_. SHALL BE EFFECTE_ 3' ,CT WATER OF, WHERE THIS iS İMPRACT:CABLE, BY ~OW. PRESSURE SATURATED STEAM.
RESSURE SHALL NOT EXCEED e 5 BAR GA'JGE.
.3 DURItio THE VCYAGE THE O,L SHA:.L BE MAİNTA!NED 'N ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEMPEATURES SET OUT :N THE HEATING
E 'N S. - - C!E.` T T HE ERıOR TO ARRiVA_ .AT PORT OF D!SCHARGE r'EAT SHALL BE APP_!ED GRADUALLY TO ENSURE THAT
EM=EFATJRE.OF THE CIL AT TIME OF D!SCHARGE 15 !N ACCORDANCE W!TH THE TEMPERATURES SET OUT !N THE HEATING
F-COH V ENDAT!ONS (T 4BL= A). THE CARGO S!-!ALL BE MA!N TA!NED W!TH!N THE RANGE OF T EMPERATURES THROUGHOUT
SO . ;R',_
.N U ✓_R TO AVO. D Ai\Y DAMAGE TO THE O: A~_TY OF THE O L, !T IS ESSENT!AL THAT '.HAT !S APPUED GRADUALLY.
A SUDDEN CREASE iN T EMPERAT URE MUST BE AVOIDED AS !T W.ILL ALMOST CERTA!NLY RESULT IN DAMAGE TO THE OIL.
6 THE !CREASE :N TEMPERATURE OF THE OL DURING ANY PERIOD OF 24 HOURS SHALL NEVER EXCEED 5°C.
,Ac FR S PRA: T!'AB_E, TOK AND ECT OM TEMPERATURES SHALL ?E MA'NTA!NED AT =OUAL LEVELS; THE D!FFERENCE
BET1,~EEN' !ESETWO TEMPERATURESSİ-IALL'.:VER EXCEED 5 °C —
3.1 8 THE ; I ~ p/PERATURES REFERRED TC ABOVE ARE THE AVERAGE OF TOP, MIDDLE AND BOTTOM READ!NGS.
HE TOK RE DING SHALL BE TAKEN AT ABOUT RO CM (ONE FOOT) BELOW THE SURFACE OF HE O!L.
7AN`"\.
H_ i C . REAONG SEAL_ BE
3
.. :N TA -.':S Y_ `-ı.CH :-A 'E CG!T::M CİLS ?T 30 CM (ÖNE FOO') ABOVE THE CEVEL OF THE CO!LS"
3. N TANKS WHICH HAVE S!DE CO!LS BU- NO BOTTOM CCILS, ATA PO!NT ABOUT TWO FEET (60 CM) FROM
THE BOTTOM OF THE TAVK AND ABOUT 30 CM (ONE FOCT) FROM THE SIDE CO!LS.
_ _ ND!C!ATED :N 3 ' -'' ABCVE ARE APPLıCABLE UNDER NORMAL CCND;TİONS RULING AT PORT OF DİSCHARG
- r F _ E((' C A313'R , A__ CONDlTIONS (SULH AS EXTREMELY LOW AtR Oç WATER TEMPERATURES) RECE!VERS, EITHER D!RECTLY
TH" GU3r. THE:R AP~OıNTED REPR_SENTATIVES, MAY VARY THE TEMPERATURES STATED AND !NSTRUCT SHIPOWNERS
04 T. ._'R A3E^ TS ACCORD!NGLY.
55T.İ _S OF S.,Ch \, 'AR =T'ONS SHALL BE DU'LY FECORDED AND ADV!SED ° C SH:PPERS OF THE!R REPRESENTATIVES.
-E '= S ?C•_E HA`. ONE REC_ •✓EF -'-'_ D._.._X ONE S-iP'STANK
h ALL RECEIVERS FROM THAT TANK SI-1OL LD BE IN AGREEMENT TO THE PROPOSED VARIATIONS IN THE
4P_RA'JRES STATED !N 3 1.4 ABOVE.
S P ER E RE:P=TSDN-.:TıV_S AT PCR .ISCHARGE SHALL ENDEAVOUP TC RECCNCL.E REOU!REMENTS
.2
3 ~ FOR :AN tS WITH HEAT EXCHANGERS
AL L RU~Tr ONS UNDER PARAGRAPH 3 ". ARE APPLİCABL.E EXCEPT FOR 3.1 .1 AND 3 ': .S; THE BOTTOM TEMPERATURE SHOULD BE
:NS
F !" i5 E'VV! AG=D THAT THE TEMPERATURE OF THE OL AT THE T!ME OF D SCHARGE WIL- BE BELOW THE M!NİMUM
Iı
= GJRE !NDI4ATED IN THE TEMPERATURE IS REACHED
4
B.J! 1( C'S SHİPPED !N TANKS SY VESSELS IIIHOSE `YOYAGE BY SEA OF :NS_AND WAT_EP`_WAY
DO NO' E xCEED Jc DAYS
-E ._. M J_S" 3E CAOED AT A T EMPERATJR= WH!CH ENABLE THE D SCHARGE TEMPF_RATL;RE TC BE
rtt 6.NG"-i= "EyFEF - JRE :)_ , -E O_ O' .M T.HAN E`C ?ER 24 HCURS
TEviPERAT:RE TA3 1 F
^ DLF NG VOYAGE AT TIME OF DİSCARGE
~3/ !_ / 2C2V
/
1 April 2020
Crımı~rniities InternaUonal
4' Sfı ppfng anti survay
FOSFA COMBINED MASTERS CERTIFiCATE
*Shippers/Charterers-Chernozemye/Tiryaki
1 state that -
2. The named ship complies with the FOSFA Qualmcations and Operational Procedures for
Ships Engaged in the Carriage of Oiis and Fats in Buik for Edible and Oleo-Chemicai
use.
3. Tank heating la by *immersed coils/heat oxchangcr. Coiis, tubes and sheli as appiicable are
of stainless steel construction, and were tested on 11.01.2020 (date) to not less
than 10.5 bars for aperiod of 60 minutes and found tight.
4. Copper and its alioys such as brass, bronze or gun metal are not present in any part of the
system installation and means of transport Chat has contact with the oiis or fats,
5. Tank access/cieaning hatches are staunch and tight with suitabie packing and gaskets
compatible with the cargo.
6. Ali intemal structurai members are self-draining.
D=1
0. For oontam'natlan Control p~rnpoees, lf essel alsa has a therrnal heating fluid
system, the thormai heating fluid 'o
11. Cargo lines ara *stainless steel/mild steoi with sufficient drain valves to ensure
complete clearing and draining of the system.
12. The tank(s) has (have) not contained, as the last three cargoes, any leaded products.
Ships Tanks N° Last cargo Second Last Cargo Third Last Cargo
1P Crude Sunflower Seed OH Crude Sunflower Sead Oil Crude Sunflower Seed OH
18 Crude Sunflower Seed Oli Crude Sunflower Seed OH Crude Sunflower Seed OH
2P Crude Sunflower Seed Ot! Crude Sunflower Seed Oli Crude Sunflower Seed 011
28 Crude Sunflower Seed Oli Crude Sunflower Seed Oli Crude Sunflower Seed Oli
3P Crude Sunflower Seed OH Crude Sunflower Seed OH Crude Sunflower Seed Oli
38 Crude Sunflower Seed Ol! Crude Sunflower Seed oii Crude Sunflower Seed 011
4P Crude Sunflower Seed Oli Crude Sunflower Seed 011 Crude Sunflower Seed Oli
48 Crude Sunflower Seed OH Grude Sunflower Seed Ol! Crude Sunflower Seed Oli
5P Crude Sunflower Seed Oli Crude Sunflower Seed oii Crude Sunflower Seed Oli
5S Crude Sunflower Seed Oli Crude Sunflower Sead Oii Crude Sunflower Seed Ot!
