L16 DIR For CT 3b2 2
L16 DIR For CT 3b2 2
Two-dimensional
computed tomography
1 2
Digital Radiology
Computed Level II
Tomography Computed Tomography
Scanning with Parallel Geometry (1st Generation) Scanning With Fan Beam Geometry (2nd Generation)
Absorption profile
Schwächungsprofil
()
90°
Detector Scanning
Detektor Abtastweg
lane
135°
45°
y
Projection
Projektions-
angle
winkel
Object µ(x,y)
Objekt µ(x,y) x
Two-dimensional
computed tomography X-ray
Röntgen-
tube
röhre
3 4
CT-Scanner of 2nd Generation Scanning with Cone Beam Geometry (3rd Generation)
Volume
Volumen
Rotation axis
Drehachse z
Volume
Cone beam
Fächerstrahl
Measurement by Object
Objekt
combination of Source
Quelle
translation and
rotation (slice) x
Three-dimensional
computed tomography Detektor
Detector
5 6
3rd generation
1
Computed Tomography (CT) of 3rd Generation Computed Tomography Spiral-CT
CT needs 100-1000
projections and
requires high
measurement time.
7 8
10-100 kV
0-80 keV
1.5-200 µm
0.6-11 µm
20 mm
25 mm
450 kV - 12 MV
> 500 µm
Energy 30-225 kV 1000 mm
Spatial resolution 5-200 µm 30-300 kV
9 10
Object diameter 300 mm 10-400 µm
600 mm
Computed Tomography
2
Accomplishing of a CT Measurement Noise
In terms of the required computing efforts the CT is
tremendously laborious. The data acquisition od followed by Extension of the integration time for each projection or
a reconstruction step (2D projection images into 3D voxel increasing the tube current will reduce the image noise.
set).
The noise within the reconstruction can also be decreased
The computational effort is determined by the number of by increasing the number of angular steps when exposing,
projections (z) * projection size (x*y) for a measurement. i.e. collecting more projections per scan.
The more projections are acquired the more computational
effort will be required rewarded by an improved resolution:
Detector size: Raw data per Measurement!
1k x 1k pixels a 2 byte, 1k projections = 2 Gbyte
2k x 2k pixels a 2 byte, 2k projections = 16 GByte 13 14
Geometric Errors
The object diameter is larger than the reconstructed one, i.e.
They appear as erroneous the objects protrudes laterally from the fan beam. The
attenuation coefficients resulting artefacts may impede a meaningful reconstruction.
calculated locally where other
coefficients exist in reality. The axis of rotation may be incorrect, the object may be
shifted during the measurement, the adjustment of the axis
Cause: Dynamic range of CT
scanner exceeded.
may be wrong. As a consequence, additional features appear,
the edges become unsharp.
15 16
3
Reconstruction with and without beam hardening Reconstruction with fan beam collimation
correction
Cut Through the YZ-Plane of the Tomography of an Cut Through the XY-Plane of the Tomography of a Component
Al Casting
21 22
Flaw analysis
- Characterisation of cavities, pores, inclusions of
impurities, shape of cracks
- Integrity analysis
- Inspection of material transitions and interconnections
Determination of dimensions
- Determination of wall thicknesses
- nominal/actual value comparison with CAD-data.
Reverse Engineering
- Reconstruction of CAD-data from existing
23 components 24
4
Reverse Engineering of Al Cylinder Head Exact Measurement of Inner Dimensions in Industry
isosurface
representation
triangulation
Goebbels, BAM-I.4 25 26