Competition Law
Competition Law
Competition Law
Section 16. Review of Mergers and Acquisitions. — The Commission shall have the power to review
mergers and acquisitions based on factors deemed relevant by the Commission.
Should the Commission deem it necessary, it may request further information that are reasonably
necessary and directly relevant to the prohibition under Section 20 hereof from the parties to the
agreement before the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period referred. The issuance of such a
request has the effect of extending the period within which the agreement may not be consummated
for an additional sixty (60) days, beginning on the day after the request for information is received by
the parties: Provided, That, in no case shall the total period for review by the Commission of the
subject agreement exceed ninety (90) days from initial notification by the parties.
When the above periods have expired and no decision has been promulgated for whatever reason,
the merger or acquisition shall be deemed approved and the parties may proceed to implement or
consummate it. All notices, documents and information provided to or emanating from the
Commission under this section shall be subject to confidentiality rule under Section 34 of this Act
except when the release of information contained therein is with the consent of the notifying entity or
is mandatorily required to be disclosed by law or by a valid order of a court of competent jurisdiction,
or of a government or regulatory agency, including an exchange.
In the case of the merger or acquisition of banks, banking institutions, building and loan
associations, trust companies, insurance companies, public utilities, educational institutions and
other special corporations governed by special laws, a favorable or no-objection ruling by the
Commission shall not be construed as dispensing of the requirement for a favorable
recommendation by the appropriate government agency under Section 79 of the Corporation Code
of the Philippines.
A favorable recommendation by a governmental agency with a competition mandate shall give rise
to a disputable presumption that the proposed merger or acquisition is not violative of this Act.
Section 18. Effect of Notification. — If within the relevant periods stipulated in the preceding section,
the Commission determines that such agreement is prohibited under Section 20 and does not qualify
for exemption under Section 21 of this Chapter, the Commission may:
(c) Prohibit the implementation of the agreement unless and until the pertinent party or
parties enter into legally enforceable agreements specified by the Commission.
Section 19. Notification Threshold. – The Commission shall, from time to time, adopt and publish
regulations stipulating:
(a) The transaction value threshold and such other criteria subject to the notification
requirement of Section 17 of this Act;
(b) The information that must be supplied for notified merger or acquisition;
(a) The concentration has brought about or is likely to bring about gains in efficiencies that
are greater than the effects of any limitation on competition that result or likely to result from
the merger or acquisition agreement; or
(b) A party to the merger or acquisition agreement is faced with actual or imminent financial
failure, and the agreement represents the least anti-competitive arrangement among the
known alternative uses for the failing entity’s assets:
Provided, That an entity shall not be prohibited from continuing to own and hold the stock or other
share capital or assets of another corporation which it acquired prior to the approval of this Act or
acquiring or maintaining its market share in a relevant market through such means without violating
the provisions of this Act:
Provided, further, That the acquisition of the stock or other share capital of one or more corporations
solely for investment and not used for voting or exercising control and not to otherwise bring about,
or attempt to bring about the prevention, restriction, or lessening of competition in the relevant
market shall not be prohibited.
Section 22. Burden of Proof. – The burden of proof under Section 21 lies with the parties seeking
the exemption. A party seeking to rely on the exemption specified in Section 21(a) must demonstrate
that if the agreement were not implemented, significant efficiency gains would not be realized.