6P Crude Sunflower Seed Oli Crude Sunflower Seed Oii Crude Sunflower Seed Oli
65 Crude Sunflower Seed Oli Crude Sunflower Seed Oli Crude Sunflower Seed Off
In the event that a cargo was less than 60% of volume of the tank, such cargo to be
recorded but is not to be consldered a qualifying prevlous cargo. Such cargo not to
be a product on the FOSFA List of Banned lmmediate Previous Cargoes ar to be a
product on the FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes; whichever list to apply,
dictated by the sales contract.
14. Subject tanks have been cleaned after immediate previous cargoes using cleaning
methods as noted below:
Ship C,a~naorri~
D-2
FOSFA Combined Master Certiflcate — 1 April 2020
C~mmoditiss 1ntematianal
Sh~ppng and Survey
FILE No. SGD00532
VESSEL GARMO A
COMMODITY CRUDE SUNFLOWER SEED OIL
VOYAGE NO 19/20
SH1P'S TANKS 1 P/ 1 S/2P/2S/3P/3S/4P/45/5P/5S/6P AND 65.
LOADING PORT PORT KA1îKAZ, RUSS[A
BERTH NO 2
PORT OF DESTINATION TURKEY
QUAN T rrY, MT ABT.5.700,000 MT
FOLLG:' G THE FOSFA HEATİNG INSTRUCTIG:S IN RESPECT OF BULK SHIPMENT OF OILS AND FATS:
1. SHs`rPER5 SHALL ENSURE THAT THE TEMPERATURE OF THE OIL DURING DEUVERY INTO THE TANK(S) OF A SHIP 15 THAT AT WHICH
THE OILTHE IS USUALLY HANDLED AND WHERE THE HEAT !S APPUED THAT TEMPERATURE IN NO CASE EXCEEDS THAT GIVEN IN
THE APfROPRIATE TABLE
2. MASER SHALL SUPPLY TO CARGO RECEIVERS A STATEMENT SHOWING THE CARGO TEMPERATURE AT LOADING AND A CHART
ON WHICH THE DAİLY TE XPERATURES AFTER LOAD:: IG HAVE BEEN RECORDED.
THE CHARRT SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE MASTER OR AUTHORISED OFFICER.
3. SHIPPERS SHALL SUPPLY THE FOLLOWING INSTP.UCTIONS WITH REGARD TO HEATING OF OIL DURING THE VOYAGE:
3.1 SHIP'S TANKS Fı ı 1 .D WITH HEATING COILS.
3.1.1 C:. CO''PLETION OF LOADİN , SHIP'S CO'ıLS SHALL BE COMPLETELY COVERED WITH OIL.
3.1 .2 HEAT.NG SHALL BE EFFECTED BY HOT VrnTER OR, WHERE THIS IS ;MPRkCTICABLE, BY LOW. PRESSURE SATUPATED STEAM.
PRESSURE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.5 BAR GAUGE.
3. 1 .3 DURING THE VOYAGE THE DL SHALL BE MNTAİNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEMPERATURES SET OUT IN THE HENnNG
RECOİ' EN ATİCNS (TABLE A).
3. 1 .4 !N SUFFICIENT T..".1E PR:^R TO ARRiVAL AT PORT OF DİSCHARGE, HEAT SHALL BE APPUED GRADUALLY TO ENSURE THAT
THE TEMPERATURE.OF THE OIL AT TIME OF DISCHARGE IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEMPERATURES SET OUT IN THE HEATING
RECOI.::ı:ENDAT. 10NS (TABLE A). THE CARGO SHALL BE MAINTAİNED WITHIN THE RANGE OFTEMPERATURES THROUGHOUT
THE DiSCHARGE.
3.1 .5 1N ORDER TO A`✓DİD ANY A'V GE TO THE OUALITY OF THE OİL, IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT HEAT IS APPUED GRADUALLY.
A SUDDEN INCREASE IN TEMPERATURE MUST BE AVOlDED AS IT WILL ALMOST CERTAINLY RESULT IN DAMAGE TO THE OIL,
3.1.6 THE INCREASE IN TEMPERATURE OF THE OIL DURING ANY PERIOD OF 24 HOURS SHALL NEVER EXCEED 5°C,
3.1.7 AS FAR AS PRACTICABLE, TOP AND BOTTOM TEMPERATURES SHALL BE MAİNTA;NED AT EOUAL LEVELS; THE DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN THESE T.VO TEMPERATURES SHALL I, EVER EXCEED 5°C.
3.1 .8 THE TEMPERATURES REFERRED TO ABOVE ARE THE AVERAGE OF TOP, MIDDLE AND BOTTOM READINGS.
THE TOP READING SHALL BE TAKEN AT ABOUT 30 CM (ONE FOOT) BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE OIL.
THE B'DTTOM READING SHALL BE TAKEN:
A. !N TANKS WHICH HA7E BOTTOM COILS AT 30 CM (ONE FOOT) ABOVE THE LEVEL OF THE COILS;
B. IN TANKS WHICH HAVE SIDE COILS BUT NO BOTTOM COILS, ATA POINT ABOUT TWO FEET (60 CM) FROM
THE BOTTOM OF THE TANK AND ABOUT 30 CM (ONE FOOT) FROM THE SIDE COILS.
3. 1 .9 THE TEMPERATUPES INDICİATED IN 3.1 .4 ABOVE ARE APPUCABLE UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS RULING AT PORT OF DISCHAF
IN THE EV ENT OF ABNOR'AL CONDİTICNS (SULH AS EXTREMELY LOW AİR OR WATER TEMPERATURES), RECEIVERS, EfTHER DIRECTL'
OR THR OUGH THEIR APPC:NTED REPRESENTATIVES, MAY VARY THE TEMPERATURES STATED AND INSTRUCT SHIPOWNERS
OR THEIR AGENTS ACCORDINGLY.
DETAiLS OF SUCH VARIATIONS SHALL BE DULY RECORDED AND ADVISED TO SHIPPERS OR THEIR REPRESENTATTVES.
IF THERE IS MORE THAN ONE RECEIVER OF THE OİL EX ONE SHIP'S TANK:
A. ALL RECEİVERS FROM THAT TANK SHOULD BE IN AGREEMENT TO THE PROPOSED VARIATIONS IN THE
TEMPERATURES STATED iN 3. 1 .4 ABOVE:
B. SH!PPER'S REPRESENTATIVES AT PORT OF DISCHARGE SHALL ENDERVOUR TO RECONCILE REGUIREe;ENTS
OF THE IND::İDUAL RECEiVERS.
3.2 FOR TANKS Y'vi I'H HEAT EXCHANGERS
ALİ.. i:.;STRUCTIONS UNDER PARAGRAPH 3.1 ARE APPUCABLE EXCEPT FOR 3. 1.1 AND 3.1.8. THE BOTTOM TEMPERATURE SHOULD E
TAKEN 30 CM (ONE FOOT) ABOVE TANK BOTTOM.
