Reflection Paper
Reflection Paper
Reflection Paper
Point Allotment
Student ID Number
Student Name
Due Date
Introduction
This essay explains how to make decisions successfully inside an organization. Included
in this procedure are crucial measures that help with organization. Managers and staff are faced
with several issues in this intricate and rapidly changing organizational context, and they have
made decisions. Given that to expressly avoid making a choice is to resolve the issue, decision-
typically make a lot of decisions, some of which are strategic and others of which are
operational. The management process's beating heart is decision-making (Velasquez & Hester,
2013). Long, intricate, highly unstructured, and dangerous decisions can significantly influence
solutions are all steps in the decision-making process. By gathering pertinent data and clarifying
options, a step-by-step decision-making process can assist management in making more careful,
Organizations worldwide are experiencing change and complexity now more than ever
because of the coronavirus pandemic, which has given us new difficulties, situations, and
workplace worries (Caligiuri et al., 2020). Jobs have been evolving, contracting, and vanishing,
while technology and coworkers are evolving quickly. Organizations are progressively returning
to in-person work due to successful vaccinations, but there will be new rules to adjust to and
frequent and unavoidable. Research supports the need to adapt (Klein et al., 2015). Adaptability
means quick access to various behaviours that allow leaders to adjust and experiment as
circumstances warrant. In different countries, successfully embracing change looks like this:
(a) Adjust their management style to the changing external challenges that the organization is
facing;
On the other hand, the most often mentioned cause of career derailment among
businesses was a failure to grow or adapt (Hogan et al., 2013). It is because rigid management
and leadership restrict others' capacity to adjust in the workplace. New efforts can be put on hold
to change, which impedes forward progress and causes worry and unpleasant feelings in other
team members. The motivation, enthusiasm, collaboration, and innovation of the workforce are
Universally, businesses are going through explosive expansion and fierce rivalry.
Companies are being forced to acknowledge and adjust to an indisputable fact by new concepts,
cutting-edge technology, and innovation in every area of the larger business ecosystem (Cels et
al., 2012). Early adopters will outperform the competition since change is the only constant in
the modern world. Companies must adopt a constructive mentality to succeed in this dynamic -
and frequently complex - environment. Companies can ensure that their services remain exciting
and useful by consistently pushing the boundaries, assessing the zeitgeist, and remaining on top
of customer expectations.
It is valid for both the broader workplace culture and the HR strategy. Learning has a
certification, and self-improvement. Moreover, a crucial aspect of this path is encapsulated in the
Unlearning is a sequence that helps learners renew their thinking, let go of outdated
concepts, and welcome new notions. This stage of unlearning serves as a foundation for
absorbing new information and finding more effective methods to carry out daily chores. For
instance, encourage a culture where L&D is used for staff to keep their positions and advance
within the company (Swarnalatha & Prasanna, 2013). Additionally, adjust the organization's
L&D approach to make it more motivating, engaging, innovative, and enjoyable. Workers will
be encouraged to leave the teaching space and explore the world of boundless options thanks to
bite-sized material, accessibility on the move, and new methods for dissemination. By
completely committing to new knowledge, they can undo what they have already learned.
The organization's operations and business strategy also aim to include and use various
superior decision-making strategies (Velasquez & Hester, 2013: Ferrell & Fraedrich, 2021). The
company must carefully consider how the decision-making process is constructed because it is a
delicate and challenging process. Organizations with effective, efficient, and well-organized
decision-making procedures are more likely to produce better decisions, boosting productivity
and performance (Kaner, 2014). The decision-making processes in these organizations must be
carefully monitored since their quality may significantly impact their overall effectiveness and
efficiency. There are five approaches to making decisions in organizations (Verma, 2014). These
are known as (i) rational model, (ii) political model, (iii) normative model, (iv) administrative
For instance, using the rational model while making decisions encourages more self-
assured and dedicated workers. Staff members are more likely to be devoted to the organization's
objectives when they are aware that choices are being made with reason, logic, and their best
interests in mind. On the contrary, an unsure leader may encounter decreased motivation,
Conclusion
Making decisions is crucial to organizational strategy and operations. The company often
must make hundreds of decisions daily, and how it manages and processes these decisions can
significantly affect how well it performs. Thus, the company must have excellent and well-
organized processes to deal with the decisions. Additionally, the organizational management
must genuinely work to improve decision-making procedures' general effectiveness and caliber.
For the change and adaptation approach, it is also essential to work toward incorporating and
Kaner, S. (2014). Facilitator's guide to participatory decision-making. John Wiley & Sons.
Klein, R. J., Midgley, G., Preston, B. L., Alam, M., Berkhout, F., Dow, K., & Shaw, M. R.
(2015). Adaptation opportunities, constraints, and limits. In Climate change 2014: Impacts,
adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group
II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (p. 899).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caligiuri, P., De Cieri, H., Minbaeva, D., Verbeke, A., & Zimmermann, A. (2020). International
HRM insights for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and
practice. Journal of international business studies, 51(5), 697-713.
Hogan, R., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Kaiser, R. B. (2013). Employability and career success:
Bridging the gap between theory and reality. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(1), 3-
16.
Cels, S., De Jong, J., & Nauta, F. (2012). Agents of change: Strategy and tactics for social
innovation. Brookings Institution Press.
Swarnalatha, C., & Prasanna, T. S. (2013). Leveraging employee engagement for competitive
advantage: Strategic role of HR. Review of HRM, 2, 139.
Ferrell, O. C., & Fraedrich, J. (2021). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases.
Cengage learning.