3.3 BULK OIIS NOT NORMALLY REOUİRING HEATING DURING THE VOYAGE
İF IT IS ENISAGED THAT THE TEMPERATURE OF THE OIL AT THE TIME OF DISCHARGE WILL BE BELOW THE MINIMıUM
FİGURE INDICATED IN THE TEMPERATURE IS REACHED
3.4 SULK NLS SHIPPED IN TANNS BY VESSELS WHOSE VOYAGE BY SEA OR INLAND WATERVJAY
DON EX_CEED 5 DAYS
THE O L MUST BE LOADED ATA TEMPERATURE WH!CH 1F.".LL ENABLE THE D!SCHARGE TEMPERATURE TO BE
REAC _D FsY R.z 15:NG THE TEMFEP~TURE OP THE OİL 8Y NOT MORE THAN 5 °C PER 24 HOURS
TEMPERATURE TABLE
DUR!NG VOYAGE AT TIME OF DISCARGE
M!N °C MAX °C MIN °C MAX °C
AMBIENT AMBIENT 15 20
<e): IT I. RECOGNIZED THAT IN SOME CASES THE A 1SİENT TEMPERATURES MAY EXCEED THE RECOMMENDED
tvL4~C(Fi~ 'M PTGURES SHOiF.N IN THE HEATING RECOMMEND.ATIONS.
DATE• 30ı12ı2020
CommocfiUes lnternattonai 1 April 2020
Sh pping and Survey
FOSFA CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, CLEANLINESS
AND SUJTABiLITY OF SHIP'S TANK
FileN~-SGD00532
1. We have sighted a statement in the form of the FOSFA Combined Master's Certifıcate
signed by the *Captain/First Officer or an equivalent statement signed by the *ship's
owners/authorlsed agent certifying that the above named ship complies wtth the FOSFA
Qualifications and Operational Procedures for Ships Engaged in the Caniage o# Oils and
Fats in Bulk for Edible and Oleo-Chemical Use.
2. Prior to inspection we were informed by ship's *Captainlplrst Officer that the tank was
* Stainlese steei.
* Miid steel coated with (description of coating); ncw coathg/ ra *^tiing to bo dociared-
whon appropriate/relevant Epoxy
* Miid stoet
3. We received a copy of a statement signed by ship's captain, owners or authorised agent
certifying that:
*a. The 'mmodiate previous corgc n tho tanık was not a prcduct appearing on the FOSFA
Uct of an r r .te r
gGe in foc-e ot ı a
tt hs an__k ompHes fh the R. ostri tions beyond the Immediaf'n Proylnuc Cargo os
ona..
cct ot En the FCSFA Lict of 3anncd Irnmodlato Prc~4ouc Cargocc. Thc provicuo
c) nr r iod a~e sta1
nhrgoes (b ck tc n nunllfyinn nreyicue_nor
"`". y" - ~ .. u .~ıed tc have be3n:
Laet Cc~go
Second Last Corgc
TC.'rd I act Garn__,~
Under the provisions of 3a. and 3b. above in the event that e cargo was less than 60% of
volume of the tank, such cargo to be recorded but is not to be considered a qualifying
previous cargo. Such cargo not to be a product on the FOSFA List of Banned Immediate
Cargoes or to be a product on the FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes;
whichever Hat to apply, dictated by the sales contreot.
E-1
est Caçgo V
Last Cargo
Sccond Last Cargc
Thlyd Last Cargv ,
4. We sighted ship's log which confırmed the above information as to the prevlous cargoes
and their respective volume in the tank.
5. We were infomıed by ship's First Offıcer that the tank had been cleaned after the last cargo
by using the foliowing cleaning procedure:
6. Tank was examined intemally for cleanliness and as far as could be seen was found to be
clean and dry and free from harmful material and, in our opinlon, in this respect based on
our visual inspection and at the time of our inspection, was in a fit state to receive a cargo
of Crude Sunflower OH in bulk.
7. From our inspection we found the tank construction was:
*a. Stainless Stcel
*b. Mild steel coated and as far as could be seen the coeting appeared to be in sound
condition with minimal miid steel exposure, without ioose scale or closed blisters.
*c. Mlld steo=and as -far as could 1 e-ecen appeared ta be in sound condition without
looco scale.
8. Ship's cargo pumps and fxed pipelines were inspected as far as possib}e in-situ and
based on visual inspection found to be clean and dry with no signiflcant odour.
9. We were informed by the ship's First Officer that the tank coiis and/or hoot oxchongors
were tested on 11.01.2020 (date) by an application of *live steam/hot wator to not less
than 10.5 bar for a period of 60 minutes and were found tight.
10. As far as could be seen from our visLı nspection, the hatch covers and jointing appeared
to be in sound condition, th sea and packing did not appear to contain copper or
copper alt --. tt alloy in the pipelines, pumping system or
tank int ey were in contact h the cargo.
8aıaııa.T:a:u
Issued b i-OSFA Member Superintendent)
Signed:
(nspection completed at .Q ı ' hours on'- /12/2020 (Date)
NB ONE REPORT PER TANK TO BE COMPLETED.
*Delete which is inapplicable
Ship-GARMONIA Ş
Ship's Tank-1
1. We have sighted e statement in the form of the FOSFA Combined Master's Certificate
signed by the *Captain/First Officer or an equlvalent statement signed by the *ship's
owners/authorised agent certifying that the above named ship complies with the FOSFA
Qualifications and Operatlonal Procedures for Ships Engaged in the Carriage of Oils and
Fats in Bulk for Edible and Oleo-Chemical Use.
2. Prior to inspection we were infomıed by ship's *Captain/First Offıcer that the tank was
* Stainiess steel.
* Mild steel coated with (description of coating); new coeting/ rc ceting tc Le deciared
when appropriate/relevant Epoxv
* Miid et-col
3. We received a copy of a statement signed by ship's Captain, owners or authorised agent
certifying that:
*a. Tho immad4ete previous eargo i^ the tank v,as net e product app uring on tho FOSFA
I
-~Stt ned Imme
-Bfi-i~c'~nvc-n- ÂI reyicr
~rrr-..zrıa-fe~--c r ~ n
zvcrfi-C~E~v~~S in nn
-nr~Tı~v-c
^ı-rrıTc
f
t ^h ~$t$-£~`.
r BUI/ of
~i'iâ~ııTrsyr
i
~~`.~.-rğ
ohe the-tank compiics with thc Rectr'ct'ono t eyond the lm^~od'ato Provious Cergc as
set cut in the FOSFA Llst of Bam^ses !mmediat Previouc Carg s. The—preve-
cargoce (Lort: to e qualify'ng-previous caryc) carr`cd ara stetcd to have besr :
Last Ce;ac
Socand Lacİ Cargo
Th'rd Last Cergo
Etc (as nocessary)
*b. The immediate previous cargo in the tank was a product on the FOSFA List of
Acceptable Previous Cargoes in force at the date of the Bitlis of Lading and the tank
complies wlth the Restrictions beyond the Immediate Previous Cargo as set out in the
FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes. The previous Cargoes (back to a
qualifying previous cargo) carried ara stated to have been:
Last Cargo Crude Sunflower Oii
Second LastCargo Crude Sunflower Oli
Third Last Cargo Crude Sunflower Oii
Etc (as necessary)
Under the provisions of 3a. and 3b. above in the event that a cargo was less than 60% of
volume of the tank, such cargo to be recorded but is not to be considered a qualifying
previous cargo. Such cargo not to be a product on the FOSFA List of Ban ned Immediate
Cargoes or to be e product on the FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes;
whichever list to apply, dictated by the sales contract.
E-1
*c. Applicablo to-nlld stee! tanks on!y The three prev!cus cargoes wero oils and fats for
Last Cargo
Second Last Cargc
Third Last Cargo
6. Tank was examined internaliy for cleanliness and as far as could be seen was found to be
clean and dry and free from harmful materiai and, in our opinion, in this respect based on
our visual inspection and at the time of our inspection, was in a frt state to receive a cargo
of Crude Sunflower 011 in bulk.
7: From our inspection we found the tank construction was:
a. Stainlecs-Stool
*b. Mild steel coated and as far as could be seen the coating appeared to be in sound
condition with minimal miid steel exposure, without loose scale or closed biisters.
looso-ccale.
8. Ship's cargo pumps and flxed pipelines were inspected as far as possible in-site and
based on visual inspection found to be clean and dry with no signifıcant odour.
9. We were informed by the ship's First Officer that the tank colis ond/or laoat oxchangoro
vere tested on 11.01.2020 (date) by an application of *live steam/hetwator to not less
than 10.5 bar for a period of 60 minutes and were found tight.
10. As far as could be seen from our visual inspection, the hatch covers and jointing appeared
to be in sound condition, the se- _ and packing did not appear to contain copper or
copper alioy and there was no .- - in the pipelines, pumping system or
tank intemal - prere in conta
— ct witfa~. e cargo.
issued by FA Member Superintendent)
Signed:
lnspection completed at O"t"`'~U hours on23 /12/2020 (Date) o s
NB ONE REPORT PER TANK TO BE COMPLETED. o t APIOHVt~
* IthC 8E f£3-
m/t GARM0NIA /
*Delete which is inapplicable U
1. We have slghted a statement in the form of the FOSFA Combined Master's Certifıcate
signed by the *Captain/First Officer or an equivalent statement slgned by the *ship's
owners/authorlsed agent certifying that the above named ship compiies with the FOSFA
Qualifıcations and Operational Procedures for Ships Engaged in the Carriage of Oils and
Fats in Bulk for Edible and Oleo-Chemical Use.
2. Prior to inspection we were informed by ship's *Captaln/First Officer that the tank was
* Stainlocs steel.
* Mild steel coated with (description of coating); new coatingi rccoating to be declared
when approprlate/relevant Epoxv
* Miid steel
3. We received a copy of a statement signed by ship's captain, owners or authorlsed agent
certifying that:
*a.
n_f__the BIİbs ❑f Ladhg
ImrnedlatPı~nuc_Cnrgoea in-ferce et the-deta
Llct-cc f Ban ned
and the tank compilos with the Rostrictlons boyond tho immodiato Provious Oafge as
sot cut in the FOSFA List of Bûnned Immediate Provious Cargoos. ho p evlvuc
eorgoos (i~ock to a quallfying prcv'cus cargo) carriod oro ctated to havo besn:
Last Cargo
Seccnd Las: Cargc
Third LastCargo
Etc (as necessary)
*b. The Immediate previous cargo in the tank was a product on the FOSFA List of
Acceptable Previous Cargoes in foroe at the date of the BIIUs of Lading and the tank
complies with the Restrictions beyond the Immediate Prevlous Cargo as set out in the
FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes. The previous Cargoes (back to a
qualifying previous cargo) carried are stated to have been:
Last Cargo Crude Sunflower Oli
SecondLastCargo Crude Sunflower Oli
Third Last Cargo Crude Sunflower Oli
Etc (as necessary)
Under the provisions of 3a. and 3b. above in the event that e cargo was less than 60% of
volume of the tank, such cargo to be recorded but is not to be considered a quailfying
previous cargo. Such cargo not to be e product on the FOSFA List of Banned Immediate
Cargoes or to be e product on the FOSFA List of Acceptable Prevlous Cargoes;
whichever Iist to apply, dictated by the sales contract.
E-1
"c. Applicablo to m;ld stee; tanke onay The t wee previous cargoos vere ❑ils and fats for
odi ı„ and oıeo char lcal r rse and lar molasses and ware 6t3t5d ta r ûve been:
Last Cargo
Second Last Cargo
Third Lact Cargo
z
Applicabie to ı r rful r
5. We were informed by ship's First Offioer that the tank had been cleaned after the last Cargo
by using the foliowing cleaning procedure:
6, Tank was examined intemally for cleaniiness and as far as couid be seen was found to be
ciean and dry and free from harmful material and, in our opinion, in this respect based on
our visual inspection and at the time of our inspection, was in a fıt state to receive e cargo
of Crude Sunfiower Oii in buik.
7. From our inspection we found the tank construction was:
xb. Mild steei coated and as far as couid be seen the coating appeared to be iri sound
condition with minimai miid steei exposure, without loosa scale or closed biisters.
ioose ecalo.
8. Ship's cargo pumps and fıxed pipelines were inspected as far as possibie in-situ and
based on visual inspection found to be ciean and dry with no significant odour.
9. We were informed by the ship's First Offıcer that the tank coiis and/er hoat oxchangcrc
were tested on 11.01.2020 (date) by an appiication of "iive steam/hot water to not less
than 10.5 bar for a period of 60 minutes and were found tight.
10. As far as could be seen from our visu iı pection, the hatch covers and Jointing appeared
to be in sound condition, the sesi and packing did not appear to contain copper or
copper alloy '- ' r riL in the pipelines, pumping system or
tank intern-' i ıhere th re in contact witl~ cargo.
issued by G -- ~A Member Superintendent)
Signed:
Inspection completed at a2 ~`~ hours on` /12/2020 (Date)
NB ONE REPORT PER TANK TO BE COMPLETED.
*Deiete which is inappiicabie
1. We have sighted a statement in the form of the FOSFA Combined Master's Certificate
signed by the *Captain/First Officer or an equivalent statement signed by the *ship's
owners/authorised agent certifying that the above named ship complies wlth the FOSFA
Quaffıcations and Operational Procedures for Ships Engaged in the Carriage of Olis and
Fats in Bulk for Edible and Oleo-Chemical Use.
2. Prior to inspection we were informed by ship's *Captaln/First Officer that the tank was
* Stainless steel.
* Mild steei coated with (description of coating); new ooatingl recoating to be declarod
whon appropriate/reievant Epoxy
* Mild steoi
3. We received a copy of a statement signed by ship's captain, owners or authorised agent
certifying that:
*a. Tho !mmodlate prvvicuc cargo in tho tonk was net a prcduct appoaring on tho FOSFA
Lict of Sannod Immodlate~°- ;uc Cogeee-ln fo o at the date-efhe-BAS--af Ladlng
E-1
*s Appiieable-ta ml!d steelianks-eniy -Tho three provieua sar9oes w0,--e;
+ d to hava boon
Last Cargo
Second LactCarcgo
Third Laet Cargc
*d. Appiicable to newiy ooate or r,ill recoated tanka Tho prevlcus cargoes carried ara
ctatod totave been -(for contarıinatlon control purposos):
Last Carge
Second Last Cargc
Third Last Cargo
4. We sighted shlp's log which confırmed the above information as to the previous cargoes
and their respective volume in the tank.
5. We were informed by ship's First Officer that the tank had been cleaned after the last cargo
by using the following cleaning procedure:
6. Tank was examined lntemelly for cleanliness and as far as could be seen was found to be
clean and dry and free from harmful material and, in our opinion, in this respect based on
our visuai inspection and at the time of our inspection, was in a fit state to receive a cargo
of Crude Sunflower OH in bulk.
7. From our inspection we found the tank construction was:
`û. S
C toinles8 Steıel
*b. Mild steel coated and as far as could be seen the coating appeared to be in sound
conditlon with minimal miid steel exposure, wühout loose scale or ciosed blisters,
*c. Mlid steel ar s far d
loose scale.
8. Ship's cargo pumps and fıxed pipelines were inspectod as far as possible in-situ and
based on visual inspection found to be ciean and dry with no signifcoant odour.
9. We were informed by the ship's First Officer that the tank coils and/or h t exchangorc
were tested on 11.01.2020 (date) by an application of *live steam/hot water to not less
than 10.5 bar for a period of 60 minutes and were found tight.
10. As far as could be seen from our visu ction, the hatch covers and jointing appeared
tö be in sound ackin_• did not appear to contain copper or
copper ailoy a -he pipelines, pumping system or
tank intemal fi rgo..
Issued by CISS i•öup Member Superintendent)
Signed:
!nspectlon completed at n2 `3 ~ hours on2 g /12/2020 (Date)
NB ONE REPORT PER TANK TO BE COMPLETED.
*Delete which is inappiicable
1. We have sighted a statement in the form of the FOSFA Combined Master's Certificate
signed by the *Captain/First Officer or an equivaient stâtement signed by the *ship's
owners/authorised agent certifying that the above named ship compiies with the FOSFA
Qualifioations and Operatbnal Procedures for Ships Engaged in the Carriage of Olis and
Fats in Buik for Edibie and Oleo-Chemical Use.
2. Prtor to inspection we were informed by ship's *Captain/First Officer that the tankwas
* Stainlecc stool.
* MUd steei coated with (description of coating); new c~atingl reco:thg tc be deciarcd
whcn approprlate/relevant Epoxv
* MUd stool
3. We received e copy of a statement signed by ship's captain, owners or authorised agent
certifying that:
"a. The lmrıcdia.o p'evrous ccage in tho4Uonk-'.vot product ppearing onht o-FOSrA
the date of the Bl1Eİc
rİ' i ot 1
Lâct Corgc
Second LactOorgo
Third Lact Cargo
Etc (as necessary)
*b. The immediate previous cargo in the tank was e product on the FOSFA List of
Acceptable Previous Cargoes In force at the date of the Bill/e of Lading and the tank
compiies with the Restrictions beyond the immediate Previous Cargo as set out in the
FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes. The previous cargoes (back to e
quaiifying previous cargo) oarried are stated to have been:
Last Cargo Crude Sunflower Oii
Second LastCargo Crude Sunfiower Oii
Third Last Cargo Crude Sunf[ower Oil
Etc (as necessary)
Under the provisions of 3a. and 3b. above in the event that a cargo was less than 60% of
volume of the tank, such cargo to be recorded but is not to be considered a quaiifying
previous cargo. Such cargo not to be a product on the FOSFA List of Banned immediate
Cargoes or to be e product on the FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes;
whichever hat to apply, dictated by the saies contract.
E-1
* f
Last Cal"go ..
Socond LastCargo
Third Last Cargo
6. Tank was examined intemaliy for cieanliness and as far as could be seen was found to be
clean and dry and free from harmful material and, in our opinion, in thls respect based on
our visual lnspection and at the time of our inspection, was in a fit state to receive a cargo
of Crude Sunflower OII in bulk.
7. From our lnspectlon we found the tank construction was:
*a. Stainless Steei
*b. Mild steel coated and as far as could be seen the coating appeared to be in sound
condition with minimal miid steei exposure, without loose scale or ciosed blisters.
*r MliA ta l anın a far as cculd
bo
iner, appea ed to be in sound condition without
loose ecale.
6. Ship's cargo pumps and fıxed pipelines were inspected as far as possible in-situ and
based on visual inspection found to be clean and dry with no signifıcant odour.
9. We were informed by the ship's First Offıcer Chat the tank colis and/or -hoat oxchangero
were tested on 11.01.2020 (date) by an appiication of *live steam/hot wator to not less
than 10.5 bar for a period of 60 minutes and w o found tight.
10. As far as could be seen from our visual ins.ection, the hatch covers and jolnting appeared
to be in sound condition, the sea : a • packing did not appear to contain copper or
copper a11oy •- * --. -- r- - ~ in the pipelines, pumping system er
tank intern -; ii yhere th re in contact wit}~ ı= cargo.
Issued by FA Member Superintendent)
Signed:
[nspection compieted at C-'. ? hours onZ_ /12/2020 (Date)
NB ONE REPORT PER TANK TO BE COMPLETED.
Taxxep 1"APM0HVIR
*Deiete which is inappiicable ıMe~ets~_s
m/t GARMONIA
FOSFA Certificete of Compliance —1 Aprll 2020
1 Aprii 2020
Commodsttes InternaUonal
Shipptng and Survey
FOSFA CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, CLEANLINESS
AND SUITABILITY OF SHiP`S TANK
FileNs-SGD00532
1. We hava sighted a statement in the form of the FOSFA Combined Master's Certifıcate
signed by the *Captain/First Officer er an equivalent statement signed by the *ship's
owners/authorised agent certifying that the above named ship complies wlth the FOSFA
Qualiflcations and Operational Procedures for Ships Engaged in the Carrlage of Oiis and
Fats in Bulk for Edible and Oleo-Chemical Use.
2. Prior to inspection we were informed by ship's *Captaln/First Officer that the tank was
* Stainlees steel,
* Miid steel coated with (description of coating); new coat'ng/ rc oating ta be dac!arod
when appropriate/relevant Eooxy
* Miid stoel
3. We recaived a copy of e statement signed by shlp's captain, owners or authorlsed agent
certify!ng that:
*a The immediate tır yloue cargo
in-the tank wac nota product appoaring on the FOSFA
ond the tank compllcs wlth the Rcstr'ctions bcyond the lmmedlato Pro4ous Cargo a~
set out in-the -F9,SF,A,-Lict ef-Bank-IwmeteProvlouc-argeee. The prevlouc
Lost Ca;ge
Socond LastCargo
Third LastCargo
Etc-(as nocessary)
*b. The immediate previous Cargo in the tank was a product on the FOSFA List of
Acceptable Previous Cargoes in force at the date of the BitI/s of Lading and the tank
complies with the Restrictions beyond the Immediate Previous Cargo as set out in the
FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes. The previous Cargoes (bask to e
quallfying previous cargo) carried ara stated to have been:
Under the provisions of 3a. and 3b, above in the event that a cargo was less than 60% of
volume of the tank, such cargo to be recorded but is not to be considered a qualifying
previous cargo. Such cargo not to be a product an the FOSFA List of Banned Immediate
Cargoes or to be e product on the FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes;
whlchever list ta apply, dictated by the sales contract.
E-1
o npplloa ,ece m lld 6teel tan1~c only - Tho t#roo proıloue cargoos woro ciis and fats for
+a to have-een+
Last Cargo
Second Last-Cargo
Thlyd Las; Cargo
Last Cargo
Second Last Cargo
Thlyd Last Cargc....,
4. We sighted ship's log which confırmed the above information as to the previous cargoes
and their respective volume in the tank.
5. We esere informed by ship's First Offioer that the tank had been cleaned after the last cargo
by using the following cleaning procedure:
6. Tank was examined Intemaliy for cleanliness and as far as could be seen was found to be
clean and dry and free from harmful material and, in our opinlon, in this respect based on
our visual inspection and at the time of our inspection, was in a fıt state to receive a cargo
of Crude Sunflower Oil in bulk.
7. From our inspection we found the tank construction was:
*a. Stainless Steel
*b. Miid steel coated and as far as could be seen the coating appeared to be in sound
condition with minimal mild steel exposure, without loose scale or ciosed blisters.
*
~oose scale.
8. Ship's cargo pumps and flxed pipelines were inspected as far as posslble In-situ and
based on visual inspection found to be clean and dry with no signiflcant odour.
9. We were informed by the ship's First Officer that the tank coils and/or hoat oxchangerc
were tested on 11.01.2020 (date) by an application of *live steam/hot wator to not less
than 10.5 bar for a period of 60 minutes and vere found tight.
10. As far as could be seen from our visual ' spection, the hatch covers and jointing appeared
to be in sound condition, the se_ ş- .d packing did not appear to contain copper or
copper allo~ oy in the pipelines, pumping system or
tank inte ı l w -r- h_.,fere in contact wi e cargo.
}na•estor r
~~ ,
o_
SFA Member Sup kent
Signed:
Inspection completed at ~'3fl hours on"Ş /12/2020 (Date) 7aHKCP rAPMOHVl
IMb 5E 1 Sç~5
NB ONE REPORT PER TANK TO BE COMPLETED.
*Delete which Is inapplicable m/t GARMONİA
1. We hava slghted a statement in the form of the FOSFA Combined Master's Certificate
signed by the *Captain/First Offıcer or an equivalent statement slgned by the *shlp's
owners/authorised agent certifying that the above named ship compiles wlth the FOSFA
Qualifıcations and Operational Procedures for Ships Engaged in the Carriage of Oils and
Fats in Bulk for Edible and Oleo-Chemical Use.
2. Prior to inspection we were informed by ship's *Captain/First Officer that the tank was
* Stainloss steel.
* Miid steel coated with (description of coating); r ew oatf nnl ranr nting
to-be
dee 3rnd
Last Cargo
Second L3st Cargc
Third Last Cargo
Etc (as nocessary)
*b. The immediate previous cargo in the tank was e product on the FOSFA List of
Acceptable Previous Cargoes in force at the date of the Bill/s of Lading and the tank
compiles with the Restrictions beyond the Immediate Previous Cargo as set out in the
FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes. The previous Cargoes (back to a
qualifying previous cargo) carried are stated to hava been:
Last Cargo Crude Sunflower 01
Second LastCargo Crude Sunflower 01I
Third LastCargoCrude Sunflower OH
Etc (as necessary)
Under the provisions of 3a. and 3b, above iri the event that a cargo was less than 60% of
volume of the tank, such cargo to be recorded but is not to be considered a qualifying
previous cargo. Such cargo not to be a product on the FOSFA List of Banned Immediate
Cargoes or ta be a product on the FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes;
whichever list to apply, dictated by the sales contract.
E-1
Last Cargo
Second LastCaro
hlyd Last Cargo
*d Anpıinnble
ta nei.'}oeated or fully recoatad xarıks—he-previous cargoes carried are
Last Cargo
Sccond Last Cargo
Thlyd Lact Cargo
4. We sighted ship's log which confırmed the above information as to the previous cargoes
and their respective volume in the tank.
5. We esere informed by ship's First Officer that the tank had been cleaned after the last cargo
by using the following cleaning procedure:
6. Tank was examined intemaliy for cleanllness and as far as could be seen was found to be
clean and dry and free from harmful material and, in our opinion, in this respect based on
our visual inspection and at the time of our inspection, was in a fit state to recelve a cargo
of Crude Sunflower Oli in bulk.
7. From our inspection we found the tank construction was:
*a. Stainioss Stee}
*b. Miid steel coated and as far as couid be seen the coating appeared to be in sound
condfion with minimai miid steel exposure, without loose scale or ciosed blisters.
-- er-M
*v t$ '"s *.2~-ı~zo-v0~
nen Fı
,.-cTe $~» ta be (n sound nnndi+inn ti .ri4h
a~}e~r2o'~-v~-.~t.-rrı-~crcrra-v.~ı-rvıczorr~rrrrrJl:t
loocc scale.
8. Ship's cargo pumps and fıxed pipelines were inspected as far as possible in-situ and
based on visual inspection found to be clean and dry with no significant odour.
9. We were informed by the ship's First Offıcer that the tank coils andlor hoat oxshangcro
were tested on 11.01.2020 (date) by an appilcation of *llve steam/hot wator to not less
than 10.5 bar for a period of 60 minutes and were found tight.
1. We have slghted a statement in the form of the FOSFA Combined Master's Certifıcate
signed by the *Captain/First Offcer or an equivalent statement slgned by the *ship's
owners/authorised agent certifying that the above named ship complles with the FOSFA
Quallfications and Operatlonal Procedures for Ships Engaged in the Carriage of 011s and
Fats in Bulk for Edible and Oleo-Chemical Use.
2. Prior to inspection we were informed by ship's *Captain/Flrst OffIcer that the tank was
* Stainlecs steel,
* Mi}d steel coated with (description of coating); now coat}ng/ rc}ccating to be deciared-
when appropriate/reievant Epoxy
* Miid steel
*b. The immediate previous cargo in the tank was e product on the FOSFA List of
Acceptable Previous Cargoes in force at the date of the Bil}/s of Lading and the tank
compiies with the Restrictions beyond the immedlate Prevlous Cargo as set out in the
FOSFA List of Acceptable Prevlous Cargoes. The previous cargoes (back to a
qualifying previous cargo) carried ara stated to have been:
Last Cargo Crude Sunflower Oli
Second LastCargo Crude Sunflower Oii
Thlyd Last Cargo Crude Sunflower 011
Etc (as necessary)
Under the provislons of 3a. and 3b. above in the event that a cargo was less than 60% of
volume of the tank, such cargo to be recorded but la not to be considered a qualifying
previous cargo. Such cargo not to be a product on the FOSFA List of Banned Immediate
Cargoes or to be a product on the FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes;
whichever list to apply, dictated by the sales contract.
E-1
*
i
Last Cargo
Sccond Last Cargo
Thlyd LastCarge
.r
etatod ta hava been (for contaminatlon control purpoees}:
Last Carge
Soccnd Last Cargo
Third Last Carge
We sighted ship's log which confırmed the above informatlon as ta the previous cargoes
and their respective volume in the tank.
We were informed by ship`s First Officer that the tank had been cleaned after the last cargo
by using the following cleaning procedure:
6. Tank was examined lnternafy for clean1ness and as far as could be seen was found to be
ciean and dry and free from harmful materiai and, in our opinion, in thls respect based on
our visual inspection and at the time of our inspection, was in a fıt state to receive e cargo
of Crude Sunflower Oil in bulk.
7. From our inspection we found the tank construction was:
a. Staintess-âteet
*b. Miid steel coated and as far as could be seen the coating appeared to be in sound
conditlon with minimal miid steel exposure, without basa scale or cbosed blisters.
'o. Mfd steel and ao fat ae could._I c aae„ appeared ta be in sound oond.ltion without
b asa scale. y
8. Ship's cargo pumps and flxed pipelines were inspected as far as possible in-situ and
based on visual inspection found to be ciean and dry with no signlflcant odour.
9. We were informed by the ship's First Officer that the tank coils ond!or heat exchangera
were tested on 11.01,2020 (date) by an appbication of *live steam/tıot water to not bess
than 10.5 bar for a perlod of 60 minutes and were found tlght.
10. As far as could be seen from our visual ection, the hatch covers and jointing appeared
to be in sound conditlon, the seals- packing did not appear to contain copper or
copper albay and there was no co►> co •+er a_ lioy in the pipefnes, pumping system or
tank intern - e cargo.
issued by FA Member Superintendent)
Signed:
lnspection compieted at02 " hours or - /12/2020 (Date)
NB ONE REPORT PER TANK TO BE COMPLETED.
*Debete which be inapplicable TaHKep rAPMOHwA
fMCal;ıcs s
mjt GARMONIA
FOSFA Certificate of Compiiance — 1 Apri! 2020
1 April 2020
:~~ . G:oi~otitttes ilı~~t r-oa1
Shipptng and Survey
FOSFA CERTIFiCATE OF COMPLiANCE, CLEANLiNESS
AND SUITABILITY OF SHiP'S TANK
FileNg-SGD00532
î. We hava sighted a statement in the form of the FOSFA Cornbined Master's Certlffcate
signed by the *Captain/First Officer or an equivalent statement signed by the *ship's
owners/authorised agent certifying that the above named ship complies with the FOSFA
Qualiflcations and Operational Procedures for Ships Engaged in the Carriage of Oils and
Fats in Bulk for Edible and Oleo-Chemical Use,
2. Prior to inspection we were informed by ship's *CaptainlFirst Offlcer that the tank was
* Stalnlece steel.
* Miid steel coated with (description of coating);
when appropriate/relevant Epoxy
* {Miid steel
3. We received a copy of a statement signed by ship's captain, owners or authorised agent
certifying that:
*a, +-ha FOSFA
Last Cargo
Second taet
Third LastCargo
Etc (as necessary)
*b. The immediate previous cargo in the tank was a product an the FOSFA List of
Acceptable Previous Cargoes in force at the date of the Bill/s of Lading and the tank
compiles with the Restrictions beyond the Immediate Previous Cargo as set out in the
FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes. The previous cargoes (back to a
qualifying previous cargo) carried are stated to hava been:
Last Cargo Crude Sunflower Oil
Second LastCargo Crude Sunflower Oii
Third Last Cargo Crude Sunflower Oii
Etc (as necessary)
Under the provislons of 3a. and 3b. above in the event that e cargo was less than 60% of
volume of the tank, such cargo to be recorded but iş not to be considered a qualifying
previous cargo. Such cargo not to be a product on the FOSFA List of Banned Immediate
Cargoes or to be a product an the FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes;
whichever list to apply, dictated by the sales contract.
E-1
*c. App;icable to mild6tee ta-nke cfl-' The threo previcus cargoes wore sls and fats fcr
edlbie-and a;en eho [ca 1 << e and ,'e - ~elaseac and c atcd ta h e-bee
ast Carge
Seccnd Last C~rgc
- fgC
*rl ~nnlirnhln in noıı lır rn~ r~ r ' fl - iari nk T n
prcv
5. We were informed by ship's First Officer that the tank had been cleaned after the last cargo
by using the following cleaning procedure;
6. Tank was examined intemally for cleanliness and as far as could be seen was found to be
ciean and dry and free from harmfui material and, in our opinlon, in thls respect based on
our visual inspection and at the time of our inspection, was in a fıt state to receive e cargo
of Crude Sunflower Oil in bulk.
7. From our inspection we found the tank construction was;
*e. Stainloss Steel
*b. Mild steel coated and as far as could be seen the coating appeared to be in sound
condition with minimal mild steel exposure, without loose scale er ciosed biisters,
*c. M'ld ctoel and as Tar as could bc secn appeared fc be in eound condltion without
1oose scale.
S. Ship's cargo pumps and fixed pipelines were inspected as far as possible in-sltu and
based on visual inspection found to be clean and dry with no signiflcant odour.
9. We were Informed by the ship's First Offıcer that the tank colls and/or heat oxohangorc
were tested on 11.01.2020 (date) by an application of *live steam/hot wetor to not less
than 10.5 bar for a period of 60 minutes and were found tight.
10. As far as oould be seen from our visual insp o , the hatch covers and jointing appeared
to be in sound condition, the seals a s p~king did not appear to contain copper or
copper alloy an ' r' cep- .. ..._ .v in the pipellnes, pumping system or
tank intemal " ı J._ :yere they' " contact with ~ kargo.
/ SJr+,.ııa;an+e
issued by CI F i;',.,...,._ , ? ~~#rA MemberSuperi
Signed:
Inspection completed at ~Z' ~' hours on`Z /12/2020 (Date) T&HKep rApM0H4451
}UQ 96 ti,45
NB ONE REPORT PER TANK TO BE COMPLETED.
m/t GARMONiA
*Delete which is inappllcable
1. We have sighted e statement in the form of the FOSFA Combined Master's Certiftcate
signed by the *Captain/Pirst Officer or an equivalent statement signed by the *ship's
owners/authorised agent certifying that the above named ship compiles with the FOSFA
Qualifıcations and Operational Procedures for Ships Engaged in the Can'iage of Oiis and
Fets in Buik for Edible and Oleo-Chemical Use.
2. Prior to inspection we were informed by ship's *Captain/First Offlcer that the tank was
* Stainlece stool.
* Miid steel coated with (description of coating); ncw coctEhg/ recoating to bo docbrcd
when appropriate/relevant Epoxy
* Miid ctool
3. We received a copy of a statement signed by ship's Captain, owners or authorlsed agent
certifying that:
*a.The mmadfat previus
Ll~t of B , , Immodlnte at the dcrc Sli! of 1 nding
Provious C ee4 o e of the
and the tank compUr C w1th tho RoerrÎet4~nc beyond the il^Îmed!ote Prov'ous Cargo ac
set- cut in,:ISE F €A List of Bannod Immediato Pravioue Cargaoe. Thc prov'acc
eargccs (back to a qusfjing prevloue cerge) carrL am stated to "cvc been:
L act Cargo,
gasp-Last Cargo
Th"d Lcct 0-argo
Etc (as nacossary)
*b. The immedlate previous cargo in the tank was a product on the FOSFA List of
Acceptable Previous Cargoes in force at the date of the Blli/s of Lading and the tank
complies with the Restrictions beyond the Immediate Previous Cargo as set out in the
FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes. The previous Cargoes (back to a
qualifying previous cargo) carried ara stated to hava been:
Last Cargo Crude Sunflower Oil
Second LastCargo Crude Sunflower Oil
Third Last Cargo Crude Sunflower OH
Etc (as necessary)
Under the provisions of 3a. and 3b. above in the event that a cargo was less than 60% af
volume of the tank, such cargo to be recorded but is not to be considered a qualifying
previous cargo. Such cargo not to be a product on the FOSFA List of Banned Immediate
Cargoes or to be e product on the FOSFA List of Acceptable Previous Cargoes;
whichever list to apply, dictated by the sales contract.
E-1
* -Appllcab-io ta !is anad fats for
Lact Cargc
5eccnd Last Cargc
Thlyd Last Cargo
stated
ta ha' .'o been (fnr contaninntion rnntrni nurn0605):
Tank was examined lntemafy for cleanfness and as far as could be seen was found to be
clean and dry and free from harmful material and, in our opinion, in thls respect based on
our visual inspection and at the time of our inspection, was in e fıt state to receive a cargo
of Crude Sunflower Oil in bulk.
From our inspection we found the tank construction was:
*a. Stainloss Steel
*b. Miid steel coated and as far as could be seen the coating appeared to be in sound
condition with minimal miid steel exposure, without b asa acaba or closed bfsters.
*c. Mild ctc-o] and as far as could be sccn appcaroc-to be 'n sound aondfion without
loose scale.
8. Ship's cargo pumps and fixed pipelines were inspected as far as possibie in-situ and
based on visual inspection found to be clean and dry with no signiflcant odour.
9. We were informed by the ship's First Officer that the tank coiis and/er hoat oxchangorc
were tested on 11.01.2020 (date) by an application of *live steam/hot water to not less
than 10.5 bar for a period of 60 minutes and were found tight.
10. As far as could be seen from our visual ins h, the hatch covers and jointing appeâred
to be in sound condition, the saate ing did not appear to contain copper or
copper alboy and Ln the pipefnes, pumping system or
tank Internet fitt' go.
bssued by CiSS ember Superintendent)
Signed:
lnspection completed at ~'~'~ hours on2-~/12/2020 (Date)
NB ONE REPORT PER TANK TO BE COMPLETED.
*Debete which is inappfcabbe
1. We hava sighted e statement in the form of the FOSFA Combined Master's Certiflcate
signed by the *CaptainlFirst Officer or an equivaient statement signed by the *ship's
ownerslauthorised agent certifying that the above named ship complies with the FOSFA
Qualifications and Operational Procedures for Ships Engaged in the Carriage of Oils and
Fats in Buik for Edible and Oleo-Chemicai Use.
2. Prior to lnspection we were informed by ship's *Captain/First Offıcer that the tank was
* Stainiess steel.
* Miid steel coated with (description of coating); ,new ccat6nr/ re003thg ta be deoiared
whe a-ppFopriate/relevant Epoxy
* Miid steel
3. We received a copy of e statement signed by ship's captain, owners er authorised agent
certifying that:
cet out in the FOSFA List of 3annod imrrıcdbto Provious Cargooc. Tho proviouo
carnoos (bank ta a gualifying preyicuc cargo) narriod .^.re etated to have boon:
Last Cargo
Second Last Cargo
Third LastCc go-
Etc (as nececsary)
*b. The immediate previous cargo in the tank was a product on the FOSFA List of
Acceptable Previous Cargoes in force at the date of the BUi/s of Lading and the tank
complies with the Restrlctions beyond the Immediate Previous Cargo as set out in the
FOSFA List of Acceptabie Previous Cargoes. The previous cargoes (bask to a
qualifying previous cargo) carried ara stated to have been:
Last Cargo Crude Sunflower Oii
SecondLastCargo Crude Sunflower Dil
Third Last Cargo Crude Sunflower Oli
Etc (as necessary)
Under the provisions of 3a. and 3b. above in the event that a cargo was less than 60% of
volume of the tank, such cargo to be recorded but is not to be considered a quaiifying
previous cargo. Such cargo not to be a product on the FOSFA List of Banned Immediate
Cargoes or to be a product on the FOSFA List of Acceptabie Previous Cargoes;
whichever Ust to apply, dlctated by the seles contract.
E-1
*c. AppUcabls to nıfld ctcct tarıke onay The tihree prcvious car~aee wero o'ls and fats-for
rlınfn »n%: r+iaı-s_r L'ı tn I T a rol jnr mnlnn nri ı+ro o+nfnıı i-n hn a hoo»
Soocna LactCargc
Third Last Cwrea
* ~ n ppııoab,o ta rewıy o te-d cr f Uy rooated tar:ks Thc previoue cargoce canlcd are
st2tod :o have-bccn ('or contamtno an coatro! purpoao-:
ı -+ ("T'-, -'
y
Sccor , t am+ Carg
T h,r Last Carlo
4 We sighted ship's log which confirmed the above information as to the prevlous cargoes
and their respective volume in the tank.
We were informed by ship's First Offıcer that the tank had been cleaned after the last cargo
by using the following cleaning procedure:
Tank was examined lntemafly for cleanllness and as far as could be seen was found to be
clean and dry and free from harmful materfal and, in our opinlon, in this respect based on
our visual inspection and at the time of our inspection, was in e fıt state to receive e cargo
of Crude Sunflower Oil in bulk.
From our inspection we found the tank construction was:
*b. Mifd steel coated and as far as could be seen the coating appeared to be in sound
condition with minimal miid steel exposure, without loose scale or ciosed blisters.
*c. Mid steol and aa4a^rasS ı vö4û-be-c nn ~nneered to be ın oun
d c nd!ticn without
basa-scale.
8. Ship's cargo pumpe and fıxed pipelines were inspected as far as possible in-situ and
based on visual inspection found to be clean and dry with no slgnifıcant odour.
9. We were informed by the ship's First Officer that the tank coiis and/or hoat oxchangors
were tested on 11.01.2020 (date) by an application of *live steam/hot wator to not less
than 10.5 bar for a period of 60 minutes and were found tight.
10. As far as oould be seen from our visual ins ion, the hatch covers and jolntirıg appeared
to be in sound condition, the seai r packing did not appear to contain copper or
copper alloy and there was no c r> - or copper alloy in the pipelines, pumping system or
tank - : ; , the cargo.
issued b SFA Mermer Superintendent)
Signed:
inspection completed at Q t ;3' hours on25/12/2020 (Date)
NB ONE REPORT PER TANK TO BE COMPLETED. TaHKep i'APMOHU1A
*Delete which is inapplicable tMo a6 f E?.S
m/t GAAMONiA
1. We have sighted a statement in the form of the FOSFA Combined Master's Certifıcate
signed by the *Captain/First Officer or an equivalent statement signed by the *ship's
owners/authorised agent certifying that the above named ship compUes with the FOSFA
Qualifıcations and Operatlonal Procedures for Ships Engaged in the Carriage of Oils and
Fats in Bulk for Edible and Oleo-Chemical Use.
Z. Prior to inspection we were informed by ship`s *Captain/Rrst Offlcer that the tank was
* Stainless steel.
* Miid steel coated with (description of coating); now ooating/ rccooting ta be dec.'arcd
whon appropriate/roiovant Epoxy
* Mild stavi
3. We received a copy of a statement signed by ship's captain, owners or authorlsed agent
certifying that:
*a. The 'mn odicto prcvio~s cargo tn thc ta r '4-wac not-a product appearl T-the OS-Rn
List cf d irnnadlato Peviouc Cargaac in force + Mhc 3i11/c cf Lad'ng
and- the tank sompl'cs with thc Rcstrictions boycnd the Immediate Prcv'ou~-Sorgc as
et cut '^ th3 FOSFA List of 5anr,od I~ımcdiâ±c-Qre' ie~s-r rgaes, rh a„ı
ccrgoos (back to : qual fying prc: ious corgo) carrisd arc statcd ta have been:
Lust Cargo
Second-ast Cargo
T rd Last Co gc
•
Under the provisions of 3a. and 3b, above in the event that a cargo was less than 60% of
volume of the tank, such cargo to be recorded but is not to be considered a qualifying
previous cargo. Such cargo not to be a product on the FOSFA List of Banned Immediate
Cargoes or to be a product on the FOSFA List of Acceptebie Previous Cargoes;
whichever list to apply, dictated by the sales contract.
E-1
* ı
Last Cargo
Second LastCarga
Th'rd Last Cargo
*
Appllcable ta newly caated or fuUy
st ta#ava on - (fnr nnnt minatinn nnnfrof nurposeo
ted
Last Cargo
Sacond Last Cargo
Third Last Cargo
We sighted ship's log which confırmed the above information as to the prevlous cargoes
and their respective volume in the tank.
We were informed by ship's First Omcer that the tank had been cleaned after the iast cargo
by using the foliowing cleaning procedure:
Tank was examined intemaliy for cleanliness and as far as could be seen was found to be
clean and dry and free from harmful material and, in our opinion, in thls respect based on
our visual inspection and at the time of our inspection, was in a fit state to receive a cargo
of Crude Sunflower Oil in bulk.
7. From our lnspection we found the tank constructlon was:
*b. Miid steel coated and as far as could be seen the coating appeared to be in sound
condition with minimal miid steel exposure, without loosa scale or closed biisters.
loose acaba.
6. Ship's cargo pumps and fıxed pipeiines were inspected as far as possible in-site and
based on visual lnspectlon found to be clean and dry with no signlfıcant odour:
9. We were informed by the ship's First Officer that the tank coiis anWor hoat oxchangoru
were tested on 11.01.2020 (date) by an applbcation of *llve steam/hot wator to not less
than 10.5 bar for a period of 60 minutes and were found tight.
10. As far as could be seen from our visual in ön, the hatch covers and jointing appeared
to be in sound condition, the seals~ cking did not appear to contain copper or
copper alloy and there was no copp copper alloy in the pipelines, pumping system or
tank internal ; he cargo.
lssued by Sac~Mzıwa(F _FAMemberSuperintendent)
. _. _ ,, - 4Y, ı ..
Slgned:
inspection compieted at ©- - "3 `~ hours on2 9' /12/2020 (Date)
y~
NB ONE REPORT PER TANK TO BE COMPLETED.
*Debete which is Inapplicable raxaep t'APMOHVtR :F
ıırc ss:=:= 5
m/t GARMOPIIA /~
FOSFA Cerkfıcate of Compi(ance —1 April 2020